Emergency Department Management of Patients With Febrile Neutropenia: Guideline Concordant or Overly Aggressive?

OBJECTIVES: The Infectious Diseases Society of America and the American Society of Clinical Oncology recommend risk stratification of patients with febrile neutropenia (FN) and discharge with oral antibiotics for low-risk patients. We studied guideline concordance and clinical outcomes of FN management in our emergency department (ED). METHODS: Our urban, tertiary care teaching hospital provides all emergency and inpatient services to a large comprehensive cancer center. We performed a structured chart review of all FN patients seen in our ED from January 2010 to December 2014. Using electronic medical records, we identified all visits by patients with fever and an absolute neutrophil count of <1000 cells/mm3 and then included only patients without a clear source of infection. Following national guidelines, we classified patients as low or high risk and assessed guideline concordance in disposition and parenteral versus oral antibiotic therapy by risk category as our main outcome measure. RESULTS: Of 173 qualifying visits, we classified 44 (25%) as low risk and 129 (75%) as high risk. Management was guideline concordant in 121 (70%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 63% to 77%). Management was guideline discordant in 43 (98%, 95% CI = 88% to 100%) of low-risk patients versus 9 (7%, 95% CI = 3% to 13%) of high-risk patients (relative risk [RR] = 14, 95% CI = 7.5 to 26). Of 52 guideline-discordant cases, 36 (83%, 95% CI = 72% to 93%) involved low-risk cases with treatment that was more aggressive than recommended. CONCLUSIONS: Guideline concordance was low among low-risk patients, with management tending to be more aggressive than recommended. Unless data emerge that undermine the guidelines, we believe that many of these hospitalizations and parenteral antibiotic regimens can be avoided, decreasing the risks associated with hospitalization, while improving antibiotic stewardship and patient comfort.

Ciprofloxacin prophylaxis delays initiation of broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy and reduces the overall use of antimicrobial agents during induction therapy for acute leukaemia: A single-centre study.

BACKGROUND: Due to an outbreak of extended-spectrum ß-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae, the routine use of fluoroquinolone prophylaxis was questioned. As a result, this study was conducted with the aim to evaluate the impact of ciprofloxacin-prophylaxis on the use of broad-spectrum antibioctics and anti-mycotics. METHODS: A cohort of 139 consecutive patients with acute leukaemia treated with remission-inducing induction chemotherapy between 2004-2012 at the Department of Haematology in Uppsala University Hospital was analysed. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients (38%) received broad-spectrum antibiotics at the initiation of chemotherapy and were not eligible for prophylaxis. Of the remaining patients, the initiation of broad-spectrum antibiotics was delayed by 3 days in those receiving ciprofloxacin prophylaxis (n = 47) compared with those receiving no prophylaxis (n = 39). The median duration of systemic antibiotic treatment was 6 days shorter in patients receiving ciprofloxacin prophylaxis (12 vs 18 days; p = 0.0005) and the cumulative (total) median days on systemic antibiotic treatment was shortened by 8 days (15 vs 23 days, p = 0.0008). Piperacillin/tazobactam (p = 0.02), carbapenems (p = 0.05) and empiric broad-spectrum antifungals (p < 0.01) were used significantly less often when ciprofloxacin prophylaxis was given. CONCLUSIONS: Ciprofloxacin prophylaxis delayed empiric therapy by 3 days and reduced overall antibiotic use in this study. These benefits must be evaluated vs the risks of development of resistant bacterial strains, making fluoroquinolone prophylaxis an open question for debate.

A prospective study of febrile neutropenia in pediatric cancer patients in Jordan.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the characteristics and clinical course of febrile neutropenia (FN) in pediatric patients admitted to a comprehensive cancer center in Jordan. METHODS: This is a 6-month prospective observational study. Patients admitted with FN were identified. Patient demographics, duration since last chemotherapy, use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, presence of central lines, transfer to the intensive care unit, length of hospital stay, mortality, and the results of all cultures were recorded. RESULTS: One hundred and nine episodes for 88 patients were included, with a median age of 6 years (range, 1 to 19 y) and 55% were females. Median duration since last chemotherapy was 7 days (range, 1 to 33 d); median duration of hospital stay was 7 days (range, 1 to 81 d). Transfer to the intensive care unit was required for 11% of episodes, and there were no deaths. Positive cultures were reported in 18.4% episodes. Pathogens isolated were gram-positive organisms (50%), gram-negative organisms (20%), viral (25%), and fungal (5%). Positive blood cultures were significantly more in episodes with central lines compared with those with no central lines (P=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: FN episodes had favorable outcomes and were mostly associated with negative cultures. There were differences between the microbiologic profiles reported in this study, compared with what has been previously described.