Quality by Design Approach for Preparation of Zolmitriptan/Chitosan Nanostructured Lipid Carrier Particles - Formulation and Pharmacodynamic Assessment.

PURPOSE: Zolmitriptan (ZT) is a selective serotonin agonist that is used for the treatment of migraine. It belongs to BCS class III with high solubility and low permeability. Besides, the drug is subjected to pre-systemic metabolism. Accordingly, new Zolmitriptan/chitosan nanostructured lipid carriers (ZT/CT NLCs) coated with Tween 80 (stealthy layer) have been developed to overcome such demerits. METHODS: The NLCs were developed by combining ultrasonication and double emulsion (w/o/w) techniques. The lipids were Gelucire and Labrasol. Herein, the quality by design (23 full factorial design) was scrupulously followed, where critical process parameters and critical quality attributes were predefined. The optimized formulation (F8) was fully characterized with respect to entrapment efficiency (%EE), percentage yield (% yield), particle size, size distribution (PDI), zeta potential (ZP), morphological appearance (TEM). In vitro release, stability study and pharmacodynamic evaluations were also assessed. The optimized freeze dried formula was dispensed in in situ gelling hard gelatin capsule encompassing pectin and guar gum for further in vitro and pharmacodynamic evaluations. RESULTS: The optimized spherical nanoparticles experienced high percentage EE and yield (78.14% and 60.19%, respectively), low particle size and PDI (343.87 nm and 0.209, respectively), as well as high negative ZP (-25.5 mV). It showed good physical stability at refrigerated conditions. The NLCs dispensed in in situ gelling hard gelatin capsule comprising pectin and guar gum experienced sustained release for 30 h and significantly maintained the pharmacological effect in mice up to 8 h (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: ZT, a BCS class III drug that suffers from poor permeability and pre-systemic metabolism, was successfully maneuvered as nanostructured lipid carrier particles (NLCs). The incorporation of the NLCs in in situ gelling hard gelatin capsules fulfilled a dual function in increasing permeability, as well as sustaining the pharmacodynamic effect. This result would open new vistas in improving the efficacy of other class III drugs.

Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of Contezolid at Therapeutic and Supratherapeutic Doses in Healthy Chinese Subjects, and Assessment of Contezolid Dosing Regimens Based on Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Analysis.

PURPOSE: This study assessed the tolerability and pharmacokinetic (PK) properties of a new-generation oxazolidinone, contezolid (MRX-I), and its major inactive metabolite, M2, after single oral administrations of 800, 1200, and 1600 mg in the fed state, and compared the efficacy of 3 dosing regimens in the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection based on PK/pharmacodynamic (PD) analysis. METHODS: A Phase I study at a single study center was conducted with 2 parts. In the first part, 20 healthy subjects received a single oral dose of 1200 or 1600 mg of contezolid or placebo in the fed state in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation tolerance study. In the second part of the study, 52 subjects received a single oral dose of 800 mg of contezolid in the fed state in a single-center, randomized, blinded, 4-period, crossover, thorough QT study. Noncompartmental analyses were used to evaluate the PK properties of contezolid and M2. Steady-state concentrations of contezolid following the 3 dosing regimens (800, 1200, and 1600 mg q12h) were simulated by employing a newly developed 2-compartmental PK model. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) distributions of contezolid were analyzed in 178 Staphylococcus, Enterococcus, and Streptococcus clinical isolates. Monte Carlo simulations were conducted to predict the efficacy of the 3 dosing regimens to obtain probability of target attainment and cumulative fraction of response. FINDINGS: Single-dose oral administrations of 800, 1200, and 1600 mg of contezolid were well tolerated in healthy subjects in the fed state, and nonlinear PK was observed. The mean plasma exposures to M2 exceeded 17.3% of contezolid exposure in the 3 groups. Both MIC50 and MIC90 (MICs that inhibit the growth of 50% and 90% of microorganisms, respectively) of contezolid against MRSA were 1 mg/L with clinical isolates from China. PK/PD analysis and Monte Carlo simulations predicted that 800 mg q12h of oral contezolid would be efficacious against MRSA infection, with a MIC of ≤4 mg/L (probability of target attainment, >90%; cumulative fraction of response, >90%). IMPLICATIONS: Contezolid is a well-tolerated treatment option for MRSA infection, including at supratherapeutic doses up to 1600 mg. The regimen of 800 mg q12h could achieve efficacy in treating bacterial infection with MRSA. To our knowledge, this is the first PK study to predict that a dosing regimen of 800 mg q12h of oral contezolid is sufficient for treating MRSA infection, with a MIC of ≤4 mg/L. A Phase III study of this suggested dosing regimen is being conducted. Chinadrugtrials.org.cn identifier: CTR20161074.

Comparative activity of tedizolid and glycopeptide combination therapies for the treatment of Staphylococcus aureus infections: an in vitro and in vivo evaluation against strains with reduced susceptibility to glycopeptides.

PURPOSE: Glycopeptides are widely used for the treatment of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections. Although difficult to detect, isolates with reduced (GISA), hetero (hGISA) or complete (GRSA) resistance to glycopeptides are increasingly reported. Optimal therapy for such strains is unknown. We compared the in vitro and in vivo activity of tedizolid (TED), a recently licensed oxazolidonone, with vancomycin (VAN) and teicoplanin (TEIC) combined with fusidic acid (FD) or rifampicin (RIF) against S. aureus (SA) with reduced susceptibility to glycopeptides. METHODS: Susceptibility was determined for six (GISA, hGISA and GRSA) reference strains and 72 clinical MRSA isolates screened for hGISA/GISA-like phenotypes. Synergy and bactericidal activity were assessed using chequerboard and time-kill assays. The G. mellonella wax moth caterpillar model was used to measure the activity of TED and the combinations in vivo. RESULTS: Glycopeptide MICs (VAN/TEIC) ranged from 0.5-8/4 and 0.125-1 for TED. No significant synergy was noted when VAN/TEIC were combined with either RIF or FD. Time-kill assays confirmed that TED was bacteriostatic but superior to VAN and TEIC against GISA strains. In G. mellonella TED was more effective than TEIC monotherapy versus GISA strains. The combination of TEIC with RIF was the most effective combination overall, both in vitro and in vivo. CONCLUSIONS: TED had good in vitro activity versus MRSA including those with reduced susceptibility to glycopeptides. Although bacteriostatic, it was effective in the G. mellonella model and superior to TEIC in the treatment of GISA. Although this supports the use of TED for MRSA and GISA, the TEIC/RIF combination also warrants further study.

Development of zolmitriptan transfersomes by Box-Behnken design for nasal delivery: in vitro and in vivo evaluation.

The aim was to prepare an optimized zolmitriptan (ZT)-loaded transfersome formulation using Box-Behnken design for improving the bioavailability by nasal route for quick relief of migraine and further to compare with a marketed nasal spray. Here, three factors were evaluated at three levels. Independent variables include: amount of soya lecithin (X1), amount of drug (X2) and amount of tween 80 (X3). The dependent responses were vesicle size (Y1), flexibility index (Y2) and regression coefficient of drug release kinetics (Y3). Prepared formulations were evaluated for physical characters and an optimal system was identified. Further, in vivo pharmacokinetic study was performed in male wistar rats to compare the amount of drug in systemic circulation after intranasal administration. Optimized ZT-transfersome formulation containing 82.74 mg of lecithin (X1), 98.37 mg of zolmitriptan (X2) and 32.2 mg of Tween 80 (X3) and had vesicle size of 93.3 nm, flexibility index of 20.25 and drug release regression coefficient of 0.992. SEM picture analysis revealed that the vesicles were spherical in morphology and had a size more than 1 µm. The formulations were found to be physically stable upon storage at room temperature up to 2 months period, as there were no significant changes noticed in size and ZP. The nasal bioavailability of optimized transfersome formulation was found to be increased by 1.72 times than that of marketed nasal spray (Zolmist®). The design and development of zolmitriptan as transfersome provided improved nasal delivery over a conventional nasal spray for a better therapeutic effect.

Neuropeptide S increases motor activity and thermogenesis in the rat through sympathetic activation.

The central role of neuropeptide S (NPS), identified as the endogenous ligand for GPR154, now named neuropeptide S receptor (NPSR), has not yet been fully clarified. We examined the central role of NPS for body temperature, energy expenditure, locomotor activity and adrenal hormone secretion in rats. Intracerebroventricular (icv) injection of NPS increased body temperature in a dose-dependent manner. Energy consumption and locomotor activity were also significantly increased by icv injection of NPS. In addition, icv injection of NPS increased the peripheral blood concentration of adrenalin and corticosterone. Pretreatment with the ß1- and ß2-adrenergic receptor blocker timolol inhibited the NPS-induced increase of body temperature. The expression of both NPS mRNA in the brainstem and NPSR mRNA in the hypothalamus showed a nocturnal rhythm with a peak occurring during the first half of the dark period. To examine whether the endogenous NPS is involved in regulation of body temperature, NPSR antagonist SHA68 was administered one hour after darkness. SHA68 attenuated the nocturnal rise of body temperature. These results suggest that NPS contributes to the regulation of the sympathetic nervous system.

Critical role of tedizolid in the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections.

Tedizolid phosphate has high activity against the Gram-positive microorganisms mainly involved in acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections, such as strains of Staphylococcus aureus (including methicillin-resistant S. aureus strains and methicillin-sensitive S. aureus strains), Streptococcus pyogenes, Streptococcus agalactiae, the Streptococcus anginosus group, and Enterococcus faecalis, including those with some mechanism of resistance limiting the use of linezolid. The area under the curve for time 0-24 hours/minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) pharmacodynamic ratio has shown the best correlation with the efficacy of tedizolid, versus the time above MIC ratio and the maximum drug concentration/minimum inhibitory concentration ratio. Administration of this antibiotic for 6 days has shown its noninferiority versus administration of linezolid for 10 days in patients with skin and skin structure infections enrolled in two Phase III studies (ESTABLISH-1 and ESTABLISH-2). Tedizolid's more favorable safety profile and dosage regimen, which allow once-daily administration, versus linezolid, position it as a good therapeutic alternative. However, whether or not the greater economic cost associated with this antibiotic is offset by its shorter treatment duration and possibility of oral administration in routine clinical practice has yet to be clarified.

Successful Treatment of a Child With Extensively Drug-Resistant Tuberculous Meningitis.

Unlike in pulmonary multidrug-resistant (MDR) tuberculosis, the clinical outcome of MDR tuberculous meningitis (TBM) in children, including extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis, is poor and management is challenging. We report the successful treatment of a case of extensively drug-resistant TBM in a 4-year-old girl, and we discuss implications for tuberculosis diagnosis and chemotherapy.

What's new in the treatment of serious MRSA infection?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Vancomycin has been the cornerstone of treatment for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections. This review describes new MRSA-active antibiotics that have recently been introduced and highlights emerging resistance. RECENT FINDINGS: Elevations in the vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration within the susceptible range are associated with treatment failure and mortality in the treatment of MRSA infections. Ceftaroline and ceftobiprole are anti-MRSA cephalosporins and are noninferior to comparator agents in the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs) and pneumonia. Tedizolid is more potent than linezolid, has improved pharmacokinetics and reduced toxicity and is active against cfr-containing S. aureus. Telavancin now has approval for treatment of hospital-acquired pneumonia, and recent phase 2 trial data showed similar cure rates in S. aureus bacteremia. Dalbavancin and oritavancin are administered once weekly and are noninferior to comparators for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections. Resistance has emerged against many new anti-MRSA antimicrobials including ceftaroline. Combination therapy of ß-lactams with vancomycin or daptomycin is increasing. SUMMARY: Several new MRSA-active agents are now approved for use, although much of the data is derived from treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections or pneumonia. Further studies are required for more invasive infections, such as bacteremia and endocarditis.

Single therapeutic and supratherapeutic doses of anacetrapib, a cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitor, do not prolong the QTcF interval in healthy volunteers.

Anacetrapib is a cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitor in Phase III development. This double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, placebo- and active-comparator-controlled, 4-period, balanced crossover study evaluated the effects of anacetrapib (100 mg and 800 mg) on QTcF interval in healthy subjects. QTcF measurements were made up to 24 h following administration of single doses of anacetrapib 100 or 800 mg, moxifloxacin 400 mg, or placebo in the fed state. The primary hypothesis was supported if the 90% CI for the least squares (LS) mean differences between anacetrapib 800 mg and placebo in QTcF interval change from baseline were entirely <10 msec at every post-dose time point (1, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, and 24 h). The upper bounds of the 90% CIs for LS mean differences from placebo in changes from baseline in QTcF intervals for anacetrapib 100 and 800 mg were <5 msec at every time point. In conclusion, single doses of anacetrapib 100 and 800 mg do not prolong the QTcF interval to a clinically meaningful degree relative to placebo and are generally well tolerated in healthy subjects.

Use of linezolid to treat MRSP bacteremia and discospondylitis in a dog.

A 1.5 yr old male German shepherd dog was evaluated for recurrent intermittent episodes of fever and lethargy. Clinicopathologic abnormalities were suggestive of a discospondylitis at the seventh and eighth thoracic vertebrae. Blood and urine cultures yielded growth of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius (MRSP) that was resistant to all commonly used antibiotics. Extralabel antibiotic susceptibility testing demonstrated susceptibility of both blood and urine isolates to linezolid. The prescribed dose was extrapolated from pharmacokinetic (PK) studies and the isolate's plasma minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). Linezolid was administered for 23 wk and resulted in successful resolution of bacteremia, bacteriuria, and discospondylitis. When justified, linezolid should be considered to treat methicillin-resistant infections.

Linezolid decreases susceptibility to secondary bacterial pneumonia postinfluenza infection in mice through its effects on IFN-γ.

Influenza infection predisposes patients to secondary bacterial pneumonia that contributes significantly to morbidity and mortality. Although this association is well documented, the mechanisms that govern this synergism are poorly understood. A window of hyporesponsiveness following influenza infection has been associated with a substantial increase in local and systemic IFN-γ concentrations. Recent data suggest that the oxazolidinone antibiotic linezolid decreases IFN-γ and TNF-α production in vitro from stimulated PBMCs. We therefore sought to determine whether linezolid would reverse immune hyporesponsiveness after influenza infection in mice through its effects on IFN-γ. In vivo dose-response studies demonstrated that oral linezolid administration sufficiently decreased bronchoalveolar lavage fluid levels of IFN-γ at day 7 postinfluenza infection in a dose-dependent manner. The drug also decreased morbidity as measured by weight loss compared with vehicle-treated controls. When mice were challenged intranasally with Streptococcus pneumoniae 7 d postinfection with influenza, linezolid pretreatment led to decreased IFN-γ and TNF-α production, decreased weight loss, and lower bacterial burdens at 24 h postbacterial infection in comparison with vehicle-treated controls. To determine whether these effects were due to suppression of IFN-γ, linezolid-treated animals were given intranasal instillations of rIFN-γ before challenge with S. pneumoniae. This partially reversed the protective effects observed in the linezolid-treated mice, suggesting that the modulatory effects of linezolid are mediated partially by its ability to blunt IFN-γ production. These results suggest that IFN-γ, and potentially TNF-α, may be useful drug targets for prophylaxis against secondary bacterial pneumonia following influenza infection.

Pharmacotherapy for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus nosocomial pneumonia.

OBJECTIVE: To review the evidence for pharmacologic agents available in the treatment of nosocomial methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) pneumonia. DATA SOURCES: A search of PubMed (1975-July 2012) was conducted using a combination of the terms methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, pneumonia, nosocomial, vancomycin, linezolid, telavancin, ceftaroline, tigecycline, and quinupristin/dalfopristin. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Randomized comparative clinical trials, meta-analyses, and review articles published in English were included. A manual review of the bibliographies of available literature was conducted and all relevant information was included. Observational and in vitro studies were incorporated as indicated. DATA SYNTHESIS: Pharmacotherapy for the treatment of nosocomial MRSA pneumonia is limited. Vancomycin has been the treatment of choice for several years. Linezolid has demonstrated similar efficacy to vancomycin in randomized clinical trials and recent data have suggested that it may be superior in some cases, although there are limitations to this conclusion. Telavancin has also demonstrated similar clinical efficacy to vancomycin; however, the drug is not commercially available in the US. Other agents with MRSA activity include ceftaroline, clindamycin, quinupristin/dalfopristin, and tigecycline, although the evidence for their use in nosocomial pneumonia is limited. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the currently available evidence and cost-effectiveness, vancomycin should continue to be the drug of choice for most patients with nosocomial MRSA pneumonia. Linezolid is a reasonable alternative for patients with treatment failure while receiving vancomycin, isolates with vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentrations over 2 µg/mL, allergic reactions, or vancomycin-induced nephrotoxicity.

Treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections with a minimal inhibitory concentration of 2 µg/mL to vancomycin: old (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) versus new (daptomycin or linezolid) agents.

BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommend that agents other than vancomycin be considered for some types of infection due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) when the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) to vancomycin is 2 µg/mL or more. Alternative therapeutic options include daptomycin and linezolid, 2 relatively new and expensive drugs, and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX), an old and inexpensive agent. OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical efficacy and potential cost savings associated with use of TMP/SMX compared to linezolid and daptomycin. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted at Detroit Medical Center. For calendar year 2009, unique adults (age >18 years) with infections due to MRSA with an MIC to vancomycin of 2 µg/mL were included if they received 2 or more doses of TMP/SMX and/or daptomycin and/or linezolid. Data were abstracted from patient charts and pharmacy records. RESULTS: There were 328 patients included in the study cohort: 143 received TMP/SMX alone, 89 received daptomycin alone, 75 received linezolid alone, and 21 patients received a combination of 2 or more of these agents. In univariate analysis, patients who received TMP/SMX alone had significantly better outcomes, including in-hospital (p = 0.003) and 90-day mortality (p < 0.001) compared to patients treated with daptomycin or linezolid. Patients receiving TMP/SMX were also younger (p < 0.001), had fewer comorbid conditions (p < 0.001), had less severe acute severity of illness (p < 0.001), and received appropriate therapy more rapidly (p = 0.001). In multivariate models the association between TMP/SMX treatment and mortality was no longer significant. Antimicrobial cost savings associated with using TMP/SMX averaged $2067.40 per patient. CONCLUSIONS: TMP/SMX monotherapy compared favorably to linezolid and daptomycin in terms of treatment efficacy and mortality. Use of TMP/SMX instead of linezolid or daptomycin could potentially significantly reduce antibiotic costs. TMP/SMX should be considered for the treatment of MRSA infection with MIC of 2 µg/mL to vancomycin.

An investigation into the potential use of nanoparticles as adjuvants for the production of polyclonal antibodies to low molecular weight compounds.

Two nanoparticle based adjuvants were assessed for their ability to produce polyclonal antibodies in rabbits to low molecular weight target analytes, i.e. veterinary drugs banned from use in food producing animals. The nanoparticles, Montanide IMS 251 and amphiphilic poly (γ-glutamic acid) were compared against a mineral oil adjuvant, Montanide ISA 50, which had previously been shown to be successful in producing antibodies to haptens whilst being safe to use with respect to the welfare of the host animals. The adjuvants were assessed for their tendency to cause adverse effects to the host animals and by the quality of the antibodies generated in terms of assay sensitivity. None of the three adjuvants employed in the trial generated any measurable adverse effects in the host animals. While the mineral oil adjuvant produced higher titres of antibodies the nanoparticle adjuvants were found to produce antibodies of statistically comparable sensitivity. Based on IC(50) values, six antisera displayed potential to detect the required level of the target compounds; five of these were produced by rabbits immunised with the two different nanoparticle adjuvants. As antibody sensitivity is the main performance criteria of an analytical immunoassay, it can be concluded that the nanoparticle adjuvants under evaluation are fit for the purpose described in this study.

Effect of linezolid on the 50% lethal dose and 50% protective dose in treatment of infections by Gram-negative pathogens in naive and immunosuppressed mice and on the efficacy of ciprofloxacin in an acute murine model of septicemia.

Murine models of infection were used to study the effect of linezolid on the virulence of Gram-negative bacteria and to assess potential pharmacodynamic interactions with ciprofloxacin in the treatment of these infections, prompted by observations from a recent clinical trial. Naive and immunosuppressed mice were challenged with Klebsiella pneumoniae 53A1109, K. pneumoniae GC6658, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa UC12120 in acute sepsis and pulmonary infection models, using different serial dilutions of these pathogens (groups of 8 animals each). Linezolid (100 mg/kg/dose) was administered orally at 0.5 and 4.0 h postchallenge in the sepsis model and at 4 h postchallenge followed by 2 days of twice-daily treatment in the pulmonary model. Further, ciprofloxacin alone and in combination with oral linezolid was investigated in the sepsis model. Survival was assessed for 4 and 10 days postchallenge in the systemic and respiratory models, respectively. The data were fitted to a nonlinear regression analysis to determine 50% lethal doses (LD(50)s) and 50% protective doses (PD(50)s). A clinically relevant, high-dose regimen of linezolid had no significant effect on LD(50) in these models. This lack of effect was independent of immune status. A combination of oral ciprofloxacin with linezolid yielded lower PD(50)s than oral ciprofloxacin alone (ciprofloxacin in combination, 8.4 to 32.7 mg/kg; oral ciprofloxacin, 39.4 to 88.3 mg/kg). Linezolid did not improve the efficacy of subcutaneous ciprofloxacin (ciprofloxacin in combination, 2.0 to 2.4 mg/kg; subcutaneous ciprofloxacin, 2.0 to 2.8 mg/kg). In conclusion, linezolid does not seem to potentiate infections caused by Gram-negative pathogens or to interact antagonistically with ciprofloxacin.

Linezolid in the treatment of MDR-TB: a retrospective clinical study.

BACKGROUND: There is limited information on Chinese patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) treated with a linezolid-containing regimen. OBJECTIVE: To examine treatment outcomes among MDR-TB patients who were treated with linezolid at the Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, China. DESIGN: We retrospectively reviewed 151 patients who were treated for MDR-TB from 2007 to 2010. RESULTS: Eighteen MDR-TB patients, including 15 with extensively drug-resistant TB, received linezolid as part of their individualised treatment regimens. Patients had isolates resistant to a median of 7 drugs (range 5-11). Of the 18 cases, 17 had cavitary changes and positive sputum smear microscopy results at the time of MDR-TB diagnosis. Culture conversion occurred in all cases at a median of 7 weeks. At data censure, 9 of the 18 patients had achieved treatment success. Three continued to receive treatment. There were no deaths. Six patients had a poor outcome, including 1 default, 2 treatment failures and 3 relapses. Side effects occurred in 17 patients, including myelosuppression, neurotoxicity and gastrointestinal adverse events. Adverse events were managed by combinations of temporary suspension of linezolid in 1 patient, dose adjustment in 17 patients and symptom management in 13 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Linezolid may have efficacy in the treatment of MDR-TB, although treatment was complicated by adverse events.

Fusidic acid for the treatment of bone and joint infections caused by meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

There is a lack of surveillance data on resistance to fusidic acid (FA) in Asia, and no reviews of FA usage for the treatment of orthopaedic infections have been conducted since the year 2000. In this study, we present a systemic literature review of FA resistance in Asia and the clinical use of FA for the treatment of bone and joint infections (BJIs). The in vitro activity of FA against meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates remains good, with low (<10%) resistance rates in most Asian countries. FA in Asia appears to be a better oral anti-MRSA agent than trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and clindamycin. More than 80 cases of FA use for BJI have been reported since 2000 and the recurrence or failure rate is <10%. There is much evidence supporting the use of FA in combination with other antibiotics (e.g. rifampicin) as an oral treatment following intravenous glycopeptide treatment for BJIs.

Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic evaluation of daptomycin, tigecycline, and linezolid versus vancomycin for the treatment of MRSA infections in four western European countries.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the usefulness of daptomycin, tigecycline, and linezolid for the treatment of MRSA infection compared with vancomycin in Belgium, the United Kingdom/Ireland, and Spain. METHODS: The methodology included the following steps: acquisition of microbiological and pharmacokinetic data, Monte Carlo simulation, estimation of the probability of target attainment (PTA), and calculation of the cumulative fraction of response (CFR). RESULTS: We showed that differences in the susceptibility of MRSA strains among countries may justify differences in the antibiotic dose selection. Two, 3, and 4 g daily of vancomycin seem be adequate in Belgium, Spain, and United Kingdom/Ireland respectively. The CFR obtained with 50 mg tigecycline every 12 h was higher in Spain than in Belgium and the United Kingdom/Ireland, but with the highest dose (100 mg q12h) the CFR was always 100%. At least 8 mg/kg daptomycin is necessary in United Kingdom/Ireland, but 4 mg/kg may be sufficient in Spain, and probably in Belgium. Six hundred mg q12h linezolid may be adequate in the four countries. CONCLUSION: Our study reinforces the idea that the local MIC distribution must be considered in order to increase the probability of success of empirical treatment and must be periodically updated.