[Diaphragm pacemaker: alternative for long-term ventilatory support; 5 years later]. / Diafragmapacemaker: alternatief voor chronische beademing.

Currently, more than 3000 patients in the Netherlands receive long-term ventilatory support. In the majority of patients, long-term ventilatory support leads to increased survival without any complications. Diaphragm pacing with an external pacemaker (diaphragm pacing system, DPS) seems an attractive alternative for long-term ventilatory support by mask or tracheostomy. Scientific research has since shown that DPS is effective in patients with high cervical paraplegia. In addition, patients with congenital central hypoventilation syndrome are also eligible for DPS. Patients with diaphragm paralysis are a new group of patients who may be eligible for DPS. Two European studies have shown that DPS should not be used in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. In our experience, patients are no longer completely dependent on a ventilator or may even be able to discontinue using one if the procedure was successful. In the Netherlands, as far as we know, the technique is only used at the University Medical Center Groningen.

Conium maculatum intoxication: Literature review and case report on hemlock poisoning.

The aim of this paper is to highlight the symptomatology in three Conium maculatum intoxication incidents, one of which was fatal. A number of studies were reviewed in order to update and summarize the relevant literature on the incidence, sociodemographic variables, method of poisoning, pathophysiology, diagnosis, variables associated with survival and fatality, management, and treatment of C. maculatum intoxication as well as the biosynthesis and biological effects of poison hemlock alkaloids. Results show that hemlock poisoning is relatively rare, although incidence varies in different regions, despite its worldwide distribution. Hemlock poisoning is more common in European and especially Mediterranean countries. The majority of the patients are adult males over 38 years of age. The clinical course of hemlock poisoning includes neurotoxicosis, tremor, vomiting, muscle paralysis, respiratory paralysis/failure, rhabdomyolysis, and acute renal failure. The therapeutic management focuses on absorption reduction, close observation for complications, and supportive therapy (especially for respiration). Acute occurrence is severe and life-threatening, but the survival rate is high if treatment is provided promptly. Recovery is rapid, generally taking only a few days.

Diaphragmatic dysfunction.

The diaphragm is the main breathing muscle and contraction of the diaphragm is vital for ventilation so any disease that interferes with diaphragmatic innervation, contractile muscle function, or mechanical coupling to the chest wall can cause diaphragm dysfunction. Diaphragm dysfunction is associated with dyspnoea, intolerance to exercise, sleep disturbances, hypersomnia, with a potential impact on survival. Diagnosis of diaphragm dysfunction is based on static and dynamic imaging tests (especially ultrasound) and pulmonary function and phrenic nerve stimulation tests. Treatment will depend on the symptoms and causes of the disease. The management of diaphragm dysfunction may include observation in asymptomatic patients with unilateral dysfunction, surgery (i.e., plication of the diaphragm), placement of a diaphragmatic pacemaker or invasive and/or non-invasive mechanical ventilation in symptomatic patients with bilateral paralysis of the diaphragm. This type of patient should be treated in experienced centres. This review aims to provide an overview of the problem, with special emphasis on the diseases that cause diaphragmatic dysfunction and the diagnostic and therapeutic procedures most commonly employed in clinical practice. The ultimate goal is to establish a standard of care for diaphragmatic dysfunction.

Extended use of diaphragm pacing in patients with unilateral or bilateral diaphragm dysfunction: a new therapeutic option.

BACKGROUND: Diaphragm dysfunction (DD) can cause sleep abnormalities, dyspnea, atelectasis, and respiratory failure. Historical treatments, including positive pressure ventilation or diaphragm plication, may alleviate symptoms but do not restore physiologic diaphragm function. Diaphragm pacing (DP) is approved for spinal cord-injured patients and in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. We report a series of DD patients undergoing use of DP outside of these initial indications. METHODS: This report involves a prospective, nonrandomized, interventional trial under institutional review board approval at a single institution. DP involves laparoscopic motor point mapping with implantation of intramuscular electrodes in each hemidiaphragm. Postoperatively, diaphragm conditioning ensues. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients were evaluated; all patients had symptomatic and objective hypoventilation for an average of 36 months of symptoms. Causes included idiopathic (n = 13), chest surgery (n = 5), shoulder surgery or trauma (n = 6), and others (n = 3); 17 had bilateral involvement, 6 had nonstimulable diaphragms and were not implanted, and 21 were implanted. Thirteen (62%) had substantial clinically relevant respiratory improvements. Four ventilator patients were weaned completely. Four had partial improvement, 3 had no improvement, and 1 patient was lost to follow-up for objective analysis. CONCLUSION: This is the first report of DP being used to treat diverse causes of DD. Eighty-one percent of implanted patients experienced improvements. This success suggests a potential for a wider use of DP and areas for future research.

Electric ventilation: indications for and technical aspects of diaphragm pacing stimulation surgical implantation.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with high cervical spinal cord injury are usually dependent on mechanical ventilation support, which, albeit life saving, is associated with complications and decreased life expectancy because of respiratory infections. Diaphragm pacing stimulation (DPS), sometimes referred to as electric ventilation, induces inhalation by stimulating the inspiratory muscles. Our objective was to highlight the indications for and some aspects of the surgical technique employed in the laparoscopic insertion of the DPS electrodes, as well as to describe five cases of tetraplegic patients submitted to the technique. METHODS: Patient selection involved transcutaneous phrenic nerve studies in order to determine whether the phrenic nerves were preserved. The surgical approach was traditional laparoscopy, with four ports. The initial step was electrical mapping in order to locate the "motor points" (the points at which stimulation would cause maximal contraction of the diaphragm). If the diaphragm mapping was successful, four electrodes were implanted into the abdominal surface of the diaphragm, two on each side, to stimulate the branches of the phrenic nerve. RESULTS: Of the five patients, three could breathe using DPS alone for more than 24 h, one could do so for more than 6 h, and one could not do so at all. CONCLUSIONS: Although a longer follow-up period is needed in order to reach definitive conclusions, the initial results have been promising. At this writing, most of our patients have been able to remain ventilator-free for long periods of time.

Functional electrical stimulation: restoration of respiratory function.

Tetraplegia can lead to chronic respiratory failure. The need for tracheostomy mechanical ventilation significantly increases the cost of care, decreases the quality of life of the patient, and decreases life expectancy in spinal cord injury (SCI) because of pneumonias. Phrenic nerve stimulation was initially developed in the 1960s and diaphragm pacing was developed in the 1990s; both have the ability to remove a patient from positive pressure ventilation and allow them to breathe with their own diaphragm, decreasing posterior lung lobe atelectasis and pneumonia risk. This chapter summarizes the current surgical techniques, ventilator weaning options, and long-term results of functional electrical stimulation in restoring respiratory function.

Ventilação elétrica: indicações e aspectos técnicos do implante cirúrgico do marca-passo de estimulação diafragmática / Electric ventilation: indications for and technical aspects of diaphragm pacing stimulation surgical implantation

OBJETIVO: Pacientes com lesão medular cervical alta em geral são dependentes de ventilação mecânica, que, embora salve vidas, está associada a complicações e redução da expectativa de vida devido a infecções respiratórias. A estimulação do diafragma por marca-passo, às vezes chamada de ventilação elétrica, induz a inspiração por estimulação dos músculos inspiratórios. Nosso objetivo foi destacar as indicações e alguns aspectos da técnica cirúrgica empregada no implante laparoscópico dos eletrodos, assim como descrever cinco casos de pacientes tetraplégicos submetidos à técnica. MÉTODOS: A seleção dos pacientes envolveu estudos de condução do nervo frênico por via transcutânea para determinar se os nervos estavam preservados. A abordagem cirúrgica foi laparoscopia clássica, com quatro trocartes. A técnica foi iniciada com o mapeamento elétrico para encontrar os "pontos motores" (pontos de contração máxima do diafragma). Se o mapeamento era bem-sucedido, dois eletrodos eram implantados na face abdominal de cada lado do diafragma para estimular ramos do nervo frênico. RESULTADOS: Dos cinco pacientes, três e um, respectivamente, eram capazes de respirar somente com o uso do marca-passo por períodos superiores a 24 e 6 h, enquanto um não era capaz. CONCLUSÕES: Embora seja necessário um acompanhamento mais longo para chegar a conclusões definitivas, os resultados iniciais são promissores, pois, no momento, a maioria dos nossos pacientes pode permanecer sem ventilação mecânica por longos períodos de tempo.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with high cervical spinal cord injury are usually dependent on mechanical ventilation support, which, albeit life saving, is associated with complications and decreased life expectancy because of respiratory infections. Diaphragm pacing stimulation (DPS), sometimes referred to as electric ventilation, induces inhalation by stimulating the inspiratory muscles. Our objective was to highlight the indications for and some aspects of the surgical technique employed in the laparoscopic insertion of the DPS electrodes, as well as to describe five cases of tetraplegic patients submitted to the technique. METHODS: Patient selection involved transcutaneous phrenic nerve studies in order to determine whether the phrenic nerves were preserved. The surgical approach was traditional laparoscopy, with four ports. The initial step was electrical mapping in order to locate the "motor points" (the points at which stimulation would cause maximal contraction of the diaphragm). If the diaphragm mapping was successful, four electrodes were implanted into the abdominal surface of the diaphragm, two on each side, to stimulate the branches of the phrenic nerve. RESULTS: Of the five patients, three could breathe using DPS alone for more than 24 h, one could do so for more than 6 h, and one could not do so at all. CONCLUSIONS: Although a longer follow-up period is needed in order to reach definitive conclusions, the initial results have been promising. At this writing, most of our patients have been able to remain ventilator-free for long periods of time.

Diaphragm pacing after bilateral implantation of intradiaphragmatic phrenic stimulation electrodes through a transmediastinal endoscopic minimally invasive approach: pilot animal data.

OBJECTIVES: Phrenic nerve stimulation for diaphragm pacing allows patients with central respiratory paralysis to be weaned from mechanical ventilation. Two procedures are available, either intrathoracic (bilateral thoracotomy) or intradiaphragmatic (four ports laparoscopy). The present experimental work assesses the feasibility, safety and efficacy of a trans-mediastinal implantation of intradiaphragmatic phenic nerve stimulation electrodes using a flexible gastroscope through a cervical incision. METHODS: We operated on nine ewes. After selective bronchial intubation, we dissected the latero-tracheal space and opened both mediastinal pleura. We then introduced a flexible gastroscope into the pleural cavities, in a sequential manner. The phrenic nerves were located and followed up to the diaphragm dome. Electrodes loaded within a long, pliable needle were introduced through the adjacent intercostal space and implanted in each hemidiaphragm, at a 'tendinous' location (as close as possible to the entry of the nerve in the central tendon), and at a more lateral 'muscular' location. Postoperatively, the animals were ventilated using bilateral phrenic nerve stimulation. After euthanasia, abdominal verification of the electrodes position was performed through a laparotomy. RESULTS: The mediastinal and pleural parts of the procedure were uneventful. The insertion of electrodes was associated with transdiaphragmatic puncture and small abdominal haematomas in the first two animals studied. After a slight modification of the insertion technique, this was not observed anymore. Phrenic nerve stimulation produced efficient ventilation, with tidal volumes significantly higher when delivered at the tendinous site than at the muscular site. CONCLUSIONS: The trans-mediastinal implantation of intradiaphragmatic phrenic nerve stimulation electrodes is feasible, appears reasonably safe, and allows efficient ventilation.

Electrophrenic pacing and decannulation for high-level spinal cord injury: a case series.

BACKGROUND: In 1997, guidelines were developed for the management of high-level ventilator-dependent patients with spinal cord injury who had little or no ventilator-free breathing ability (VFBA). This article describes the three categories of patients, the decannulation criteria, and the successful decannulation of four patients with no VFBA and electrophrenic/diaphragm pacing, using these criteria. METHOD: Case series. CONCLUSION: Lack of VFBA in patients with high-level spinal cord injury does not mandate tracheostomy or electrophrenic/diaphragm pacing.

Minimally invasive trans-mediastinal endoscopic approach to insert phrenic stimulation electrodes in the human diaphragm: a preliminary description in cadavers.

OBJECTIVE: Diaphragm pacing by phrenic nerve (PN) stimulation is currently used for patients with central respiratory paralysis to be weaned from mechanical ventilation. Electrodes are inserted either through bilateral thoracotomy or through four ports laparoscopy. The aim of this experimental work is to demonstrate the feasibility of trans-mediastinal bilateral implantation of PN electrodes using a flexible gastroscope introduced through a cervical incision in human cadavers. METHODS: Ten refrigerated and non-embalmed cadavers were used. The gastroscope was introduced through a cervical incision into the latero-tracheal space and then subsequently into both pleura by opening the mediastinal pleura. After identification of the PN, electrodes were introduced through an intercostal space to the desired diaphragmatic location using a long, pliable needle with the electrode loaded in its lumen. RESULTS: Results are described for each hemi-diaphragm not for an anatomic subject. Mediastinal exploration and introduction of the video gastroscope into the pleural cavities proved easy in all subjects. Pleural adherences were present in five hemi-diaphragms. The central tendon of both hemi-diaphragms could be identified unambiguously in all the subjects. Identification of the entry point of the phrenic nerve into the diaphragm was straightforward in 10 hemi-diaphragms. In the remaining 10, this proved more difficult because of mediastinal fat or lung parenchyma. Introduction of the electrode-holding needles through the intercostal space and their insertion close to the phrenic nerve entry point was also easy. Withdrawal of the needle from the diaphragm and 'capture' of the hook were successful on the first attempt in 14 hemi-diaphragms, but failed in six others in whom a second attempt was necessary. CONCLUSION: Trans-mediastinal implantation of PN stimulation electrodes is possible using a flexible endoscope. This application of endoscopic surgery could allow a minimally invasive placement of PN electrodes in patients with central respiratory paralysis, for example, at the time of tracheostomy.

Laparoscopic diaphragmatic pacer placement--a potential new treatment for ALS patients: a brief description of the device and anesthetic issues.

The Diaphragm Pacing Stimulator (DPS) has been used to treat ventilatory insufficiency in quadriplegic patients. The FDA approved a trial using the DPS in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Three patients with advanced ALS, who underwent laparoscopic diaphragmatic pacer placement, and their general anesthetic management, are presented.

Anaesthetic aspects of implanting diaphragmatic pacing in patients with spinal cord injury.

Some patients with high cervical spinal cord injury are largely or completely dependent on mechanical ventilator support. Diaphragmatic phrenic nerve pacing is a new technique that offers some patients greater independence from mechanical ventilation. In selected patients, electrodes are placed on the abdominal side of the diaphragm via laparoscopy. An external pacing box provides the pacing stimulus. We report our experience with four patients with spinal cord injury in a pilot project, presenting for laparoscopic insertion of diaphragmatic phrenic nerve pacing leads inserted. The surgery took about two hours and diaphragmatic mapping precluded muscle relaxants. We used desflurane with remifentanil for maintenance. Apart from transferring the patients to and from their usual ventilators, other anaesthesia issues were difficult venous and arterial access for lines and long-term tracheostomies with no cuff or cuffs filled with water While hypotension was a frequent problem, one patient also developed intraoperative hypertension secondary to autonomic dysreflexia. Preoperative testing predicted pacing outcome with three of the four patients having successful pacing with tidal volumes of up to 10 ml/kg at the end of surgery. This initial Australian experience may lead to greater use of the technique.

Multicenter analysis of diaphragm pacing in tetraplegics with cardiac pacemakers: positive implications for ventilator weaning in intensive care units.

BACKGROUND: Diaphragm pacing (DP) can replace mechanical ventilation in tetraplegics and in trials has assisted respiration in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients. This report describes results of DP in patients with cardiac pacemakers. METHODS: Prospective, single-center and multicenter, nonrandomized, controlled, interventional protocols under U.S. Food and Drug Administration and/or institutional review board approval were evaluated. Patients underwent laparoscopic diaphragm motor point mapping to identify optimal electrode site for implantation. With diaphragm conditioning, patients were weaned from their ventilator. Perioperative and long-term assessments between the cardiac pacemakers and DP were analyzed for any device-to-device interactions. RESULTS: Over 300 subjects were implanted from 2000 to 2010. Twenty tetraplegics with cardiac pacemakers and DP were analyzed from 6 sites. Subjects ranged from 19 to 61 years old with DP implantation 6 months to 24 years postinjury. There were no immediate or long-term device to device interactions. All patients achieved diaphragm-paced tidal volumes exceeding their basal requirements and, after conditioning, all patients could go >4 hours without mechanical ventilators; 71% could go 24 hours continuously. CONCLUSION: DP can be safely implanted in tetraplegics having cardiac pacemakers. Applications for temporary use of DP to maintain diaphragm type 1 muscle fiber and improve posterior lobe ventilation may benefit complex critical care patients.