Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Daru ; 29(2): 477-481, 2021 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34313939

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Lead Poisoning is a major health problem in Iran. We aimed to compare efficacy of a standard regimen (Succimer) with that of a low-priced combination of D-penicillamine and Garlic in outpatients with lead poisoning. METHODS: In this retrospective cross-sectional study, year-long clinical files of outpatients with lead poisoning in two referral toxicology clinics in Mashhad, Iran were reviewed. A total of 79 patients (all men), received either Succimer or a combination of D-penicillamen plus garlic (DPN + Gar), for 19 and 30 days, respectively. Clinical and laboratory data, including blood lead level (BLL), were analyzed and treatment expanses were compared between the two regimens. RESULTS: Of 79 male patients, 42 were treated by DPN + Gar and 37 received Succimer. Mean BLL of DPN + Gar group before treatment (965.73 ± 62.54 µg/L) was higher than that of the Succimer group (827.59 ± 24.41) (p < 0.001). After treatment, BLL in both groups significantly reduced to 365.52 ± 27.61 µg/L and 337.44 ± 26.34 µg/L, respectively (p < 0.001). The price of a 19-day treatment with Succimer was approximately 28.6 times higher than a one-month course of treatment with garlic plus DPN. None of the treatments caused serious side effects in the patients. CONCLUSION: Combination therapy with DPN + Gar is as effective as Succimer in Pb poisoning, while treatment with Succimer is significantly more expensive.


Assuntos
Antídotos/administração & dosagem , Alho/química , Intoxicação por Chumbo/tratamento farmacológico , Penicilamina/administração & dosagem , Compostos Fitoquímicos/administração & dosagem , Succímero/administração & dosagem , Adulto , Antídotos/economia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Estudos Transversais , Quimioterapia Combinada , Humanos , Irã (Geográfico) , Chumbo/sangue , Intoxicação por Chumbo/sangue , Masculino , Penicilamina/economia , Compostos Fitoquímicos/economia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Succímero/economia , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Indian J Gastroenterol ; 37(1): 31-38, 2018 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29457214

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Experience with zinc in treating symptomatic hepatic Wilson's disease (WD) is limited. AIM: To study the efficacy of Penicillamine followed by zinc in treating symptomatic hepatic Wilson's disease. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed case records of 31 symptomatic hepatic WD patients for whom disease severity scores (Child's, model for end-stage liver disease (MELD), Nazer's, and New Wilson Index (NWI) score) and 24-h urinary copper were compared at 3-time points-baseline at presentation, at transition from penicillamine to zinc and at end of follow up. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients (median age 11 [5-24] years) with symptomatic hepatic WD were studied; ten had associated neuropsychiatric manifestations of WD. Penicillamine was changed to zinc sulfate either due to financial constraints (28 patients) or due to adverse effects of penicillamine (3 patients). At presentation (baseline), six patients belonged to Child's class A, five to Child's B, and 17 to Child's C. Duration of initial penicillamine chelation therapy was 134 (2-320) weeks, and of subsequent zinc therapy was 363 (35-728) weeks. There was a significant improvement in liver function tests and disease severity scores (Child's, MELD, Nazer's, and NWI score) at the transition from penicillamine to zinc compared to baseline. This improvement was maintained until the end of study period with 90% survival at 10 (2-20) years. Fifteen of the 17 Child's C cirrhotic patients showed significant improvement in disease severity scores from baseline until end of follow up. CONCLUSIONS: Penicillamine followed by zinc may be a safe and effective treatment in resource-constrained setting for symptomatic hepatic WD patients in all grades of baseline disease severity. Some patients with decompensated cirrhosis due to WD may be managed with medical treatment, avoiding liver transplantation.


Assuntos
Quelantes/administração & dosagem , Quelantes/economia , Redução de Custos , Substituição de Medicamentos , Degeneração Hepatolenticular/tratamento farmacológico , Penicilamina/administração & dosagem , Penicilamina/economia , Sulfato de Zinco/administração & dosagem , Sulfato de Zinco/economia , Adolescente , Adulto , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Cobre/urina , Feminino , Seguimentos , Degeneração Hepatolenticular/urina , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
3.
J Neurol Sci ; 264(1-2): 129-32, 2008 Jan 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17765927

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Penicillamine, once considered the cornerstone of treatment for Wilson disease (WD), is rather expensive and toxic, and often causes neurological worsening. Zinc sulphate, aiming at the treatment of free-copper toxicosis, has emerged as effective, safe and cheap alternative. AIM: To assess the effect of withdrawal of penicillamine from maintenance treatment with penicillamine and zinc sulphate. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 45 patients of WD (M:F: 28:17; age at diagnosis: 13.5+/-63 years), on both penicillamine (P) and zinc sulphate (Zn), couldn't continue penicillamine due to financial constraints. Their clinical data, disability and impairment scores (Schwab and England (S&E) score, Neurological Symptom Score (NSS), and Chu staging) and follow-up data of patients maintained only on zinc sulphate were recorded. RESULTS: Majority of patients (84.4%) had neuropsychiatric manifestations. The mean duration of treatment with penicillamine (P) and zinc sulphate (P+Zn), before stopping penicillamine, was 107.4+/-67.3 months. 40 patients improved variably, while the rest didn't. They received only zinc sulphate for 27.2+/-8.5 months (range: 12 to 34) and 44 patients (97.7%) remained status quo or improved marginally. Only one patient reported worsening in dysarthria. Their disability and impairment scores during combination (penicillamine and zinc sulphate) and Zn alone were: Chu (1.3+/-0.5 vs. 1.5+/-1.9; p=0.4), NSS (1.8+/-3.1 vs. 1.5+/-2.3; p=0.03) and S&E (96.4+/-5.6 vs. 98.6+/-3.5; p=0.03). There were no adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS: Withdrawal of penicillamine from zinc sulphate/penicillamine maintenance therapy for patients with Wilson's disease was effective, safe and economic, for almost all patients. This retrospective study reiterates that zinc sulphate may be used as a preferred mode of treatment for patients with Wilson's disease.


Assuntos
Degeneração Hepatolenticular/tratamento farmacológico , Penicilamina/administração & dosagem , Sulfato de Zinco/administração & dosagem , Adolescente , Adulto , Adstringentes/administração & dosagem , Adstringentes/economia , Quelantes/administração & dosagem , Quelantes/efeitos adversos , Quelantes/economia , Terapia por Quelação/efeitos adversos , Terapia por Quelação/economia , Terapia por Quelação/métodos , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Cobre/metabolismo , Cobre/toxicidade , Feminino , Degeneração Hepatolenticular/metabolismo , Degeneração Hepatolenticular/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Masculino , Transtornos Neurocognitivos/induzido quimicamente , Transtornos Neurocognitivos/metabolismo , Transtornos Neurocognitivos/fisiopatologia , Penicilamina/efeitos adversos , Penicilamina/economia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Sulfato de Zinco/economia
4.
Med Decis Making ; 15(1): 13-24, 1995.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7898292

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: No consensus exists regarding the preferred treatment of childhood lead poisoning. The authors used decision analysis to compare the clinical impacts and cost-effectiveness of four management strategies for childhood lead poisoning, and to investigate how effective chelation therapy must be in reducing neuropsychologic sequelae to warrant its use. METHODS: The model was based on a 2-year-old child with moderate lead poisoning [blood lead level 1.21 to 1.88 mumol/L (25 to 39 micrograms/dL)]. The following strategies were compared: 1) no treatment; 2) EDTA provocation testing, followed by chelation if testing is positive (PROV); 3) penicillamine chelation with crossover to EDTA provocation testing if toxicity occurs (PCA); 4) EDTA provocation testing with crossover to penicillamine chelation if testing is negative (EDTA). RESULTS: The EDTA and PCA strategies prevented 22.5% of the cases of reading disability and resulted in an increase of 1.02 quality-adjusted life years compared with no treatment. When the costs of outpatient EDTA testing and chelation are considered, the EDTA strategy is more cost-effective than the PCA strategy; when inpatient costs are considered, the PCA strategy becomes more cost-effective. When costs of remedial education are considered, all strategies are cost-saving compared with no treatment if chelation reduces the risk of lead-induced reading disability by more than 20%. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment strategies for childhood lead poisoning vary in clinical impact, cost, and cost-effectiveness. Chelation of the 1.4% of United States preschoolers whose blood lead levels are 2.21 mumol/L (25 micrograms/dL) or higher could prevent more than 45,000 cases of reading disability, and save more than $900 million per year in overall costs when the costs of remedial education are considered.


Assuntos
Terapia por Quelação/economia , Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão , Ácido Edético/economia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Intoxicação por Chumbo/economia , Intoxicação por Chumbo/terapia , Terapia Assistida por Computador , Terapia por Quelação/efeitos adversos , Pré-Escolar , Análise Custo-Benefício , Árvores de Decisões , Dislexia Adquirida/economia , Dislexia Adquirida/etiologia , Dislexia Adquirida/reabilitação , Ácido Edético/uso terapêutico , Educação/economia , Humanos , Intoxicação por Chumbo/complicações , Intoxicação por Chumbo/diagnóstico , Modelos Econômicos , Razão de Chances , Penicilamina/efeitos adversos , Penicilamina/economia , Penicilamina/uso terapêutico , Qualidade de Vida , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA