Efficacy of intraoperative blood salvage and autotransfusion in living-donor liver transplantation: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Liver transplantation (LT) may be associated with massive blood loss and the need for allogeneic blood transfusion. Intraoperative blood salvage autotransfusion (IBSA) can reduce the need for allogeneic blood transfusion. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of blood salvage in LT. METHODS: Among 355 adult patients who underwent elective living-donor LT between January 1, 2019, and December 31, 2022, 59 recipients without advanced hepatocellular carcinoma received IBSA using Cell Saver (CS group). Based on sex, age, model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score, preoperative laboratory results, and other factors, 118 of the 296 recipients who did not undergo IBSA were matched using propensity score (non-CS group). The primary outcome was the amount of intraoperative allogenic red blood cell (RBC) transfusion. Comparisons were made between the two groups regarding the amount of other blood components transfused and postoperative laboratory findings. RESULTS: The transfused allogeneic RBC for the CS group was significantly lower than that of the non-CS group (1,506.0 vs. 1,957.5 ml, P = 0.026). No significant differences in the transfused total fresh frozen plasma, platelets, cryoprecipitate, and estimated blood loss were observed between the two groups. The postoperative allogeneic RBC transfusion was significantly lower in the CS group than in the non-CS group (1,500.0 vs. 2,100.0 ml, P = 0.039). No significant differences in postoperative laboratory findings were observed at postoperative day 1 and discharge. CONCLUSIONS: Using IBSA during LT can effectively reduce the need for perioperative allogeneic blood transfusions without causing subsequent coagulopathy.

Efficacy of Low Dose Intravenous Epinephrine Infusion in Improving Perioperative Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Transurethral Resection of Prostate: A Prospective Parallel Arm Double-Blind Randomized Control Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of intraoperative low-dose intravenous epinephrine infusion in improving intraoperative bleeding and perioperative outcomes of transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) surgery. METHODS: This was a double-blinded, randomized control trial in which all patients undergoing bipolar TURP were included. Patients with uncontrolled hypertension, cardiac disease, and on anticoagulants were excluded. The study group received intravenous epinephrine, whereas the control group received normal saline at the same rate (0.05 µg/kg/min) throughout the procedure. Intraoperative blood loss was the primary outcome. The secondary outcomes were incidence of intraoperative hypotension (due to spinal anesthesia), resection time, indwelling catheter time, and length of hospitalization. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients were included in each group. Demographic and clinical profiles were comparable with an overall median prostate size of 41 (34-52) gram in both groups. The primary objective, mean intraoperative blood loss in the study group was lower than the control group but statistically insignificant (67.91+/-18.7 mL vs 75.14 +/-17.1 mL; P = .086). Incidence of intraoperative hypotension was significantly lower in the study group (8.3% vs 33.3%; P = .01). Rest of the secondary outcomes, resection time (83 (64-111.5) minutes vs 86 (68-94.75) minutes; P = .97), mean indwelling catheter time (P = .94), postoperative complications (P = .73), and length of hospitalization (P = .87) were comparable. CONCLUSION: In this first-of-its-kind trial, low-dose epinephrine infusion did not reduce intraoperative blood loss in patients undergoing TURP. However, it significantly reduced intraoperative hypotension, which complicates spinal anesthesia particularly in elderly population.

The effect of tranexamic acid on perioperative blood loss in transurethral resection of the prostate: A double-blind, randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Bleeding and bleeding-related complications remain common after bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for benign prostatic hyperplasia. This may possibly lead to prolonged postoperative irrigation, catheterization, and hospital stay. The objective of this trial was to evaluate the effect of high-dose tranexamic acid (TXA) on perioperative blood loss in patients treated with bipolar TURP for prostate sizes between 30 and 80 g. METHODS: We conducted a single-center, prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Eighty patients were screened for inclusion between March 2020 and January 2023. After exclusion, 65 patients were randomized in two comparable groups. The TXA group (31 patients) received a TXA intravenous loading dose of 10 mg/kg over 30 min before induction, followed by a maintenance dose of 5 mg/kg/h over 12 h. The placebo group (34 patients) received an equal dose of saline infusion. We measured age, weight, preoperative prostate size, anticoagulant use, 5-alpha reductase inhibitor use, preoperative urinary tract infection, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, difference in pre- and 24 h postoperative hemoglobin and hematocrit levels, operative time, resected adenoma weight, duration of postoperative irrigation, total amount of postoperative irrigation fluid, indwelling catheter time, duration of hospital stay, blood transfusion rate, and 4-week complication rate. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics in both groups were comparable. Postoperative hemoglobin decrease in TXA versus placebo group was 1 versus 1.6 mg/dL, respectively (p = 0.04). In addition, the amount of postoperative irrigation fluid (10.7 vs. 18.5 L), irrigation time (24.3 vs. 37.9 h), catheterization time (40.8 vs. 53.7 h), and hospital stay (46.9 vs. 59.2 h) were statistically significant in favor of TXA use. No blood transfusions were carried out. Four-week complication rate was comparable between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative high-dose TXA seems beneficial in reducing hemoglobin loss, postoperative irrigation, catheterization time, and hospital stay in bipolar TURP for prostate sizes between 30 and 80 g, without increased risk of TXA-related thromboembolic events.

Autologous blood transfusion reduces the requirement for perioperative allogenic blood transfusion in patients undergoing major hepatopancreatobiliary surgery: a retrospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Major hepatopancreatobiliary surgery is associated with a risk of major blood loss. The authors aimed to assess whether autologous transfusion of blood salvaged intraoperatively reduces the requirement for postoperative allogenic transfusion in this patient cohort. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this single centre study, information from a prospective database of 501 patients undergoing major hepatopancreatobiliary resection (2015-2022) was analysed. Patients who received cell salvage ( n =264) were compared with those who did not ( n =237). Nonautologous (allogenic) transfusion was assessed from the time of surgery to 5 days postsurgery, and blood loss tolerance was calculated using the Lemmens-Bernstein-Brodosky formula. Multivariate analysis was used to identify factors associated with allogenic blood transfusion avoidance. RESULTS: 32% of the lost blood volume was replaced through autologous transfusion in patients receiving cell salvage. Although the cell salvage group experienced significantly higher intraoperative blood loss compared with the noncell salvage group (1360 ml vs. 971 ml, P =0.0005), they received significantly less allogenic red blood cell units (1.5 vs. 0.92 units/patient, P =0.03). Correction of blood loss tolerance in patients who underwent cell salvage was independently associated with avoidance of allogenic transfusion (Odds ratio 0.05 (0.006-0.38) P =0.005). In a subgroup analysis, cell salvage use was associated with a significant reduction in 30-day mortality in patients undergoing major hepatectomy (6 vs. 1%, P =0.04). CONCLUSION: Cell salvage use was associated with a reduction in allogenic blood transfusion and a reduction in 30-day mortality in patients undergoing major hepatectomy. Prospective trials are warranted to understand whether the use of cell salvage should be routinely utilised for major hepatectomy.

Tranexamic Acid in Facial Feminization Surgery: Quantifying a High-risk Setting With Exogenous Estrogen Supplementation.

Tranexamic acid (TXA) has been increasingly utilized in orthognathic surgery, aesthetic surgery, and craniofacial surgery. However, the risk of increasing venous thromboembolic events (VTE) must be carefully considered as TXA is a prothrombotic agent. Our study aimed to investigate the safety of TXA in the setting of facial feminization surgery. These patients are at an elevated risk for VTE at baseline given their uniform history of exogenous estrogen supplementation. A retrospective review of all patients that underwent facial feminization surgery at our medical center between December 2015 and September of 2022 was performed. Demographic information, procedure type, Caprini scores, hematoma rate, VTE rate, estimated blood loss, and operative time were all studied. Unpaired t tests were used to compare patients that received TXA and those who did not. In total, there were 79 surgeries performed during our study period. There were 33 surgeries (41.77%) that used TXA intraoperatively. Ten patients (12.65%) received anticoagulation postoperatively, 5 of whom received TXA intraoperatively. Of the 33 patients who received TXA, 30 patients remained on estrogen therapy. There was no statistically significant difference in VTE rates in patients who received TXA (n=33, 41.77%) and those who did not (n=46, 58.23%). Bleeding events, Caprini scores, estimated blood loss, and operative time were also not found to be significantly different between the 2 cohorts. The authors found no significant increase in VTE in facial feminization patients undergoing estrogen supplementation when intraoperative TXA was utilized. This is the first known report investigating the safety of TXA in this higher risk patient population.

THE USE OF AUTOLOGOUS BLOOD TRANSFUSION IN DIGESTIVE TRACT SURGERY: A LITERATURE REVIEW.

BACKGROUND: The use of autologous blood transfusion in digestive tract surgeries, whether after preoperative blood collection or intraoperative blood salvage, is an alternative to allogeneic blood, which brings with it certain risks and shortage, due to the lack of donors. Studies have shown lower mortality and longer survival associated with autologous blood, however the theoretical possibility of spreading metastatic disease is still one of the limiting factors of its use. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the application of autologous transfusion in digestive tract surgeries, noting the benefits, damages and effects on the spread of metastatic disease. METHODS: This is an integrative review of the literature available in the PubMed, Virtual Health Library and SciELO databases, by searching for "Autologous Blood Transfusion AND Gastrointestinal Surgical Procedures". Observational and experimental studies and guidelines published in the last five years in Portuguese, English or Spanish were included. RESULTS: Not all patients benefit from blood collection before elective procedures, with the time of surgery and hemoglobin levels some of the factors that may indicate the need for preoperative storage. Regarding the intraoperative salvaged blood, it was observed that there is no increased risk of tumor recurrence, but the importance of using leukocyte filters and blood irradiation is highlighted. There was no consensus among the studies whether there is a maintenance or reduction of complication rates compared to allogeneic blood. The cost related to the use of autologous blood may be higher, and the less stringent selection criteria prevent it from being added to the general donation pool. CONCLUSION: There were no objective and concordant answers among the studies, but the strong evidence of less recurrence of digestive tumors, the possibility of changes in morbidity and mortality, and the reduction of costs with patients suggest that the practice of autologous blood transfusion should be encouraged in digestive tract surgeries. It is necessary to note if the deleterious effects would stand out amidst the possible benefits to the patient and to health care systems.

Preoperative Arterial Embolization for Heterotopic Ossification of the Hip.

PURPOSE: To investigate the efficacy and safety of preoperative arterial embolization for neurogenic heterotopic ossification (NHO) of the hip. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This single-center retrospective study reviewed outcomes in 16 consecutive patients who had surgical resection of NHO of the hip: 8 of whom underwent preoperative arterial embolization and 8 of whom did not. Both patient cohorts had similar baseline characteristics. A mean of 2.62 ± 1.9 arteries per patient, including the gluteal, lateral circumflex femoral, and deep circumflex iliac branches, were embolized using an n-butyl cyanoacrylate (NBCA)-ethiodized oil mixture. Data from both cohorts regarding intraoperative blood loss, volume of blood transfused, complications, and duration of hospitalization were compared. RESULTS: A mean of 2.6 ± 1.9 arteries were embolized with NBCA-ethiodized oil, mainly the gluteal arteries, lateral circumflex femoral artery, and deep circumflex iliac artery. In the embolization group, mean intraoperative blood loss was 875 mL ± 320, mean number of units of blood used was 0.5 ± 0.7, and mean number of days of hospitalization was 6.4 days ± 1.6. In the control group, mean intraoperative blood loss was 1,350 mL ± 120, mean number of units of blood used was 2 ± 1.1, and average number of days of hospitalization was 11.5 days ± 1.4. The embolization group had a mean reduction in blood loss of 40.7% (P = 0.035), reduction in units of blood administered of 75% (P = 0.021), and reduction in days of hospitalization of 44.7% (P = 0.014). No procedural complications were recorded. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative arterial embolization is effective and safe in reducing intraoperative blood loss, number of hospitalization days, and need for blood transfusions in surgical resection of NHO of the hip.

Jehovah's witness head and neck free flap reconstruction patient outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Jehovah's Witnesses are members of a Christian religious denomination that rejects the transfusion of whole blood and component blood products. Given new transfusion-free strategies, Jehovah's Witness patients are undergoing free flap reconstructions with increased regularity. However, outcome data remains limited. With this study, we sought to examine post-operative outcomes in Jehovah's Witness patients undergoing free flap reconstruction of the head and neck, compare their outcomes to non-Jehovah's Witness patients, and enumerate strategies to enhance the safety of transfusion-free surgery. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was carried out on 10 patients who identified as Jehovah's Witness and 63 patients who did not. Demographic information, pre-operative laboratory values, peri-operative resuscitative interventions, and peri-operative outcome measures were compiled. Descriptive data analysis, Mann-Whitney, Chi-square tests, and multivariate analysis were used. RESULTS: Jehovah's Witness patients were significantly older than non-Jehovah's Witness patients (p = 0.03) and had significantly higher ASA scores (p = 0.009). Head and neck cancer was the primary surgical indication in both groups (p = 0.71). Jehovah's witness patients have significantly less intraoperative blood loss (p = 0.011) and lower post-operative hemoglobin (p = 0.002) compared to non-Jehovah's Witness patients. While Jehovah's Witness patients had significantly higher rates of severe anemia (p = 0.014), there was no significant difference between the two groups in other post-operative complications and readmission rates even in a multivariate analysis accounting for age and ASA score. CONCLUSIONS: Free flap microvascular reconstruction can be reliably performed on Jehovah's Witness head and neck patients without an increased risk of complication. Policies such as the use of non-blood volume expanders, albumin, Epogen, perioperative iron supplementation, cell saver and acute normovolemic hemodilution are key to ensuring good outcomes.

Patient Blood Management programs for post-partum hemorrhage.

Patient blood management (PBM) strategies aim to maintain hemoglobin concentration, optimize hemostasis, and minimize blood loss to improve patient outcomes. Because postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) is a leading cause of maternal mortality and blood product utilization, PBM principles can be applied in its therapeutic approach. First, pre-operative identification of risk factors for PPH and identification of peri-delivery anemia should be conducted. Iron supplementation should be used to optimize hemoglobin concentration before delivery; it can also be used to treat anemia in the postpartum period after severe PPH. Both acute normovolemic hemodilution and intraoperative cell salvage can be effective techniques to reduce allogeneic blood transfusion during or after surgical procedures. Furthermore, these strategies appear to be safe when used in the pregnant population.

Effect of cell salvage on bleeding, transfusion of blood products, and bleeding parameters in patients undergoing liver transplantation with intraoperative massive blood transfusion.

BACKGROUND: Autologous transfusion using a cell saver system has been used in liver transplantation with controversial outcomes. Its efficiency in patients with massive intraoperative transfusion has not been studied yet. This study aimed to evaluate effect of cell salvage (CS) on intraoperative bleeding and transfusion practices in liver transplantation with massive intraoperative transfusion. METHODS: Consecutive patients aged ≥18 years with intraoperative massive blood transfusion (≥ 6 units) between March 2014 and September 2020 were included. Patients subjected to CS were grouped as CS, whereas other patients were grouped as control. Number of transfused red blood cells was study's primary outcome. RESULTS: There were 38 and 32 patients in CS and control groups, respectively. Median blood loss was significantly lower in CS group than in control group (2500 mL vs. 4000 mL, p = 0.010). There were significantly more transfusions of red blood cells, fresh frozen plasma, platelets, and cryoprecipitates in CS group (p < 0.05). Postoperative median hemoglobin levels were determined as 4.8 g/dL and 8.2 g/dL in CS and control groups (p < 0.001). The decrease in postoperative hemoglobin levels compared to preoperative values was significantly higher in the CS group (p < 0.001). The mortality rate in postoperative first year was significantly higher in CS group than in control group (36.8% vs. 12.5%, p = 0.041). DISCUSSION: Use of CS in patients undergoing liver transplantation with massive intraoperative transfusion did not improve clinical and transfusion-related outcomes. In conclusion, its usage can be questionable given the absence of any clinical benefit and presence of poor outcomes.

Clinical Application Effects of Different Preoperative Blood Management Schemes in Older Patients with Delayed Intertrochanteric Fracture Surgery.

Introduction: Research on preoperative blood management in older patients with delayed surgery for intertrochanteric fracture is scarce, especially regarding hematopoiesis and hemostasis. We assessed the effectiveness of optimized blood management programs in older patients undergoing delayed surgery for intertrochanteric fractures. Methods: This retrospective study included 456 patients who underwent delayed surgery for intertrochanteric fractures. According to the optimized blood management plan, the patients were divided into four groups: group A was the control group; group B received 1 g of tranexamic acid (TXA) intravenously at admission; group C underwent sequential TXA treatment after admission until 1 day before surgery (1 g/day); and group D received iron supplements (200 mg/day) in addition to the treatment administered to group C, with or without recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO; 40,000 IU). The primary outcomes were preoperative hidden blood loss (HBL), preoperative allogeneic blood transfusion (ABT) rate, hemoglobin (Hb) change, and actual Hb drop. Results: The Hb reduction, calculated HBL, and hospitalization duration in groups C and D were significantly lower than those in groups A and B. The preoperative ABT rates in groups C and D were significantly lower than those in groups A and B, with no significant difference between groups C and D. Discussion: The results of this study suggested that iron supplementation (with or without rHuEPO) combined with the sequential IV TXA scheme did not show a better clinical effect than the sequential IV TXA scheme in the management of patients undergoing delayed surgery for intertrochanteric fractures. Therefore, further evaluation is needed before recommending iron supplements and rHuEPO in older patients.

Effects of omega-3 fatty acids supplementation on perioperative blood loss and complications after radical prostatectomy.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Many dietary supplements, including omega-3 fatty acids (ω3), are suspected to affect blood coagulation and platelet function. Despite no clinical evidence, discontinuation is recommended before radical prostatectomy. However, long-chain ω3 (LCω3) appear beneficial against prostate cancer progression. Here, we aim to determine the effect of LCω3 supplements on perioperative bleeding, hemoglobin, platelets, and postoperative complications after radical prostatectomy. METHODS: This is a planned exploratory analysis of 130 patients diagnosed with prostate cancer grade group 2 or greater enrolled in a randomized controlled trial (NCT02333435) testing the effects of LCω3, on prostate cancer biological and pathological outcomes at radical prostatectomy as main outcomes. The LCω3 intervention (MAG-EPA 3 g daily) or equivalent placebo was given 4-10 weeks prior to radical prostatectomy. An intention-to-treat analysis approach was used with bi-variate statistical testing of bleeding and complications outcomes. We also estimated the difference between groups using linear regression and non-parametric quantile regression models. All models were adjusted for confounding variables selected on clinical relevance. RESULTS: We found no clinically significant effect of LCω3 versus placebo on perioperative bleeding, laboratory tests or postoperative complications. In contrast, as expected, we found a significant increase in perioperative bleeding in open retropubic radical prostatectomy compared to robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (adjusted difference 115.8 mL, p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that ω3 supplements can be safely taken before radical prostatectomy without increasing surgical bleeding risk. These findings are relevant since ω3 may beneficially affect prostate cancer evolution.

Craniosynostosis With Preoperative Iron Supplementation Exposure: A Retrospective Cohort Study Examining Preoperative Iron Supplementation and Transfusion Practice in a National Paediatric Craniofacial Centre.

BACKGROUND: Blood loss and subsequent transfusion are key concerns in the surgical management of craniosynostosis, and have been associated with increased morbidity, requirement for intensive care admission and increased length of hospital stay. Patient blood management guidelines advocate treatment of anemia before elective surgical procedures where significant blood loss is anticipated. At present there is little evidence in the literature investigating the clinical value of this practice in pediatric craniofacial surgery. AIMS: The authors examined the effect of preoperative oral iron supplementation on blood loss and transfusion rates in a national pediatric craniofacial unit. METHODS: A total of 157 patients were included in a retrospective and prospective observational cohort study conducted between July 2011 and November 2016. Eighty-five (85) patients included in the preoperative iron supplementation group were prescribed oral ferrous fumarate before total cranial vault reconstruction, frontal-orbital advancement or extended strip cranial vault remodeling procedures. This cohort was retrospectively compared to seventy-two (72) consecutive patients who did not receive iron supplementation. RESULTS: Calculated blood loss was 51.3 mL/kg in the intervention group, and 56.65 mL/kg in the control group. Transfusion rate and mean volumes for the intervention group were 85.9% and 25 mL/kg. The control group had transfusion rate of 86.1% with mean transfused volume of 24.7 mL/kg. These differences were not statistically significant. Intraoperative tranexamic acid was associated with significantly reduced transfusion volumes overall. CONCLUSIONS: This study did not show a statistically significant benefit to preoperative iron supplementation. Secondary outcomes of this study showed a statistically significant difference in estimated versus calculated intraoperative blood loss. Further research in to specific iron supplementation protocols is indicated.

Passive ankle motion and calf massage without anticoagulation therapy after total hip arthroplasty: A retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: It has been previously reported that manual calf massage and passive ankle motion after total hip arthroplasty could reduce the incidence of venous thromboembolism. However, a combination of chemical and mechanical prophylaxes was employed. In this study, we aimed to examine the effect of mechanical prevention without pharmacological antithrombotic intervention. METHODS: Of the 313 patients who underwent unilateral primary total hip arthroplasty and received passive ankle motion and calf massage postoperatively at our hospital between January 2015 and December 2019, 261 (58 men, 203 women; mean age 62.1 years) were included in this retrospective study. Pharmacological anticoagulation therapy was administered in 176 patients (combination group); 137 patients only underwent calf massage and passive ankle motion without anticoagulation therapy (single group). The study outcomes were operation time, the incidence of deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary thromboembolism, intraoperative bleeding, estimated actual blood loss, blood transfusion, and major bleeding. RESULTS: No significant differences were found in sex, age, side, platelet counts, activated partial thromboplastin time, prothrombin time, prothrombin time - International Normalized Ratio, intraoperative blood loss, estimated blood loss, and operation time. Moreover, the incidence of deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary thromboembolism, and intraoperative bleeding was not significantly different between the groups (deep vein thrombosis 4.0% vs. 6.3%, p = 0.244; pulmonary thromboembolism 0.7% vs. 0%, p = 0.548; and intraoperative bleeding 394 ± 173.6 ml vs. 365.4 ± 168.5 ml, p = 0.550). However, estimated actual blood loss and postoperative bleeding differed between the groups (eABL 996.6 ± 348.3 ml vs. 858.5 ± 269.6 ml, p = 0.003; postoperative bleeding 601.8 ± 330.0 ml vs. 492.1 ± 277.1 ml, p = 0.016), and both increased in the combination group. No major bleeding was noted in the two groups. CONCLUSION: Postoperative anticoagulant therapy does not have to be routinely used if mechanical prophylaxis is performed in patients without deep vein thrombosis before total hip arthroplasty.

The effect of intranasal irrigation with epinephrine solution on intraoperative visualization and bleeding during FESS.

PURPOSE: Bleeding during Functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) can have adverse effect on surgical outcomes. This study evaluates if there is any benefit of adding epinephrine to the saline nasal irrigation in patients undergoing elective FESS for chronic rhinosinusitis. METHODS: A prospective, randomized, double-blinded study was performed. Fifty ASA I or II patients undergoing FESS were randomized to have irrigation either with normal saline or (1:100,000) epinephrine in normal saline during surgery. Outcomes measure included the Boezaart grading scale to assess the intraoperative surgical field, surgeon's satisfaction with field visualization and bleeding which was evaluated in a 10 cm visual analog scale, estimated blood loss as well as hemodynamic parameters changes. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in the studied variables between both groups. However in patients with higher than 12 Lund-Mackay score the volume of blood loss was significantly less in the epinephrine group. All surgical procedures were completed and there were no operative complications or any reported perioperative cardiovascular events. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative irrigation with saline-epinephrine solution at a concentration of (1:100,000) is safe and does not change heart rate or blood pressure but is unlikely to improve the setting of intraoperative surgical field except for decreasing the volume of blood loss in patients with high Lund-Mackay score.

Impact of Intraoperative Salvaged Blood Autotransfusion During Obstetric Hemorrhage on the Coagulation Function: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore the effect of intraoperative blood salvage (autotransfusion) on coagulation function in the rescue of an obstetric hemorrhage. METHODS: A total of 65 pregnant women who were diagnosed with placenta previa in our Hospital and gave birth in the hospital were enrolled in the study. All the patients underwent thromboelastography, routine blood tests, and blood coagulation series + D-dimer before and within 30 min of the autologous blood transfusion. The differences in various indicators were evaluated. RESULTS: (1) After the autotransfusion, the hemoglobin and neutrophil counts were significantly higher than beforehand, and the platelet count was significantly reduced; the differences were statistically significant (p < .05). (2) There were no significant differences in prothrombin time (PT), fibrinogen, and D-dimer levels before and after the autotransfusion (p > .05). The activated partial thromboplastin time after autotransfusion was shorter than that beforehand, and the difference was statistically significant (p < .05). (3) There were no significant differences in the R value, K value, α value, and MA value of the thromboelastogram before and after the autotransfusion (p > .05). CONCLUSION: After the recovery autotransfusion, the hemoglobin of patients with a massive obstetric hemorrhage increased significantly, while the platelet count decreased, but the coagulation function and thromboelastogram did not change significantly, indicating the autotransfusion did not affect the coagulation function of the obstetric hemorrhage rescue. Thus, it would appear that intraoperative blood salvage can be safely used in the clinical rescue of massive hemorrhaging during cesarean section.

Preoperative autologous blood donation for kidney transplant and end-stage renal disease patients: A single-center study.

Although preoperative autologous blood donation (PABD) has many advantages, there has been a decrease in the performance due to a decrease in the residual risk of allogeneic blood transfusion. In allogeneic blood transfusion, anti HLA antibodies and donor-specific antibodies mediate antibody-mediated rejection, which results in graft failure. PABD for anemic patients such as those with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and a kidney transplant is relatively contraindicated. In this study, we aimed to investigate the characteristics of patients who underwent PABD and elucidate the safety and feasibility of PABD. We performed PABD safely in ten ESRD patients and nine kidney transplant patients and retrospectively analyzed medical records of the hospital. All kidney transplant patients avoided allogeneic blood transfusion, but 4 out of 10 ESRD patients had allogeneic blood transfusion, even if their blood donation volume was larger than those of the kidney transplant patients. It depends on the type of operation; cardiovascular surgery was more common in ESRD patients, and orthopedic surgery was more common in kidney transplant patients. There was profuse bleeding in cardiovascular surgery compared to orthopedic surgery because of longer operation time of the former. Completely avoiding allogeneic blood transfusion in major surgery was rather difficult even if PABD was performed. To prevent the formation of anti- HLA antibodies, PABD would be considered for ESRD patients undergoing kidney transplantation and kidney transplant patients that are potential candidates for secondary kidney transplantation.