Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Métodos Terapêuticos e Terapias MTCI
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf ; 31(8): 921-925, 2022 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35404496

RESUMO

PURPOSE: How completely do hospital discharge diagnoses identify cases of myopericarditis after an mRNA vaccine? METHODS: We assembled a cohort 12-39 year-old patients, insured by Kaiser Permanente Northwest, who received at least one dose of an mRNA vaccine (Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna) between December 2020 and October 2021. We followed them for up to 30 days after their second dose of an mRNA vaccine to identify encounters for myocarditis, pericarditis or myopericarditis. We compared two identification methods: A method that searched all encounter diagnoses using a brief text description (e.g., ICD-10-CM code I40.9 is defined as 'acute myocarditis, unspecified'). We searched the text description of all inpatient or outpatient encounter diagnoses (in any position) for "myocarditis" or "pericarditis." The other method was developed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD), which searched for emergency department visits or hospitalizations with a select set of discharge ICD-10-CM diagnosis codes. For both methods, two physicians independently reviewed the identified patient records and classified them as confirmed, probable or not cases using the CDC's case definition. RESULTS: The encounter methodology identified 14 distinct patients who met the confirmed or probable CDC case definition for acute myocarditis or pericarditis with an onset within 21 days of receipt of COVID-19 vaccination. When we extended the search for relevant diagnoses to 30 days since vaccination, we identified two additional patients (for a total of 16 patients) who met the case definition for acute myocarditis or pericarditis, but those patients had been misdiagnosed at the time of their original presentation. Three of these patients had an ICD-10-CM code of I51.4 "Myocarditis, Unspecified;" that code was omitted by the VSD algorithm (in the late fall of 2021). The VSD methodology identified 11 patients who met the CDC case definition for acute myocarditis or pericarditis. Seven (64%) of the 11 patients had initial care for myopericarditis outside of a KPNW facility and their diagnosis could not be ascertained by the VSD methodology until claims were submitted (median delay of 33 days; range of 12-195 days). Among those who received a second dose of vaccine (n = 146 785), we estimated a risk as 95.4 cases of myopericarditis per million second doses administered (95% CI, 52.1-160.0). CONCLUSION: We identified additional valid cases of myopericarditis following an mRNA vaccination that would be missed by the VSD's search algorithm, which depends on select hospital discharge diagnosis codes. The true incidence of myopericarditis is markedly higher than the incidence reported to US advisory committees in the fall of 2021. The VSD should validate its search algorithm to improve its sensitivity for myopericarditis.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde , Miocardite , Pericardite , Adolescente , Adulto , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra COVID-19/efeitos adversos , Criança , Humanos , Miocardite/induzido quimicamente , Miocardite/diagnóstico , Pericardite/induzido quimicamente , Pericardite/diagnóstico , Vacinação/efeitos adversos , Adulto Jovem , Vacinas de mRNA
2.
Pharmacotherapy ; 36(4): 443-8, 2016 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26940554

RESUMO

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To describe three cases of pericarditis probably related to azacitidine administration in a span of 3 years at our center. DESIGN: Case series. SETTING: Comprehensive cancer center within a large, academic medical center. PATIENTS: Three patients with high-grade myelodysplastic syndrome or acute myeloid leukemia who received azacitidine. INTERVENTION: None. MEASUREMENTS: None. MAIN RESULTS: Patient 1 presented with pericarditis after cycle 2 of azacitidine, patient 3 presented 3 weeks after completing cycle 5, and patient 2 presented during cycle 1. All patients were treated symptomatically and responded to corticosteroids. None of the patients were re-challenged with hypomethylating agents. Use of the Naranjo adverse drug reaction probability scale indicated a probable adverse drug reaction (score of 6) for patients 1 and 3 and a possible adverse drug reaction (score of 3) for patient 2. CONCLUSION: With the exclusion of other common causes of pericarditis, we believe it is likely that azacitidine was responsible for the findings in our patients. Providers caring for patients receiving hypomethylating agents should consider this potential adverse drug reaction in the setting of unexplained chest pain or other clinical signs consistent with cardiotoxicity.


Assuntos
Antimetabólitos Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Azacitidina/efeitos adversos , Metilases de Modificação do DNA/antagonistas & inibidores , Inibidores Enzimáticos/efeitos adversos , Pericardite/induzido quimicamente , Idoso , Antimetabólitos Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Azacitidina/uso terapêutico , Dor no Peito/etiologia , Dor no Peito/prevenção & controle , Terapia Combinada , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Monitoramento de Medicamentos , Inibidores Enzimáticos/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Glucocorticoides/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/tratamento farmacológico , Masculino , Metilprednisolona/uso terapêutico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Síndromes Mielodisplásicas/tratamento farmacológico , Pericardite/diagnóstico , Pericardite/fisiopatologia , Pericardite/terapia , Prednisona/uso terapêutico , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA