Unilateral Thalamic Infarct Presenting as a Convulsive Seizure.

Lesions of the thalamus and those extending into midbrain can cause various types of movement disorders such as dystonia, asterixis and ballism-chorea. Seizures are rare manifestation of thalamic disorder. Occurrence of seizures in bilateral thalamic infarct has been reported; but seizures in unilateral thalamic infarct have been reported very rarely. Literature review showed only single case of perinatal unilateral thalamic infarct presenting with seizures. We are reporting a unique case of convulsive seizure at the onset of unilateral thalamic infarct in an adult male, which has never been reported to the best of our knowledge.

Rationale for an adjunctive therapy with fenofibrate in pharmacoresistant nocturnal frontal lobe epilepsy.

OBJECTIVE: Nocturnal frontal lobe epilepsy (NFLE) is an idiopathic partial epilepsy with a family history in about 25% of cases, with autosomal dominant inheritance (autosomal dominant NFLE [ADNFLE]). Traditional antiepileptic drugs are effective in about 55% of patients, whereas the rest remains refractory. One of the key pathogenetic mechanisms is a gain of function of neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) containing the mutated α4 or ß2 subunits. Fenofibrate, a common lipid-regulating drug, is an agonist at peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPARα) that is a ligand-activated transcription factor, which negatively modulates the function of ß2-containing nAChR. To test clinical efficacy of adjunctive therapy with fenofibrate in pharmacoresistant ADNFLE\NFLE patients, we first demonstrated the effectiveness of fenofibrate in a mutated mouse model displaying both disease genotype and phenotype. METHODS: We first tested the efficacy of fenofibrate in transgenic mice carrying the mutation in the α4-nAChR subunit (Chrna4S252F) homologous to that found in humans. Subsequently, an add-on protocol was implemented in a clinical setting and fenofibrate was administered to pharmacoresistant NFLE patients. RESULTS: Here, we show that a chronic fenofibrate diet markedly reduced the frequency of large inhibitory postsynaptic currents (IPSCs) recorded from cortical pyramidal neurons in Chrna4S252F mice, and prevented nicotine-induced increase of IPSC frequency. Moreover, fenofibrate abolished differences between genotypes in the frequency of sleep-related movements observed under basal conditions. Patients affected by NFLE, nonresponders to traditional therapy, by means of adjunctive therapy with fenofibrate displayed a reduction of seizure frequency. Furthermore, digital video-polysomnographic recordings acquired in NFLE subjects after 6 months of adjunctive fenofibrate substantiated the significant effects on control of motor-behavioral seizures. SIGNIFICANCE: Our preclinical and clinical studies suggest PPARα as a novel disease-modifying target for antiepileptic drugs due to its ability to regulate dysfunctional nAChRs.

Levetiracetam como terapia adjuvante em pacientes com epilepsia mioclônica juvenil resistentes à monoterapia / Levetiracetam as adjuvant therapy in patients with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy resistant to monotherapy

CONTEXTO: A epilepsia é uma doença cerebral crônica caracterizada pela recorrência de crises epilépticas não provocadas. Conforme Protocolo Clínico e Diretrizes Terapêuticas (PCDT) vigente do Ministério da Saúde (MS), o tratamento disponível no Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS) inclui os agentes antiepilépticos fenobarbital, fenitoína, primidona, topiramato, lamotrigina, carbamazepina e valproato de sódio. As epilepsias idiopáticas generalizadas são classificadas como síndromes epilépticas. A EMJ é a mais comum dentre as síndromes da adolescência e uma das mais frequentemente diagnosticadas. A maioria dos pacientes com EMJ apresentam bom controle do quadro clínico com a utilização do valproato de sódio em monoterapia, mas na falha ou impossibilidade de seu uso, fármacos como a lamotrigina e o levetiracetam podem ser utilizados. TECNOLOGIA: levetiracetam (Keppra®). INDICAÇÃO: Terapia adjuvante, ou seja em associação com o valproato de sódio, em pacientes com epilepsia mioclônica juvenil (EMJ) resistentes à monoterapia. PERGUNTA: O uso do levetiracetam em regime de terapia adjuvante, é eficaz, seguro e custoefetivo em relação à continuação da monoterapia em pacientes com epilepsia mioclônica juvenil, resistentes a outros agentess antiepilépticos na perspectiva do SUS? EVIDÊNCIAS CIENTÍFICAS: A evidência da utilização do levetiracetam associado à tratamento prévio com um agente antiepiléptico para o tratamento da EMJ é baseada em um ensaio clínico duplo-cego que apresentou redução significante de 50% no número de dias por semana com crises convulsivas s (OR = 4,77; IC 95% 2,12 ­ 10,77; p<0,0001 e um maior número de pacientes, que receberam levetiracetam, apresentaram ausência total de crises durante o tratamento (16,7% dos pacientes, p = 0,03, vs 3,3 % do grupo que recebeu placebo). AVALIAÇÃO ECONÔMICA: Foi apresentado um modelo de custo-efetividade comparando a monoterapia com ácido valpróico ao tratamento adjuvante do levetiracetam (associado) ao ácido valpróico. Foi elaborado um modelo baseado primeiramente em uma árvore de decisão, seguido por um modelo de Markov. No caso-base a razão de custo-utilidade incremental (RCUI) foi de R$ 58.294 por ano de vida ajustada pela qualidade, que na análise de sensibilidade univariada variou entre R$ 22.119 e R$ 80.359. Avaliação de Impacto Orçamentário: Conforme as estimativas feitas pelo demandante o impacto orçamentário será de aproximadamente R$ 1,58 milhão no primeiro ano e de R$ 43,6 milhões nos primeiros 5 anos após a incorporação. Na análise de sensibilidade realizada o impacto orçamentário para os próximos 5 anos variou entre R$ 14,5 e R$ 87,3 milhões. EXPERIÊNCIA INTERNACIONAL: o levetiracetam é utilizado em terapia adjuvante para o tratamento de crises mioclônicas em agências como o National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) e Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH), de acordo com condições estabelecidas Discussão: A evidência do tratamento com levetiracetam em pacientes resistentes à monoterapia padrão, associado ao medicamento já utilizado, ocasionou em redução significante de pelo menos 50% no número de dias por semana com crises convulsivas e um maior número de pacientes apresentaram ausência total de crises convulsivas durante seu período de seguimento. Porém trata-se de evidência indireta e de baixa qualidade. Os estudos para essa indicação da tecnologia são escassos e há baixa probabilidade de novos estudos serem realizados. A avaliação econômica foi custo-efetiva na adição do levetiracetam ao medicamento previamente utilizado em monoterapia, em pacientes resistentes, com um impacto orçamentário de até R$ 87,3 milhões em 5 anos, de acordo com a análise de sensibilidade. A secretaria executiva da CONITEC estimou o número de pacientes, que considera mais adequada para o cálculo, que foi 7,8% maior que a população considerada na análise do demandante, o que levaria a um impacto orçamentário ainda maior. RECOMENDAÇÃO DA CONITEC: A CONITEC em sua 54ª reunião no dia 06 de abril de 2017, recomendou preliminarmente a incorporação no SUS do levetiracetam como terapia adjuvante em pacientes com epilepsia mioclônica juvenil resistentes à monoterapia, condicionada à redução de preço e consonância com a atualização do PCDT de Epilepsia. Consulta pública: Foi realizada a Consulta Pública nº 22/2017, entre os dias 25/04/2017 e 16/05/2017 e recebeu 105 contribuições, sendo 88 sobre experiência ou opinião e 17 técnicocientíficas. Todas as contribuições foram avaliadas quantitativamente e qualitativamente. Seu conteúdo não trouxe novas evidências e informações que pudessem modificar a recomendação inicial da CONITEC. DELIBERAÇÃO FINAL: Os membros da CONITEC presentes na 56ª reunião ordinária do plenário do dia 07/06/2017 deliberaram, por unanimidade, por recomendar a incorporação do levetiracetam para pacientes com epilepsia mioclônica juvenil (EMJ) resistentes à monoterapia, associando-o ao medicamento já utilizado, condicionado à negociação de preço e conforme Protocolo Clínico e Diretrizes Terapêuticas do Ministério da Saúde. Foi assinado o Registro de Deliberação nº 264/2017.(AU)

Low risk of seizures with slow flumazenil infusion and routine anticonvulsant prophylaxis for high-dose benzodiazepine dependence.

High-dose benzodiazepine (BZD) dependence represents an emerging and under-reported addiction phenomenon and is associated with reduced quality of life. To date there are no guidelines for the treatment of high-dose BZD withdrawal. Low-dose slow flumazenil infusion was reported to be effective for high-dose BZD detoxification, but there is concern about the risk of convulsions during this treatment. We evaluated the occurrence of seizures in 450 consecutive high-dose BZD dependence patients admitted to our unit from April 2012 to April 2016 for detoxification with low-dose slow subcutaneous infusion of flumazenil associated with routine anticonvulsant prophylaxis. In our sample, 22 patients (4.9%) reported history of convulsions when previously attempting BZD withdrawal. Only four patients (0.9%) had seizures during ( n = 2) or immediately after ( n = 2) flumazenil infusion. The two patients with seizures during flumazenil infusion were poly-drug misusers. The most common antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) used for anticonvulsant prophylaxis were either valproate 1000 mg or levetiracetam 1000 mg. Our data indicate that, when routinely associated with AEDs prophylaxis, low-dose slow subcutaneous flumazenil infusion represents a safe procedure, with low risk of seizure occurrence.

Secondary paroxysmal dyskinesia in multiple sclerosis: Clinical-radiological features and treatment. Case report of seven patients.

Secondary paroxysmal dyskinesias (SPDs) are short, episodic, and recurrent movement disorders, classically related to multiple sclerosis (MS). Carbamazepine is effective, but with risk of adverse reactions. We identified 7 patients with SPD among 457 MS patients (1.53%). SPD occurred in face ( n = 1), leg ( n = 2), or arm +leg ( n = 4) several times during the day. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed new or enhancing lesions in thalamus ( n = 1), mesencephalic tegmentum ( n = 1), and cerebellar peduncles ( n = 5). Patients were treated with clonazepam and then acetazolamide ( n = 1), acetazolamide ( n = 5), or levetiracetam ( n = 1) with response within hours (acetazolamide) to days (levetiracetam). No recurrences or adverse events were reported after a median follow-up of 33 months.

Levetiracetam synergizes with gabapentin, pregabalin, duloxetine and selected antioxidants in a mouse diabetic painful neuropathy model.

RATIONALE: We have reported that levetiracetam, a novel anticonvulsant with analgesic properties, synergizes with ibuprofen/aspirin/paracetamol in a model of diabetic painful neuropathy (DPN). Most guidelines recommend gabapentin, pregabalin, and duloxetine as first- or second-line agents for DPN. OBJECTIVE: We examined the effects of combination treatment of first-/second-line analgesics with levetiracetam in a model of DPN. Additionally, the levetiracetam's combinations with antioxidants, low dose of aspirin, coenzyme Q10, or α-lipoic acid were evaluated. METHODS: Diabetes was induced in C57BL/6 mice with a single high dose of streptozotocin. The antinociceptive effects of orally administered levetiracetam, gabapentin, pregabalin, duloxetine (acute treatment) and aspirin, coenzyme Q10, and α-lipoic acid (preventive 7-day treatment), as well as combinations of levetiracetam with individual drugs were examined in the tail-flick test. In combination experiments, the drugs were coadministered in fixed-dose fractions of single-drug ED50; the type of interaction was determined by isobolographic analysis. RESULTS: About 60-, 32-, 30-, 26-, 18-, and 6-fold reductions of doses of both drugs in levetiracetam combinations with pregabalin, gabapentin, coenzyme Q10, aspirin, duloxetine, and α-lipoic acid, respectively, were detected. CONCLUSIONS: Combinations of levetiracetam with gabapentin/pregabalin/duloxetine that target different mechanisms/sites of action involved in DPN, as well as combinations of levetiracetam and low-dose aspirin/coenzyme Q10/α-lipoic acid that target underlying causes of DPN, produce marked synergistic interactions in reducing nociception in diabetic mice. This suggests that these combination treatments might be of great benefit for diabetic patients and should be explored further in clinical trials.

Resting-state fMRI revealed different brain activities responding to valproic acid and levetiracetam in benign epilepsy with central-temporal spikes.

OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to investigate regional difference in brain activities in response to antiepileptic drug (AED) medications in benign epilepsy with central-temporal spikes (BECTS) using resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). METHODS: Fifty-seven patients with BECTS underwent resting-state fMRI scans after receiving either valproic acid (VPA) (n = 15), levetiracetam (LEV) (n = 21), or no medication (n = 21). fMRI regional homogeneity (ReHo) parameter among the three groups of patients were compared and were correlated with total doses of AED in the two medicated groups. RESULTS: Compared with patients on no-medication, patients receiving either VPA or LEV showed decreased ReHo in the central-temporal region, frontal cortex, and thalamus. In particular, the VPA group showed greater ReHo decrease in the thalamus and milder in cortices and caudate heads compared with the LEV group. In addition, the VPA group demonstrated a negative correlation between ReHo values in the central-temporal region and medication dose. CONCLUSION: Both VPA and LEV inhibit resting-state neural activity in the central-temporal region, which is the main epileptogenic focus of BECTS. VPA reduced brain activity in the cortical epileptogenic regions and thalamus evenly, whereas LEV reduced brain activity predominantly in the cortices. Interestingly, VPA showed a cumulative effect on inhibiting brain activity in the epileptogenic regions in BECTS. KEY POINTS: • Regional differences in brain activity in response to different AEDs in BECTS. • AEDs inhibit resting-state neural activity in epileptogenic and subcortical regions in BECTS. • Valproic acid effect on the cortical epileptogenic regions and thalamus evenly. • Levetiracetam effect seen predominantly in cortices. • Valproic acid has a cumulative effect on inhibiting brain activity in epileptogenic regions.

Serious and reversible levetiracetam-induced psychiatric symptoms after resection of frontal low-grade glioma: two case histories.

Levetiracetam may induce serious behavioral disturbances, especially after surgical resection of frontal lobe low-grade glioma. Two patients, treated with levetiracetam, developed serious psychiatric complications postoperatively which completely resolved after switching to valproate. We aim to create awareness for this serious but reversible adverse effect of levetiracetam in this specific patient category.

Guideline conform initial monotherapy increases in patients with focal epilepsy: A population-based study on German health insurance data.

PURPOSE: To examine the implementation of the clinical practice guideline "first epileptic seizure and epilepsy in adulthood" published in 2008 to patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy between 2008 and 2014. METHOD: This retrospective, population-based analysis was performed on patient data of 4.1 million insurants from the German statutory health insurance. Prevalent and incident cases in adults were identified based on ICD-10 codes, using a hierarchical diagnosis selection algorithm. The first anticonvulsive agent in a newly diagnosed epilepsy patient was validated against the clinical practice guideline. RESULTS: We determined an annual crude prevalence rate in adults between 0.946% and 1.090% and incidence rates of at least 156 per 100,000. A significant increase in guideline compliant monotherapy was found in patients with a focal epilepsy syndrome, while, among patients with idiopathic generalised epilepsies, the share of guideline noncompliant monotherapy increased. Both changes are likely due to the overall increase in prescription of levetiracetam from 19.6% in 2008 to 58.9% in 2014 in all newly treated patients. Overall, the proportion of enzyme-inducing anticonvulsants fell significantly from 20.7% in 2008 to 4.3% in 2014 (p<0.001). The likelihood to receive non-enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs was 5.82 (95% CI 4.62-7.33) higher in 2014 than in 2008. CONCLUSION: Initial monotherapy for focal epilepsy is in line with current clinical practice guidelines and mainly implemented by prescription of levetiracetam. Further evaluations should address the question of whether patients treated in line with the guidelines have a favorable outcome, compared to patients not treated in line with current guidelines.

Levetiracetam prophylaxis ameliorates seizure epileptogenesis after fluid percussion injury.

To determine whether post-traumatic seizure severity would be affected by the interval between seizures and head injury, we measured seizures after various times with or without fluid percussion brain injury (2atm fluid percussion injury; FPI). To determine efficacy of anti-seizure medication, we also determined if levetiracetam (LEV) would alter the relationship between injury and subsequent seizures. Early post-traumatic seizures were induced by Kainic acid (KA) at one week after 2atm fluid percussion injury (FPI) in one group (FPI-ES). Seizures were induced at two weeks after FPI by KA in another group (FPI-LS). In addition, one group had induced seizures by KA without FPI, (sham-ES). Finally one group of animals received the antiepileptic agent (levetiracetam) infusion for one week after FPI and then had seizures induced by KA (FPI-LEV-ES). We measured seizure onset time, ictal duration and severity of seizures using a modified Racine's scale. Histopathological changes in the hippocampus CA1 region were also analyzed. Severity of seizures were increased in the FPI-ES group compared with sham-ES animals. Severity was also enhanced in early post-injury seizures induced by KA (FPI-ES vs. FPI-LS); this exacerbation of seizure severity could be ameliorated by levetiracetam infusion (FPI-ES vs. FPI-LEV-ES). Neuronal degeneration in CA1 was more severe in the FPI-ES group and this degeneration was also diminished by LEV. We conclude that early post injury seizures exacerbate susceptibility and severity of post traumatic seizures and increase neuronal degeneration in the CA1 layer of hippocampus. These changes are partially reversed by LEV infusion after FPI.

Aggravation of atonic seizures by rufinamide: A case report.

BACKGROUND: Rufinamide is a novel antiepileptic drug used as adjunctive therapy in patients with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome and provides seizure control especially in tonic and atonic seizures. Rufinamide is expected to be effective in intractable epilepsy when atonic and tonic seizures exist. However, rufinamide induced seizure aggravation has been reported in a few patients, which was not associated with a specific type of seizure. CASE: A 12-year-old boy with intractable epilepsy had tonic and atonic seizures despite treatment with valproic acid (3000mg/day), levetiracetam (3000mg/day) and clobazam (40mg/day). Rufinamide was administered as adjuvant therapy. After 2weeks on rufinamide, he experienced atonic seizure worsening, and the frequency of epileptic discharges increased. The deterioration in seizure frequency and epileptiform discharges resolved when rufinamide was discontinued. CONCLUSION: Rufinamide may aggravate atonic seizures in patients with intractable epilepsy.

Effect of levetiracetam versus gabapentin on peripheral neuropathy and sciatic degeneration in streptozotocin-diabetic mice: Influence on spinal microglia and astrocytes.

Peripheral diabetic neuropathy develops in diabetic patients. The current study tested the antiallodynic and antihyperalgesic effects of the anticonvulsant drug, levetiracetam compared with the standard drug, gabapentin, in a model of streptozotocin-induced peripheral diabetic neuropathy. Male albino mice were injected intraperitoneally with streptozotocin (40mg/kg) for five consecutive days to induce type 1 diabetes mellitus. After development of peripheral diabetic neuropathy, mice were then treated orally with 10 doses of levetiracetam or gabapentin (or vehicle). The effect of multiple doses of levetiracetam on the histopathology of sciatic nerve and spinal cord was tested. Furthermore, the effect of levetiracetam on the spinal expression of microglia and astrocytes was examined in comparison with gabapentin. Results indicated that the highest dose of levetiracetam and all doses of gabapentin increased the withdrawal threshold in von Frey test. Furthermore, all doses of levetiracetam and gabapentin prolonged the reaction time exhibited by diabetic mice tested in hot plate test. Both drugs provided protection for the sciatic nerve and the spinal cord. In addition, levetiracetam (20 and 40mg/kg) decreased spinal immunostaining for CD11b (microglia marker) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP, astrocytes marker) however; the high dose of gabapentin (40mg/kg) reduced the spinal immunostaining for GFAP only. In conclusion, levetiracetam produced antiallodynic and antihyperalgesic effect in diabetic mice with favorable effects on sciatic nerve and spinal cord that were accompanied by downregulation of the spinal expression of microglia and astrocytes. Thus, levetiracetam may have promise in alleviating neuropathic pain in diabetic patients.

"Herbal seizures"--atypical symptoms after ibogaine intoxication: a case report.

INTRODUCTION: Misuse of various new psychotropic substances such as ibogaine is increasing rapidly. Knowledge of their negative side effects is sparse. CASE PRESENTATION: We present a case of intoxication with the herbal substance ibogaine in a 22-year-old white man. After taking a cumulative dose of 38 g (taken in two doses), he developed visual memories, nausea and vomiting. He developed a generalized tonic-clonic seizure with additional grand mal seizures. He was treated with midazolam and levetiracetam. Extended drug screenings and computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging findings were all negative. CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge of the side effects of ibogaine has mainly come from reports of cardiovascular complications; seizures are rarely mentioned and experimental findings are inconsistent. It seems that ibogaine acts like a proconvulsive drug at high doses.

The bone mineral content alterations in pediatric patients medicated with levetiracetam, valproic acid, and carbamazepine.

AIM: The negative effect of antiepileptic drugs on bone health has been previously documented. However, which antiepileptic drug is safer in regard to bone health is still questionable. Our aims were to investigate the bone mineral density alterations in pediatric patients who receive antiepileptic medication for a minimum of two years and to compare the results of these drugs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-nine patients (32 males, 27 females; mean age: 8.6±4.6years) and a control group (13 males, 7 females; mean age: 7.6±3.3years) were included in the study. The patients were receiving necessarily the same antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) for at least two years, and none of the patients had mental retardation or cerebral palsy. The patients were divided into three groups: group 1 (patients receiving levetiracetam (LEV), n=20), group 2 (patients receiving carbamazepine (CBZ), n=11), and group 3 (patients receiving valproic acid (VPA), n=28). Plasma calcium (Ca), phosphorus (P), parathyroid hormone (PTH), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), vitamin D levels, and bone mineral density (BMD) values of femur and vertebras (L1-4) and z-scores (comparative results of BMD values of the patients with the age- and gender-matched controls in device database) of the groups were compared. RESULTS: The differences between P, PTH, ALP and age, Ca and BMD results, and vitamin D levels of the patients in all four groups was not statistically significant according to Kruskal-Wallis test (p>0.05). The z-score levels of all the patient and control groups were also not statistically significantly different compared with each other. CONCLUSION: In contrast to previous reports in pediatric patients, our study has documented that there is not a considerable bone loss in patients receiving long-term AED medication. Although levetiracetam has been proposed as bone-protecting medication, we did not observe any difference between AEDs regarding bone mineral density after two years of treatment.

A rare cause of status epilepticus; alpha lipoic acid intoxication, case report and review of the literature.

INTRODUCTION: Alpha lipoic acid is a powerful antioxidant widely used for the supplementary treatment of diabetic neuropathy. Intoxication with alpha lipoic acid is very rare. There is no reported dose of safety in children. CASE REPORT: A 14-month-old previously healthy girl was referred to our hospital with the diagnosis of drug intoxication. She was admitted to the emergency department with lethargy and continuing involuntary movements for several hours after she had ingested an unknown amount of alpha lipoic acid. On admission she was lethargic and had myoclonic seizures involving all extremities. She had no fever and laboratory examinations were normal except for mild metabolic acidosis. The seizures were unresponsive to bolus midazolam, phenytoin infusion and levetiracetam infusion. She was taken to the pediatric intensive care unit with the diagnosis of status epilepticus. After failure of the treatment with midazolam infusion she was intubated and thiopental sodium infusion was started. Her myoclonic seizures were controlled with thiopental sodium infusion. After 48 h intubation and mechanical ventilation thiopental sodium was gradually reduced and then stopped. Following the withdraw of thiopental sodium, she was seizure free on her discharge on the 8th day. CONCLUSION: Alpha lipoic acid and derivatives cause side effects in children like refractory convulsions. They are frequently rendered as vitamins by diabetic patients and are left at places where children can easily access them. Therefore, when faced with refractory convulsions in children who have had no disease before, intoxication by medicaments with alpha lipoic acid should be taken into consideration.

Omega 3 polyunsaturated fatty acids enhance the protective effect of levetiracetam against seizures, cognitive impairment and hippocampal oxidative DNA damage in young kindled rats.

Levetiracetam (LEV) is a unique, effective, relatively safe antiepileptic drug that preferentially interacts with synaptic vesicle protein 2A (SV2A). This study aimed to explore the effect of combined treatment of LEV with omega 3 (OM3) on cognitive impairment and hippocampal oxidative stress and DNA damage induced by seizures in the PTZ-kindled young rat model. Cognitive functions, biomarkers of oxidative stress, and DNA damage were assessed in PTZ-kindled young rats pretreated with single and combined treatment of LEV (30mg/kg, i.p.) and OM3 (200mg/kg, p.o.). Pretreatment with LEV and OM3 at the tested doses significantly attenuated PTZ-induced seizures and decreased cognitive impairment in both passive avoidance and elevated plus maze tests in the PTZ-kindled rats. Moreover, the increase in hippocampal glutamate, malondialdehyde and 8-hydroxy-2-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG) levels, as well as the decrease in reduced glutathione (GSH) levels and GSH-peroxidase and superoxide dismutase activities induced by PTZ kindling, significantly decreased. These effects were higher with combined treatment of LEV with OM3 and significantly more than the observed effects of single LEV or OM3. In conclusion, the combined treatment of LEV with OM3 is more effective in seizure control and alleviating the cognitive impairment induced by PTZ kindling in the young rat model, the effects that result from the decrease in hippocampal oxidative stress and DNA damage which can be attributed to the antioxidant properties of both LEV and OM3. These results may be promising for the use of LEV and OM3 combination in the treatment of epileptic children.

Levetiracetam synergises with common analgesics in producing antinociception in a mouse model of painful diabetic neuropathy.

Painful diabetic neuropathy is difficult to treat. Single analgesics often have insufficient efficacy and poor tolerability. Combination therapy may therefore be of particular benefit, because it might provide optimal analgesia with fewer adverse effects. This study aimed to examine the type of interaction between levetiracetam, a novel anticonvulsant with analgesic properties, and commonly used analgesics (ibuprofen, aspirin and paracetamol) in a mouse model of painful diabetic neuropathy. Diabetes was induced in C57BL/6 mice with a single high dose of streptozotocin, applied intraperitoneally (150 mg/kg). Thermal (tail-flick test) and mechanical (electronic von Frey test) nociceptive thresholds were measured before and three weeks after diabetes induction. The antinociceptive effects of orally administered levetiracetam, analgesics, and their combinations were examined in diabetic mice that developed thermal/mechanical hypersensitivity. In combination experiments, the drugs were co-administered in fixed-dose fractions of single drug ED50 and the type of interaction was determined by isobolographic analysis. Levetiracetam (10-100 mg/kg), ibuprofen (2-50 mg/kg), aspirin (5-75 mg/kg), paracetamol (5-100 mg/kg), and levetiracetam-analgesic combinations produced significant, dose-dependent antinociceptive effects in diabetic mice in both tests. In the tail-flick test, isobolographic analysis revealed 15-, and 19-fold reduction of doses of both drugs in the combination of levetiracetam with aspirin/ibuprofen, and paracetamol, respectively. In the von Frey test, approximately 7- and 9-fold reduction of doses of both drugs was detected in levetiracetam-ibuprofen and levetiracetam-aspirin/levetiracetam-paracetamol combinations, respectively. These results show synergism between levetiracetam and ibuprofen/aspirin/paracetamol in a model of painful diabetic neuropathy and might provide a useful approach to the treatment of patients suffering from painful diabetic neuropathy.

Epilepsy update, part 2: nursing care and evidence-based treatment.

OVERVIEW: As new research has increased our understanding of epilepsy and the challenges patients with epilepsy face, the role of the nurse as an educator and advocate has grown. This article, the second in a two-part series, addresses the most important aspects of assessing and caring for patients with epilepsy-highlighting the seizure first-aid instructions that all family members of a patient with epilepsy should have; the teaching points to share with parents of young children with epilepsy; and online epilepsy resources for patients, family members, and health care professionals. The authors also discuss current medical, surgical, neurostimulatory, and dietary approaches to epilepsy treatment.