Idarucizumab and factor Xa reversal agents: role in hospital guidelines and protocols.

As expected with all antithrombotic agents, there is a risk of bleeding complications in patients receiving direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) because of the DOAC itself, acute trauma, invasive procedures, or underlying comorbidities. For many bleeding events, a prudent course of action will be to withdraw the DOAC, then "wait and support" the patient, with the expectation that the bleeding event should resolve with time. Likewise, DOAC therapy may be interrupted ahead of a planned procedure, the stopping time being dependent on the agent involved and the patient's renal function. However, urgent reversal of anticoagulation is required in patients with serious or life-threatening bleeding or in those requiring urgent surgery or procedures. Novel specific reversal agents, either under development or recently approved, will need to be incorporated into local anticoagulation reversal protocols. For dabigatran-treated patients, idarucizumab recently has been approved for clinical use in cases of life-threatening or uncontrolled bleeding or when patients require emergency surgery or urgent procedures, both associated with a high risk of bleeding. As clinical experience with individual specific reversal agents grows, their roles in managing major bleeding events in DOAC-treated patients will become better defined. Future research, as well as ongoing use of idarucizumab, should help establish when it is appropriate to re-dose with idarucizumab, coadminister with prothrombin complex concentrates, or re-initiate DOAC after idarucizumab use. Ongoing trials should help identify the appropriate doses and expected durations of effect for andexanet alfa and ciraparantag, which are likely to vary depending on the individual oral anticoagulants.

Optimizing the safety of treatment for venous thromboembolism in the era of direct oral anticoagulants.

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are rapidly replacing vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE). The DOACs include dabigatran, which inhibits thrombin, and rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban, which inhibit factor Xa. When compared with conventional VTE treatment consisting of a parenteral anticoagulant followed by a VKA, the DOACs were equally effective for prevention of recurrence, but were associated with less bleeding. With similar efficacy, better safety, and the convenience of fixed dosing without the need for routine coagulation monitoring, guidelines now recommend DOACs over VKAs for VTE treatment in patients without active cancer. Nonetheless, measures are needed to optimize the safety of DOACs. Focusing on these measures, this paper summarizes the results of phase III trials evaluating DOACs for VTE treatment; identifies which VTE patients are or are not candidates for DOACs; provides guidance on how to choose among DOACs; lists the licensed dosing information for DOACs; discusses the optimal treatment duration for VTE; describes periprocedural management of DOACs in patients requiring surgery or intervention; and finally, reviews the management of bleeding, including the role for specific reversal agents.

[Treatment with inhibitors of new oral direct anticoagulants in patients with severe bleedings or urgent surgical procedures. The new dabigatran antidote: the place of idarucizumab in clinical practice]. / Teendok súlyos vérzés vagy sürgos sebészeti beavatkozás esetén direkt orális antikoaguláns gyógyszerrel kezeltekben. Az új dabigatran-antidótum: idarucizumab helye a klinikai gyakorlatban.

Only vitamin K antagonists could be applied as oral anticoagulants over the past six decades. Coumarols have narrow therapeutic range, and unpredictable anticoagulant effects are resulted by multiple drug interactions. Therefore, regular routine monitoring of the international normalized ratio is necessary. There are two groups of factor-specific anticoagulants: molecules with anti-FIIa (dabigatran) and anti-FXa (rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban) effect. Author summarizes the most important clinical features of the new oral anticoagulants, their indications and the possibilities of laboratory controls. Bleedings are the most important side effects of anticoagulants. This review summarizes the current published evidences for new oral anticoagulants reversal (non-specific and specific) agents, especially in cases with severe acute bleedings or urgent surgery procedures. It reports on how to use inhibitors, the recommended doses and the most important clinical results. The review focuses on idarucizumab - already approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency - which has a key role as the first specific inhibitor of dabigatran.

Comparison of the Novel Oral Anticoagulants Apixaban, Dabigatran, Edoxaban, and Rivaroxaban in the Initial and Long-Term Treatment and Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Anticoagulation with low molecular weight heparin and vitamin K antagonists is the current standard of care (SOC) for venous thromboembolism (VTE) treatment and prevention. Although novel oral anti-coagulants (NOACs) have been compared with SOC in this indication, no head-to-head randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have directly compared NOACs. A systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) were conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of NOACs for the initial and long-term treatment of VTE. METHODS: Electronic databases (accessed July 2014) were systematically searched to identify RCTs evaluating apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban versus SOC. Eligible patients included adults with an objectively confirmed deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE) or both. A fixed-effect Bayesian NMA was conducted for outcomes of interest, and results were presented as relative risks (RR) and 95% credible intervals (Crl). RESULTS: Six Phase III RCTs met criteria for inclusion: apixaban (one RCT; n = 5,395); rivaroxaban (two RCTs; n = 3,423/4,832); dabigatran (two RCTs; n = 2,539/2,568); edoxaban (one RCT; n = 8,240). There were no statistically significant differences between the NOACs with regard to the risk of 'VTE and VTE-related death. Apixaban treatment was associated with the most favourable safety profile of the NOACs, showing a statistically significantly reduced risk of 'major or clinically relevant non-major (CRNM) bleed' compared with rivaroxaban (0.47 [0.36, 0.61]), dabigatran (0.69 [0.51, 0.94]), and edoxaban (0.54 [0.41, 0.69]). Dabigatran was also associated with a significantly lower risk of 'major or CRNM bleed' compared with rivaroxaban (0.68 [0.53, 0.87]) and edoxaban (0.77 [0.60, 0.99]). CONCLUSIONS: Indirect comparisons showed statistically similar reductions in the risk of 'VTE or VTE-related death for all NOACs. In contrast, reductions in 'major or CRNM bleed' for initial/long-term treatment were significantly better with apixaban compared with all other NOACs, and with dabigatran compared with rivaroxaban and edoxaban. Results from the current analysis indicate that the NOACs offer clinical benefit over conventional therapy while highlighting relative differences in their bleeding profile.

Hedgehog Pathway Inhibition for Locally Advanced Periocular Basal Cell Carcinoma and Basal Cell Nevus Syndrome.

PURPOSE: To review our experience treating patients with the Hedgehog pathway inhibitor, vismodegib, in patients with orbital or periocular locally advanced or metastatic basal cell carcinoma (BCC) or basal cell nevus syndrome. DESIGN: Retrospective interventional case series. METHODS: We reviewed all patients with locally advanced or metastatic orbital or periocular BCC or basal cell nevus syndrome treated with the Hedgehog pathway inhibitor, vismodegib, at a comprehensive cancer center from 2009 through 2015. Reviewed data included age; sex; American Joint Commission on Cancer tumor, node, metastasis staging system designation; type and grade of drug-related side effects; response to treatment; duration of follow-up, and status at last follow-up. RESULTS: The study included 10 white men and 2 white women; the median age was 64.5 years. Ten patients had locally advanced BCC; 2 had basal cell nevus syndrome. Among the patients with locally advanced BCC, 5 had T3bN0M0 disease at presentation; 1 each had T3aN0M0, T3bN1M0, T2N1M1, T4N1M1, and T4N2cM1 disease. Overall, 3 patients had a complete response, 6 had a partial response, and 3 had stable disease at last follow-up. Two patients developed progressive disease after a complete response for 38 months and stable disease for 16 months, respectively. All patients developed grade I drug-related adverse effects, most commonly muscle spasms (12 patients), weight loss (10), dysgeusia (9), alopecia (9), decreased appetite (5), and fatigue (4). Five patients developed grade II adverse effects. At last follow-up, none of the 5 patients presenting with T3bN0M0, nor the patient with T3bN1M0 disease, had required orbital exenteration. CONCLUSION: Hedgehog pathway inhibition produces a significant clinical response in most patients with locally advanced or metastatic orbital or periocular BCC or basal cell nevus syndrome and can obviate orbital exenteration in some patients. Drug-related adverse effects are manageable in most patients.

Captopril attenuates hypertension and renal injury induced by the vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitor sorafenib.

Vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors (VEGFi) are known to cause hypertension and renal injury that severely limits their use as an anticancer therapy. We hypothesized that the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor captopril not only prevents hypertension, but also decreases renal injury caused by the VEGFi sorafenib. Rats were administered sorafenib (20 mg/kg per day) alone or in combination with captopril (40 mg/kg per day) for 4 weeks. Sorafenib administration increased blood pressure, which plateaued by day 10. Concurrent treatment with captopril for 4 weeks resulted in a 30 mmHg decrease in blood pressure compared with sorafenib alone (155 ± 5 vs 182 ± 6 mmHg, respectively; P < 0.05). Furthermore, concurrent captopril treatment reduced albuminuria by 50% compared with sorafenib alone (20 ± 8 vs 42 ± 9 mg/day, respectively; P < 0.05) and reduced nephrinuria by eightfold (280 ± 96 vs 2305 ± 665 µg/day, respectively; P < 0.05). Glomerular injury, thrombotic microangiopathy and tubular cast formation were also decreased in captopril-treated rats administered sorafenib. Renal autoregulatory efficiency was determined by evaluating the afferent arteriolar constrictor response to ATP. Sorafenib administration attenuated the vasoconstriction to ATP, whereas concurrent captopril treatment improved ATP reactivity. In conclusion, captopril attenuated hypertension and renal injury and improved renal autoregulatory capacity in rats administered sorafenib. These findings indicate that captopril treatment, in addition to alleviating the detrimental side-effect of hypertension, decreases the renal injury associated with anticancer VEGFi therapies such as sorafenib.

ABT-594 (a nicotinic acetylcholine agonist): anti-allodynia in a rat chemotherapy-induced pain model.

ABT-594 ((R)-5-(2-azetidinylmethoxy)-2-chloropyridine) represents a novel class of broad-spectrum analgesics whose primary mechanism of action is activation of the neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. The present study characterized the effects of ABT-594 in a rat chemotherapy-induced neuropathic pain model, where it attenuated mechanical allodynia with an ED50 = 40 nmol/kg (i.p.). This anti-allodynic effect was not blocked by systemic (i.p.) pretreatment with naloxone but was blocked completely with mecamylamine. Pretreatment with chlorisondamine (0.2-5 micromol/kg, i.p.) only partially blocked the effects of ABT-594 at the higher doses tested. In contrast, central (i.c.v.) pretreatment with chlorisondamine completely blocked ABT-594's anti-allodynic effect. Taken together, the data demonstrate that ABT-594 has a potent anti-allodynic effect in the rat vincristine model and that, in addition to its strong central site of action, ABT-594's effects are partially mediated by peripheral nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in this animal model of chemotherapy-induced neuropathic pain.

Differential effect of phosphodiesterase IV inhibitor RP73401 on various inflammatory and immune responses relevent to rheumatoid arthritis.

Phosphodiesterase (PDE) IV inhibitors have been reported to possess potent anti-inflammatory activities through enhancement of cAMP. In this study, the immunopharmacological effect of PDE IV inhibitor (RP73401) was further carefully evaluated. RP73401 strongly blocked the production of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha from lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-stimulated murine macrophages (RAW264.7) and human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) and LPS-primed mice. RP73401 did not relieve joint inflammation in adjuvant-arthritis (RA) model, whereas the compound attenuated arachidonic acid-induced inflammation. RP73401 displayed weak or no modulatory effects on the activation of macrophage and lymphocytes (assessed by proliferation, nitric oxide (NO) release and cell-cell adhesion, TNF-alpha production upon phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) treatment), and fluorescein-isothiocynate (FITC)-induced ear oedema. Collectively, these data suggest that PDE IV inhibitor RP73401 may differentially modulate various immune responses and these may explain its inability to inhibit adjuvant-induced joint inflammation or FITC-induced ear oedema.

Vasopeptidase inhibitor omapatrilat induces profound insulin sensitization and increases myocardial glucose uptake in Zucker fatty rats: Studies comparing a vasopeptidase inhibitor, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, and angiotensin II type I receptor blocker.

BACKGROUND: ACE inhibitors (ACEIs) improve insulin resistance and prevent type 2 diabetes, possibly mediated by inhibition of bradykinin (BK) degradation. The vasopeptidase inhibitor omapatrilat (OMA) raises BK to a greater extent than ACEIs by dual enzyme inhibition, whereas its insulin-sensitizing effects and mechanisms have not been investigated. METHODS AND RESULTS: We compared the insulin-sensitizing effects of OMA, ramipril (an ACEI), losartan (an angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker), and placebo by 2-step euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp in insulin-resistant Zucker fatty rats (n=6 to 7 in each group). OMA resulted in a lower rate of endogenous glucose production than placebo at baseline (35+/-5 versus 54+/-4 mmol x kg(-1) x min(-1), P<0.01), greater suppression of endogenous glucose production by low-dose insulin (73+/-11% versus 27+/-18%, P<0.05), and greater glucose disposal at high-dose insulin (135+/-5 versus 92+/-4 mmol x kg(-1) x min(-1), P<0.01). Ramipril tended to improve insulin sensitivity, but losartan did not. OMA significantly increased 2-deoxyglucose uptake by myocardium, fat, and skeletal muscle. Ramipril increased 2-deoxyglucose uptake only by some skeletal muscles, but losartan did not. The insulin-sensitizing effects of OMA were blocked significantly by HOE-140 (a BK, B2 receptor antagonist) and NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (a nitric oxide synthase inhibitor) in all tissues except myocardium. CONCLUSIONS: OMA induces profound insulin sensitization and increases myocardial glucose uptake in Zucker fatty rats. This effect is greater than that of ramipril and probably occurs at least in part via stimulation of the B2 receptor. OMA has the potential for greater type 2 diabetes prevention than ACEI.

2-[18F]F-A-85380: a PET radioligand for alpha4beta2 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors.

2-[18F]fluoro-3-(2(S)-azetidinylmethoxy)pyridine (2-[18F]F-A-85380), a ligand for nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) was evaluated in an in vitro binding assay with membranes of rat brain and in vivo by PET in Rhesus monkey brain. The ligand has high affinity for alpha4beta2 nAChRs (K(D)=50 pM), crosses the blood-brain barrier, and distributes in the monkey brain in a pattern consistent with that of alpha4beta2 nAChRs. The specific/non-specific binding ratio increased steadily, reaching a value of 3.3 in the thalamus at 4 h. The specific binding of 2-[18F]F-A-85380 was reversed by cytisine. These results, in combination with the data demonstrating low toxicity of 2-[18F]F-A-85380, indicate that this ligand shows promise for use with PET in human subjects.

Differential regional antagonism of 8-OH-DPAT-induced decrease in serotonin synthesis by two 5-HT1A receptor antagonists.

The effects of two 5-HT1A receptor antagonists, (R)-3-N, N-dicyclobutylamino-8-fluoro-3,4-dihydro-2 H-1-benzopyran-5-carboxamide hydrogen (2 R,3 R)-tartrate monohydrate (NAD-299) and N-(2-(1-(2-methoxyphenyl)-piperazinyl))ethyl)-N-(2-pyridinyl) cyclohexanecarboxamide trihydrochloride (WAY-100635) on the decrease in 5-hydroxytryptophan (5-HTP) accumulation evoked by (RS)-2-dipropylamino-8-hydroxy-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalene (8-OH-DPAT) in rats treated with the decarboxylase inhibitor, 3-hydroxyphenylhydrazine (NSD 1015) were studied in four rat brain regions: hippocampus, hypothalamus, striatum and frontal cortex. Dose-response studies revealed differential effects of both antagonists in the areas examined. Both antagonists were significantly more potent in antagonising the effect of 0.30 and 0.76 micromol/kg s.c. 8-OH-DPAT in hippocampus than in hypothalamus, striatum and frontal cortex in mentioned order. This order of potency was the opposite to that found for 8-OH-DPAT in decreasing the 5-HTP accumulation. Since previous studies by others have indicated that the reserve of somatodendritic 5-HT1A receptors is greater in dorsal raphe nucleus innervating frontal cortex and striatum than in median raphe nucleus which mainly innervates hippocampus, the observed different regional potency of the two 5-HT1A receptor antagonists may be explained by this difference in the 5-HT1A receptor reserve.

Behavioral evaluation of the anti-excitotoxic properties of MK-801: comparison with neurochemical measurements.

The ability of MK-801 to protect striatal neurons from the excitotoxic action of quinolinic acid was evaluated by means of apomorphine-induced rotational behavior and by measurement of striatal choline acetyltransferase (ChAT) and glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) activity, neurochemical markers for cholinergic and GABAergic neurons, respectively. Animals with a unilateral quinolinic acid lesion of the striatum exhibited a vigorous rotational response when challenged with apomorphine (0.5 mg/kg, s.c.) 6 days later and were found to have an 88 90% depletion of striatal ChAT and GAD activity. Treatment with a high dose of MK-801 (10 mg/kg, i.p.) prior to intrastriatal injection of quinolinic acid eliminated the subsequent rotational response to apomorphine and resulted in complete protection of striatal ChAT and GAD activity. Lower doses of MK-801 (1, 3 and 5 mg/kg, i.p.) failed to significantly reduce the rotational response to apomorphine but provided partial, dose-dependent protection of both ChAT and GAD activity. The rotational response to apomorphine correlated with the percent reduction in both ChAT activity (r = 0.57, P less than 0.0005) and GAD activity (r = 0.49, P less than 0.0005). Rotational behavior may thus provide a means to evaluate the functional integrity of the striatum.