Chest physiotherapy for the prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia: A meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) remains a frequent and severe complication in mechanically ventilated patients. We undertook a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of chest physiotherapy (CPT) for the prevention of VAP. METHODS: A systematic literature search of PubMed and Embase databases were searched up until November 25, 2018 for published studies of mechanically ventilated patients comparing CPT with controls and reporting on the occurrence of VAP. Two authors independently selected studies and abstracted data on study quality and outcomes. We pooled data using random-effects models. RESULTS: A total of 6 randomized (n = 704) controlled trials were identified. CPT did not significantly reduce the incidence of VAP (risk ratio = 1.02; 95% confidence interval, 0.82-1.26; P = .87), but reduced hospital mortality (risk ratio = 0.68; 95% confidence interval, 0.48-0.95; P = .02). No significant differences were observed regarding intensive care unit mortality, length of intensive care unit stay, and duration of mechanical ventilation. CONCLUSIONS: CPT may not significantly reduce the incidence of VAP and alter other important clinical outcomes in adult patients receiving mechanical ventilation. However, the results should be interpreted cautiously owing to the heterogeneity and the limited trials. Further large-scale, well-designed randomized controlled trials are needed.

[THE UTILITY OF BRONCHOSCOPY IN INTENSIVE CARE UNIT PATIENTS WITH VENTILATOR ASSOCIATED PNEUMONIA].

BACKGROUND: Ventilator associated pneumonia (VAPI is a common complication leading to lengthier hospitalizations and higher mortality. Prompt adequate initial antibiotic coverage is the crucial issue affecting survival. Currently, there is no gold standard diagnostic test. No conclusive data regarding the benefit of bronchoscopy exists in the literature reviewed. AIM: This study aims to evaluate the change of prognosis for patients who developed VAP, following a positive culture from bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL). DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study. SETTING: General intensive care unit in a tertiary university healthcare center. PARTICIPANTS: All patients who were admitted to Surgical ICU and developed VAP and who then underwent diagnostic bronchoscopy with BAL between the period 01/02/2007 - 31/02/2011. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: A total of 66 patients who were admitted to the ICU, developed VAP and underwent bronchoscopy while ventilated; 30 patients were excluded. The positive BAL culture group was compared to the negative BAL culture group; there was no difference between demographic and clinical characteristics, mortality rates (for 30 days) or therapy change between the two groups. No complications were reported regarding the bronchoscopy procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate that performing y a diagnostic bronchoscopy with BAL does not improve the prognosis of patients with VAP. Furthermore, expanded prospective studies will be needed to conclude regarding its benefit in diagnosis and subsequent rectifying of therapy.