Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials: Medical therapies for the treatment and prevention of pouchitis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: We conducted a systematic review to assess medical therapy for the treatment and prevention of pouchitis. METHODS: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of medical therapy in adults with or without pouchitis were searched to March 2022. Primary outcomes included clinical remission/response, maintenance of remission and prevention of pouchitis. RESULTS: Twenty RCTs (N = 830) were included. Acute pouchitis: One study compared ciprofloxacin with metronidazole. At 2 weeks, 100% (7/7) of ciprofloxacin participants achieved remission, compared with 67% (6/9) of metronidazole participants (RR: 1.44, 95% CI: 0.88-2.35, very low certainty evidence). One study compared budesonide enemas with oral metronidazole. Fifty percent (6/12) of budesonide participants achieved remission compared with 43% (6/14) of metronidazole participants (RR: 1.17, 95% CI: 0.51-2.67, low certainty evidence). Chronic pouchitis: Two studies (n = 76) assessed De Simone Formulation. Eighty-five percent (34/40) of De Simone Formulation participants maintained remission at 9-12 months compared with 3% (1/36) placebo participants (RR: 18.50, 95% CI: 3.86-88.56, moderate certainty evidence). One study assessed vedolizumab. Thirty-one percent (16/51) of vedolizumab participants achieved clinical remission at 14 weeks compared with 10% (5/51) of placebo participants (RR: 3.20, 95% CI: 1.27-8.08, moderate certainty evidence). PROPHYLAXIS: Two studies assessed De Simone Formulation. Ninety percent (18/20) of De Simone Formulation participants did not develop pouchitis compared with 60% (12/20) of placebo participants (RR: 1.50, 95% CI: 1.02-2.21, moderate certainty evidence). CONCLUSIONS: Apart from vedolizumab and the De Simone formulation, the effects of other medical interventions for pouchitis are uncertain.

Vedolizumab for the Treatment of Chronic Pouchitis.

BACKGROUND: Approximately half the patients with ulcerative colitis who undergo restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) will subsequently have pouchitis, and among those patients, one fifth will have chronic pouchitis. METHODS: We conducted a phase 4, double-blind, randomized trial to evaluate vedolizumab in adult patients in whom chronic pouchitis had developed after undergoing IPAA for ulcerative colitis. Patients were assigned (in a 1:1 ratio) to receive vedolizumab intravenously at a dose of 300 mg or placebo on day 1 and at weeks 2, 6, 14, 22, and 30. All the patients received concomitant ciprofloxacin from weeks 1 to 4. The primary end point was modified Pouchitis Disease Activity Index (mPDAI)-defined remission (an mPDAI score of ≤4 and a reduction from baseline of ≥2 points in the mPDAI total score; scores range from 0 to 12, with higher scores indicating more severe pouchitis) at week 14. The mPDAI is based on clinical symptoms and endoscopic findings. Other efficacy end points included mPDAI-defined remission at week 34, mPDAI-defined response (a reduction from baseline of ≥2 points in the mPDAI score) at weeks 14 and 34, and PDAI-defined remission (a PDAI score of ≤6 and a reduction from baseline of ≥3 points; scores range from 0 to 18, with higher scores indicating more severe pouchitis) at weeks 14 and 34. The PDAI is based on clinical symptoms, endoscopic findings, and histologic findings. RESULTS: Among the 102 patients who underwent randomization, the incidence of mPDAI-defined remission at week 14 was 31% (16 of 51 patients) with vedolizumab and 10% (5 of 51 patients) with placebo (difference, 21 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], 5 to 38; P = 0.01). Differences in favor of vedolizumab over placebo were also seen with respect to mPDAI-defined remission at week 34 (difference, 17 percentage points; 95% CI, 0 to 35), mPDAI-defined response at week 14 (difference, 30 percentage points; 95% CI, 8 to 48) and at week 34 (difference, 22 percentage points; 95% CI, 2 to 40), and PDAI-defined remission at week 14 (difference, 25 percentage points; 95% CI, 8 to 41) and at week 34 (difference, 19 percentage points; 95% CI, 2 to 37). Serious adverse events occurred in 3 of 51 patients (6%) in the vedolizumab group and in 4 of 51 patients (8%) in the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with vedolizumab was more effective than placebo in inducing remission in patients who had chronic pouchitis after undergoing IPAA for ulcerative colitis. (Funded by Takeda; EARNEST ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02790138; EudraCT number, 2015-003472-78.).

Is biologic therapy effective for antibiotic-refractory pouchitis?

MAIN TEXT INTRODUCTION: The use of biologic therapy for antibiotic-refractory pouchitis is controversial, due to few studies on the subject and lack of convincing results. OBJECTIVES: To study the efficacy of biologic therapy for refractory pouchitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, patient records at the Medical and Surgical departments in our hospital during an eleven-year period were scrutinized. 25 patients treated with biologics for refractory pouchitis were identified. RESULTS: The majority of these patients (n = 19, 76%) had either good or partial effect of biologic therapy for refractory pouchitis. Six of these patients did not respond until the second or third-line treatment. All naïve patients (n = 14) had good or partial response regardless if the diagnosis was idiopathic or Crohn's-like pouchitis. In comparison, only 45% (n = 5) of the patients with prior exposure to biologics (n = 11) had a positive response. Six of ten patients treated with second or third-line therapy had a good or partial response. All not naïve patients who had previously been treated with Infliximab (n = 9) had adverse reactions when the same drug was given for pouchitis. CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective study suggests that biologic therapy may be effective for both idiopathic and Crohn's-like refractory pouchitis. Naïve patients seem to respond more successfully than not naïve patients. In cases without response on first-line treatment should second-line treatment be considered. Due to the high risk of adverse reactions Infliximab should be avoided to not naïve patients.

Long-term Antibiotic Treatment in Pouchitis-Patterns of Use and Safety.

INTRODUCTION: Pouchitis, often developing after colectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis, is highly responsive to antibiotics. Ciprofloxacin and/or metronidazole are commonly used, often for prolonged periods. We report patterns of antibiotic use, adverse events, and resistant infections in patients with pouchitis with long-term antibiotic treatment. METHODS: In a cohort of patients following pouch surgery, a retrospective nested case-control analysis was performed between 2010 and 2017. Ultra-long-term use, defined as the top 10% of users, was compared with the remaining users. Patterns of antibiotic use, adverse events, and resistant infections were analyzed. RESULTS: The cohort included 205 patients with UC, of whom 167 (81.5%) used antibiotics for pouchitis, predominantly ciprofloxacin. The long-term antibiotic use rate was 18% and 42% at 5 and 20 years postsurgery, respectively. Mean antibiotic use of at least 1, 3, and 6 months/year was noted in 54 (26.3%), 31 (15.1%), and 14 (6.8%) patients, respectively. Twenty-two (13.2%) and 4 (2.4%) patients reported mild and severe (transient) adverse events, respectively, without mortalities, tendinopathies or arrhythmias. Adverse event rates for ciprofloxacin and metronidazole were 1per 10,000 and 6 per 10,000 use-days, respectively. Longer, but not ultra-long antibiotic use, was associated with mild adverse events. There was no association between antibiotic use and resistant infections. Thirteen (6.3%) patients required ileostomy procedures-more commonly in the ultra-long-term antibiotic users. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with pouchitis may require prolonged antibiotic treatment, reflecting clinical benefit and favorable safety profile. Few adverse events and resistant infections were observed with long-term antibiotics use. However, resistant microbial strains selection, which are potentially transmittable, warrants consideration of different therapeutic alternatives.

Safety and Efficacy of Biological Therapy in Chronic Antibiotic Refractory Pouchitis: A Systematic Review With Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Pouchitis is the most common long-term complication after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with ulcerative colitis. Those with ≥3 episodes of pouchitis/year and symptoms despite antibiotics are considered to have chronic antibiotic refractory pouchitis (CARP). While several agents including probiotics, steroids and immunomodulators have been used, treatment of CARP remains challenging. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the safety and efficacy of various biological agents in treatment of CARP. METHODS: Multiple databases were searched through June 2020 for studies that reported the efficacy and safety of biological therapy including antitumor necrosis factor-alpha agents [infliximab (IFX) and adalimumab (ADA)], vedolizumab (VDZ), and ustekinumab in CARP. We excluded studies on Crohn's like and/or other inflammatory complications of the pouch. Meta-analysis was performed to calculate pooled rates of clinical as well as endoscopic improvement and remission. RESULTS: We included 15 studies with 311 patients in our final analysis. Ninety-two patients were treated with IFX, 42 with ADA, 144 with VDZ and 33 with ustekinumab. Pooled rate of clinical improvement was 71.4%, 58.2%, 47.9% and clinical remission was 65.7%, 31%, 47.4% with IFX, ADA, and VDZ, respectively. Pooled rate of endoscopic improvement was achieved in 61.2% patients treated with VDZ while endoscopic remission was achieved in 70.3% patients treated with IFX. Adverse events were reported in 3.9% patients. CONCLUSION: Biologic therapy is safe and effective in the treatment of CARP.

Increased Quinolone-Resistant Mutations of gyrA and parC Genes after Pouchitis Treatment with Ciprofloxacin.

BACKGROUND: Oral antibiotics, such as ciprofloxacin (CFX), are widely used for the treatment of acute and chronic pouchitis. Most bacterial mutations that confer quinolone resistance are at Ser-83 and Asp-87 in the gyrA gene and Ser-80 and Glu-84 in the parC gene. METHODS: We obtained 51 stool samples from 43 patients who were diagnosed with ulcerative colitis and underwent ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Patients were divided into 2 groups: 13 patients with CFX treatment of pouchitis and 30 patients without pouchitis. After extraction of fecal DNA, the amount of Escherichia coli 16S rRNA, gyrA, and parC gene DNA were measured using real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Possible mutations at gyrA 83 and 87 and at parC 80 and 84 were investigated by PCR cloning and sequencing, and mutation rates were quantified by rapid PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism. RESULTS: Samples from both CFX-treated and -untreated patients had comparable levels of gyrA and parC gene DNA. Nucleic acid and amino acid mutations were identified at gyrA 83 and 87, and at parC 80 and 84. We successfully quantified mutation rates at gyrA 83 and 87, and at parC 84, all of which were significantly higher in samples from CFX-treated patients (70, 84, and 38%) than from CFX-untreated patients (13, 11, and 5%). CONCLUSION: E. coli in patient pouches may have mutations in their gyrA and parC genes that produce CFX resistance. Mutation rates of these genes were significantly higher in samples from CFX-treated patients. This study contributes to understanding the decrease and loss of CFX effectiveness against pouchitis.

Predominantly Antibiotic-resistant Intestinal Microbiome Persists in Patients With Pouchitis Who Respond to Antibiotic Therapy.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Pouchitis that develops in patients with ulcerative colitis after total proctocolectomy and ileal pouch anal anastomosis is usually treated with antibiotics. Some patients have recurrence of flares, or become antibiotic-dependent, and require repeated courses or prolonged periods of antibiotic therapy. We investigated microbial factors associated with response to antibiotic treatment and development of antibiotic dependence in patients with pouchitis. METHODS: We performed a prospective study of 49 patients who had undergone pouch surgery at a tertiary center. Disease activity was determined based on clinical, endoscopic, and histologic criteria. Pouch phenotype was defined as recurrent-acute pouchitis (n = 6), chronic pouchitis and Crohn's-like disease of the pouch (n = 27), normal pouch from patient with ulcerative colitis (n = 10), and normal pouch from patient with familial adenomatous polyposis (n = 6). Fecal samples (n = 234) were collected over time during or in the absence of antibiotic treatment (ciprofloxacin and/or metronidazole). Thirty-three patients were treated with antibiotics, for a median of 425 days of cumulative antibiotic therapy, during follow-up. Calprotectin was measured and fecal DNA was sequenced using shotgun metagenomics and analyzed with specifically designed bioinformatic pipelines. Bacterial strains were isolated from fecal samples. We assessed their ciprofloxacin resistance and ability to induce secretion of inflammatory cytokines by HT-29 intestinal epithelial cells. RESULTS: Most antibiotic-treated patients (79%) had a clinical response to each course of antibiotics; however, 89% of those who completed a 4-week course relapsed within 3 months. Median calprotectin levels decreased by 40% in response to antibiotics. Antibiotic treatment reduced disease-associated bacteria such as Clostridium perfringens, Ruminococcus gnavus, and Klebsiella pneumoniae, but also beneficial species, such as Faecalibacterium prausnitzii. The microbiomes of antibiotic-responsive patients were dominated by facultative anaerobic genera (Escherichia, Enterococcus, and Streptococcus), with multiple ciprofloxacin-resistance mutations in drug target genes and confirmed drug resistance. However, these strains had lower potential for virulence and did not induce secretion of inflammatory cytokines by epithelial cells. After antibiotic cessation, patients had an abrupt shift in microbiome composition, with blooms of oral and disease-associated bacteria. In addition, antibiotic treatment enriched for strains that acquired multidrug resistance loci, encoding enzymes that confer resistance to nonrelated antibiotics, including extended-spectrum beta-lactamases. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of antibiotic treatment of pouchitis might be attributed to the establishment of an antibiotic-resistant microbiome with low inflammatory potential. This microbiome might provide resistance against colonization by bacteria that promote inflammation. To avoid progression to antibiotic-dependent disease and its consequences, strategies such as short-term alternating antibiotics and nutrition- and microbiome-based interventions should be considered.

Treatment and prevention of pouchitis after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis.

BACKGROUND: Pouchitis occurs in approximately 50% of patients following ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) for chronic ulcerative colitis (UC). OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to determine the efficacy and safety of medical therapies for prevention or treatment of acute or chronic pouchitis. SEARCH METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase and CENTRAL from inception to 25 July 2018. We also searched references, trials registers, and conference proceedings. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials of prevention or treatment of acute or chronic pouchitis in adults who underwent IPAA for UC were considered for inclusion. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently screened studies for eligibility, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias. The certainty of the evidence was evaluated using GRADE. The primary outcome was clinical improvement or remission in participants with acute or chronic pouchitis, or the proportion of participants with no episodes of pouchitis after IPAA. Adverse events (AEs) was a secondary outcome. We calculated the risk ratio (RR) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) for each dichotomous outcome. MAIN RESULTS: Fifteen studies (547 participants) were included. Four studies assessed treatment of acute pouchitis. Five studies assessed treatment of chronic pouchitis. Six studies assessed prevention of pouchitis. Three studies were low risk of bias. Three studies were high risk of bias and the other studies were unclear. Acute pouchitis: All ciprofloxacin participants (7/7) achieved remission at two weeks compared to 33% (3/9) of metronidazole participants (RR 2.68, 95% CI 1.13 to 6.35, very low certainty evidence). No ciprofloxacin participants (0/7) had an AE compared to 33% (3/9) of metronidazole participants (RR 0.18, 95% CI 0.01 to 2.98; very low certainty evidence). AEs included vomiting, dysgeusia or transient peripheral neuropathy. Forty-three per cent (6/14) of metronidazole participants achieved remission at 6 weeks compared to 50% (6/12) of budesonide enema participants (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.37 to 1.96, very low certainty evidence). Fifty per cent (7/14) of metronidazole participants improved clinically at 6 weeks compared to 58% (7/12) of budesonide enema participants (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.42 to 1.74, very low certainty evidence). Fifty-seven per cent (8/14) of metronidazole participants had an AE compared to 25% (3/12) of budesonide enema participants (RR 2.29, 95% CI 0.78 to 6.73, very low certainty evidence). AEs included anorexia, nausea, headache, asthenia, metallic taste, vomiting, paraesthesia, and depression. Twenty-five per cent (2/8) of rifaximin participants achieved remission at 4 weeks compared to 0% (0/10) of placebo participants (RR 6.11, 95% CI 0.33 to 111.71, very low certainty evidence). Thirty-eight per cent (3/8) of rifaximin participants improved clinically at 4 weeks compared to 30% (3/10) of placebo participants (RR 1.25, 95% CI 0.34 to 4.60, very low certainty evidence). Seventy-five per cent (6/8) of rifaximin participants had an AE compared to 50% (5/10) of placebo participants (RR 1.50, 95% CI 0.72 to 3.14, very low certainty evidence). AEs included diarrhea, flatulence, nausea, proctalgia, vomiting, thirst, candida, upper respiratory tract infection, increased hepatic enzyme, and cluster headache. Ten per cent (1/10) of Lactobacillus GG participants improved clinically at 12 weeks compared to 0% (0/10) of placebo participants (RR 3.00, 95% CI 0.14 to 65.90, very low certainty evidence). Chronic pouchitis: Eighty-five per cent (34/40) of De Simone Formulation (a probiotic formulation) participants maintained remission at 9 to 12 months compared to 3% (1/36) of placebo participants (RR 20.24, 95% CI 4.28 to 95.81, 2 studies; low certainty evidence). Two per cent (1/40) of De Simone Formulation participants had an AE compared to 0% (0/36) of placebo participants (RR 2.43, 95% CI 0.11 to 55.89; low certainty evidence). AEs included abdominal cramps, vomiting and diarrhea. Fifty per cent (3/6) of adalimumab patients achieved clinical improvement at 4 weeks compared to 43% (3/7) of placebo participants (RR, 1.17, 95% CI 0.36 to 3.76, low certainty evidence). Sixty per cent (6/10) of glutamine participants maintained remission at 3 weeks compared to 33% (3/9) of butyrate participants (RR 1.80, 95% CI 0.63 to 5.16, very low certainty evidence). Forty-five per cent (9/20) of patients treated with bismuth carbomer foam enema improved clinically at 3 weeks compared to 45% (9/20) of placebo participants (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.50 to 1.98, very low certainty evidence). Twenty-five per cent (5/20) of participants in the bismuth carbomer foam enema group had an AE compared to 35% (7/20) of placebo participants (RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.27 to 1.88, very low certainty evidence). Adverse events included diarrhea, worsening symptoms, cramping, sinusitis, and abdominal pain. PREVENTION: At 12 months, 90% (18/20) of De Simone Formulation participants had no episodes of acute pouchitis compared to 60% (12/20) of placebo participants (RR 1.50, 95% CI 1.02 to 2.21, low certainty evidence). Another study found 100% (16/16) of De Simone Formulation participants had no episodes of acute pouchitis at 12 months compared to 92% (11/12) of the no treatment control group (RR 1.10, 95% 0.89 to 1.36, very low certainty evidence). Eighty-six per cent (6/7) of Bifidobacterium longum participants had no episodes of acute pouchitis at 6 months compared to 60% (3/5) of placebo participants (RR 1.43, 95% CI 0.66 to 3.11, very low certainty evidence). Eleven per cent (1/9) of Clostridium butyricum MIYAIRI participants had no episodes of acute pouchitis at 24 months compared to 50% (4/8) of placebo participants (RR 0.22, 95% CI 0.03 to 1.60, very low certainty evidence). Forty-six per cent (43/94) of allopurinol participants had no episodes of pouchitis at 24 months compared to 43% (39/90) of placebo participants (RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.46; low certainty evidence). Eighty-one per cent (21/26) of tinidazole participants had no episodes of pouchitis over 12 months compared to 58% (7/12) of placebo participants (RR 1.38, 95% CI 0.83 to 2.31, very low certainty evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The effects of antibiotics, probiotics and other interventions for treating and preventing pouchitis are uncertain. Well designed, adequately powered studies are needed to determine the optimal therapy for the treatment and prevention of pouchitis.

ANTECEDENTES: La reservoritis ocurre en aproximadamente el 50% de los pacientes después de la anastomosis entre la bolsa ileal y el ano (IPAA, por sus siglas en inglés) para la colitis ulcerosa crónica (CU). OBJETIVOS: El objetivo primario fue determinar la eficacia y la seguridad de los tratamientos médicos para la prevención o el tratamiento de la reservoritis aguda o crónica. MÉTODOS DE BÚSQUEDA: Se hicieron búsquedas en MEDLINE, Embase y en CENTRAL, desde su inicio hasta el 25 julio 2018. También se buscó en las listas de referencias, registros de ensayos en curso y actas de congresos. CRITERIOS DE SELECCIÓN: Se consideraron para inclusión los ensayos controlados aleatorios de prevención o tratamiento de la reservoritis aguda o crónica en adultos a los que se les realiza IPAA para la CU. OBTENCIÓN Y ANÁLISIS DE LOS DATOS: Dos autores de la revisión, de forma independiente, evaluaron la elegibilidad de los estudios, extrajeron los datos y analizaron el riesgo de sesgo. La calidad de la evidencia se evaluó mediante los criterios GRADE. El resultado primario la mejoría clínica o remisión en los pacientes con reservoritis aguda o crónica, o la proporción de pacientes sin episodios de reservoritis después de IPAA. Se incluyeron los eventos adversos como resultado secundario. Se calculó el cociente de riesgos (CR) y el intervalo de confianza (IC) del 95% correspondiente para los resultados dicotómicos. RESULTADOS PRINCIPALES: Se incluyeron 15 estudios (547 participantes). Cuatro estudios evaluaron el tratamiento de la reservoritis aguda. Cinco estudios evaluaron el tratamiento de la reservoritis crónica. Seis estudios evaluaron la prevención de la reservoritis. Tres estudios presentaban bajo de riesgo de sesgo. En tres estudios el riesgo fue alto y en los otros estudios fue poco claro. reservoritis aguda: Todos los pacientes que recibieron ciprofloxacina (7/7) lograron la remisión a las dos semanas en comparación con el 33% (3/9) de los pacientes que recibieron metronidazol (CR 2,68; IC del 95%: 1,13 a 6,35) (evidencia de certeza muy baja). Ninguno de los participantes que recibieron ciprofloxacina (0/7) presentó eventos adversos en comparación con el 33% (3/9) de los participantes que recibieron metronidazol (CR0,18; IC del 95%: 0,01 a 2,98; evidencia de certeza muy baja). Los eventos adversos incluyeron vómitos, disgeusia o neuropatía periférica transitoria. El 40% (6/14) de los participantes que recibieron metronidazol lograron la remisión a las 6 semanas en comparación con el 50% (6/12) de los participantes que recibieron enema de budesonida (CR 0,86; IC del 95%: 0,37 a 1,96; evidencia de certeza muy baja). El 50% (7/14) de los participantes del grupo de metronidazol mejoraron clínicamente a las 6 semanas en comparación con el 58% (7/12) de los participantes que recibieron enema de budesonida (CR 0,86; IC del 95%: 0,42 a 1,74; evidencia de certeza muy baja). El 57% (8/14) de los participantes del grupo de metronidazol presentaron eventos adversos en comparación con el 25% (3/12) de los participantes que recibieron enema de budesonida (CR 2,29; IC del 95%: 0,78 a 6,73; evidencia de certeza muy baja). Los eventos adversos incluyeron anorexia, náuseas, cefalea, astenia, sabor metálico, vómitos, parestesia y depresión. El 25% (2/8) de los participantes que recibieron rifaximina lograron la remisión a las 4semanas en comparación con el 0% (0/10) de los participantes que recibieron placebo (CR 6,11; IC del 95%: 0,33 a 111,71; evidencia de certeza muy baja). El 38% (3/8) de los participantes del grupo de rifaximina mejoraron clínicamente a las 4 semanas en comparación con el 30% (3/10) de los participantes que recibieron placebo (CR 1,25; IC del 95%: 0,34 a 4,60; evidencia de certeza muy baja). El 75% (6/8) de los participantes del grupo de rifaximina presentaron un evento adverso en comparación con el 50% (5/10) de los participantes que recibieron placebo (CR 1,50; IC del 95%: 0,72 a 3,14; evidencia de certeza muy baja). Los eventos adversos incluyeron diarrea, flatulencias, náuseas, proctalgia, vómitos, sed, cándida, infección de las vías respiratorias superiores, aumento de las enzimas hepáticas y cefalea en racimos. El 10% (1/10) de los participantes del grupo de Lactobacillus GGmejoraron clínicamente a las 12 semanas en comparación con el 0% (0/10) de los participantes que recibieron placebo (CR 3,00; IC del 95%: 0,14 a 65,90; evidencia de certeza muy baja). Reservoritis crónica: El 85% (34/40) de los pacientes que recibieron la formulación De Simone mantuvieron la remisión de nueve a 12 meses en comparación con el 3% (1/36) de los participantes que recibieron placebo (CR 20,24; IC del 95%: 4,28 a 95,81; dos estudios; evidencia de certeza baja). El 2% (1/40) de los participantes que recibieron la fórmula De Simone presentaron un evento adverso, en comparación con el 0% (0/36) de los participantes que recibieron placebo (CR 2,43; IC del 95%: 0,11 a 55,89; evidencia de certeza baja). Los efectos secundarios incluyeron cólicos abdominales, vómitos y diarrea. Cuarenta y tres por ciento (3/6) de los pacientes en el grupo de adalimumab lograron una mejoría clínica a las 4 semanas en comparación con un 43 (3/7) de los pacientes del grupo de placebo (CR 1,17, IC del 95%: 0,36 a 3,76; evidencia de certeza baja). El 60% (6/10) de los participantes del grupo de glutamina mantuvieron la remisión a las 3 semanas en comparación con el 33% (3/9) de los participantes que recibieron placebo (CR 1,80; IC del 95%: 0,63 a 5,16; evidencia de certeza muy baja). El 45% (9/20) de los participantes del grupo de enema de espuma de carbómero de bismuto mejoraron clínicamente a las 3 semanas en comparación con el 45% (9/20) de los participantes que recibieron placebo (CR 1,00; IC del 95%: 0,50 a 1,98; evidencia de certeza muy baja). El 25% (5/20) de los participantes del grupo de aceite de cannabis presentaron un evento adverso en comparación con el 35% (7/20) de los participantes que recibieron placebo (CR 0,71; IC del 95%: 0,27 a 1,88; evidencia de certeza muy baja). Los eventos adversos incluyeron diarrea, síntomas de empeoramiento, cólicos, sinusitis y dolor abdominal. Prevención: A los 12 meses, el 90% (18/20) de los pacientes que recibieron la formulación De Simone no presentaron episodios de reservoritis aguda en comparación con el 60% (12/20) de los pacientes que recibieron placebo (CR 1,50: IC del 95%: 1,02 a 2,21; evidencia de certeza baja). Otro estudio halló que el 100% (16/16) de los participantes que recibieron la fórmula De Simone no presentaron episodios de reservoritis aguda a los 12 meses en comparación con el 92% (11/12) de los pacientes del grupo control sin tratamiento (CR 1,10: IC del 95%: 0,89 a 1,36; evidencia de certeza muy baja). El 86% (6/7) de los participantes del grupo de Bifidobacterium longum no presentaron episodios de reservoritis aguda a los 6 meses en comparación con el 60% (3/5) de los participantes que recibieron placebo (CR 1,43; IC del 95%: 0,66 a 3,11; evidencia de certeza muy baja). El 11% (1/9) de los participantes del grupo de Clostridium butyricum MIYAIRI no presentaron episodios de reservoritis aguda a los 24 meses en comparación con el 50% (4/8) de los participantes que recibieron placebo (CR 0,22; IC del 95%: 0,03 a 1,60; evidencia de certeza muy baja). El 46% (43/94) de los participantes del grupo de alopurinol no presentaron episodios de reservoritis a los 24 meses en comparación con el 43% (39/90) de los participantes que recibieron placebo (CR1,06; IC del 95%: 0,76 a 1,46; evidencia de certeza baja). El 81% (21/26) de los participantes del grupo de tinidazol no presentaron episodios de reservoritis a los 12 meses en comparación con el 58% (7/12) de los participantes que recibieron placebo (CR 1,38; IC del 95%: 0,83 a 2,31; evidencia de certeza muy baja). CONCLUSIONES DE LOS AUTORES: No se conocen los efectos de los antibióticos, probióticos y otras intervenciones para el tratamiento y la prevención de la reservoritis. Se necesitan estudios bien diseñados con poder estadístico suficiente para determinar la forma óptima de tratamiento y prevención de la reservoritis.

Treatment and prevention of pouchitis after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis.

BACKGROUND: Pouchitis occurs in approximately 50% of patients following ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) for chronic ulcerative colitis (UC). OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to determine the efficacy and safety of medical therapies for prevention or treatment of acute or chronic pouchitis. SEARCH METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase and CENTRAL from inception to 25 July 2018. We also searched references, trials registers, and conference proceedings. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials of prevention or treatment of acute or chronic pouchitis in adults who underwent IPAA for UC were considered for inclusion. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently screened studies for eligibility, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias. The certainty of the evidence was evaluated using GRADE. The primary outcome was clinical improvement or remission in participants with acute or chronic pouchitis, or the proportion of participants with no episodes of pouchitis after IPAA. Adverse events (AEs) was a secondary outcome. We calculated the risk ratio (RR) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) for each dichotomous outcome. MAIN RESULTS: Fifteen studies (547 participants) were included. Four studies assessed treatment of acute pouchitis. Five studies assessed treatment of chronic pouchitis. Six studies assessed prevention of pouchitis. Three studies were low risk of bias. Three studies were high risk of bias and the other studies were unclear.Acute pouchitis: All ciprofloxacin participants (7/7) achieved remission at two weeks compared to 33% (3/9) of metronidazole participants (RR 2.68, 95% CI 1.13 to 6.35, very low certainty evidence). No ciprofloxacin participants (0/7) had an AE compared to 33% (3/9) of metronidazole participants (RR 0.18, 95% CI 0.01 to 2.98; very low certainty evidence). AEs included vomiting, dysgeusia or transient peripheral neuropathy. Forty-three per cent (6/14) of metronidazole participants achieved remission at 6 weeks compared to 50% (6/12) of budesonide enema participants (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.37 to 1.96, very low certainty evidence). Fifty per cent (7/14) of metronidazole participants improved clinically at 6 weeks compared to 58% (7/12) of budesonide enema participants (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.42 to 1.74, very low certainty evidence). Fifty-seven per cent (8/14) of metronidazole participants had an AE compared to 25% (3/12) of budesonide enema participants (RR 2.29, 95% CI 0.78 to 6.73, very low certainty evidence). AEs included anorexia, nausea, headache, asthenia, metallic taste, vomiting, paraesthesia, and depression. Twenty-five per cent (2/8) of rifaximin participants achieved remission at 4 weeks compared to 0% (0/10) of placebo participants (RR 6.11, 95% CI 0.33 to 111.71, very low certainty evidence). Thirty-eight per cent (3/8) of rifaximin participants improved clinically at 4 weeks compared to 30% (3/10) of placebo participants (RR 1.25, 95% CI 0.34 to 4.60, very low certainty evidence). Seventy-five per cent (6/8) of rifaximin participants had an AE compared to 50% (5/10) of placebo participants (RR 1.50, 95% CI 0.72 to 3.14, very low certainty evidence). AEs included diarrhea, flatulence, nausea, proctalgia, vomiting, thirst, candida, upper respiratory tract infection, increased hepatic enzyme, and cluster headache. Ten per cent (1/10) of Lactobacillus GG participants improved clinically at 12 weeks compared to 0% (0/10) of placebo participants (RR 3.00, 95% CI 0.14 to 65.90, very low certainty evidence).Chronic pouchitis: Eighty-five per cent (34/40) of De Simone Formulation participants maintained remission at 9 to 12 months compared to 3% (1/36) of placebo participants (RR 20.24, 95% CI 4.28 to 95.81, 2 studies; low certainty evidence). Two per cent (1/40) of De Simone Formulation participants had an AE compared to 0% (0/36) of placebo participants (RR 2.43, 95% CI 0.11 to 55.89; low certainty evidence). AEs included abdominal cramps, vomiting and diarrhea. Fifty per cent (3/6) of adalimumab patients achieved clinical improvement at 4 weeks compared to 43% (3/7) of placebo participants (RR, 1.17, 95% CI 0.36 to 3.76, low certainty evidence). Sixty per cent (6/10) of glutamine participants maintained remission at 3 weeks compared to 33% (3/9) of butyrate participants (RR 1.80, 95% CI 0.63 to 5.16, very low certainty evidence). Forty-five per cent (9/20) of patients treated with bismuth carbomer foam enema improved clinically at 3 weeks compared to 45% (9/20) of placebo participants (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.50 to 1.98, very low certainty evidence). Twenty-five per cent (5/20) of participants in the bismuth carbomer foam enema group had an AE compared to 35% (7/20) of placebo participants (RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.27 to 1.88, very low certainty evidence). Adverse events included diarrhea, worsening symptoms, cramping, sinusitis, and abdominal pain. PREVENTION: At 12 months, 90% (18/20) of De Simone Formulation participants had no episodes of acute pouchitis compared to 60% (12/20) of placebo participants (RR 1.50, 95% CI 1.02 to 2.21, low certainty evidence). Another study found 100% (16/16) of De Simone Formulation participants had no episodes of acute pouchitis at 12 months compared to 92% (11/12) of the no treatment control group (RR 1.10, 95% 0.89 to 1.36, very low certainty evidence). Eighty-six per cent (6/7) of Bifidobacterium longum participants had no episodes of acute pouchitis at 6 months compared to 60% (3/5) of placebo participants (RR 1.43, 95% CI 0.66 to 3.11, very low certainty evidence). Eleven per cent (1/9) of Clostridium butyricum MIYAIRI participants had no episodes of acute pouchitis at 24 months compared to 50% (4/8) of placebo participants (RR 0.22, 95% CI 0.03 to 1.60, very low certainty evidence). Forty-six per cent (43/94) of allopurinol participants had no episodes of pouchitis at 24 months compared to 43% (39/90) of placebo participants (RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.46; low certainty evidence). Eighty-one per cent (21/26) of tinidazole participants had no episodes of pouchitis over 12 months compared to 58% (7/12) of placebo participants (RR 1.38, 95% CI 0.83 to 2.31, very low certainty evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The effects of antibiotics, probiotics and other interventions for treating and preventing pouchitis are uncertain. Well designed, adequately powered studies are needed to determine the optimal therapy for the treatment and prevention of pouchitis.

Targeting Endothelial Ligands: ICAM-1/alicaforsen, MAdCAM-1.

Specific blockade of the endothelial ligands intercellular adhesion molecule-1 [ICAM-1] and mucosal addressin cell adhesion molecule [MAdCAM] involved in leukocyte recruitment to the site of inflammation as therapeutic targets in inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] has been recognized from their overexpression in the inflamed mucosa and successful intervention based on these ligands in preclinical animal models. Interventions to target ICAM-1 in human IBD are confined to the ICAM-1 anti-sense oligonucleotide alicaforsen. While results with parenteral formulations of alicaforsen in Crohn's disease have largely been negative, efficacy signals derived from studies with an enema formulation in ulcerative colitis and pouchitis are promising and have led to a Food and Drug Administration Fast-Track designation for the latter. A large phase III programme in pouchitis is underway. Phase II studies with the anti-MAdCAM-1 antibody [SHP647] delivered positive results in ulcerative colitis and anti-inflammatory signals in Crohn's disease. Furthermore, it was shown that SHP647 does not affect the number and composition of cells in cerebrospinal fluid, suggesting that the compound is not affecting immune surveillance in the central nervous system. In addition, both alicaforsen and SHP647 are promising compounds based on the clear safety profile observed so far.

Refractory pouchitis improves after administration of the green tea polyphenol EGCG: a retrospective review.

INTRODUCTION: Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a common, chronic, inflammatory process limited to the colon. UC affects up to 1 million individuals in the USA alone and requires resection in up to 30% of patients. Resection is often followed by creation of a pouch. Pouchitis is the most common complication of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) following total proctocolectomy, affecting up to 50% of patients. Symptoms include increased stool frequency, urgency, cramping, and bleeding. Management of pouchitis is complex in antibiotic refractory cases. Plant-based polyphenolic compounds have shown protective effects against UC. We conducted a retrospective review of pouchitis patients treated with EGCG 200-400 mg twice daily. RESULTS: Seven of nine (78%) patients experienced significant improvement based on reduced frequency of bowel movements and bleeding, while five of nine (56%) experienced complete relief. One patient experienced no improvement with EGCG, and one had progression of pouchitis symptoms while taking EGCG. No significant adverse events were noted by patients while taking EGCG. DISCUSSION: The green tea-derived molecule EGCG exhibits an efficacy signal in the IBD-related condition of pouchitis. Impressively, 78% of patients experienced noticeable improvement in pouchitis symptoms after initiation of EGCG, while 56% of treated patients entered complete remission. These positive responses to EGCG in patients with pouchitis suggests the need to confirm these findings in a formal, controlled trial. Based on recent findings documenting its effects on epithelial permeability and mucosal inflammation, combined with its favorable safety profile, a possible preventative role could also be explored.

Alicaforsen for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease.

INTRODUCTION: Intracellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1), is a transmembrane glycoprotein of the immunoglobulin family, constitutively expressed on vascular endothelial cells and upregulated in inflamed colonic tissue. Alicaforsen, a 20 base ICAM-1 anti-sense oligonucleotide and highly selective ICAM-1 inhibitor, down-regulates ICAM-1 mRNA. Areas covered: We review mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics, pre-clinical, clinical and safety data of alicaforsen for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC), pouchitis and Crohn's disease (CD). Expert opinion: After 6 weeks of treatment, topical alicaforsen was significantly more effective than placebo in inducing remission in patients with moderate-severe distal UC, with treatment effects lasting up to 30 weeks. No difference was observed in head-head comparison with mesalamine topical enema, although alicaforsen appeared to have more durable treatment effect. Clinical trials of an intravenous formulation in Crohn's disease showed no significant treatment effect compared to placebo. An open-label trial in alicaforsen for pouchitis demonstrated encouraging results, now being assessed in a multi-national phase 3 trial. No major safety signals have been observed in UC patients treated with alicaforsen enemas. The potential as a novel therapy for pouchitis has led to orphan designation for this indication by the FDA and European Medicines Agency.

Short article: Successful faecal coliform sensitivity-based oral ertapenem therapy for chronic antibiotic-refractory pouchitis: a case series.

Pouchitis is a common complication of restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis, and a proportion of patients develop a refractory course. The treatment of chronic antibiotic-refractory pouchitis (CARP) is challenging, and treatment failure is often a cause of pouch excision. We report on a series of three patients with CARP who were treated with oral ertapenem following faecal coliform sensitivity testing. There was an improvement in the pouchitis disease activity index in all three patients [pretreatment pouch disease activity index, median 13 (range: 10-14); post-treatment pouch disease activity index, median 1 (range: 1-3)]. Identification of faecal coliform sensitivity and treatment with oral ertapenem might be helpful in patients with CARP.

Treatment and prevention of pouchitis after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis.

BACKGROUND: Pouchitis occurs in approximately 50% of patients following ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) for chronic ulcerative colitis. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to determine the efficacy and safety of medical therapies (including antibiotics, probiotics, and other agents) for prevention or treatment of acute or chronic pouchitis. SEARCH METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library from inception to October 2014. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials of prevention or treatment of acute or chronic pouchitis in adults who underwent IPAA for ulcerative colitis were considered for inclusion. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently screened studies for eligibility, extracted data and assessed study quality. Methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. The overall quality of the evidence supporting the outcomes was evaluated using the GRADE criteria. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with clinical improvement or remission of pouchitis in patients with acute or chronic pouchitis, or the proportion of patients with no episodes of pouchitis after IPAA. The proportion of patients who developed at least one adverse event was a secondary outcome. We calculated the risk ratio (RR) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) for each dichotomous outcome. MAIN RESULTS: Thirteen studies (517 participants) were included in the review. Four studies assessed treatment of acute pouchitis. One study (16 participants) compared ciprofloxacin and metronidazole; another (26 participants) compared metronidazole to budesonide enemas; another (18 participants) compared rifaximin to placebo; and the fourth study (20 participants) compared Lactobacillus GG to placebo. Four studies assessed treatment of chronic pouchitis. One study (19 participants) compared glutamine to butyrate suppositories; another (40 participants) compared bismuth enemas to placebo; and two studies (76 participants) compared VSL#3 to placebo. Five studies assessed prevention of pouchitis. One study (40 participants) compared VSL#3 to placebo; another (28 participants) compared VLS#3 to no treatment; one study (184 participants) compared allopurinol to placebo; another (12 participants) compared the probiotic Bifidobacterium longum to placebo; and one study (38 participants) compared tinidazole to placebo. Three studies were judged to be of high quality. Two studies were judged to be low quality and the quality of the other studies was unclear. Treatment of acute pouchitis: The results of one small study (16 participants) suggest that ciprofloxacin may be more effective than metronidazole for the treatment of acute pouchitis. One hundred per cent (7/7) of ciprofloxacin patients achieved remission at two weeks compared to 33% (3/9) of metronidazole patients. A GRADE analysis indicated that the overall quality of the evidence supporting this outcome was very low due to high risk of bias (no blinding) and very sparse data (10 events). There was no difference in the proportion of patients who had at least one adverse event (RR 0.18, 95% CI 0.01 to 2.98). Adverse events included vomiting, dysgeusia or transient peripheral neuropathy. There were no differences between metronidazole and budesonide enemas in terms of clinical remission, clinical improvement or adverse events. Adverse events included anorexia, nausea, headache, asthenia, metallic taste, vomiting, paraesthesia, and depression. There were no differences between rifaximin and placebo in terms of clinical remission, clinical improvement, or adverse events. Adverse events included diarrhea, flatulence, nausea, proctalgia, vomiting, thirst, candida, upper respiratory tract infection, increased hepatic enzyme, and cluster headache. There was no difference in clinical improvement between Lactobacillus GG and placebo. The results of these studies are uncertain due to very low quality evidence. Treatment of chronic pouchitis: A pooled analysis of two studies (76 participants) suggests that VSL#3 may be more effective than placebo for maintenance of remission. Eighty-five per cent (34/40) of VLS#3 patients maintained remission at 9 to 12 months compared to 3% (1/36) of placebo patients (RR 20.24, 95% CI 4.28 to 95.81). A GRADE analysis indicated that the quality of evidence supporting this outcome was low due to very sparse data (35 events). Adverse events included abdominal cramps, vomiting and diarrhea. There was no difference in effectiveness between glutamine and butyrate suppositories for maintenance of remission. There was no difference in clinical improvement or adverse event rates between bismuth carbomer foam enemas and placebo. Adverse events included diarrhea, worsening symptoms, cramping, sinusitis, and abdominal pain. The results of these studies are uncertain due to very low quality evidence. Prevention of pouchitis: The results of one small study (40 participants) suggest that VSL#3 may be more effective than placebo for prevention of pouchitis. Ninety per cent (18/20) of VSL#3 patients had no episodes of acute pouchitis during the 12 month study compared to 60% (12/20) of placebo patients (RR 1.50, 95% CI 1.02 to 2.21). A GRADE analysis indicated that the quality of evidence supporting this outcome was low due to very sparse data (30 events). Another small study (28 participants) found that VLS#3 was not more effective than no treatment for prevention of pouchitis. Bifidobacterium longum, allopurinol and tinidazole were not more effective than placebo for prevention of pouchitis. The results of these studies are uncertain due to very low quality evidence. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: For acute pouchitis, very low quality evidence suggests that ciprofloxacin may be more effective than metronidazole. For chronic pouchitis, low quality evidence suggests that VSL#3 may be more effective than placebo for maintenance of remission. For the prevention of pouchitis, low quality evidence suggests that VSL#3 may be more effective than placebo. Well designed, adequately powered studies are needed to determine the optimal therapy for the treatment and prevention of pouchitis.

Topical tacrolimus therapy for antibiotic-refractory pouchitis.

BACKGROUND: Pouchitis is the most common complication after restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis, and it leads to pouch failure. The administration of oral antibiotics is the main treatment for pouchitis; however, in some cases, antibiotic-refractory pouchitis may develop, which requires further medical therapy. OBJECTIVE: We investigated the applicability of topical tacrolimus for refractory pouchitis. DESIGN: We performed a prospective pilot study. The study protocols were registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry, 000006658. SETTING: This study was conducted in the Surgical Department of Hyogo College of Medicine. PATIENTS: Patients with antibiotic-refractory pouchitis were treated for 8 weeks with a tacrolimus enema. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The efficacy was assessed by comparing Pouchitis Disease Activity Index scores. Safety was assessed by measuring whole blood tacrolimus trough levels. RESULTS: Ten patients with refractory pouchitis were enrolled. No severe adverse events occurred. The mean scores decreased from 15.9 ± 0.8 to 7.8 ± 0.8 during 8 weeks of treatment (p < 0.01). Specifically, the clinical symptom, endoscopic finding, and histological finding subscores decreased to 0.8 ± 0.6, 3.9 ± 0.2, and 2.9 ± 0.4. Nine patients recovered from their clinical symptoms, and 3 patients recovered from pouchitis. LIMITATIONS: This small study was neither blinded nor randomized. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that the use of topical tacrolimus for the treatment of refractory pouchitis is safe and effective in the short term for clinical symptoms. Although complete endoscopic healing was not achieved, this treatment may have early rescue efficacy in the treatment of antibiotic-refractory pouchitis.

The effects of probiotics on barrier function and mucosal pouch microbiota during maintenance treatment for severe pouchitis in patients with ulcerative colitis.

BACKGROUND: A total of 10-15% of patients with an ileoanal pouch develop severe pouchitis necessitating long-term use of antibiotics or pouch excision. Probiotics reduce the risk of recurrence of pouchitis, but mechanisms behind these effects are not fully understood. AIM: To examine mucosal barrier function in pouchitis, before and after probiotic supplementation and to assess composition of mucosal pouch microbiota. METHODS: Sixteen patients with severe pouchitis underwent endoscopy with biopsies of the pouch on three occasions: during active pouchitis; clinical remission by 4 weeks of antibiotics; after 8 weeks of subsequent probiotic supplementation (Ecologic 825, Winclove, Amsterdam, the Netherlands). Thirteen individuals with a healthy ileoanal pouch were sampled once as controls. Ussing chambers were used to assess transmucosal passage of Escherichia coli K12, permeability to horseradish peroxidase (HRP) and 5¹Cr-EDTA. Composition and diversity of the microbiota was analysed using Human Intestinal Tract Chip. RESULTS: Pouchitis Disease Activity Index (PDAI) was significantly improved after antibiotic and probiotic supplementation. Escherichia coli K12 passage during active pouchitis [3.7 (3.4-8.5); median (IQR)] was significantly higher than in controls [1.7 (1.0-2.4); P < 0.01], did not change after antibiotic treatment [5.0 (3.3-7.1); P = ns], but was significantly reduced after subsequent probiotic supplementation [2.2 (1.7-3.3); P < 0.05]. No significant effects of antibiotics or probiotics were observed on composition of mucosal pouch microbiota; however, E. coli passage correlated with bacterial diversity (r = -0.40; P = 0.018). Microbial groups belonging to Bacteroidetes and Clostridium clusters IX, XI and XIVa were associated with healthy pouches. CONCLUSIONS: Probiotics restored the mucosal barrier to E. coli and HRP in patients with pouchitis, a feasible factor in prevention of recurrence during maintenance treatment. Restored barrier function did not translate into significant changes in mucosal microbiota composition, but bacterial diversity correlated with barrier function.

Enemas with N-acetylcysteine can reduce the level of oxidative damage in cells of the colonic mucosa diverted from the faecal stream.

BACKGROUND: Oxidative stress has been related to inflammation of the colonic mucosa in patients with diversion colitis (DC). AIM: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the antioxidants effects of n-acetylcysteine (NAC) in colon segments without faecal stream. METHODS: Thirty-six Wistar rats were subjected to diversion of the faecal stream by proximal colostomy and a distal mucosal colon fistula. They were distributed into three experimental groups of 12 animals each; the animals in each group underwent daily enemas containing saline solution (control group) or either a 25 or 100 mg/kg dose of NAC (treated groups). In each group, animals were sacrificed after 2 or 4 weeks. The degree of inflammation was determined by histopathological analysis and stratified by inflammatory grading scale. Oxidative DNA damage was measured by comet assay. The Mann-Whitney test and ANOVA were used for statistical analysis; p<0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: The oxidative DNA damage in colon segments without faecal stream was significantly lower in animals treated with either concentration of NAC than in control group, regardless of the duration of intervention (p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Intrarectal application of NAC reduces the inflammation as well as DNA oxidative damage and could be beneficial as a complementary agent in the treatment of DC.