Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Sensors (Basel) ; 23(13)2023 Jun 21.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37447632

RESUMO

A retinal prosthesis, also known as a bionic eye, is a device that can be implanted to partially restore vision in patients with retinal diseases that have resulted in the loss of photoreceptors (e.g., age-related macular degeneration and retinitis pigmentosa). Recently, there have been major breakthroughs in retinal prosthesis technology, with the creation of numerous types of implants, including epiretinal, subretinal, and suprachoroidal sensors. These devices can stimulate the remaining cells in the retina with electric signals to create a visual sensation. A literature review of the pre-clinical and clinical studies published between 2017 and 2023 is conducted. This narrative review delves into the retinal anatomy, physiology, pathology, and principles underlying electronic retinal prostheses. Engineering aspects are explored, including electrode-retina alignment, electrode size and material, charge density, resolution limits, spatial selectivity, and bidirectional closed-loop systems. This article also discusses clinical aspects, focusing on safety, adverse events, visual function, outcomes, and the importance of rehabilitation programs. Moreover, there is ongoing debate over whether implantable retinal devices still offer a promising approach for the treatment of retinal diseases, considering the recent emergence of cell-based and gene-based therapies as well as optogenetics. This review compares retinal prostheses with these alternative therapies, providing a balanced perspective on their advantages and limitations. The recent advancements in retinal prosthesis technology are also outlined, emphasizing progress in engineering and the outlook of retinal prostheses. While acknowledging the challenges and complexities of the technology, this article highlights the significant potential of retinal prostheses for vision restoration in individuals with retinal diseases and calls for continued research and development to refine and enhance their performance, ultimately improving patient outcomes and quality of life.


Assuntos
Engenharia Biomédica , Retina , Doenças Retinianas , Próteses Visuais , Humanos , Qualidade de Vida , Retina/patologia , Retina/fisiologia , Doenças Retinianas/patologia , Doenças Retinianas/terapia , Próteses Visuais/efeitos adversos , Próteses Visuais/normas , Próteses Visuais/tendências , Engenharia Biomédica/instrumentação , Engenharia Biomédica/tendências , Eletrodos Implantados/normas , Seleção de Pacientes , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol ; 253(3): 381-7, 2015 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25219982

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: To restore vision in patients with retinitis pigmentosa, several types of electronic devices have been developed to stimulate neurons at different levels along the visual pathway. Subretinal stimulation of the retina with the Retina Implant Alpha IMS (Retina Implant AG, Reutlingen, Germany) has been demonstrated to provide useful vision in daily life. Here we evaluated the safety of this device. METHODS: An interventional, prospective, multi-center, single-arm study was conducted in patients with retinitis pigmentosa with the Retina Implant Alpha IMS. The results from the first nine patients of a single center regarding safety of the device are reported. Any untoward medical occurrence related or unrelated to the tested device was documented and evaluated. RESULTS: Nine adult subjects were included in the study at the Tübingen site. Seventy-five adverse events occurred in total, and 53 affected the eye and its adnexa. Thirty-one ocular adverse events had a relationship to the implant that was classified as "certain" while 19 had a probable or possible relationship; three had no relationship to the implant. Thirty-nine ocular adverse events resolved without sequelae, two resolved with sequelae, 11 remained unresolved, and in one the status was unknown. The intensity of ocular adverse events was mild in the majority of cases (n = 45), while six were of moderate and two of severe intensity. There was no non-ocular adverse event with certain relationship to the device. One subject lost light perception (without light localization) in her study eye. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, this prospective study, "Safety and Efficacy of Subretinal Implants for Partial Restoration of Vision in Blind Patients," shows that the Retina Implant Alpha IMS is an option for restoring vision using a subretinal stimulation device with a clinically acceptable safety profile.


Assuntos
Eletrodos Implantados/efeitos adversos , Amaurose Congênita de Leber/cirurgia , Retina/cirurgia , Retinose Pigmentar/cirurgia , Transtornos da Visão/reabilitação , Próteses Visuais/efeitos adversos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica/instrumentação , Angiofluoresceinografia , Humanos , Pressão Intraocular , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Método Simples-Cego , Tomografia de Coerência Óptica
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA