Carotid Baroreceptor Magnetic Activation and Beat-to-Beat Blood Pressure Variability, Implications to Treat Abrupt Blood Pressure Elevation in Labile Hypertension.

Mounting evidence suggests enhanced blood pressure (BP) variability (BPV) independent role in cardiovascular (CV) damage. The goal was to estimate the effect of the carotid baroreceptor (CB) magnetic stimulation on sudden high BP elevation. Mean femoral arterial BP (MAP), heart rate (HR), baroreflex sensitivity (BRS), and ear lobe skin microcirculatory blood flow, by microphotoelectric plethysmography (MPPG), were simultaneously recorded in conscious rabbits sedated by pentobarbital intravenous (i.v.) infusion (5 mg/kg/h) after 40 min CB exposure to 350 mT static magnetic field (SMF), by Nd2 -Fe14 -B magnets (n = 14), or sham magnets exposure (n = 14). BRS was assessed from HR and MAP responses to abrupt hypotension induced by i.v. bolus injections of nitroprusside (Ni) and abrupt MAP elevation (MAPAE ) by i.v. bolus of phenylephrine (Ph). Beat-to-beat BPV was estimated by MAP standard deviation. SMF CB exposure significantly increased BRSNi (74.5 ± 17.8%, P < 0.001) and microcirculation (23.8% ± 11.0%, P = 0.039); decreased MAP (-5.7 ± 1.7%, P < 0.014) and phenylephrine-induced MAPAE (-19.1%, P = 0.043). MAPAE positively correlated with resting MAP (r = 0.342, P = 0.0383) and MAP SD (r = 0.383, P = 0.0194), and inversely with BRSPh (r = -0.47, P = 0.0156). SMF CB exposure enhanced the nitroprusside, which acts by releasing nitric oxide (NO), vasodilatory effect. This indicates arterial baroreflex to improve vessel sensitivity to NO, which is a new physiology with BP buffering effect. A positive correlation of MAP SD to phenylephrine BP ramps suggests a causal relationship and BPV prognostic significance to forecast abrupt BP elevation. Mechano/baroreceptor magneto-sensing property proposed to be the basic physiology by which SMFs boost CV autonomic regulation with potential implementation in high CV risk labile arterial hypertensive disease. © 2022 Bioelectromagnetics Society.

Effects of carotid baroreceptor stimulation on aortic remodeling in obese rats.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Our previous study found carotid baroreceptor stimulation (CBS) reduces body weight and white adipose tissue (WAT) weight, restores abnormal secretion of adipocytokines and inflammation factors, decreases systolic blood pressure (SBP) by inhibiting activation of sympathetic nervous system (SNS) and renin-angiotensin system (RAS) in obese rats. In this study, we explore effects of CBS on aortic remodeling in obese rats. METHODS AND RESULTS: Rats were fed high-fat diet (HFD) for 16 weeks to induce obesity and underwent either CBS device implantation and stimulation or sham operation at 8 weeks. BP and body weight were measured weekly. RAS activity of WAT, histological, biochemical and functional profiles of aortas were detected after 16 weeks. CBS effectively decreased BP in obese rats, downregulated mRNA expression of angiotensinogen (AGT) and renin in WAT, concentrations of AGT, renin, angiotensin II (Ang II), protein levels of Ang II receptor 1 (AT1R) and Ang II receptor 2 (AT2R) in WAT were declined. CBS inhibited reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation, inflammatory response and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress in aortas of obese rats, restrained vascular wall thickening and vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) phenotypic switching, increased nitric oxide (NO) synthesis, promoted endothelium-dependent vasodilatation by decreasing protein expression of AT1R and leptin receptor (LepR), increasing protein expression of adiponectin receptor 1 (AdipoR1) in aortic VSMCs. CONCLUSION: CBS reduced BP and reversed aortic remodeling in obese rats, the underlying mechanism might be related to the suppressed SNS activity, restored adipocytokine secretion and restrained RAS activity of WAT.

Cost-impact analysis of baroreflex activation therapy in chronic heart failure patients in the United States.

BACKGROUND: The study evaluated the cost of baroreflex activation therapy plus guideline directed therapy (BAT + GDT) compared to GDT alone for HF patients with reduced ejection fraction and New York Heart Association Class III or II (with a recent history of III). Baroreflex activation therapy (BAT) is delivered by an implantable device that stimulates the baroreceptors through an electrode attached to the outside of the carotid artery, which rebalances the autonomic nervous system to regain cardiovascular (CV) homeostasis. The BeAT-HF trial evaluated the safety and effectiveness of BAT. METHODS: A cost impact model was developed from a U.S. health care payer or integrated delivery network perspective over a 3-year period for BAT + GDT versus GDT alone. Expected costs were calculated by utilizing 6-month data from the BeAT-HF trial and existing literature. HF hospitalization rates were extrapolated based on improvement in NT-proBNP. RESULTS: At baseline the expected cost of BAT + GDT were $29,526 per patient more than GDT alone due to BAT device and implantation costs. After 3 years, the predicted cost per patient was $9521 less expensive for BAT + GDT versus GDT alone due to lower rates of significant HF hospitalizations, CV non-HF hospitalizations, and resource intensive late-stage procedures (LVADs and heart transplants) among the BAT + GDT group. CONCLUSIONS: BAT + GDT treatment becomes less costly than GDT alone beginning between years 1 and 2 and becomes less costly cumulatively between years 2 and 3, potentially providing significant savings over time. As additional BeAT-HF trial data become available, the model can be updated to show longer term effects.

A Paradoxical Vasodilatory Nutraceutical Intervention for Prevention and Attenuation of Migraine-A Hypothetical Review.

Studies suggest that migraine pain has a vascular component. The prevailing dogma is that peripheral vasoconstriction activates baroreceptors in central, large arteries. Dilatation of central vessels stimulates nociceptors and induces cortical spreading depression. Studies investigating nitric oxide (NO) donors support the indicated hypothesis that pain is amplified when acutely administered. In this review, we provide an alternate hypothesis which, if substantiated, may provide therapeutic opportunities for attenuating migraine frequency and severity. We suggest that in migraines, heightened sympathetic tone results in progressive central microvascular constriction. Suboptimal parenchymal blood flow, we suggest, activates nociceptors and triggers headache pain onset. Administration of NO donors could paradoxically promote constriction of the microvasculature as a consequence of larger upstream central artery vasodilatation. Inhibitors of NO production are reported to alleviate migraine pain. We describe how constriction of larger upstream arteries, induced by NO synthesis inhibitors, may result in a compensatory dilatory response of the microvasculature. The restoration of central capillary blood flow may be the primary mechanism for pain relief. Attenuating the propensity for central capillary constriction and promoting a more dilatory phenotype may reduce frequency and severity of migraines. Here, we propose consideration of two dietary nutraceuticals for reducing migraine risk: L-arginine and aged garlic extracts.

Baroreflex Amplification and Carotid Body Modulation for the Treatment of Resistant Hypertension.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Patients with true resistant hypertension (RH) are characterized by having high sympathetic activity and therefore potentially benefit from treatments such as baroreflex amplification (baroreflex activation therapy (BAT) or endovascular baroreflex amplification therapy (EVBA)) or carotid body (CB) modulation. This review aims at providing an up-to-date overview of the available evidence regarding these two therapies. RECENT FINDINGS: In recent years, increasing evidence has confirmed the potential of baroreflex amplification, either electrically (Barostim neo) or mechanically (MobiusHD), to improve blood pressure control on short- and long-term with only few side effects, in patients with RH. Two studies regarding unilateral CB resection did not show a significant change in blood pressure. Only limited studies regarding CB modulation showed promising results for transvenous CB ablation, but not for unilateral CB resection. Despite promising results from mostly uncontrolled studies, more evidence regarding the safety and efficacy from ongoing large randomized sham-controlled trials is needed before baroreflex amplification and CB modulation can be implemented in routine clinical practice.

New approaches for treating atrial fibrillation: Focus on autonomic modulation.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a rapidly growing clinical problem in routine practice, both for cardiologists as well as general practitioners. Current therapies aimed at the management of AF include anti-arrhythmic drug therapy and catheter ablation. These therapies have a number of limitations and risks, and have disappointing long-term efficacy in maintaining sinus rhythm and improving hard clinical outcomes. Because of this, there is growing interest in pursuing alternative management strategies in patients with AF. This review seeks to highlight emerging AF therapies, with a specific focus on several modalities aimed at modulation of the autonomic nervous system. These therapies have shown promise in early pre-clinical and clinical trials, and represent exciting alternatives to standard AF treatment.

Baroreflex activation therapy systems: current status and future prospects.

Introduction: Resistant hypertension is characterized by an hyperadrenergic tone and by a neurohumoral activation. In this condition drug therapies are unable to obtain a good control of blood pressure and therefore need a contribution from non-pharmachological approach. To this aim it has been hypothesized that to lower blood pressure this could be obtained through stimulation of carotid baroreceptors and modulation of the adrenergic tone.Areas covered: several studies and trials have evaluated the safety and efficacy of two devices-based therapies and this review will discuss the research obtained mainly in resistant hypertensive subjects.Expert opinion: the studies performed have clearly shown the safety and efficacy of these approaches. The stimulation of carotid baroreceptors induces a significant reduction in blood pressure values associated with a reduction in adrenergic tone. The two systems have same limitations. While baroreflex activation therapy has been upgraded to a more simple system, an upgrade of endovascular baroreflex amplification will be able to reduce the side effects. Due to the fact that neurohumoral activation and hyperadrenergic tone are present in several pathophysiological conditions it is possible to assume a wider use of these systems in the future.

Carotid baroreceptor stimulation suppresses ventricular fibrillation in canines with chronic heart failure.

Carotid baroreceptor stimulation (CBS) has been shown to improve cardiac dysfunction and pathological structure remodelling. This study aimed to investigate the effects of CBS on the ventricular electrophysiological properties in canines with chronic heart failure (CHF). Thirty-eight beagles were randomized into control (CON), CHF, low-level CBS (LL-CBS), and moderate-level CBS (ML-CBS) groups. The CHF model was established with 6 weeks of rapid right ventricular pacing (RVP), and concomitant LL-CBS and ML-CBS were applied in the LL-CBS and ML-CBS groups, respectively. After 6 weeks of RVP, ventricular electrophysiological parameters and left stellate ganglion (LSG) neural activity and function were measured. Autonomic neural remodelling in the LSG and left ventricle (LV) and ionic remodelling in the LV were detected. Compared with the CHF group, both LL-CBS and ML-CBS decreased spatial dispersion of action potential duration (APD), suppressed APD alternans, reduced ventricular fibrillation (VF) inducibility, and inhibited enhanced LSG neural discharge and function. Only ML-CBS significantly inhibited ventricular repolarization prolongation and increased the VF threshold. Moreover, ML-CBS inhibited the increase in growth-associated protein-43 and tyrosine hydroxylase-positive nerve fibre densities in LV, increased acetylcholinesterase protein expression in LSG, and decreased nerve growth factor protein expression in LSG and LV. Chronic RVP resulted in a remarkable reduction in protein expression encoding both potassium and L-type calcium currents; these changes were partly amended by ML-CBS and LL-CBS. In conclusion, CBS suppresses VF in CHF canines, potentially by modulating autonomic nerve and ion channels. In addition, the effects of ML-CBS on ventricular electrophysiological properties, autonomic remodelling, and ionic remodelling were superior to those of LL-CBS.

Cardiovascular phenotyping for personalized lifestyle treatments of chronic abdominal pain in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A randomized pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Different physical exercise interventions for pain and other related symptoms largely follow non-personalized guidelines and show a high degree of variability in outcome. These interventions are considered to have different pathways toward improvement in autonomic regulation of energy metabolism. The current pilot study was conducted to assess the predictive value of individual cardiovascular (CV) activity markers at rest to predict clinical outcomes for two popular exercise-based interventions (walking and yoga) in patients with Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS). METHODS: Twenty-seven adult participants with IBS were randomly assigned to a 16-biweekly Iyengar yoga or walking program. They completed pre- and post-treatment assessments on IBS symptom severity, affective and somatic complaints, and various measures of resting autonomic function including blood pressure (BP), heart rate and its variability, baroreceptor sensitivity (BRS) to activations and inhibitions with gains of brady- and tachycardiac baro-responses, and BP start points for these spontaneous baroreflexes. RESULTS: Pretreatment BRS was differentially related to clinical response for the treatment groups. Specifically, a significant decrease in pain severity was found in response to yoga for those participants who had lower resting BRS to activations, but decreased pain severity was associated with higher resting BRS for those in the walking group. The effect was not related to affective symptom relief. Other CV measures showed similar associations with clinical outcomes for both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The data suggest therefore that CV based phenotypes may be useful in personalizing clinical interventions for IBS. They may also point to autonomic mechanisms that are targets for such interventions.

Carotid baroreceptor stimulation in obese rats affects white and brown adipose tissues differently in metabolic protection.

The sympathetic nervous system (SNS) regulates the functions of white adipose tissue (WAT) and brown adipose tissue (BAT) tightly. Carotid baroreceptor stimulation (CBS) efficiently inhibits SNS activation. We hypothesized that CBS would protect against obesity. We administered CBS to obese rats and measured sympathetic and AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK)/ PPAR pathway responses as well as changes in perirenal WAT (PWAT), epididymal WAT (EWAT), and interscapular BAT (IBAT). CBS alleviated obesity-related metabolic changes, improving insulin resistance; reducing adipocyte hypertrophy, body weight, and adipose tissue weights; and decreasing norepinephrine but increasing acetylcholine in plasma, PWAT, EWAT, and IBAT. CBS also downregulated fatty acid translocase (CD36), fatty acid transport protein (FATP), phosphorylated and total hormone sensitive lipase, phosphorylated and total protein kinase A, and PPARγ in obese rats. Simultaneously, CBS upregulated phosphorylated adipose triglyceride lipase, phosphorylated and total AMPK, and PPARα in PWAT, EWAT, and IBAT. However, BAT and WAT responses differed; although many responses were more sensitive in IBAT, responses of CD36, FATP, and PPARγ were more sensitive in PWAT and EWAT. Overall, CBS decreased chronically activated SNS and ameliorated obesity-related metabolic disorders by regulating the AMPK/PPARα/γ pathway.

Kidney protective effects of baroreflex activation therapy in patients with resistant hypertension.

Baroreflex activation therapy (BAT) is approved for the treatment of resistant hypertension. In addition to blood pressure (BP) reduction, pilot studies suggested several organoprotective effects of BAT. Thirty-two patients with resistant hypertension were prospectively treated with BAT. Besides office BP and 24-hour ambulatory BP (ABP) measurements, detection of a urinary proteome-based classifier (CKD273), which has been shown to predict chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression, was carried out at baseline and after 6 months of BAT. Office BP significantly decreased from 170 ± 25/90 ± 18 to 149 ± 29/82 ± 18 mm Hg. Analysis of CKD273 score and eGFR with CKD-EPI equation at baseline revealed strong correlation (r = 0.568, P < 0.001). After 6 months of BAT, there was no significant change in CKD273 score (-0.061 [95% CI: -0.262 to 0.140], P = 0.601). However, by stratification of the data regarding ABP response, there was a statistically significant (P = 0.0113) reduction in the CKD273 score from a mean of 0.161 [95% CI: -0.093 to 0.414] to -0.346 [95% CI: -0.632 to -0.060] after BAT in patients with systolic ABP decrease of ≥5 mm Hg. These data emphasized potential nephroprotective effects of BAT in patients with sufficient BP response.

An early analysis of cost-utility of baroreflex activation therapy in advanced chronic heart failure in Germany.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate cost-utility of baroreflex activation therapy (BAT) using the Barostim neo™ device (CVRx Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA) compared with optimized medical management in patients with advanced chronic heart failure (NYHA class III) who were not eligible for treatment with cardiac resynchronization therapy, from a statutory health insurance perspective in Germany over a lifetime horizon. METHODS: A decision analytic model was developed using the combination of a decision tree and the Markov process. The model included transitions between New York Heart Association (NYHA) health states, each of which is associated with a risk of mortality, hospitalization, cost, and quality of life. The effectiveness of BAT was projected through relative risks for mortality (obtained by application of patient-level data to the Meta-analysis Global Group in Chronic Heart Failure risk prediction model) and hospitalization owing to worsening of heart failure (obtained from BAT Randomized Clinical Trial). All patients were in NYHA class III at baseline. RESULTS: BAT led to an incremental cost of €33,185 (95% credible interval [CI] €24,561-38,637) and incremental benefits of 1.78 [95% CI 0.45-2.71] life-years and 1.19 [95% CI 0.30-1.81] quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). This resulted in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of €27,951/QALY (95% CI €21,357-82,970). BAT had a 59% probability of being cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of €35,000/QALY (but 84% at a threshold of €52,000/QALY). CONCLUSIONS: BAT can be cost-effective in European settings in those not eligible for cardiac resynchronization therapy among patients with advanced heart failure.

Role of the heart in blood pressure lowering during chronic baroreflex activation: insight from an in silico analysis.

Electrical stimulation of the baroreflex chronically suppresses sympathetic activity and arterial pressure and is currently being evaluated for the treatment of resistant hypertension. The antihypertensive effects of baroreflex activation are often attributed to renal sympathoinhibition. However, baroreflex activation also decreases heart rate, and robust blood pressure lowering occurs even after renal denervation. Because controlling renal sympathetic nerve activity (RSNA) and cardiac autonomic activity cannot be achieved experimentally, we used an established mathematical model of human physiology (HumMod) to provide mechanistic insights into their relative and combined contributions to the cardiovascular responses during baroreflex activation. Three-week responses to baroreflex activation closely mimicked experimental observations in dogs including decreases in blood pressure, heart rate, and plasma norepinephrine and increases in plasma atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP), providing validation of the model. Simulations showed that baroreflex-induced alterations in cardiac sympathetic and parasympathetic activity lead to a sustained depression of cardiac function and increased secretion of ANP. Increased ANP and suppression of RSNA both enhanced renal excretory function and accounted for most of the chronic blood pressure lowering during baroreflex activation. However, when suppression of RSNA was blocked, the blood pressure response to baroreflex activation was not appreciably impaired due to inordinate fluid accumulation and further increases in atrial pressure and ANP secretion. These simulations provide a mechanistic understanding of experimental and clinical observations showing that baroreflex activation effectively lowers blood pressure in subjects with previous renal denervation. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Both experimental and clinical studies have shown that the presence of renal nerves is not an obligate requirement for sustained reductions in blood pressure during chronic electrical stimulation of the carotid baroreflex. Simulations using HumMod, a mathematical model of integrative human physiology, indicated that both increased secretion of atrial natriuretic peptide and suppressed renal sympathetic nerve activity play key roles in mediating long-term reductions in blood pressure during chronic baroreflex activation.

Endovascular Baroreflex Amplification for Resistant Hypertension.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Most hypertension devices have been designed to interrupt or modify the sympathetic nervous system, which seems to be unbalanced in hypertension. Carotid baroreceptors play a pivotal role in maintaining adrenergic balance via a direct feedback interface and would be an exceptional target for intervention. The purpose of this review is to define the role of the baroreceptor in hypertension, to examine device-based therapies targeting the baroreflex and to explore future promises of endovascular baroreflex amplification (EBA). RECENT FINDINGS: In the last two decades, two therapeutic strategies targeting the carotid baroreceptor have evolved: baroreflex activation therapy (BAT) and EBA. Both therapies enhance baroreceptor activity, either directly by electrical stimulation or indirectly by changing the geometric shape of the carotid sinus and increasing pulsatile wall strain. By showing a significant, sympathetic inhibition-mediated effect on blood pressure, BAT has laid the foundation for baroreflex-targeting therapies for resistant hypertension. EBA is a less invasive therapy with promising first-in-man study results. Ongoing randomized sham-controlled trials are needed to better understand efficacy, durability, and long-term safety and define phenotypes that may most benefit from this treatment.

Baroreceptor Activation Therapy 2 Decades after Vascular Surgery on Both Carotid Arteries in a Patient with Resistant Hypertension: First Case Report in the Literature.

Patients with previous surgery of the carotids or significant stenosis are not included in the study populations of baroreceptor activation therapy (BAT). In this case report about a 78-year-old woman with implantation of a BAT system 2 decades after bilateral thromboendarterectomy, control of hypertensive dysregulation could be observed even 20 months after implantation. Successful modulation of the baroreceptors requires intact adventitial tissue near the carotid sinus. In our case with previous longitudinal incision and patch angioplasty, the nerval innervation had been preserved. After careful evaluation, patients with a history of carotid thromboendarterectomy might be considered for BAT.

Diagnosis and management of resistant hypertension: state of the art.

Resistant hypertension is defined as a lack of ambulatory blood pressure response to optimized medical treatment after exclusion of secondary hypertension in patients who are fully adherent to antihypertensive therapy. Patients with resistant hypertension are at high risk of complications, particularly cardiovascular events, and optimization of medical treatment remains the cornerstone of their management. Such optimization should be based on simple algorithms and include the use of aldosterone antagonists. The available data from clinical trials do not support the use of device-based approaches such as renal denervation, baroreflex activation therapy or arteriovenous anastomosis for the treatment of resistant hypertension in the majority of patients. Therefore, device treatment remains a last-resort for patients with truly resistant hypertension in the context of clinical research in highly skilled tertiary referral centres. Future research should focus on improving understanding of the intrinsic (physiological and psychological factors) and extrinsic (environmental stressors) mechanisms that contribute to a lack of response to blood-pressure-lowering drugs in adherent patients. The use of biomarkers to identify patients with early target organ damage and new technologies, such as renal nerve stimulation, to predict blood pressure responses to renal denervation could aid the selection of patients who might benefit from device therapies.

Baroreflex stimulation for treating resistant hypertension: ready for the prime-time?

The search of alternative methods for improving clinical management and outcomes of individuals affected by resistant hypertension has become a true health priority. In this review, we aimed at providing a timely overview and evidence synthesis on baroreflex activation therapy (BAT) and endovascular baroreflex amplification (EBA), two device-based therapies which rely on the principle of lowering blood pressure by stimulating the carotid baroreflex to decrease the sympathetic and enhance the parasympathetic activity. In resistant forms of arterial hypertension, accruing evidence has confirmed the capacity of these techniques to improve blood pressure control and to reduce the amount of anti-hypertensive therapy at cost of few side effects. Future results from ongoing randomized sham-controlled trials are eagerly awaited to best define the efficacy, safety and durability of effects in the long term before such an invasive approach may be considered as a suitable option in daily clinical practice.

Tonic aortic depressor nerve stimulation does not impede baroreflex dynamic characteristics concomitantly mediated by the stimulated nerve.

Although electrical activation of the carotid sinus baroreflex (baroreflex activation therapy) is being explored as a device therapy for resistant hypertension, possible effects on baroreflex dynamic characteristics of interaction between electrical stimulation and pressure inputs are not fully elucidated. To examine whether the electrical stimulation of the baroreceptor afferent nerve impedes normal short-term arterial pressure (AP) regulation mediated by the stimulated nerve, we electrically stimulated the right aortic depressor nerve (ADN) while estimating the baroreflex dynamic characteristics by imposing pressure inputs to the isolated baroreceptor region of the right ADN in nine anesthetized rats. A Gaussian white noise signal with a mean of 120 mmHg and standard deviation of 20 mmHg was used for the pressure perturbation. A tonic ADN stimulation (2 or 5 Hz, 10 V, 0.1-ms pulse width) decreased mean sympathetic nerve activity (367.0 ± 70.9 vs. 247.3 ± 47.2 arbitrary units, P < 0.01) and mean AP (98.4 ± 7.8 vs. 89.2 ± 4.5 mmHg, P < 0.01) during dynamic pressure perturbation. The ADN stimulation did not affect the slope of dynamic gain in the neural arc transfer function from pressure perturbation to sympathetic nerve activity (16.9 ± 1.0 vs. 14.7 ± 1.6 dB/decade, not significant). These results indicate that electrical stimulation of the baroreceptor afferent nerve does not significantly impede the dynamic characteristics of the arterial baroreflex concomitantly mediated by the stimulated nerve. Short-term AP regulation by the arterial baroreflex may be preserved during the baroreflex activation therapy.

Effect of respiratory rehabilitation techniques on the autonomic function in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A systematic review.

Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) show several extrapulmonary abnormalities such as impairment in the autonomic function (AF). Similarly, the use of respiratory training techniques such as controlled breathing techniques, noninvasive mechanical ventilation (NIMV), and oxygen supplementation for AF modulation in patients with COPD is popular in existing literature. However, the evidence to support their use is nonexistent. A systematic search of studies reporting on the effect of controlled breathing techniques, NIMV, and/or oxygen supplementation techniques on AF outcome parameters was conducted in three online databases: PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses statement, relevant studies were retained and qualitatively analyzed for evidence synthesis. The methodological quality in these studies was evaluated using the evidence based guideline development (EBRO) checklists per designs provided by the Dutch Cochrane Centre. Eighteen studies met the inclusion criteria of the review and were included and discussed. The evidence synthesis revealed that a strong and moderate level evidence supported oxygen supplementation and slow breathing techniques, respectively, in significantly enhancing the baroreceptor sensitivity (BRS) values in patients with COPD. The effect of the examined techniques on the heart rate variability and muscle sympathetic nerve activity was of a limited or inconsistent evidence. The findings from this review suggest that oxygen supplementation and controlled breathing techniques have profound positive influence on the BRS in patients with COPD. However, it is not fully clear whether these influence translates to any therapeutic benefit on the general AF of patients with COPD in the long term.

Blood pressure after blinded, randomized withdrawal, and resumption of baroreceptor-activating therapy.

BACKGROUND: Baroreceptor-activating therapy (BAT) has been shown to control resistant hypertension in one sham-controlled and further observational studies. Incremental but significant reincrease of blood pressure (BP) have been described after open-label temporary withdrawal of such therapy. METHOD: Our study in 16 randomized patients investigated the course of automated office, ambulatory, and home BP in a randomized, controlled cross-over design. RESULTS: After 4 weeks of blinded and randomized withdrawal in hypertension-controlled long-term carriers of BAT (2.67 ±â€Š1.3 years, 145/104 mmHg), the primary end point of 35 mmHg difference, similar to initial BP drop after BAT initiation, was not reached in any patient. Ambulatory BP rose significantly during BAT off by 10/8 ±â€Š4/3 mmHg (3.13/2.10, P = 0.007/0.002) and automated office BP by 10/4 ±â€Š2/1 (4.17/0.58, P = 0.005/0.03) at 4 weeks after BAT on while mean home BP did not change significantly by 2/2 ±â€Š3/2 mmHg (-5.9/-3.5, P = 0.6/0.5). CONCLUSION: Our data in a limited study population show, that BP rise after temporary BAT withdrawal is significant but does not reach a magnitude comparable with the initial drop after de novo implantation. Such results points to preserved hypertension control after electrical BAT withdrawal and deserves further pathophysiological and clinical clarification.