KRAS-mutated plasma DNA as predictor of outcome from irinotecan monotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: We investigated the clinical implications of KRAS and BRAF mutations detected in both archival tumor tissue and plasma cell-free DNA in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with irinotecan monotherapy. METHODS: Two hundred and eleven patients receiving second-line irinotecan (350 mg m(-2) q3w) were included in two independent cohorts. Plasma was obtained from pretreatment EDTA blood-samples. Mutations were detected in archival tumour and plasma with qPCR methods. RESULTS: Mutation status in tumor did not correlate to efficacy in either cohort, whereas none of the patients with mutations detectable in plasma responded to therapy. Response rate and disease control rate in plasma KRAS wt patients were 19 and 66% compared with 0 and 37%, in patients with pKRAS mutations, (P=0.04 and 0.01). Tumor KRAS status was not associated with PFS but with OS in the validation cohort. Plasma BRAF and KRAS demonstrated a strong influence on both PFS and OS. The median OS was 13.0 mo in pKRAS wt patients and 7.8 in pKRAS-mutated, (HR=2.26, P<0.0001). PFS was 4.6 and 2.7 mo, respectively (HR=1,69, P=0.01). Multivariate analysis confirmed the independent prognostic value of pKRAS status but not KRAS tumor status. CONCLUSION: Tumor KRAS has minor clinical impact, whereas plasma KRAS status seems to hold important predictive and prognostic information.

Enhancing detection of circulating tumor cells with activating KRAS oncogene in patients with colorectal cancer by weighted chemiluminescent membrane array method.

BACKGROUND: In 2008, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network suggested conducting a KRAS mutations test in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients prior to administering therapy that uses anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibody. However, tests of KRAS mutations have been limited when traditional molecular techniques, such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR) combined direct sequencing, are used to obtain and analyze patients' cancer tissues. If the primary tumor or metastatic tissues of patients with mCRC is unavailable, then such analysis will not be feasible. Our laboratory has successfully established a colorimetric membrane array analysis platform that could detect activating KRAS mutations from the peripheral blood of patients with various malignancies. METHODS: The current research aims to improve the above-mentioned technique not only by using chemiluminescence detection to replace color development, but also to add scores weighted according to the relevance of each gene to activating KRAS mutations. RESULTS: Our results show that the described weighted chemiluminescent membrane array (WCHMA) can detect circulating tumor cells (CTCs) harboring activating KRAS mutations in the peripheral blood in CRC. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 90.2, 94.9, and 93.5%, respectively, and the detection limitation was three colon tumor cells per millimeter of blood. The current study would significantly improve the detection sensitivity and accuracy over that of our previously designed membrane array method. CONCLUSIONS: These findings also highlight the need to prompt further prospective studies on more cases of CRC to further establish the clinical relevance of activating KRAS mutation detection from peripheral blood in anti- EGFR-based chemotherapy that uses activating KRAS detection chips and the WCHMA analysis method.