[Reflection on the psychiatric financial allocation in France]. / Réflexion sur la péréquation financière de psychiatrie en France.

For 25years work has been underway in France for the implementation of an alternative to public financing of health care. In the absence of progress, some regional health agencies are engaged in work related to the reallocation of public finances between psychiatric institutions. We propose a reflection with suggestion on the method proposed by the Provence Alpes Côte d'Azur Regional Health Agency. Without questioning the need for a reallocation of resources between psychiatric institutions, the method proposed here needs to evolve further to be applied in a legitimate and appropriate manner. There is a kind of urgency for a reallocation of resources between psychiatric institutions in France, but it implies a collective thinking and especially the definition of evaluation procedures for the selected models. These conditions are necessary to guarantee the quality of French psychiatry and equity in access to psychiatric care.

[System-immanent incentives in the remuneration for psychiatry and psychosomatics : Analysis exemplified by treatment of alcohol-related disorders]. / Systemimmanente Anreize im PEPP : Analyse am Beispiel der Behandlung alkoholbezogener Störungen.

BACKGROUND: The German fixed rate remuneration system in psychiatry and psychosomatics (PEPP) has been criticized by many specialty associations because negative effects on mental healthcare are expected through economic incentives. OBJECTIVE: Through analysis of performance data in the treatment of alcohol dependency at the Evangelical Hospital Bielefeld (Evangelisches Krankenhaus Bielefeld, EvKB) from 2014 and various simulations, the incentives of the PEPP (version 2015) were analyzed and its potential impact on patient care was evaluated. METHODS: Groups of cases were created based on the clinical data. Various parameters were evaluated, such as duration of treatment, PEPP coding, loss of income by merging cases and case remuneration. Additionally, changes in the duration of treatment, the intensity of treatment and the intensity of care were simulated. RESULTS: In the simulations a reduction in the duration of treatment by 16.1 % led to additional revenues of 1.9 % per treatment day. The calculated additional costs of 1:1 care and intensive nursing care were not completely covered by the additional revenues, whereas psychotherapeutic inpatient treatment programs showed positive profit contributions. Complicated cases with increased merging of cases showed lower revenues but with above average expenditure of efforts. CONCLUSION: The current version of the PEPP leads to misdirected incentives in patient care. This is caused, for example, by the fact that higher profit contributions can be realized in some patient groups and intensive nursing care of patients is insufficiently represented. It is not clear whether these incentives will persist or can be compensated in subsequent versions of the system.

[Normative-empirical determination of personnel requirements in psychosomatic medicine and psychotherapy]. / Normativ-empirische Bestimmung des Personalbedarfs in der Psychosomatischen Medizin und Psychotherapie.

OBJECTIVES: There is a high degree of misallocated medical care for patients with somatoform disorders and patients with concomitant mental diseases. This complex of problems could be reduced remarkably by integrating psychosomatic departments into hospitals with maximum medical care. Admitting a few big psychosomatic specialist clinics into the calculation basis decreased the Day-Mix Index (DMI). The massive reduction of the calculated costs per day leads to a gap in funding resulting in a loss of the necessary personnel requirements - at least in university psychosomatic departments. The objective of this article is therefore to empirically verify the reference numbers of personnel resources calculated on the basis of the new German lump-sum reimbursement system in psychiatry and psychosomatics (PEPP). METHODS: The minute values of the reference numbers of Heuft (1999) are contrasted with the minute values of the PEPP reimbursement system in the years 2013 and 2014, as calculated by the Institute for Payment Systems in Hospitals (InEK). RESULTS: The minute values derived from the PEPP data show a remarkable convergence with the minute values of Heuft's reference numbers (1999). CONCLUSIONS: A pure pricing system like the PEPP reimbursement system as designed so far threatens empirically verifiable and qualified personnel requirements of psychosomatic departments. In order to ensure the necessary therapy dosage and display it in minute values according to the valid OPS procedure codes, the minimum limit of the reference numbers is mandatory to maintain the substance of psychosomatic care. Based on the present calculation, a base rate of at least 285 e has to be politically demanded. Future developments in personnel costs have to be refinanced at 100 %.

[Concept of budget-based remuneration system for the fields of psychiatry and psychotherapy, psychosomatic medicine and psychotherapy, child and adolescent psychiatry and psychotherapy]. / Konzept eines budgetbasierten Entgeltsystems für die Fachgebiete Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie und -psychotherapie.

A new remuneration system is currently being developed for the hospital care of people with mental disorders. Last year, because of sharp criticism the option phase of the planned Flat-rate Charges in Psychiatry and Psychosomatics (Pauschalierende Entgelte Psychiatrie und Psychosomatik, PEPP) was extended by 2 years. During this time the Federal Ministry of Health wants to look for alternatives and possible starting points for the further development of care. Now, 16 scientific professional associations and organisations have presented a joint concept for a sustainable solution: the budget-based remuneration system. The system is suitable for ensuring that people with mental disorders are treated according to their particular needs and for promoting the appropriate further development of regional care in all treatment settings. It corresponds with the objectives as formulated in Section 17d of the Hospital Finance Act (Krankenhausfinanzierungsgesetz, KHG) and translates the PEPP system, which is currently being developed and focusses on average prices, into a performance-oriented, transparent budgetary system. The fundamental principle is the separation of the individual hospitals' budgeting on the basis of evidence-based, feature- and performance-related modules and billing in the form of advance payments from the agreed budget.

Telepsychiatry: Benefits and costs in a changing health-care environment.

In the USA, the high cost and inefficiencies of the health care system have prompted widespread demand for a better value on investment. Reform efforts, focused on increasing effective, cost-efficient, and patient-centred practices, are inciting lasting changes to health care delivery. Integrated care, providing team-based care that addresses both physical and behavioural health needs is growing as an evidence-based way to provide improved care with lower overall costs. This in turn, is leading to an increasing demand for psychiatrists to work with primary care physicians in delivering integrated care. Telepsychiatry is an innovative platform that has a variety of benefits to patients, providers, and systems. Associated costs are changing as technology advances and policies shift. The purpose of this article is to describe the changing role of psychiatry within the environment of U.S. healthcare reform, and the benefits (demonstrated and potential) and costs (fixed, variable, and reimbursable) of telepsychiatry to providers, patients and systems.

[Introduction of performance- and day-based lump-sum remuneration for stationary psychiatric and psychosomatic treatments in Germany--analysis of incentives of the PEPP system]. / Leistungs- und tagesbezogene pauschale Vergütung in der stationären psychiatrischen und psychosomatischen Versorgung - Eine Analyse der Anreizwirkungen des PEPP-Systems.

PURPOSE: This paper surveys the effects of day-based lump-sum remuneration as defined by the PEPP system on the patients' length of stay and compares its incentives to the mechanisms of the German DRG system and the former remunera-tion system for stationary psychiatric and psychosomatic treatments. METHODS: The analysis identifies the economically optimal length of stay defined as the profit maximising duration of treatment by comparing marginal revenues and marginal costs. Since it is economically optimal to extend the treatment until the marginal costs exceed the marginal revenues, psychiatric and psychosomatic facilities are incentivised to minimise the time gap between average duration of treatment as expected duration of treatment and the economically optimal length of stay. RESULTS: Compared to the German DRG system, which provides a strong incentive to reduce length of stay, the incentives set by the PEPP system imply either a reduction or an extension of treatment duration depending on the underlying cost function. If a degressive cost function is assumed, which is typical for treatments of psychiatric and psychosomatic illnesses, the economically optimal duration of treatment will be at the last upper boundary of the interval of the marginal revenue function in which the average marginal revenues exceed the average marginal costs. It is also feasible that it is economically optimal to treat the patient for as long as possible. The hospital is incentivised to extend or reduce the time of treatment to this point in time. CONCLUSIONS: Psychiatric and psychosomatic hospitals are able to increase their profits by reducing or extending time of treatment. Therefore these facilities have to justify the extent of treatment to the health insurance companies. Since the incentives of the PEPP system and the DRG system diverge, the results of research on supply induced demand in the DRG system cannot be transferred to the discussion about the effects of the introduction of the PEPP system. As long as the average duration of treatment as expected duration of treatment deviates from the economically optimal length of stay, policy makers should consider the options of adaptations, i. e., increase of time intervals or calculating cost weights based on variable costs combined with separate remuneration of fixed costs. The TEPP system and PEPPplus are already being discussed as adaptions or additions.

[The new payment system in psychiatry - do elderly people belong to the losers? An analysis on the basis of the VIPP1 data base]. / Das neue Entgeltsystem in der Psychiatrie - gehören ältere Patienten zu den Verlierern? Eine Analyse auf der Grundlage der VIPP-Datenbank.

The development of the lump-sum reimbursement System in psychiatry and psychosomatics (PEPP) (Klimke et al., 2014) is being negatively considered - also in gerontopsychiatry.Thus it is reasonable to make a timely analysis of the effects of PEPP on health-care structures. For this two analyses have been carried out. On the one hand the day mix index of elderly patients (> 64 years) was compared with that of younger ones (> 17 years, < 65 years). On the other hand younger and older were included in the analysis with regard to the available treatment minutes in exact daily classifications according to the PsychPV. It is seen that evaluation of the individual day was markedly higher for gerontopsychiatric patients not only in inpatient (difference > 0.1) but also in outpatient (difference > 0.07) setting. The exact daily classifications according to PsychPV, however, were markedly poorer for the elderly patients. Thus, on the basis of routine data of VIPP projects, a clear change can be seen in favour of the elderly patient under PEPP conditions as compared to financing according to PsychPV. However, concern remains that the ageing population and modernisation of therapy are not being sufficiently taken into account. The new reimbursement system merely regulates the distribution of available resources; if these resources are too low nothing will change by the PEPP-System.

[High utilisers with affective and schizophrenic disorders in the psychiatric health care system: a comparison between Eastern and Western Germany]. / High Utiliser in der psychiatrischen Versorgung: ein Ost-West-Vergleich bei affektiven und schizophrenen Störungen.

OBJECTIVE: High utilisers of psychiatric services are defined as a group of patients showing a great amount of service use, especially inpatient care, consequently causing immense costs. There is a lack of studies investigating differences between East and West Germany. METHODS: Service use and psychopathology were examined in 350 high utilisers receiving inpatient treatment in one East German and three West German psychiatric hospitals. RESULTS: Whereas current length of stay was higher in participants from West Germany, readmissions were more frequent in the East German participants who also exhibited higher psychopathology. CONCLUSION: Presumably, the deficient situation of outpatient health care in East Germany is compensated by increased stationary admission, consequently leading to a structural promotion of high utilisation.

[The new reimbursement for psychiatry and psychosomatics - challenges, opportunities and risks of the new financing system]. / Das neue Entgeltsystem für Psychiatrie und Psychosomatik - Herausforderungen, Chancen und Risiken einer neuen Leistungsvergütung.

With the implementation of §â€Š17 d KHG which provides for the introduction of a new, much more performance-based and transparent reimbursement system for psychiatric and psychosomatic hospitals, the Federal Ministry of Health sends the psychiatric and psychosomatic facilities in Germany into a previously unexplored area. Since 2013, there is the possibility of voluntary participation in the new system. Valid from 2015, every other institution will have to deal with the new challenges, opportunities and risks coming along with the structural changes, even though this fact will not have any impact on the individual hospital revenue budget until the end of 2016. There is still some time left to get used to the new system. This paper summarises the key data on the new reimbursement system and explains its content as well as how it works. In addition to that this paper goes into the classification system and clarifies what is essential for a solid preparation. Finally, it comments on the most common criticisms emerging since 2009. How the new system will develop remains to be seen. The fact that it will evolve seems to be certain in terms of a "learning system". It is up to all parties to promote the learning process so as to make effective use of existing potential and keep risks to a minimum.

[Reimbursement in psychiatry and psychosomatics: proof of concept for a system based on daily costs]. / Vergütungssystem für Psychiatrie und Psychosomatik: Studie zur Machbarkeit eines tageskostenbasierten Entgeltsystems.

BACKGROUND: In Germany a new reimbursement system for psychiatry and psychosomatics is under development. Based on total costs of each case from selected hospitals and day clinics, in 2013 the Institute for the Hospital Remuneration System (InEK) proposed to reimburse the hospital costs daily with step-wise decreasing remuneration, mainly depending on the ICD-10 diagnosis, duration of stay and some complicating factors (PEPP grouper). It is controversial whether this degressive system will result in an inadequate remuneration of patients with longer duration of severe symptoms, such as suicidality in depression or autoaggressive behavior in borderline personality disorder and will eventually lead to advantages for acutely ill patients with short duration of stay compared to chronically ill patients. OBJECTIVES: This study formulated and tested an alternative remuneration system (proof of concept) mainly based on an analysis of daily cost data instead of the total costs of each case. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study is based on 147,749 treatment days from 4,633 cases of patients with psychotic disorders (PEPP-PA03) in 6 hospitals. As possible cost separating factors the study analyzed days with and without intensive psychiatric care, 1 to 1 care, psychological diagnostics, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), acute crisis intervention, age at admission, the first days of treatment and day of discharge. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Nearly all factors tested were shown to be statistically significant in separating daily hospital costs. Based on these findings an alternative calculation algorithm (TEPPconcret), which grouped the cases with respect to age, intensive care, 1 to 1 care, treatment days 1-4 and day of discharge, was formulated and tested. For psychotic disorders TEPPconcret with a basic rate complemented by daily add-on payments depending on the effort involved, is a serious alternative to the PEPP system and awaits further evaluation.

Lessons learned from a colocation model using psychiatrists in urban primary care settings.

OBJECTIVES: Comorbid psychiatric illness has been identified as a major driver of health care costs. The colocation of psychiatrists in primary care practices has been proposed as a model to improve mental health and medical care as well as a model to reduce health care costs. METHODS: Financial models were developed to determine the sustainability of colocation. RESULTS: We found that the population studied had substantial psychiatric and medical burdens, and multiple practice logistical issues were identified. CONCLUSION: The providers found the experience highly rewarding and colocation was financially sustainable under certain conditions. The colocation model was effective in identifying and treating psychiatric comorbidities.

[Implementing models of cross-sectoral mental health care (integrated health care, regional psychiatry budget) in Germany: systematic literature review]. / Systematische Literaturübersicht zur Implementierung der sektorübergreifenden Versorgung (Regionalbudget, integrierte Versorgung) in Deutschland.

OBJECTIVE: Cross-sectoral integrated health-care and the regional psychiatry budget are two models of cross-sectoral health care (comprising in-patient and out-patient care) in Germany. Both models of financing were created in order to overcome the so-called fragmentation in German health care. The regional psychiatry budget is a specific solution for psychiatric services whereas integrated health care models can be developed for all areas of health care. The purpose of this overview is to elucidate both the current state of implementation of these models and the results of evaluation research. METHODS: Systematic literature review, additional manual search. RESULTS: 28 journal articles and 38 websites referring to 21 projects were identified. The projects are highly heterogenuous in terms of size, included populations and services, aims, and steering-function (concerning the different pathways of care). CONCLUSIONS: The projects yield innovative models of mental health care capable of competing with the co-existing traditional financing systems of in-patient and out-patient services. The future of mental health care organisation in Germany is currently open and under political discussion.

Utilization of traditional Chinese medicine in patients treated for depression: a population-based study in Taiwan.

OBJECTIVES: Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) has been used to treat depression-like symptoms in Taiwan. We aim to examine factors associated with utilization of TCM in patients with depression and to test whether the use of TCM would impact the use of psychiatric services with a subsequent impact on healthcare costs. METHODS: Adult patients (n = 216,557) who received antidepressant treatment for depression in 2003 was identified in the National Health Insurance Research Database in Taiwan. A Two-Part model was conducted. A multivariate logistic regression was employed to explore factors associated with the use of TCM, with a particular focus on baseline comorbidities, painful physical symptoms (PPS), and frequency of psychiatric service contacts over the ensuing 12-month study period. Multivariate generalized linear modeling was then applied to examine factors associated with healthcare costs for TCM users. RESULTS: More than 40% of individuals prescribed with antidepressant treatments for depression used TCM services. Younger age, female gender, the presence of certain comorbid mental/physical illnesses or PPS, as well as having fewer psychiatric service contacts were found to be associated with the use of TCM services. These factors also affected TCM costs for users; the TCM costs equaled to 30% of costs of psychiatric out-patient services for TCM users. CONCLUSIONS: The current study suggested a set of significant factors which could influence use and cost of TCM services for patients with depression. Utilization of TCM services could have a substantial impact on use of psychiatric services and healthcare costs for patients with depression.

History of psychiatry in Sweden during a millennium.

This report covers a millennium, from year 1000 when Sweden had only 0.4 million people until today's 9.4 million. In the 13th century, the first Swedish legal text about the mentally ill and the first hospital to treat them are documented. Control, care and cure of the ill have been shaped by social and cultural changes from time to time, e.g. King Gustav Vasa introduced a paradigm shift of care after the Reformation, when he altered Catholic buildings into state hospitals. He also ordered that medical texts should no longer be written in Latin but in Swedish. The first book dealing with mental illnesses was published in 1578. Laypersons ran the mental hospitals for centuries until the medical perspective and doctors were engaged in the 1800 s. To advance the hospital doctors' competence and skill, a Swedish Psychiatric Association was established in 1905. Severely psychotic patients could not be effectively treated until the introduction of chlorpromazine in the 1950s and there is still no cure available. Following the deinstitutionalization, from more than 35,000 beds 50 years ago down to about 4500 today, the request for outpatient treatment increased. Mandatory training in psychotherapies for all psychiatrists started in the 1970s. A major "psychiatry reform", with the hope of improving the situation for the mentally ill, and to reduce the stigma, was introduced in Sweden in 1995. The historic long-term effect of the reform cannot yet be fully evaluated.

[Do the New German OPS codes map the relevant therapeutic activities in psychiatric clinics?]. / Abbildung des psychiatrisch-psychotherapeutischen Leistungsspektrums durch die aktuellen OPS-Komplexcodes.

OBJECTIVE: Actual codes for operations and procedures (OPS) in psychiatry and psychosomatics should map cost separating therapeutic activities so far defined in Germany by the normative specifications of the psychiatry staff enactment (PsychPV). OPS codes should also allow re-estimating underlying therapy times. METHOD: Therapeutic activities of the PsychPV fulfilling the minimal criteria of the OPS definition were classified as multiples of a therapeutic 25 minute unit. RESULTS: Therapeutic activities of the PsychPV are mapped to OPS complex codes in a variable degree (psychiatrists 35 %, psychologists 42 %, nurses 43 %, special therapists 59 %). CONCLUSION: Actual OPS codes are inappropriate for identifying relevant cost-separating factors in the therapy of psychiatric in-patients. They cannot assure in their actual form the standards given by the PsychPV and need substantial revision.

The intrusion of the discourse of economics into the clinical space II: from excellence to outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: There has been a recent dissemination of the term 'excellence' in psychiatric services without a full appreciation of the origins of its contemporary usage. In recent years, we have also been witness to an increasing emphasis on the language and notions of goals and outcomes in clinical practice, particularly in the public sector. This paper examines the origin and prevalence of the term excellence in both commercial and clinical services and the corresponding preoccupation with strategies and outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: It is argued that the contemporary talk of 'excellence' has been directly imported from the commercial sector. A closer examination of the ascendency of the use of this term has not been borne out by the results of the companies purported to be 'excellent'. In a similar vein, the political and corporate talk of strategies and outcomes has been transferred onto the clinical field. Such a movement has occurred primarily through political and financial motivations. A model of outcome-driven treatment is examined as an end result of such a preoccupation with outcomes.