Can Probiotics and Diet Promote Beneficial Immune Modulation and Purine Control in Coronavirus Infection?

Infection caused by the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus worldwide has led the World Health Organization to declare a COVID-19 pandemic. Because there is no cure or treatment for this virus, it is emergingly urgent to find effective and validated methods to prevent and treat COVID-19 infection. In this context, alternatives related to nutritional therapy might help to control the infection. This narrative review proposes the importance and role of probiotics and diet as adjunct alternatives among the therapies available for the treatment of this new coronavirus. This review discusses the relationship between intestinal purine metabolism and the use of Lactobacillus gasseri and low-purine diets, particularly in individuals with hyperuricemia, as adjuvant nutritional therapies to improve the immune system and weaken viral replication, assisting in the treatment of COVID-19. These might be promising alternatives, in addition to many others that involve adequate intake of vitamins, minerals and bioactive compounds from food.

Adenosine A2A receptor activation reduces inflammation and preserves pulmonary function in an in vivo model of lung transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Reperfusion injury continues to significantly affect patients undergoing lung transplantation. Isolated lung models have demonstrated that adenosine A 2A receptor activation preserves function while decreasing inflammation. We hypothesized that adenosine A 2A receptor activation by ATL-146e during the initial reperfusion period preserves pulmonary function and attenuates inflammation in a porcine model of lung transplantation. METHODS: Mature pig lungs preserved with Viaspan (Barr Laboratories, Pomona, NY) underwent 6 hours of cold ischemia before transplantation and 4 hours of reperfusion. Animals were treated with (ATL group, n = 7) and without (IR group, n = 7) ATL-146e (0.05 microg kg -1 . min -1 ATL-146e administered intravenously for 3 hours). With occlusion of the opposite pulmonary artery, the animal was maintained for the final 30 minutes on the allograft alone. Recipient lung physiology was monitored before tissue evaluation of pulmonary edema (wet-to-dry weight ratio), myeloperoxidase assay, and tissue tumor necrosis factor alpha by means of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. RESULTS: When the ATL group was compared with the IR group, the ATL group had better partial pressure of carbon dioxide (43.8 +/- 4.1 vs 68.9 +/- 6.3 mm Hg, P < .01) and partial pressure of oxygen (272.3 +/- 132.7 vs 100.1 +/- 21.4 mm Hg, P < .01). ATL-146e-treated animals exhibited lower pulmonary artery pressures (33.6 +/- 2.1 vs 47.9 +/- 3.5 mm Hg, P < .01) and mean airway pressures (16.25 +/- 0.08 vs 16.64 +/- 0.15 mm Hg, P = .04). ATL-146e-treated lungs had lower wet-to-dry ratios (5.9 +/- 0.39 vs 7.3 +/- 0.38, P < .02), lower myeloperoxidase levels (2.9 x 10 -5 +/- 1.2 x 10 -5 vs 1.3 x 10 -4 +/- 4.0 x 10 -5 DeltaOD mg -1 . min -1 , P = .03), and a trend toward decreased lung tumor necrosis factor alpha levels (57 +/- 12 vs 96 +/- 15 pg/mL, P = .06). The ATL group demonstrated significantly less inflammation on histology. CONCLUSION: Adenosine A 2A activation during early reperfusion attenuated lung inflammation and preserved pulmonary function in this model of lung transplantation. ATL-146e and similar compounds could play a significant role in improving outcomes of pulmonary transplantation.