Burn Wounds and Enzymatic Debridement (ED)-Past, Present, and Future.

INTRODUCTION: Excision of necrotic and devitalized tissues of deep burns is key for optimal care of burn injuries. However, the modality of early tangential excision followed by skin grafting proposed by Zora Janzekovic 5 decades ago was not received initially with great enthusiasm. At present, it developed to become the standard of care (SOC) despite the special expertise it necessitates and the general anesthesia it requires in addition to several drawbacks including excessive blood loss, risk of hypothermia, and most importantly potential excision of normal non-burned tissues. Conservative non-surgical selective enzymatic debridement (ED) at present is becoming more popular as an adjunct or even an alternative approach. METHODS: A systematic review of the PubMed electronic database was conducted to identify all experimental and clinical studies about ED of burn wounds. Additional separate searches were also conducted to identify any reports missed by the initial systematic review. Full texts of 59 reports (42 clinical and 17 experimental studies) were retrieved for analysis. RESULTS: A total of 46 studies (11 experimental and 35 clinical) were about the pineapple extract debriding agent. In total, 23 clinical studies describing promising favorable results with pineapple bromelain-based debridement (BBD) concentrate were published in the last 3 years (2020-2023). CONCLUSION: Though available evidence is not entirely in favor of replacing the current surgical SOC with BBD, it certainly presents ED as a highly advantageous modality for the management of burn wounds. Newly described keratinase and SN514 also are promising new products. They both still await further investigation before being clinically adopted.

Assessing the Effect of Enzymatic Debridement on the Scar Quality in Partial-Thickness Burns to Deep Dermal Burns of the Hand: A Long-Term Evaluation.

Background and Objectives: Burn surgery on the hands is a difficult procedure due to the complex anatomy and fragility of the area. Enzymatic debridement has been shown to effectively remove burn eschar while minimizing damage to the surrounding tissue and has therefore become a standard procedure in many burn centers worldwide over the past decade. However, surprisingly, our recent literature review showed limited valid data on the long-term scarring after the enzymatic debridement of the hands. Therefore, we decided to present our study on this topic to fill this gap. Materials and Methods: This study analyzed partial-thickness to deep dermal burns on the hands that had undergone enzymatic debridement at least 12 months prior. Objective measures, like flexibility, trans-epidermal water loss, erythema, pigmentation, and microcirculation, were recorded and compared intraindividually to the uninjured skin in the same area of the other hand to assess the regenerative potential of the skin after EDNX. The subjective scar quality was evaluated using the patient and observer scar assessment scale (POSAS), the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS), and the "Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand" (DASH) questionnaire and compared interindividually to a control group of 15 patients who had received traditional surgical debridement for hand burns of the same depth. Results: Between January 2014 and December 2015, 31 hand burns in 28 male and 3 female patients were treated with enzymatic debridement. After 12 months, the treated wounds showed no significant differences compared to the untreated skin in terms of flexibility, trans-epidermal water loss, pigmentation, and skin surface. However, the treated wounds still exhibited significantly increased blood circulation and erythema compared to the untreated areas. In comparison to the control group who received traditional surgical debridement, scarring was rated as significantly superior. Conclusions: In summary, it can be concluded that the objective skin quality following enzymatic debridement is comparable to that of healthy skin after 12 months and subjectively fares better than that after tangential excision. This confirms the superiority of enzymatic debridement in the treatment of deep dermal burns of the hand and solidifies its position as the gold standard.

The use of NexoBrid™ enzymatic debridement and coagulation abnormalities.

OBJECTIVES: Current evidence on how the use of bromelain-based enzymatic debridement techniques (NexoBrid™) affect patient coagulation is limited. A single patient case report [1] suggests that a patient with 15% total body surface area (TBSA) burn developed decreased coagulation activity following debridement with NexoBrid™ enzymatic debridement (ED). Regional Burns Centres in the United Kingdom may be reluctant to use ED, particularly in larger burns, citing concerns regarding coagulation. At our centre we have routinely used ED on deep partial thickness burns since 2017 including on patients with burns over 15% TBSA. This study aims to investigate whether there is a significant disruption in coagulation in patients undergoing ED with burns > 15% TBSA or admitted to intensive care compared to the standard of care (SOC) which is surgical debridement in theatre. METHODS: This single-centre retrospective study includes all patients with a burn treated with ED at Pinderfields General Hospital Regional Burns Centre intensive care unit (ITU) from 2017 to 2020. Patients were matched to those treated with SOC at the same centre by age, % TBSA burn and presence of inhalational injury. These parameters correlate with the Baux score [9]. Percentage of burn debrided was matched as closely as possible, with coagulation profiles and platelet count taken the day before, the day of and three days following surgery. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients were treated with ED in the intensive care unit between 2017 and 2020. Four patients were excluded due to insufficient records and one patient was anti-coagulated. Twenty-six patients were included and matched as described above. Average age of patients receiving ED was 44 years, the same in the matched group. Average TBSA burn is 35.5% (35.8% in matched group). No statistically significant difference in coagulation was seen between patients undergoing ED compared to SOC when considering prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and platelet count. Both groups slightly breached the upper limit of normal on day 2 post ED and SOC. There was a slight breach of the lower limit of the average platelet count on day 2 post-ED which was neither statistically nor clinically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Large burns are associated with coagulation abnormalities, therefore isolating a single variable in this cohort is challenging. However, this study found no significant change following ED use when compared to SOC and therefore no convincing evidence that ED is associated with coagulation abnormalities. This study represents one of the largest focusing on coagulation abnormalities following the use of ED, as the current literature is limited. Our study suggests that concerns regarding coagulation abnormalities should not prevent patients with large, deep partial thickness burns or full thickness burns being treated with ED.

ical Efficacy of Early Plastic Surgery Treatment for Patients with Deep Hand Burns.

Objective: This study aims to assess the effectiveness of early plastic surgery for deep hand burns by examining variables like VAS scores, wound healing time, and excellent hand function recovery rates. Methods: A total of 130 patients with deep hand burns admitted to our hospital between January 2020 and October 2021 were enrolled in this study. They were randomly assigned to either a control group (n = 65, deferred reconstructive surgery) or an observation group (n = 65, early reconstructive surgery) using a random number table. We compared the VAS scores, wound healing time, rates of excellent hand function recovery, complications, and overall treatment efficacy between the two groups. Results: The preoperative VAS scores were comparable between the observation and control groups (P > .05). Postoperative VAS scores in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group at 1, 3, and 7 days following surgery (P < .05). Additionally, the observation group exhibited shorter wound healing times and higher rates of excellent hand function recovery (P < .05). The incidence of complications such as numbness, infection, and necrosis of implants was lower in the observation group compared to the control group (P < .05). The overall treatment efficacy was also significantly better in the observation group than in the control group (P < .05). Conclusions: These findings underscore the high clinical value of early surgical intervention, supporting its broader application in the treatment of deep hand burns and potentially improving patient outcomes.

Early Enzymatic Burn Debridement: Results of the DETECT Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

Since 1970 surgeons have managed deep burns by surgical debridement and autografting. We tested the hypothesis that enzymatic debridement with NexoBrid would remove the eschar reducing surgery and achieve comparable long-term outcomes as standard of care (SOC). In this Phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned adults with deep burns (covering 3-30% of total body surface area [TBSA]) to NexoBrid, surgical or nonsurgical SOC, or placebo Gel Vehicle (GV) in a 3:3:1 ratio. The primary endpoint was complete eschar removal (ER) at the end of the debridement phase. Secondary outcomes were need for surgery, time to complete ER, and blood loss. Safety endpoints included wound closure and 12 and 24-months cosmesis on the Modified Vancouver Scar Scale. Patients were randomized to NexoBrid (n = 75), SOC (n = 75), and GV (n = 25). Complete ER was higher in the NexoBrid versus the GV group (93% vs 4%; P < .001). Surgical excision was lower in the NexoBrid vs the SOC group (4% vs 72%; P < .001). Median time to ER was 1.0 and 3.8 days for the NexoBrid and SOC respectively (P < .001). ER blood loss was lower in the NexoBrid than the SOC group (14 ± 512 mL vs 814 ± 1020 mL, respectively; P < .0001). MVSS scores at 12 and 24 months were noninferior in the NexoBrid versus SOC groups (3.7 ± 2.1 vs 5.0 ± 3.1 for the 12 months and 3.04 ± 2.2 vs 3.30 ± 2.76 for the 24 months). NexoBrid resulted in early complete ER in >90% of burn patients, reduced surgery and blood loss. NexoBrid was safe and well tolerated without deleterious effects on wound closure and scarring.

Implementing Nexobrid for Burn Debridement in a Major Italian Burn Center: A Retrospective Review of Patient Outcomes.

This retrospective study examines the implementation of Nexobrid, an enzymatic debriding agent developed from bromelain, for burn debridement in a major Italian burn center. With previous research showing encouraging results for Nexobrid in terms of reducing the need for surgical intervention and faster eschar removal, the current study aims to add to the growing body of evidence regarding its potential benefits and limitations. The patient database was utilized to identify patients who received Nexobrid treatment between October 2019 and June 2023. A retrospective analysis was conducted to gather demographic information, burn causes, procedural details, and patient outcomes. Of the 30 patients treated with Nexobrid, 10% did not require further surgical intervention, showcasing Nexobrid's potential to improve patient outcomes. However, over 80% of patients still required additional surgical intervention, demonstrating that Nexobrid's effectiveness varies across patients and should be considered a tool rather than a definitive solution in burn wound management. A few patients developed complications, and about 10% of patients succumbed to systemic complications. The study results reveal both the potential benefits and limitations of using Nexobrid in burn debridement. While it successfully eliminated the need for further surgical intervention in a small percentage of patients, the majority still required additional surgical procedures. These findings not only highlight Nexobrid's role as a tool in burn wound management but also point toward the discrepancies with previous studies. The authors suggest future research should include randomized controlled trials, direct comparisons between Nexobrid and traditional debridement methods, and studies incorporating larger and more diverse patient groups.

Anacaulase-bcdb for the treatment of severe thermal burns.

INTRODUCTION: Accurate burn depth assessment and early excision of burn eschar with maximal dermal preservation are key concepts in the optimal care of burn injury. Although excision with knife has long since been standard of care, a newer technique for wound bed preparation utilizing a bromelain-based enzyme has gained popularity worldwide and may offer several advantages. AREAS COVERED: Here we report the pharmacologic properties, evidence for clinical efficacy, safety, and tolerability of anacaulase-bcdb for the treatment of deep partial thickness and full thickness burns. EXPERT OPINION: Anacaulase-bcdb is a safe, non-surgical, selective eschar removal agent. It offers advantages over surgical excision of burn with knife and fulfills two unmet needs: burn depth assessment and dermal preservation during excision. Evidence supports a faster time to complete eschar removal; reduced number of operations; reduction in the amount of autografting, length of stay, and blood loss; prevention of burn induced compartment syndrome; and improved cosmetic outcome.

Bromelain-based enzymatic burn debridement: A systematic review of clinical studies on patient safety, efficacy and long-term outcomes.

In 2012 the European Medicines Agency approved a pineapple stem-derived Bromelain-based debridement concentrate of proteolytic enzymes (NexoBrid®, MediWound Ltd, Yavne, Israel) for adult deep burns. Over 10 000 patients have been successfully treated with NexoBrid® globally, including in the US. The aim of our study is to perform a systematic review of the current literature on Nexobrid® outcomes. We conducted a literature search in PubMed, Google Scholar, Embase, and other search engines (2013-2023). The online screening process was performed by two independent reviewers with the Covidence tool. The protocol was reported using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses, and it was registered at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews of the National Institute for Health Research. We identified 103 relevant studies of which 34 were found eligible. The included studies report the positive effects of Nexobrid® on burn debridement, functional and cosmetic outcomes, scarring, and quality of life. Also, they validate the high patient satisfaction thanks to enhanced protocols of analgosedation and/or locoregional anaesthesia during Bromelain-based debridement. Two studies investigate potential risks (coagulopathy, burn wound infection) which concluded there is no strong evidence of these adverse events. NexoBrid® is a safe, selective, non-surgical eschar removal treatment modality. The benefits of Bromelain-based debridement are faster debridement and healing times, reduced operations, length of stay, cases of sepsis, blood transfusions, and prevention of compartment syndrome. Existing evidence suggests that the indications and the role of Bromelain-based debridement are expanding to cover "off-label" cases with significant benefits to the global healthcare economy.

Pediatric Burns Debridement Under Sedoanalgesia During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cost-Effective Alternative.

Early debridement of childhood burns under sedoanalgesia in the emergency department (ED) may help to reduce the need of surgery and delay in treatment. We performed a retrospective study in burned children who underwent debridement in the ED under sedoanalgesia between March 2020 and December 2020 (COVID group), and were compared with the same months in 2019 (control group). Demographics, burns features, admission rate, and estimated costs associated were collected. A total of 733 children presented at the ED with burns (302 COVID group and 431 control group) without significant differences in burn features between them. Admission rate was significantly lower in COVID group (9.4% vs 19.4%; P < .001), as was the total associated cost for each group ($101 585 vs $209 656; P < .001). The use of sedoanalgesia for the early treatment of pediatric burns in the ED during COVID-19 pandemic is a cost-effective alternative that has reduced the need for hospital admission and associated costs.

Coagulation side effects of enzymatic debridement in burned patients.

OBJECTIVES: Bromelain-based enzymatic debridement has emerged as a valuable option to the standard surgical intervention for debridement in burn injuries. Adverse effects on coagulation parameters after enzymatic debridement have been described. The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of enzymatic and surgical debridement on coagulation. METHODS: Between 03/2017 and 02/2021 patients with burn injuries with a total body surface area (TBSA) ≥ 1% were included in the study. Patients were categorized into two groups: the surgically debrided group and the enzymatically debrided group. Coagulation parameters were assessed daily for the first seven days of hospitalization. RESULTS: In total 132 patients with a mean TBSA of 17% were included in this study, of which 66 received enzymatic debridement and 66 received regular surgical-debridement. Patients receiving enzymatic debridement presented significantly higher factor-V concentration values over the first seven days after admission (p = <0.01). Regarding coagulation parameters, we found no difference in INR-, aPTT-, fibrinogen-, factor-XIII- and thrombocyte-concentrations over the first seven days (p = >0.05). CONCLUSION: Enzymatic debridement in burned patients does not appear to increase the risk of coagulation abnormalities compared with the regular surgical approach.

The Role of the Outpatient Occupational Therapist Treating Patients With Small Burns: A Retrospective Audit of Practice.

Current Australian burn care practice guidelines recommend therapies prescribed for burn injuries, irrespective of burn size. These guidelines have been informed by research related to large burns and associated treatment burden. This article describes the clinical management of small burns by occupational therapists at a large tertiary facility in Australia. A retrospective clinical chart audit was conducted for the 12-month period from January to December 2019. Participants were eligible if they had sustained a burn of 1% TBSA or less. Eligibility criteria were met for 454 patients, reflecting 77% of new outpatients in 2019. Of these, 247 or 54% of patients saw an occupational therapist. Noninvasive therapies such as scar massage, compression, silicone and taping were prescribed for 35%, 32.6%, 22.6%, and 5.9% of patients, respectively. Occupational therapist involvement was more likely postsurgical intervention (84.5%). The data presented contribute to limited research available for the management of small burns. Findings reflect use of traditional forms of therapies for small scar management; however, there appeared little use of alternative therapies, such as tapes, which may be beneficial. This study highlights the potential need for current standard practice guidelines be nuanced according burn surface area.

Helpful hints in deciding what and when to operate after enzymatic debridement.

INTRODUCTION: In recent years, it has become clear that the burn eschar in deep burns can be selectively removed using the enzymatically debriding agent NexoBrid® (EDNX). In deep partial-thickness burns, such selective debridement preserves all non-injured dermis, which is sometimes sufficient for spontaneous re-epithelization. Nevertheless, it can be extremely challenging to determine exactly what and when to operate after an EDNX procedure. In this manuscript, we sought to investigate the clinical aspect of the enzymatically debrided wound bed of laser Doppler imaging (LDI)-confirmed deep dermal and full-thickness burns after NexoBrid® application. This to evaluate the residual wound healing capacity and implement specific indications for surgical therapy after enzymatic debridement. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Mainly LDI-blue areas, determined between 48 h and 5d after burn and afterwards treated with EDNX were selected. Six practical and three expert EDNX users evaluated the high-quality digital images of the wound beds immediately post NexoBrid® removal and after a 2 h wet-to-dry (WTD) dressing period. RESULTS: One hundred and two mainly LDI-blue areas in 32 patients were analyzed. Regarding the early decision-making, there were no significant differences in the wound bed evaluations, wound healing assessment and treatment decision of all 9 EDNX users post EDNX removal versus post WTD. Moreover, there was a good to excellent consensus between the practical and expert EDNX users in the individual wound bed evaluations. Even in the evaluation of a newly developed wound bed color code, with 7 different colors/patterns to choose from, the consensus was 80%. There was also an 84% consensus on the decision whether or not to operate. All mainly LDI-blue areas with incomplete enzymatic debridement, determined during clinical investigation by expert EDNX users, required surgery. Additionally, the expert investigators demonstrated that the following wound bed characteristics were independent predictors of the need for surgical treatment: visible fat lobules (p = 0.028), translucent fat lobules (p < 0.001), dermal step-off in the wound bed (p < 0.001), visible blood vessels (p < 0.001) and coagulated blood vessels (p = 0.023). Also, higher color code ranges on our own developed wound bed classification were significantly related to a surgical intervention (p = 0.006). When including the LDI flux values, the perfusion units were significantly different (p < 0.001) between the exclusively LDI-blue areas treated conservatively (mean 145.7) and the areas ultimately treated with autografts (mean 119.5). CONCLUSION: To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to address the clinical wound bed evaluation of LDI-confirmed deep burns after NexoBrid® application. Based on our results, it is recommended to evaluate the wound bed twice: immediately after removing NexoBrid® to assess the viability of the wound bed and after the WTD period to reach a more complete decision. During these evaluations, wound bed characteristics such as incomplete debridement, visible and/or translucent fat lobules, visible and/or coagulated blood vessels and a dermal step-off in the wound bed combined with a higher range (4-5) in the newly developed wound bed color code should lead to an early and reliable decision for skin grafting. For burn centers using LDI, mean flux values below 119.5PU - in addition to the above-mentioned wound bed evaluation - are a clear indicator for surgical therapy.

A Comparison of Topical Agents for Eschar Removal in a Porcine Model: Bromelain-enriched vs Traditional Collagenase Agents.

Surgical excision and grafting of deep partial-thickness (DPT) and full-thickness (FT) burns is a cornerstone of wound care. The use of commercially available topical enzymatic agents has been limited due to slower and less complete eschar removal than surgical excision. Using a porcine model of DPT and FT burns, we compared the eschar removal efficacy of a bromelain-enriched enzymatic agent derived from the stems of pineapple plants and a commercially available collagenase. We created 40 DPT and 40 FT burns on four anesthetized Yorkshire pigs. Eschar removal was initiated 24 hours later. Two pigs each were randomly assigned to collagenase or the bromelain-enriched agent. The bromelain-enriched agent was applied topically once for 4 hours followed by a 2-hour soaking. The collagenase was applied topically daily until complete removal of eschar or for up to 14 days. All bromelain-enriched treated FT burns underwent complete removal of the eschar after a single application while none of the collagenase-treated FT burns underwent complete removal of the eschar even after 14 days of treatment. All bromelain-enriched treated DPT burns had complete eschar removal after the single application. None of the collagenase-treated DPT burns experienced complete removal of eschar after 10 days; by day 14, 35% had complete eschar removal, 30% had >50% eschar removed, and 35% had <50% eschar removed. We conclude that eschar removal is quicker and more complete with the bromelain-enriched compared with collagenase debriding agent.

Enzymatic debridement: past, present, and future.

INTRODUCTION: Early surgical debridement of the deep second and third-degree burns is still the standard of care (SOC) to prepare the wound bed for skin grafting. However, this technique has some drawbacks that explain the growing interest in enzymatic debridement as an alternative. In this article, we provide a historic overview as well as the current state-of-the-art and future prospective of this type of non-surgical debridement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A narrative review of the available literature was conducted using a systematic search. RESULTS: A total of 32 articles were included. The only enzyme mixture still used nowadays for burn eschar removal is bromelain-based. There is increasing evidence that this type of enzymatic debridement is a powerful tool to selectively remove the eschar in deep burns, thereby reducing the need for autologous skin grafting compared to surgical SOC. Moreover, off-label use of enzymatic debridement with NexoBrid® (facial, pediatric, and >15%TBSA burns) has proven to be effective and safe. CONCLUSION: There is increasing evidence that bedside administered NexoBrid®, preferably under regional anesthesia, is a powerful tool for selective burn eschar removal. However, the clinical wound bed evaluation post-NexoBrid® procedure in relation to the optimal treatment decision-conservative treatment vs. surgery-is not yet completely elucidated. More high-quality prospective clinical trials are necessary to compare enzymatic debridement of objectively confirmed deep burns with the current standard treatment and assess the effectiveness of the eschar removal, the need for surgery, the healing time of such wounds, and the long-term scar quality.

Human cadaver model as a training tool for enzymatic burn debridement (Nexobrid®): A feasibility study.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the feasibility of using human cadavers to demonstrate enzymatic burn debridement, as a training aid for clinical staff. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A single, fresh-frozen human cadaver was used. Prior consent had been given. Burns were created by flame and scalding. Unburned control sites were also assessed. Nexobrid® enzymatic burn debridement paste was applied to all sites, in adherence to the local clinical protocol for treating burned patients. After removal of Nexobrid®, wounds were assessed to determine if the cadaveric tissue appeared similar to what would be expected in living burned patients and whether the technique could be viable for training of burn care staff. RESULTS: Nexobrid® had a very similar effect upon burned cadaveric skin to what would have been expected in living burned skin. Burns of partial thickness burn depth and full thickness burn depth were debrided and could be clearly identified. CONCLUSIONS: Fresh-frozen human cadaveric tissue is a valid means of provision of training in the technique of enzymatic burn debridement. This finding was unexpected and shows that our understanding of the mechanism of action of Nexobrid® is incomplete.

Evaluation of burned hand function after enzymatic debridement.

Hand burns are common injuries that can result in long-term impairment of hand function. Enzymatic debridement (ED) prevents damage to the viable dermis due to the procedure's selectivity and has become an option for obtaining an accurate depth assessment and enabling wound re-epithelialization with less skin graft use. We conducted a prospective study from July 2015 to July 2018, which enrolled patients with deep partial-thickness hand burns and treated them with ED using bromelain. After a specified period, we assessed the patients' hand function, using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire and the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHOQ) to assess their disabilities and activities of daily life, respectively. We assessed the hand joint range of motion using a goniometer and assessed scar quality with the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS). We analyzed 72 patients with 90 burned hands at 3 months and, at the final assessment, 69 patients with 86 burned hands. Fire was the most common cause of the burns. Bromelain allowed for early debridement (73.6% during the first 24 h). At the 3-month evaluation, the mean DASH and MHOQ scores were 2.35 and 97.9%, respectively, with a high inverse correlation between the 2 types of scores (Spearman's rho, -0.78; p < .001). The mean wrist flexion and extension were 85.7 and 80°, respectively, the mean metacarpophalangeal flexion was 88.3°, the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) flexion was 112.9°, and the thumb opposition was 77°. The mean VSS score was 2.87. At the final evaluation, with a minimum follow-up of 391 days, the mean DASH and MHOQ scores were 0.18 and 99.71%, respectively. ED with bromelain in deep partial-thickness hand burns resulted in normal values at 3 months and at over 1 year of follow-up, with complete restoration of function and quality of life and good scar results.

Utilization of Acupuncture and Herbal Ointment Instead of Skin Graft Surgery for the Treatment of Burn Injuries: A Case Series and Literature Review.

Skin graft surgery is a standard treatment that increases the survival rate of patients with burn injuries; however, it leaves many sequelae. Conventional external preparations for the treatment of burns also have various side effects. In this retrospective case study, we assessed the cases of four patients with topical third-degree burns who did not wish to undergo the skin graft surgeries recommended by medical doctors and were thus treated using traditional medicine alone. A Korean medicine doctor administered integrative traditional medicine treatment to the patients using acupuncture and herbal ointments. Analysis of the patients' treatment photographs, quantitative evaluation indices, and vivid narratives suggested that their skin recovered well without adverse effects. Traditional Korean medicine treatment, including acupuncture and herbal ointment treatment, can be a new alternative therapeutic strategy for the treatment of patients with topical burns who do not want to undergo skin graft surgery or who have higher risks for poor surgical outcomes.

Pain management during a bromelain-based selective enzymatic debridement in paediatric and adult burn patients.

BACKGROUND: Pain associated with surgical or enzymatic burn wound debridement prevents many burn centres from working outside an operating theatre, creating a burden. Alternatives for general anaesthesia to manage pain in burn patients treated with enzymatic debridements, such as regional anaesthesia, have not been studied in detail. This study explores the different possibilities for pain management during a bedside NexoBrid™ procedure. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed a single-centre retrospective study that included 82 paediatric, adolescent, and adult patients with deep dermal and full-thickness burns treated bedside with NexoBrid™ under regional or general anaesthesia. Outcome measures were pain during the NexoBrid™ procedure, the safety of the anaesthesia and the NexoBrid™ procedure, logistics of the bedside NexoBrid™ procedure, and time to wound closure. RESULTS: Forty-three patients in the adult group (43/67, 64%) only presented with burn wounds on one upper or the one or two lower extremities. In 29 of them (29/43, 67%), a NexoBrid™ procedure was performed under regional anaesthesia, which resulted in low pain levels without any adverse events. All seven patients in the paediatric group, where only one upper or one or two lower limbs were involved (7/15, 47%), underwent a NexoBrid™ procedure performed under regional anaesthesia where no adverse events were reported. In these children, the use of regional anaesthesia was associated with a significant decrease in time to wound closure (average treatment effect on the treated = -22.5 days, p = 0.021). CONCLUSION: This study highlights that regional anaesthesia administered at the bedside should be the method of choice for pain management during NexoBrid™ procedures because often, it can be adequately and safely performed in all age groups. This approach will reduce the burden on operating theatres. A flow chart has been developed to guide pain management during a NexoBrid™ procedure.