Plasma Concentrations of Rosmarinic Acid in Patients on Antiretroviral Therapy: In Silico Exploration Based on Clinical Data.

Rosmarinic acid (RA) is a phenolic compound with antiviral properties, often encountered in dietary supplements and herbal drugs. Data on the pharmacokinetics of RA are lacking in cases of the chronic use of supplements containing this compound, and only limited data on the metabolism and distribution of RA are available. The aim of the study was to investigate the plasma levels of RA after 12 weeks of use and determine potential interactions of RA and selected antiretroviral drugs. Patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus took a supplement containing RA for 12 weeks, after which the RA concentrations in the plasma samples were analyzed. A detailed in silico analysis was conducted in order to elucidate the potential interactions between RA and the drugs efavirenz, darunavir and raltegravir. It was found that RA can be detected in patients' plasma samples, mainly in the form of sulphoglucuronide. The potential interactions are suggested on the level of liver metabolizing enzymes and efflux P-glycoprotein, with RA competing with antiretroviral drugs as a substrate in metabolism and distribution systems. The present study suggests that the simultaneous use of RA and antiretroviral therapy (containing efavirenz, darunavir or raltegravir) may affect the plasma levels of RA after prolonged supplementation.

Dolutegravir in Pregnancy as Compared with Current HIV Regimens in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Data on the effectiveness and safety of dolutegravir-based antiretroviral therapy (ART) for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection in pregnancy as compared with other ART regimens commonly used in the United States and Europe, particularly when initiated before conception, are limited. METHODS: We conducted a study involving pregnancies in persons with HIV-1 infection in the Pediatric HIV/AIDS Cohort Study whose initial ART in pregnancy included dolutegravir, atazanavir-ritonavir, darunavir-ritonavir, oral rilpivirine, raltegravir, or elvitegravir-cobicistat. Viral suppression at delivery and the risks of infants being born preterm, having low birth weight, and being small for gestational age were compared between each non-dolutegravir-based ART regimen and dolutegravir-based ART. Supplementary analyses that included participants in the Swiss Mother and Child HIV Cohort Study were conducted to improve the precision of our results. RESULTS: Of the pregnancies in the study, 120 were in participants who received dolutegravir, 464 in those who received atazanavir-ritonavir, 185 in those who received darunavir-ritonavir, 243 in those who received rilpivirine, 86 in those who received raltegravir, and 159 in those who received elvitegravir-cobicistat. The median age at conception was 29 years; 51% of the pregnancies were in participants who started ART before conception. Viral suppression was present at delivery in 96.7% of the pregnancies in participants who received dolutegravir; corresponding percentages were 84.0% for atazanavir-ritonavir, 89.2% for raltegravir, and 89.8% for elvitegravir-cobicistat (adjusted risk differences vs. dolutegravir, -13.0 percentage points [95% confidence interval {CI}, -17.0 to -6.1], -17.0 percentage points [95% CI, -27.0 to -2.4], and -7.0 percentage points [95% CI, -13.3 to -0.0], respectively). The observed risks of preterm birth were 13.6 to 17.6%. Adjusted risks of infants being born preterm, having low birth weight, or being small for gestational age did not differ substantially between non-dolutegravir-based ART and dolutegravir. Results of supplementary analyses were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Atazanavir-ritonavir and raltegravir were associated with less frequent viral suppression at delivery than dolutegravir. No clear differences in adverse birth outcomes were observed with dolutegravir-based ART as compared with non-dolutegravir-based ART, although samples were small. (Funded by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and others.).

Standard dose raltegravir or efavirenz-based antiretroviral treatment for patients co-infected with HIV and tuberculosis (ANRS 12 300 Reflate TB 2): an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: In patients co-infected with HIV and tuberculosis, antiretroviral therapy options are limited due to drug-drug interactions with rifampicin. A previous phase 2 trial indicated that raltegravir 400 mg twice a day or efavirenz 600 mg once a day might have similar virological efficacy in patients given rifampicin. In this phase 3 trial, we assessed the non-inferiority of raltegravir to efavirenz. METHODS: We did a multicentre, open-label, non-inferiority, randomised, phase 3 trial at six sites in Côte d'Ivoire, Brazil, France, Mozambique, and Vietnam. We included antiretroviral therapy (ART)-naive adults (aged ≥18 years) with confirmed HIV-1 infection and bacteriologically confirmed or clinically diagnosed tuberculosis who had initiated rifampicin-containing tuberculosis treatment within the past 8 weeks. Using computerised random numbers, we randomly assigned participants (1:1; stratified by country) to receive raltegravir 400 mg twice daily or efavirenz 600 mg once daily, both in combination with tenofovir and lamivudine. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with virological suppression at week 48 (defined as plasma HIV RNA concentration <50 copies per mL). The prespecified non-inferiority margin was 12%. The primary outcome was assessed in the intention-to-treat population, which included all randomly assigned patients (excluding two patients with HIV-2 infection and one patient with HIV-1 RNA concentration of <50 copies per mL at inclusion), and the on-treatment population, which included all patients in the intention-to-treat population who initiated treatment and were continuing allocated treatment at week 48, and patients who had discontinued allocated treatment due to death or virological failure. Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of the assigned treatment regimen. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02273765. FINDINGS: Between Sept 28, 2015, and Jan 5, 2018, 460 participants were randomly assigned to raltegravir (n=230) or efavirenz (n=230), of whom 457 patients (230 patients in the raltegravir group; 227 patients in the efavirenz group) were included in the intention-to-treat analysis and 410 (206 patients in the raltegravir group; 204 patients in the efavirenz group) in the on-treatment analysis. At baseline, the median CD4 count was 103 cells per µL and median plasma HIV RNA concentration was 5·5 log10 copies per mL (IQR 5·0-5·8). 310 (68%) of 457 participants had bacteriologically-confirmed tuberculosis. In the intention-to-treat population, at week 48, 140 (61%) of 230 participants in the raltegravir group and 150 (66%) of 227 patients in the efavirenz had achieved virological suppression (between-group difference -5·2% [95% CI -14·0 to 3·6]), thus raltegravir did not meet the predefined criterion for non-inferiority. The most frequent adverse events were HIV-associated non-AIDS illnesses (eight [3%] of 229 patients in the raltegravir group; 21 [9%] of 230 patients in the efavirenz group) and AIDS-defining illnesses (ten [4%] patients in the raltegravir group; 13 [6%] patients in the efavirenz group). 58 (25%) of 229 patients in raltegravir group and 66 (29%) of 230 patients in the efavirenz group had grade 3 or 4 adverse events. 26 (6%) of 457 patients died during follow-up: 14 in the efavirenz group and 12 in the raltegravir group. INTERPRETATION: In patients with HIV given tuberculosis treatment, non-inferiority of raltegravir compared with efavirenz was not shown. Raltegravir was well tolerated and could be considered as an option, but only in selected patients. FUNDING: National French Agency for AIDS Research, Ministry of Health in Brazil, Merck. TRANSLATIONS: For the Portuguese and French translations of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Lack of impact of protease inhibitor resistance-associated mutations on the outcome of HIV-1-infected patients switching to darunavir-based dual therapy.

Background: Little is known about the impact of baseline resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) on the outcomes of alternative therapeutic strategies such as dual regimens. We assessed the efficacy of boosted darunavir plus raltegravir (DRV + RAL) dual regimen as a simplification strategy in virologically suppressed patients with protease inhibitors RAMs.Methods: Retrospective, multicentre study on the evolution of 228 heavily pretreated patients who switched to boosted DRV + RAL according to genotypic sensitivity score (GSS). Patients were classified as full susceptible (GSS = 2; n = 177), or with reduced darunavir susceptibility (GSS < 2; n = 51).Results: Median (range) number of prior antiretroviral regimens was 9 (6-14), with a median (range) of 2 (1-3), 4 (3-6), and 5 (2-9) major mutations to non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, and protease inhibitors, respectively. The median time of virological suppression before simplification was 49 months (IQR 39.8-63.5). Patients with reduced darunavir GSS showed a higher number of protease inhibitors-RAMs (9.3 vs 4.5, p < .01) and were suppressed for longer time (median, 61 months). At week 96, the rate of virological failure was low (two cases, 0.9%; 95% confidence interval, CI, 0.4-2.7%), and the efficacy, excluding non-virological reasons, was 96.8% (95%CI, 90.2-98.4%), without differences according to GSS or protease inhibitors-RAMs. Furthermore, significant improvements in CD4+ counts and CD4/CD8 ratio were observed (p < .01) in both groups.Conclusions: Treatment simplification to a dual regimen of boosted DRV + RAL after long-term virological suppression was not associated with a high risk of treatment failure, even in patients harbouring protease inhibitors-resistant HIV infection.

Lack of a Clinically Significant Pharmacokinetic Interaction between Etravirine and Raltegravir Using an Original Approach Based on Drug Metabolism, Protein Binding, and Penetration in Seminal Fluid: A Pharmacokinetic Substudy of the ANRS-163 ETRAL Study.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: The ANRS163-ETRAL study showed that etravirine 200 mg/raltegravir 400 mg twice-daily dual therapy was highly effective in the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients older than 45 years, with virologic and therapeutic success rates at week 48 of 99.4% and 94.5%, respectively. The objective of this study was to determine whether a clinically significant pharmacokinetic interaction between etravirine and raltegravir exists by assessing steady-state total and unbound etravirine, raltegravir, and inactive raltegravir-glucuronide concentrations 12 hours after last intake (C12h ) in blood plasma (BP) and seminal plasma (SP). DESIGN: Pharmacokinetic analysis of data from the ANRS163-ETRAL study. PATIENTS: One hundred forty-six HIV-1-infected patients (of the 165 patients included in the ANRS-163 ETRAL study) who were receiving etravirine 200 mg and raltegravir 400 mg twice daily. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Blood was collected from all 146 patients at weeks 2-4, 12, 24, and 48, and semen was collected from 21 patients at week 48. The extent of BP and SP protein binding was determined by using ultrafiltration assay. Total and unbound etravirine, raltegravir, and raltegravir-glucuronide C12h were determined by ultra high performance liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry and interpreted by using the in vitro calculated protein-bound 95% inhibitory concentration (PBIC95 ) for wild-type (WT) HIV: etravirine (116 ng/ml) and raltegravir (15 ng/ml). Median (interquartile range [IQR]) total BP etravirine C12h (536 ng/ml [376-719]) and raltegravir (278 ng/ml [97-690]) were adequate in 99% and 96% of patients, respectively. Median (IQR) SP:BP C12h ratio and BP unbound fraction were etravirine 0.3 (0.2-0.5) and < 1%, respectively, raltegravir 1.8 (1.3-3.3) and 12%, respectively, and raltegravir-glucuronide 12.0 (6.5-17.7) and > 99%, respectively. The BP raltegravir metabolic ratio (raltegravir glucuronide:raltegravir ratio) was 1.7, suggesting only weak induction of raltegravir glucuronidation by etravirine. Only three patients had etravirine and raltegravir C12h < PBIC95 simultaneously. CONCLUSION: No clinically significant pharmacokinetic interaction between etravirine and raltegravir was detected. Total etravirine and raltegravir BP concentrations were adequate in most patients, favoring virologic efficacy and confirming good treatment adherence (> 95%), despite twice-daily administration. The long half-life of etravirine and higher unbound fraction SP of raltegravir (57%) ensured adequate concentrations of dual therapy in genital compartments. Our results indicate that etravirine and raltegravir have good, complementary pharmacokinetic profiles, suggesting that they could be used in a dual-treatment strategy.

Association of raltegravir use with long-term health outcomes in HIV-infected patients: an observational post-licensure safety study in a large integrated healthcare system.

BACKGROUND: Raltegravir became the first integrase inhibitor to gain FDA approval; but with limited evidence documenting long-term risks in real world care, especially for major health outcomes of interest. OBJECTIVE: Assess raltegravir safety in clinical practice within an integrated health system. METHODS: We conducted a cohort study of HIV-infected adults within Kaiser Permanente California from 2005 to 2013. We compared patients initiating raltegravir during the study period with two groups; a historical cohort (started new antiretroviral regimen [ART] 2005-2007) and a concurrent cohort that did not initiate raltegravir (2007-2013). We used multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression to obtain hazard ratios (HR) for pre-specified incident health outcomes, employing propensity scores to adjust for potential confounding. RESULTS: The population included 8,219 HIV-infected adults (raltegravir cohort N = 1,757; 4,798 patient-years), with greater years known HIV-infected among raltegravir patients. The raltegravir cohort had increased HR for AIDS-defining (HR 2.69 [1.53-4.71]; HR 1.85 [1.21-2.82]) and non-AIDS-defining malignancies (HR 2.26 [1.29-3.94]; HR 1.88 [1.26-2.78]) relative to both comparison cohorts. Compared to the historical cohort we found no significant difference in all-cause mortality; the raltegravir cohort experienced increased HR for all-cause mortality compared to concurrent (HR 1.53 [1.02-2.31]). Raltegravir appeared protective of lipodystrophy when compared to the historical cohort but associated with increased incidence compared to concurrent. There were no significant differences in the incidence of hepatic, skin, or cardiovascular events. CONCLUSIONS: The potentially elevated risk for malignancy and mortality with raltegravir and residual confounding merits further investigation. We demonstrate the value of observational cohorts for monitoring post-licensure medication safety.

Bone Mineral Density and Vitamin D Levels in HIV Treatment-Naïve African American Individuals Randomized to Receive HIV Drug Regimens.

OBJECTIVES: Treatment of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate is associated with a decrease in bone mineral density (BMD). Treatment with efavirenz is associated with vitamin D deficiency. We compared the effects of efavirenz, emtricitabine, and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (EFV/FTC/TDF) with the effects of raltegravir, darunavir, and ritonavir (RAL/DRV/r) on BMD and 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D) levels in HIV-infected, antiretroviral treatment-naïve African American subjects. METHODS: This was a pilot study at a single HIV clinic. Forty HIV treatment-naïve African American subjects were screened, 35 of whom were randomized to receive either EFV/FTC/TDF or RAL/DRV/r. All of the subjects received supplemental vitamin D3 and calcium. CD4 counts, HIV RNA, parathyroid hormone, osteocalcin, N-telopeptide, and 25(OH)D levels were obtained at baseline and at 8, 24, 36, and 48 weeks. Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry of the spine and hip was performed at baseline and at week 48. RESULTS: Of the 35 subjects enrolled, 10 patients receiving each regimen completed the study. Median baseline 25(OH)D levels were decreased and similar in both groups. All of the patients had plasma HIV RNA <50 copies per milliliter by week 24. By week 48, there was a sustained increase in 25(OH)D in the RAL/DRV/r group (P = 0.0004) but not in the EFV/FTC/TDF group (P = 0.78). There were reductions in BMD of the mean total hip (P = 0.002) and the mean femoral neck (P = 0.004) in the EFV/FTC/TDF group but not in the RAL/DRV/r group. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of African American patients with HIV using EFV/FTC/TDF is associated with a reduction in BMD of the hip and sustained reductions of 25(OH)D not seen in the group that received RAL/DRV/r. This phenomenon may have long-term consequences on bone integrity in this population.

Raltegravir para el tratamiento de la infección por el virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana / Raltegravir for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus infection

INTRODUCIÓN: La epidemia del virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana (VIH) surgió alrededor de 1980 y ha afectado a millones de personas. La fase más avanzada de esta infección se denomina síndrome de inmunodeficiencia adquirida (SIDA), la cual se manifiesta por la aparición de ciertos tipos de infecciones oportunistas y cánceres vinculados con el VIH. TECNOLOGÍA: Raltegravir es un inhibidor de la integrasa que se metaboliza a través de la glucuronidación y no tiene efecto en el citocromo 3A4. El riesgo de generar resistencia es menor cuando se administra con otros agentes activos; cuando ocurre está asociada a mutaciones en varios sitios potenciales, más comúnmente Q148R o N155H. OBJETIVO: Evaluar la evidencia disponible acerca de la eficacia, seguridad y aspectos relacionados a las políticas de cobertura del uso de raltegravir en diferentes poblaciones con infección por el virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana. MÉTODOS: Se realizó una búsqueda en las principales bases de datos bibliográficas (incluyendo Medline, Cochrane y CRD), en buscadores genéricos de Internet, agencias de evaluación de tecnologías sanitarias y financiadores de salud utilizando la siguiente estrategia: (Raltegravir[Supplementary Concept] OR Raltegravir[tiab] OR MK 0518[tiab] OR MK0518[tiab] OR Isentress[tiab]) AND (HIV[Mesh] OR Immunodeficiency Virus[tiab] OR Acquired Immune Deficiency[tiab] OR AIDS Virus[tiab] OR HIV[tiab]). Se priorizó la inclusión de revisiones sistemáticas (RS), ensayos clínicos controlados aleatorizados (ECAs), evaluaciones de tecnologías sanitarias y económicas, guías de práctica clínica (GPC) y políticas de cobertura de otros sistemas de salud cuando estaban disponibles. RESULTADOS: Para el siguiente informe se incluyeron tres ECAs, un estudio observacional, diez GPC, y siete políticas de cobertura. Estudios clínicos: Steigbigel y colaboradores publicaron en 2008, los resultados combinados de dos ECAs fase III, que incluyeron pacientes experimentados (699 en total), con niveles de RNA VIH-1 mayores a 1000 copias/ mm3 y resistencia documentada a al menos una droga de cada una de las siguientes clases: inhibidores de la transcriptasa reversa, inhibidores no nucleósidos de la transcriptasa reversa, inhibidores de la proteasa. Los pacientes fueron aleatorizados a recibir raltegravir versus placebo sumados a la TARV previa. El objetivo primario fue lograr un recuento menor a 50 copias/ml de ARN VHI-1. A la semana 16 se observó un 61,8% de pacientes del grupo raltegravir versus 34,7% en la rama placebo, que alcanzó el objetivo primario, con similares tasas de eventos adversos. En la semana 156 (aproximadamente 3 años), 51% versus 22% de los pacientes, alcanzó dicho objetivo. Luego de la semana 156 todos los pacientes recibieron la droga en forma abierta hasta la semana 240 (aproximadamente 4 años y medio), encontrándose un 6% de falla al tratamiento. Guías de práctica clínica y recomendaciones de sociedades científicas: El Consenso Argentino de Terapia Antirretroviral 2014-2015, sustenta la indicación de raltegravir como una opción dentro del triple esquema de tratamiento de inicio de TARV, especialmente en combinación con tenofovir + emtricitabina o lamivudina ((grado de recomendación/ nivel de evidencia (apéndice 1): AI)). Dependiendo del perfil de resistencia y tolerancia al esquema previo, se le considera como una opción dentro del esquema que se sugiere administrar a los pacientes con antecedentes de falla a uno o varios tratamientos previos (AI/ AII). Políticas de cobertura: Las políticas de cobertura relevadas, de seis financiadores privados de salud en EE.UU. (Aetna, Cigna, BlueCross and BlueShield of Illinois, BlueCross and BlueShield of Carolina, Texas department of State Health Services, Health Alliance) lo cubren. Esta tecnología tiene recupero por el Sistema Único de Reintegro de la Superintendencia de Servicios de Salud de Argentina, en caso de falla previa a múltiples tratamientos y con resultados de test de resistencia disponibles. Costos: El costo aproximado de venta al público para un mes de tratamiento, en dosis de 800 mg/día, es de ARS 22.500 (pesos argentinos, julio 2015), equivalente a aproximadamente USD 2.700 (dólares estadounidenses, julio 2015). CONCLUSIONES: Evidencia de alta calidad metodológica mostró que raltegravir es eficaz para el tratamiento de pacientes adultos infectados por el virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana, tanto en pacientes vírgenes como con falla a tratamientos previos. La mayoría de las guías de práctica clínica lo consideran como una opción válida tanto en adultos como en niños, así como en pacientes con co-infección con hepatitis C y tras una exposición a fuentes potenciales de contagio. Algunas de ellas mencionan a los costos como una potencial limitación para su utilización. Las recomendaciones y políticas de cobertura relevadas consideran su uso, aunque la Organización Mundial de la Salud restringe su uso a los casos de falla a tratamientos previos.

Association between first-year virological response to raltegravir and long-term outcomes in treatment-experienced patients with HIV-1 infection.

BACKGROUND: We explored the relationship between virological response in the first year of treatment and long-term outcomes in the BENCHMRK studies. METHODS: Patients failing antiretroviral treatment with 3-class resistant HIV-1 received double-blinded raltegravir (or placebo) with optimized background therapy (OBT) until week 156, followed by open-label raltegravir with OBT up to week 240. In this exploratory analysis of patients randomized to raltegravir, virological response over weeks 16-48 was categorized as continuous suppression (CS; viral RNA [vRNA] always <50 copies/ml), low-level viraemia (LLV; vRNA always <400 copies/ml, >50 copies/ml at least once), or not suppressed (NS; vRNA >400 copies/ml at least once). The association between these first-year vRNA response categories and baseline factors was analysed with univariate and multivariate models. Virological and immunological outcomes for years 2-5 were assessed by first-year vRNA response category (observed failure approach). RESULTS: Baseline vRNA, baseline CD4(+) T-cell count and rapid viral decay (vRNA <50 copies/ml between weeks 2-12) correlated with first-year vRNA response (P<0.001); only rapid viral decay remained significant by multiple regression. Virological response rates were similar in the LLV and CS groups and lowest in the NS group. CD4(+) T-cell count increased through week 240 in the CS and LLV groups. Time to loss of virological response (confirmed vRNA ≥400 copies/ml) through week 240 did not support as strong a difference between the LLV and CS groups (log-rank P=0.11) as previously reported through weeks 156 and 192 (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment-experienced patients on a raltegravir-based regimen with early LLV may have long-term virological and immunological benefit when their therapy is maintained.

Antiviral characteristics of GSK1265744, an HIV integrase inhibitor dosed orally or by long-acting injection.

GSK1265744 is a new HIV integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI) engineered to deliver efficient antiviral activity with a once-daily, low-milligram dose that does not require a pharmacokinetic booster. The in vitro antiviral profile and mechanism of action of GSK1265744 were established through integrase enzyme assays, resistance passage experiments, and cellular assays with site-directed molecular (SDM) HIV clones resistant to other classes of anti-HIV-1 agents and earlier INSTIs. GSK1265744 inhibited HIV replication with low or subnanomolar efficacy and with a selectivity index of at least 22,000 under the same culture conditions. The protein-adjusted half-maximal inhibitory concentration (PA-EC50) extrapolated to 100% human serum was 102 nM. When the virus was passaged in the presence of GSK1265744, highly resistant mutants with more than a 10-fold change (FC) in EC50 relative to that of the wild-type were not observed for up to 112 days of culture. GSK1265744 demonstrated activity against SDM clones containing the raltegravir (RAL)-resistant Y143R, Q148K, N155H, and G140S/Q148H signature variants (FC less than 6.1), while these mutants had a high FC in the EC50 for RAL (11 to >130). Either additive or synergistic effects were observed when GSK1265744 was tested in combination with representative anti-HIV agents, and no antagonistic effects were seen. These findings demonstrate that, similar to dolutegravir, GSK1265744 is differentiated as a new INSTI, having a markedly distinct resistance profile compared with earlier INSTIs, RAL, and elvitegravir (EVG). The collective data set supports further clinical development of GSK1265744.