Transurethral resection of the prostate achieves favorable outcomes in stroke patients with symptomatic benign prostate hyperplasia.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the surgical outcomes of stroke patients with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) who underwent transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) and compare the clinical outcomes between patients with stroke and those without stroke receiving this procedure. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study analyzed claims data collected during the period of 1997-2012 from Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. We enrolled 6625 patients who had persistent lower urinary tract symptoms and underwent TURP for BPH. They were categorized into a stroke (n = 577) and nonstroke (n = 6048) group. Patient characteristics, postoperative clinical outcomes, medication records, and medical expenses were compared. RESULTS: Compared with the stroke group patients, those in the nonstroke group were younger, had fewer comorbidities, and more favorable postoperative clinical outcomes. Nevertheless, TURP achieved favorable outcomes in stroke patients with symptomatic BPH. In the stroke group, the rate of urinary tract infection (UTI) decreased from 34.7% during 1 year preoperatively to 29.8% during 1 year postoperatively (p = .05). The rate of urinary retention (UR) also decreased from 55.5% during 1 year preoperatively to 22.5% during 1 year postoperatively (p = .05). TURP reduced the overall medical expenses of patients with stroke. Annual patient medical expense during 1 year preoperatively, 1 year postoperatively, 2 years postoperatively, and 3 years postoperatively was NT$659,000, NT$646,000, NT$560,000, and NT$599,000, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with stroke, TURP reduces the risks of UTI and UR and annual total medical expense.

Physician Use of Sacral Neuromodulation Among Medicare Beneficiaries With Overactive Bladder and Urinary Retention.

OBJECTIVE: To identify physician-level factors associated with high rates of sacral neuromodulation testing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study using a 20% sample of national Medicare claims to identify physicians who performed sacral neuromodulation procedures between 2005 and 2010. Physician-level rates of device testing were determined based on the number of patients seen for overactive bladder and urinary retention diagnoses in the office in each calendar year. These rates were then used to fit a Poisson model to examine factors associated with high rates of device testing. RESULTS: The number of physicians performing test procedures increased 4-fold from 2005 to 2010. Average rates of test procedures increased from 4.0 to 6.4 procedures per physician per year (P <.001), whereas rates of device implantation remained stable (P = .23). Physicians who had higher rates of device testing were associated with lower rates of device implantation (estimate, -1.76, P <.01). Other predictors of physicians with higher test rates included more recent calendar year, testing done in any setting other than an ambulatory surgery center, gynecology subspecialty, and geographic location in the South and West (all P values <.01). CONCLUSION: Over time, physicians are testing more patients but are not implanting more devices. Additionally, there is an inverse relationship between rates of device testing and implantation, suggesting opportunities to improve efficiency and resource utilization.

Sacral neuromodulation: cost considerations and clinical benefits.

OBJECTIVES: To demonstrate the efficacy of sacral neuromodulation and compare voiding-related health care utilization costs before and after receiving an implant. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients receiving InterStim therapy (Medtronic Neurological, Minneapolis, Minn) was completed. Health care utilization was determined for the year before and the year after implantation, and included hospital and clinic visits, diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, and prescriptions. Utilization costs were derived from Medicare CPT coding and reimbursement data. Drug costs were derived from the actual pharmacy costs. Efficacy was assessed subjectively by patient-reported questionnaire and objectively by voiding diary, pad usage, and number of catheterizations. RESULTS: Sixty-five patients received InterStim therapy. Outpatient visits for urinary symptoms decreased in the 12 months after implantation with a mean decrease of 2.2 visits (P <0.0001). This resulted in a 73% reduction in average yearly office visit expenses from $994 to $265 per patient. After implant, diagnostic and therapeutic procedures performed decreased by 0.97 (P <0.0001). This translated into a decrease in the cost of therapeutic and diagnostic procedures from $733 to $59 per patient (P <0.0001). Drug costs were significantly decreased (P <0.02) from $693 to $483 per patient. These cost savings represent a 92% reduction in outpatient doctor visits and diagnostic and procedure costs along with and a 30% reduction in drug expenditures. CONCLUSION: After InterStim therapy, voiding-related health care costs are reduced. InterStim therapy is an effective treatment option with high patient satisfaction for medically refractory voiding dysfunction.