[State-of-the-art paradigm of corticosteroid therapy for immune-mediated inflammatory kidney diseases].

Since 1950's corticosteroids (CS) have remained the cornerstone of immunosuppressive therapy for immune-mediated kidney diseases. However multiple adverse events, associated with the prolonged CS therapy, became the basis for the development of novel treatment approaches. Current evidence supports the implementation of the steroid-sparing regimens for the treatment of different types of glomerulonephritis. Randomised controlled trial PEXIVAS demonstrated the efficacy and safety of early steroid tapering, starting from the second week of therapy, in patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis with kidney involvement. Several trials showed the efficacy of oral prednisolone 0.3-0.5 mg/kg/daily as a part of multitarget therapy for severe proliferative lupus nephritis. A combination of calcineurin inhibitors and low-dose CS are effective for remission induction in membranous nephropathy, as well as the steroid-free rituximab regimen for the patients with moderate risk of disease progression. Medium dose CS showed promising effect in patients with IgA-nephropathy. Long-term high dose CS remain the standard-of-care for the treatment of minimal change disease and focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, however patients with steroid-dependent and relapsing disease tacrolimus and rituximab can help to achieve steroid-sparing effect. The role of CS pulse-therapy is currently debated, nevertheless it remains a compulsory treatment in several conditions. Thus, overall trend is directed towards the minimization of the maximal doses of CS and/or treatment duration. However, to implement this approach morphological verification of the diagnosis and personalized assessment of the potential risk and benefit are required.

Influence of Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index on Occurrence of Adverse Events and Duration of Treatment in Patients With Lymphoma Receiving R-CHOP Therapy.

BACKGROUND/AIM: No studies have examined the association between the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) at the initiation of chemotherapy for malignant lymphoma and the occurrence of adverse events. Therefore, we investigated the impact of GNRI at treatment initiation on the occurrence of side effects and time to treatment failure (TTF) in patients with malignant lymphoma undergoing initial rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study included 131 patients who underwent initial R-CHOP therapy between March 2016 and October 2021. Patients were stratified into those with high (GNRI ≥92; n=56) or low (GNRI <92; n=75) GNRI status. RESULTS: Comparing the High GNRI group and Low GNRI group, the incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN) and Grade ≥3 creatinine increase, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) increase, albumin decrease, hemoglobin decrease, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia were significantly higher in the Low GNRI group. TTF in the High GNRI group was significantly longer than that in the Low GNRI group (p=0.045). Multivariate analysis showed that the factors influencing the duration of treatment were PS (≥2) at the start of treatment, serum albumin level, and GNRI. CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing R-CHOP therapy, GNRI <92 at regimen initiation increased the risks of developing FN and hematologic toxicity. Multivariate analysis revealed that performance status, albumin levels, and GNRI at regimen initiation were the factors influencing treatment duration. Nutritional status at treatment initiation may influence the development of hematologic toxicity and TTF.

Rituximab versus intravenous cyclophosphamide in patients with connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung disease in the UK (RECITAL): a double-blind, double-dummy, randomised, controlled, phase 2b trial.

BACKGROUND: Rituximab is often used as rescue therapy in interstitial lung disease (ILD) associated with connective tissue disease (CTD), but has not been studied in clinical trials. This study aimed to assess whether rituximab is superior to cyclophosphamide as a treatment for severe or progressive CTD associated ILD. METHODS: We conducted a randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, phase 2b trial to assess the superiority of rituximab compared with cyclophosphamide. Patients aged 18-80 years with severe or progressive ILD related to scleroderma, idiopathic inflammatory myositis, or mixed CTD, recruited across 11 specialist ILD or rheumatology centres in the UK, were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive rituximab (1000 mg at weeks 0 and 2 intravenously) or cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2 body surface area every 4 weeks intravenously for six doses). The primary endpoint was rate of change in forced vital capacity (FVC) at 24 weeks compared with baseline, analysed using a mixed-effects model with random intercepts, adjusted for baseline FVC and CTD type. Prespecified secondary endpoints reported in this Article were change in FVC at 48 weeks versus baseline; changes from baseline in 6 min walk distance, diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO), physician-assessed global disease activity (GDA) score, and quality-of-life scores on the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), King's Brief Interstitial Lung Disease (KBILD) questionnaire, and European Quality of Life Five-Dimension (EQ-5D) questionnaire at 24 and 48 weeks; overall survival, progression-free survival, and time to treatment failure; and corticosteroid use. All endpoints were analysed in the modified intention-to-treat population, which comprised all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01862926). FINDINGS: Between Dec 1, 2014, and March 31, 2020, we screened 145 participants, of whom 101 participants were randomly allocated: 50 (50%) to receive cyclophosphamide and 51 (50%) to receive rituximab. 48 (96%) participants in the cyclophosphamide group and 49 (96%) in the rituximab group received at least one dose of treatment and were included in analyses; 43 (86%) participants in the cyclophosphamide group and 42 (82%) participants in the rituximab group completed 24 weeks of treatment and follow-up. At 24 weeks, FVC was improved from baseline in both the cyclophosphamide group (unadjusted mean increase 99 mL [SD 329]) and the rituximab group (97 mL [234]); in the adjusted mixed-effects model, the difference in the primary endpoint at 24 weeks was -40 mL (95% CI -153 to 74; p=0·49) between the rituximab group and the cyclophosphamide group. KBILD quality-of-life scores were improved at 24 weeks by a mean 9·4 points (SD 20·8) in the cyclophosphamide group and 8·8 points (17·0) in the rituximab group. No significant differences in secondary endpoints were identified between the treatment groups, with the exception of change in GDA score at week 48, which favoured cyclophosphamide (difference 0·90 [95% CI 0·11 to 1·68]). Improvements in lung function and respiratory-related quality-of-life measures were observed in both treatment groups. Lower corticosteroid exposure over 48 weeks of follow-up was recorded in the rituximab group. Two (4%) of 48 participants who received cyclophosphamide and three (6%) of 49 who received rituximab died during the study, all due to complications of CTD or ILD. Overall survival, progression-free survival, and time to treatment failure did not significantly differ between the two groups. All participants reported at least one adverse event during the study. Numerically fewer adverse events were reported by participants receiving rituximab (445 events) than those receiving cyclophosphamide (646 events). Gastrointestinal and respiratory disorders were the most commonly reported adverse events in both groups. There were 62 serious adverse events of which 33 occurred in the cyclophosphamide group and 29 in the rituximab group. INTERPRETATION: Rituximab was not superior to cyclophosphamide to treat patients with CTD-ILD, although participants in both treatment groups had increased FVC at 24 weeks, in addition to clinically important improvements in patient-reported quality of life. Rituximab was associated with fewer adverse events. Rituximab should be considered as a therapeutic alternative to cyclophosphamide in individuals with CTD-ILD requiring intravenous therapy. FUNDING: Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation Programme (Medical Research Council and National Institute for Health Research, UK).

Onset of Pyoderma Gangrenosum in Patients on Biologic Therapies: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE: To summarize clinical outcomes of paradoxical pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) onset in patients on biologic therapy. METHODS: The authors conducted MEDLINE and EMBASE searches using PRISMA guidelines to include 57 patients (23 reports). RESULTS: Of the included patients, 71.9% (n = 41/57) noted PG onset after initiating rituximab, 21.1% (n = 12/57) noted tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) inhibitors, 5.3% (n = 3/57) reported interleukin 17A inhibitors, and 1.8% (n = 1/57) reported cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 antibodies. The majority of patients (94.3%) discontinued biologic use. The most common medications used to resolve rituximab-associated PG were intravenous immunoglobulins, oral corticosteroids, and antibiotics, with an average resolution time of 3.3 months. Complete resolution of PG in TNF-α-associated cases occurred within an average of 2.2 months after switching to another TNF-α inhibitor (n = 1), an interleukin 12/23 inhibitor (n = 2), or treatment with systemic corticosteroids and cyclosporine (n = 3), systemic corticosteroids alone (n = 1), or cyclosporine alone (n = 1). CONCLUSIONS: Further investigations are warranted to determine whether PG onset is associated with underlying comorbidities, the use of biologic agents, or a synergistic effect. Nevertheless, PG may develop in patients on rituximab or TNF-α inhibitors, suggesting the need to monitor and treat such adverse effects.

Safety and efficacy of rituximab in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in Malawi: a prospective, single-arm, non-randomised phase 1/2 clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: There are no clinical trials involving patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in sub-Saharan Africa since antiretroviral therapy (ART) for HIV became widely available in this region. We aimed to establish the safety and efficacy of rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) in patients with DLBCL in Malawi. METHODS: This prospective, single-arm, non-randomised phase 1/2 clinical trial was done at Kamuzu Central Hospital Cancer Clinic (Lilongwe, Malawi). Eligible patients were adults (aged 18-60 years) with newly diagnosed DLBCL, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2, a CD4 count of 100 cells per µL or higher (if HIV-positive), measurable disease by physical examination, an absolute neutrophil count of 1000 × 109 cells per L or higher, a platelet count of 100 × 109 platelets per L or higher, a serum creatinine concentration of 132·60 µmol/L or less, a total bilirubin concentration of 34·21 µmol/L or less, a negative urine pregnancy test in women of childbearing potential, and no previous cytotoxic therapy. Pregnant or breastfeeding women, and individuals with CNS involvement from DLBCL, chronic hepatitis B infection (unless they were receiving tenofovir plus lamivudine), or any other comorbidities that would compromise the protocol objectives were excluded. Eligible patients received intravenous rituximab 375 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2, doxorubicin 50 mg/m2, and vincristine 1·4 mg/m2 (maximum 2 mg/m2), and oral prednisone 100 mg or an equivalent drug every 21 days for up to six cycles. HIV-positive patients received concurrent ART. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade 3 or 4 non-haematological toxic effects or treatment-related deaths after six cycles of treatment. Secondary efficacy outcomes included the proportion of patients with a complete response after six cycles of treatment, and progression-free survival and overall survival at 12 months and 24 months. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02660710. FINDINGS: Between Aug 1, 2016, and July 31, 2019, 76 patients were screened, of whom 37 were eligible for the study and received R-CHOP. The median age of patients was 44 years (IQR 39-49) and 16 (43%) were women. Of all 37 patients, 20 (54%) had stage III or IV DLBCL, and the age-adjusted international prognostic index was 2 or higher in 25 (68%) patients. 27 (73%) patients were HIV-positive, with a median CD4 count of 208 cells per µL (IQR 144-422), and 21 (78%) patients were receiving ART at enrolment. Patients completed a median of six cycles (IQR 4-6). Grade 3 or 4 non-haematological toxic effects were reported in 12 (32% [95% CI 19-49]) patients, the most common of which was infection (nine [24%] patients). Of 16 (43%) deaths, ten were due to progression of DLBCL, four were due to treatment-related complications, and two were due to other causes, yielding a treatment-related mortality of 11% (95% CI 4-26%). Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia was observed in 26 (70%) patients, and grade 3 or 4 anaemia was observed in 11 (29%) patients. A total of 22 (59%) patients had a complete response. Overall survival was 68% (95% CI 50-80) at 12 months and 55% (37-70) at 24 months, and progression-free survival was 59% (42-73) at 12 months and 53% (35-68) at 24 months. INTERPRETATION: R-CHOP could be feasible, safe, and efficacious in patients with DLBCL in Malawi. This is the first completed clinical trial on DLBCL focused on sub-Saharan African populations. Given the paucity of data on treatment of DLBCL from this region, these results could inform emerging cancer treatment programmes in sub-Saharan Africa. FUNDING: The University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center.

Life-threatening disseminated enterovirus infection during combined rituximab and ibrutinib maintenance treatment for mantle cell lymphoma: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Rituximab is a well-established component of treatment regimens for B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Rituximab binds the CD20 antigen on the surface of B lymphocytes, causing an enhanced clearance of malignant and benign B cells. Thus, rituximab leads to depletion of normal B lymphocytes as well, which can cause substantial immunodeficiency. Ibrutinib inhibits the Bruton tyrosine kinase and thereby B-cell activity. It is used for the treatment of different B-lymphocyte malignancies, such as mantle cell lymphoma. Recently, the combination of both drugs has been tested in various clinical scenarios. CASE PRESENTATION: We present a case of disseminated enterovirus infection resulting from combined rituximab and ibrutinib maintenance treatment in a 57-year-old Caucasian patient. with mantle cell lymphoma. Initially presenting with myositis symptoms, further diagnostic investigation revealed myocarditis, enteritis, myeloencephalitis, and hepatitis. These organ manifestations led to potentially life-threatening complications such as rhabdomyolysis, delirium, and heart rhythm disturbances. After treatment with high-dose intravenous immunoglobulins, virus clearance was achieved and organ functions could be restored. CONCLUSIONS: This case emphasizes the risk of combined therapy with rituximab/ibrutinib for severe immune-related side effects with the necessity of continuous patient monitoring. High-dose intravenous therapy should be considered as treatment for severe enterovirus infection. In severe enterovirus infections, we recommend subtyping for the development of efficient preventive and therapeutic strategies.

Maintenance rituximab in Veterans with follicular lymphoma.

Real-world practice patterns and clinical outcomes in patients with follicular lymphoma (FL), including the adoption of maintenance rituximab (MR) therapy in the United States (US), have been reported in few studies since the release of the National LymphoCare Study almost a decade ago. We analyzed data from the largest integrated healthcare system in the United States, the Veterans Health Administration (VHA), to identify rates of adoption and effectiveness of MR in FL patients after first-line (1L) treatment. We identified previously untreated patients with FL in the VHA between 2006 and 2014 who achieved at least stable disease after chemoimmunotherapy or immunotherapy. Among these patients, those who initiated MR within 238 days of 1L composed the MR group, whereas those who did not were classified as the non-MR group. We examined the effect of MR on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). A total of 676 patients met our inclusion criteria, of whom 300 received MR. MR was associated with significant PFS (hazard ratio [HR]=0.55, P < .001) and OS (HR = 0.53, P = .005) compared to the non-MR group, after adjusting by age, sex, ethnicity, geographic region, diagnosis period, stage, grade at diagnosis, hemoglobin, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), 1L treatment regimen, and response to 1L treatment. These results suggest that in FL patients who do not experience disease progression after 1L treatment in real-world settings, MR is associated with a significant improvement in both PFS and OS. Maintenance therapy should be considered in FL patients who successfully complete and respond to 1L therapy.

Safety and efficacy of temsirolimus in combination with three different immuno-chemotherapy regimens in relapse and refractory mantle cell lymphoma, final results of the T3 phase IB trial of the LYSA.

Mantle cell lymphoma has a dismal prognosis at relapse or in the refractory setting. Among therapies, mTor pathway targeting by temsirolimus has been the first strategy approved for relapse in Europe. While its efficacy in monotherapy has long been demonstrated, its use remains limited. In the T3 phase Ib clinical trial, we investigated the recommended dose of temsirolimus in association with R-CHOP (R-CHOP-T), or high-dose cytarabine plus rituximab (R-DHA-T), or fludarabine, cyclophosphamide plus rituximab (R-FC-T). From November 11, 2011 to February 26, 2015, forty-one patients were enrolled. Patients presented with high MIPI (47.5%) at relapse and a median number of treatments of 1 (1-3). Patients were treated by R-CHOP-T (n = 10), R-FC-T (n = 14), or R-DHA-T (n = 17) according to the choice of local investigators. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was 15 mg in the R-CHOP-T arm and has not been determined in other treatment arms because of toxicities. All patients experienced ≥ Grade 3 adverse events, mainly thrombocytopenia (76%). Twenty-six patients discontinued prematurely the treatment, mostly for toxicity (n = 12) and progression of the disease (n = 8). Of note, 6 patients of the R-DHA-T arm reached complete remission (35%). Temsirolimus with immuno-chemotherapy is associated with a high rate of toxicities. Determination of MTD could only be achieved for R-CHOP-T arm. Associations between temsirolimus and other targeted therapies may be warranted for R/R MCL patients.

West Nile virus neuroinvasive disease associated with rituximab therapy.

West Nile virus neuroinvasive disease (WNVND) manifests with meningitis, encephalitis, and/or acute flaccid paralysis. It represents less than 1% of the clinical syndromes associated with West Nile virus (WNV) infection in immunocompetent patients. Immunosuppressive therapy is associated with increased risk of WNVND and worse prognosis. We present a patient with WNVND during therapy with rituximab, and a review of the literature for previous similar cases with the goal to describe the clinical spectrum of WNVND in patients treated specifically with rituximab. Our review indicates that the most common initial complaints are fever and altered mental status, brain magnetic resonance imaging often shows bilateral thalamic hyperintensities, and cerebrospinal analysis consistently reveals mild lymphocytic pleocytosis with elevated protein, positive WNV polymerase chain reaction, and negative WNV antibodies. Treatment is usually supportive care, with intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG) plus corticosteroids and WNV-specific IVIG also used. The disease is usually fatal despite intervention. Our patient's presentation was very similar to prior reports, however demonstrated spontaneous improvement with supportive management only. WNVND is a rare and serious infection with poor prognosis when associated with rituximab therapy. Diagnosis is complicated by absent or delayed development of antibodies. The presence of bilateral thalamic involvement is a diagnostic clue for WNVND. There is insufficient evidence to recommend the use of corticosteroids or IVIG.

The simplified follicular lymphoma PRIMA-prognostic index is useful in patients with first-line chemo-free rituximab-based therapy.

Follicular lymphoma (FL) is a heterogeneous disease; therefore, reliable prognostic tools are needed to plan treatment strategies. The FL International Prognostic Index (FLIPI) was developed before the rituximab era, while the PRIMA-PI was built on rituximab chemotherapy. Our objective was to evaluate these two prognostic tools in a cohort of 291 patients with FL treated in two prospective randomised Nordic Lymphoma Group trials with rituximab ± interferon. All patients had symptomatic/progressive disease and were previously untreated. The PRIMA-PI was prognostic for both time to treatment failure (TTF) and overall survival (OS) (log-rank P = 0·003 and P < 0·001, respectively). The PRIMA-PI high-risk identified a small group of patients with a very short TTF and OS compared to the low-risk group, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 1·90 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1·30-2·78, P = 0·001) and HR of 3·19 (95% CI 1·75-5·83, P < 0·001), respectively. The FLIPI risk groups were prognostic only for OS (log-rank P = 0·018). The simplified PRIMA-PI was valid in our FL cohort with first-line rituximab-containing chemo-free therapy and shows an improved risk stratification compared to the FLIPI, especially in patients aged >60 years. Patients in the PRIMA-PI high-risk group should be considered for alternative therapies.

Evaluation of the MD Anderson tumor score for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in the rituximab era.

OBJECTIVES: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is an aggressive heterogeneous lymphoma with standard treatment. However, 30%-40% of patients still fail, so we should know which patients are candidates for alternative therapies. IPI is the main prognostic score but, in the rituximab era, it cannot identify a very high-risk (HR) subset. The MD Anderson Cancer Center reported a score in the prerituximab era exclusively considering tumor-related variables: Tumor Score (TS). We aim to validate TS in the rituximab era and to analyze its current potential role. METHODS: From GELTAMO DLBCL registry, we selected those patients homogeneously treated with R-CHOP (n = 1327). RESULTS: Five-years PFS and OS were 62% and 74%. All variables retained an independent prognostic role in the revised TS (R-TS), identifying four different risk groups, with 5-years PFS of 86%, 71%, 50%, and very HR (28%). With a further categorization of three variables of the original TS (Ann Arbor Stage, LDH and B2M), we generated a new index that allowed an improvement in HR assessment. CONCLUSIONS: (a) All variables of the original TS retain an independent prognostic role, and R-TS remains predictive in the rituximab era; (b) R-TS and additional categorization of LDH, B2M, and AA stage (enhanced TS) increased the ability to identify HR subsets.

A meta-analysis of biologic therapies on risk of new or recurrent cancer in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and a prior malignancy.

OBJECTIVES: To explore the risk of new and recurrent cancer in adult RA patients with prior malignancy and subsequently exposed to biologic therapies. METHODS: Separate searches were performed of PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library and conference proceedings for observational studies reporting cancer incidence or recurrence in patients with RA and prior malignancy treated with biologics and conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs). Mantel-Haenszel fixed-effects method was conducted to calculate relative risk and 95% CI. RESULTS: A total of 12 studies involving 13 598 patients and 32 473 patient-years of follow-up were included (10, 3 and 1 studies for TNF inhibitors [TNFi], rituximab and anakinra, respectively). The crude incidence of new and recurrent cancer per 1000 patient-years were 34.4 for TNFi, 32.3 for rituximab, 32.3 for anakinra and 31.8 for csDMARDs. In the quantitative meta-analysis, biologics were not associated with an increased risk of new or recurrent cancer compared with csDMARDs in patients with RA and prior cancer (TNFi: relative risk = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.83, 1.09; rituximab: relative risk = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.52, 1.53). Secondary analyses of stratification of cancer types, the interval between initiation of TNFi and prior cancer diagnosis, and duration of TNFi exposure, found similar results. CONCLUSION: Compared with csDMARDs, there is no increased risk of developing cancer overall or some specific subtypes in RA patients with a prior cancer receiving biologics. More investigations are warranted to explore the risk of cancer development in individual cancer as well as to determine optimal time to initiate biologic therapy after the diagnosis of cancer or completion of cancer treatment.

Scientific rationale underpinning the development of biosimilar rituximab in hematological cancers and inflammatory diseases.

Sandoz rituximab (SDZ-RTX; Rixathon®; GP2013), a rituximab biosimilar, was approved in June 2017 in Europe in all indications of reference rituximab. The stepwise SDZ-RTX development program generated extensive physicochemical, structural, functional, and biological data demonstrating a match with reference rituximab on all clinically relevant attributes. A focused clinical development program followed, in two indications selected for sensitivity to detect potential differences versus reference rituximab: rheumatoid arthritis (pivotal pharmacokinetics and efficacy evaluation) and follicular lymphoma (pivotal efficacy/safety evaluation). These trials demonstrated highly similar pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity profiles. The totality of evidence for biosimilarity for SDZ-RTX, combined with knowledge that B-cell depletion is common to each approved indication, allowed SDZ-RTX approval for use in all indications of reference rituximab.

Time-to-progression after front-line fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab chemoimmunotherapy for chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: a retrospective, multicohort study.

BACKGROUND: Fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab (FCR) has become a gold-standard chemoimmunotherapy regimen for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. However, the question remains of how to treat treatment-naive patients with IGHV-unmutated chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. We therefore aimed to develop and validate a gene expression signature to identify which of these patients are likely to achieve durable remissions with FCR chemoimmunotherapy. METHODS: We did a retrospective cohort study in two cohorts of treatment-naive patients (aged ≥18 years) with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. The discovery and training cohort consisted of peripheral blood samples collected from patients treated at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (Houston, TX, USA), who fulfilled the diagnostic criteria of the International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, had received at least three cycles of FCR chemoimmunotherapy, and had been treated between Oct 10, 2000, and Oct 26, 2006 (ie, the MDACC cohort). We did transcriptional profiling on samples obtained from the MDACC cohort to identify genes associated with time to progression. We did univariate Cox proportional hazards analyses and used significant genes to cluster IGHV-unmutated samples into two groups (intermediate prognosis and unfavourable prognosis). After using cross-validation to assess robustness, we applied the Lasso method to standardise the gene expression values to find a minimum gene signature. We validated this signature in an external cohort of treatment-naive patients with IGHV-unmutated chronic lymphocytic leukaemia enrolled on the CLL8 trial of the German Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia Study Group who were treated between July 21, 2003, and April 4, 2006 (ie, the CLL8 cohort). FINDINGS: The MDACC cohort consisted of 101 patients and the CLL8 cohort consisted of 109 patients. Using the MDACC cohort, we identified and developed a 17-gene expression signature that distinguished IGHV-unmutated patients who were likely to achieve a long-term remission following front-line FCR chemoimmunotherapy from those who might benefit from alternative front-line regimens (hazard ratio 3·83, 95% CI 1·94-7·59; p<0·0001). We validated this gene signature in the CLL8 cohort; patients with an unfavourable prognosis versus those with an intermediate prognosis had a cause-specific hazard ratio of 1·90 (95% CI 1·18-3·06; p=0·008). Median time to progression was 39 months (IQR 22-69) for those with an unfavourable prognosis compared with 59 months (28-84) for those with an intermediate prognosis. INTERPRETATION: We have developed a robust, reproducible 17-gene signature that identifies a subset of treatment-naive patients with IGHV-unmutated chronic lymphocytic leukaemia who might substantially benefit from treatment with FCR chemoimmunotherapy. We recommend testing the value of this gene signature in a prospective study that compares FCR treatment with newer alternative therapies as part of a randomised clinical trial. FUNDING: Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia Global Research Foundation and the National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute.

High Red Cell Distribution Width is an Adverse Predictive and Prognostic Factor in Patients With Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Treated With Chemoimmunotherapy.

INTRODUCTION: The red blood cell distribution width (RDW) is an easy-to-obtain laboratory value that has emerged as a potential prognostic factor in solid and hematologic malignancies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We evaluated 121 patients with de novo diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) treated with standard chemoimmunotherapy at our institution between 2010 and 2012. We categorized patients with high RDW (> 14.6%) and normal RDW (11.6%-14.6%). We fitted multivariate regression models for complete response (CR) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Patients with high RDW were less likely to achieve CR to chemoimmunotherapy than patients with normal RDW (48% vs. 83%; P < .001). The 5-year OS rate for patients with high RDW was lower than in patients with normal RDW (51% vs. 79%; P = .001). In multivariate regression models, high RDW was independently associated with lower odds of achieving CR (odds ratio, 0.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.12-0.83; P = .02) and with higher risk of death from any cause (hazard ratio [HR], 2.04; 95% CI, 1.03-4.02; P = .04) than normal RDW in patients with DLBCL treated with chemoimmunotherapy. High RDW remained an independent adverse factor for OS after adjustment for the International Prognostic Index and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network-International Prognostic Index scores with HR 2.20 (95% CI, 1.12-4.31; P = .02) and HR 2.67 (95% CI 1.28-5.59; P = .009), respectively. CONCLUSION: High RDW appears to be an adverse predictive and prognostic factor in patients with de novo DLBCL treated with R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone).

Phase 1b trial of an ibrutinib-based combination therapy in recurrent/refractory CNS lymphoma.

Ibrutinib is a first-in-class inhibitor of Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) and has shown single-agent activity in recurrent/refractory central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma. Clinical responses are often transient or incomplete, suggesting a need for a combination therapy approach. We conducted a phase 1b clinical trial to explore the sequential combination of ibrutinib (560 or 840 mg daily dosing) with high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) and rituximab in patients with CNS lymphoma (CNSL). HD-MTX was given at 3.5 g/m2 every 2 weeks for a total of 8 doses (4 cycles; 1 cycle = 28 days). Ibrutinib was held on days of HD-MTX infusion and resumed 5 days after HD-MTX infusion or after HD-MTX clearance. Single-agent daily ibrutinib was administered continuously after completion of induction therapy until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or death. We also explored next-generation sequencing of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) before and during treatment. The combination of ibrutinib, HD-MTX, and rituximab was tolerated with an acceptable safety profile (no grade 5 events, 3 grade 4 events). No dose-limiting toxicity was observed. Eleven of 15 patients proceeded to maintenance ibrutinib after completing 4 cycles of the ibrutinib/HD-MTX/rituximab combination. Clinical responses occurred in 12 of 15 patients (80%). Sustained tumor responses were associated with clearance of ctDNA from the CSF. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02315326.

Eficacia y seguridad del uso de ibrutinib en el tratamiento de leucemia linfática crónica (LLC)/linfoma linfocítico de células pequeñas (LLP) en paciente adulto mayor frágil, no tributario a quimioinmunoterapia / Efficacy and safety of the use of ibrutinib in the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (LLP) / small cell lymphocytic lymphoma (LLC) in frail older adult patient, not tributary to chemoimmunotherapy

INTRODUCCIÓN: El presente dictamen expone la evaluación de la eficacia y seguridad del uso de ibrutinib para el tratamiento de LLC/LLP, en paciente adulto mayor frágil, no tributario a quimioinmunoterapia. La epidemiología y generalidades de la leucemia linfática crónica(LLC)/linfoma linfocítico de células pequeñas (LLP), se describe a detalle en el Dictamen Preliminar de Evaluación de Tecnología Sanitaria N.° 058-SDEPFyOTS-DETS-IETSI-2017. Brevemente, en el Perú no existe data publicada con respecto a la frecuencia de esta enfermedad. No obstante, existen reportes locales donde se menciona una baja proporción de casos. Por otro lado, la edad promedio al momento de diagnóstico de esta neoplasia es de 70 años con una sobrevida global a los cinco años cercana al 80 %, la cual se ve disminuida en pacientes mayores de 75 años. TECNOLOGIA SANITARIA DE INTERÉS: Se describe a detalle el mecanismo de acción de ibrutinib. Brevemente, este es una molécula pequeña, inhibidor de la tirosina quinasa de Bruton (BTK), que se une de manera irreversible al residuo 481 de la BTK, así como a otros dominios que contienen un residuo de cisteína análogo. Así, este inhibe la proliferación de los linfocitos B acelerando la muerte de las células neoplásicas. Ibrutinib fue elaborado, patentado y comercializado originalmente por Pharmacyclics Inc y luego por el laboratorio Janssen de Johnson & Johnson, como Imbruvica®. METODOLOGÍA: Se realizó una búsqueda de la literatura con respecto a la eficacia y seguridad del uso de ibrutinib para el tratamiento de LLC/LLP, en paciente adulto mayor frágil, no tributario a quimioinmunoterapia. Esta búsqueda se realizó utilizando los meta-buscadores: Translating Research into Practice (TRIPDATABASE) y National Library of Medicine (Pubmed-Medline). Adicionalmente, se realizó una búsqueda manual del listado de referencias bibliográficas de los estudios seleccionados a fin de identificar otros estudios que pudieran ser útiles para la presente evaluación. Por otro lado, se amplió la búsqueda revisando la evidencia generada por grupos internacionales que realizan revisiones sistemáticas (RS), evaluación de tecnologías sanitarias (ETS) y guías de práctica clínica (GPC), tales como la Cochrane Group, The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), the Agency for Health care Research and Quality (AHRQ), The Scottish Medicines Consortium (SMC), y The Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH). Esta búsqueda se complementó revisando publicaciones de grupos dedicados a la educación, investigación y mejora de la práctica clínica oncológica y hematológica dentro de América y Europa, como The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) y The European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO), y The American Society of Hematology (ASH). Por último, se completó la búsqueda ingresando a la página web www.clinicaltrials.gov, para así poder identificar ensayos clínicos en elaboración o que no hayan sido publicados aún, y así disminuir el riesgo de sesgo de publicación. RESULTADOS: En la actualidad dentro de la institución no se realiza una prueba para diferenciar a los pacientes que presentan o no la mutación TP53 o deleción 17p, con lo cual el tratamiento brindando a los pacientes no es diferenciando según el estado de mutación. No obstante, la evidencia científica es presentada diferenciando la presencia o ausencia de la mutación TP53 o deleción 17p. Es por ello que la población de la pregunta PICO del presente dictamen incluyó a toda la población en general, incluyendo pacientes con presencia o ausencia de la mutación TP53 o deleción 17p. Con ello, se consideró toda la evidencia disponible para los pacientes con LLC/LLP en primera línea no tributarios a quimioinmunoterapia. Luego de una búsqueda sistemática y revisión de la evidencia en torno al uso de ibrutinib para LLC/LLP, se encontró que el objetivo del ensayo RESONATE-2 es el que se ajusta de manera más precisa con la pregunta PICO de interés del presente dictamen, es de notar que solo se incluyen a pacientes sin la mutación TP53 o la deleción 17p. Asimismo, el RESONATE-2 es parte de la evidencia utilizada tanto en las guías de práctica clínica, como en una de las ETS incluidas en el presente documento. Así en dicho ensayo no se pudo estimar las medianas de sobrevida global (SG) en el tiempo de duración del estudio. Si bien se observa que sí hubo una diferencia estadísticamente significativa en relación al hazard ratio (HR) de sobrevida libre de progresión (SLP) y SG, favoreciendo a ibrutinib, existen limitaciones importantes en relación a ambas medidas y desenlaces, tal como se describe de manera extensa en la discusión, con lo cual no se puede concluir que exista un beneficio en el uso de ibrutinib en relación a su perfil de eficacia. Adicionalmente, no existe un artículo donde se presente de manera detallada la evaluación y resultados del análisis de calidad de vida. Así, no ha sido posible hacer una valoración de la calidad y solidez de estos, más aún cuando se trata de un ensayo de etiqueta abierta donde existe un mayor riesgo de sesgo de resultados subjetivos, tal como lo es la calidad de vida. Por último, en el tiempo de seguimiento del ensayo se observó el doble de eventos adversos serios en el grupo de ibrutinib en comparación a clorambucil. CONCLUSIÓN: El Instituto de Evaluación de Tecnologías Sanitarias-IETSI no aprueba el uso ibrutinib para el tratamiento de leucemia linfática crónica (LLC)/linfoma linfocítico de células pequeñas (LLP), en paciente adulto mayor frágil, no tributario a quimioinmunoterapia.

B cell-targeted immunotherapy for type 1 diabetes: What can make it work?

Immunotherapy has revolutionized treatment of cancers and autoimmune diseases. Bucking the trend, however, is type 1 diabetes (T1D), although it is one of best understood autoimmune diseases and individuals at genetic risk are identifiable with high certainty. Here we review the major obstacles associated with pan-B-cell-depletion using rituximab (RTX) and discuss the notion that B cell-directed therapy may be most effective as a preventive measure. We suggest that it will be more productive to aim at identifying and targeting autoreactive B cells rather than making adjustments to pan-B cell depletion and that non-conventional alternative therapies such as antibody blockade of FasL to bolster IL-10-producing Breg cells, which work successfully in mice, should be considered.

Biologic Therapies: Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor-α, Anti-Interleukins, Rituximab and Others.

Biologic agents are a group of therapeutic agents targeting mediators of inflammation, including soluble factors (e.g. cytokines and chemokines), cytokine/chemokine receptors and immune cell surface markers. The purpose of this chapter is to introduce the use of biologic therapies for the treatment of ocular inflammatory diseases. Anti-tumor necrosis factor agents, particularly infliximab and adalimumab, are well studied. We will review these, as well as newer options in the development of more targeted therapy, including anti-interleukins, anti-cell surface molecule biologics and interferon-2α. Biologic treatment of ocular inflammatory disease has advanced rapidly over the past 10 years and continues to be an exciting field of study.