Percutaneous EVAR for Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Using the Cordis INCRAFT Endograft.

OBJECTIVES: Low profile endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) devices such as the Cordis INCRAFT AAA Stent Graft System may expand the category of patients suitable for endovascular repair. We report our experience with the INCRAFT system in treating ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAA). METHODS: We included all patients presenting with rAAA from 2015 to 2019 in our hospital who were treated by percutaneous EVAR with the INCRAFT system. The primary outcome was technical success, referring to adequate stent graft placement. Secondary outcomes included completion of the procedure under local anesthesia and mortality at 30-days, one year and long-term follow-up. RESULTS: Fifteen male patients (mean age: 74 years, SD 6.7) were treated for rAAA with a median aneurysm diameter of 8.25 cm (SD 1.66). The device was successfully delivered and deployed in all subjects. Per-procedurally one type I endoleak required additional stent placement and one patient developed an acute thrombosis of the device main body and iliac limbs requiring thrombectomy. 80.0% of patients were successfully treated under local anesthesia only. The 30 day and one year mortality were 26.6% and 33.3% respectively. Long-term survival was 60.0% at a median follow-up period of 57 months, with two patients requiring late reintervention for an endoleak. CONCLUSIONS: The INCRAFT system can be used to percutaneously treat rAAA with a high technical success rate and mortality similar to reported in the literature for other devices. The large majority of procedures can be completed with only local anesthesia.

Treatment Results of Endovascular Aneurysm Repair Using the Parallel Stent-Graft Double D Technique for Distal Saccular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms and Common Iliac Aneurysms.

BACKGROUND: Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) using a bifurcated stent graft may involve technical challenges when aortic disease (aneurysm or dissection) consists of a length <70 mm between the inferior renal artery and aortic bifurcation or narrow aortic bifurcation that is common in asymmetric distal abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) or iliac artery aneurysms (IAAs). We use EVAR with the double D technique (DDT-EVAR) for such cases, which involves straight type of stent grafts with same diameter in left and right that are deployed parallel to an aortic cuff that has been previously placed. In addition, DDT-EVAR can preserve the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) for IAA. METHODS: DDT-EVAR was performed for 21 of 910 (2%) cases from April 2007 to April 2019 at our institution. The median patient age was 74 years (range, 52-85). Nineteen patients (90%) were men. Six patients (all saccular; 1 rupture) had AAAs, 12 had IAAs, and 3 had chronic type B aortic dissociation (TBAD) for re-entry closure. AAA and IAA had diameters of 45 mm (range, 34-71) and 34 mm (range, 25-58), respectively. An aortic cuff was used for 19 (90%) cases. Endurant II (Medtronic, Santa Rosa, CA) was used for 12 cases. The Excluder (W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc, Flagstaff, AZ) was used for 7 cases. Endurant II was used for 20 cases, and the VBX (W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc) was used for 1 case as stent-graft limbs. RESULTS: The procedural success rate was 100%. The median operative time was 146 min (range, 88-324). IMA planned for preservation was successful for all 12 cases. Type I and type III endoleaks were not observed. With TBAD, flow to the false lumen decreased or disappeared, and no complications during the hospital stay were associated with the procedure. For 2 patients whose procedure involved Endurant II stent-graft limb, limb occlusions were observed postoperatively, and reintervention was required. No other patients required additional treatment at a median follow-up of 18 months (range, 4-50). CONCLUSIONS: DDT-EVAR is a safe and straightforward technique for the treatment of distal AAA, common iliac artery aneurysm, and TBAD. It may help preserve the IMA and internal iliac artery, even when it is impossible to preserve them with a bifurcated stent graft.

A meta-analysis of locoregional anesthesia versus general anesthesia in endovascular repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm.

OBJECTIVE: To conduct a meta-analytic review of studies investigating the effect of the anesthesia modality on perioperative mortality in endovascular repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (REVAR). METHODS: The present meta-analysis was performed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Multiple electronic databases were comprehensively searched from database inception to January 2020. Eligible studies included cohort studies that reported the 30-day/in-hospital mortality rate or the multivariate adjusted odds ratio (OR) or hazard ratio of the mortality risk for patients who underwent emergency REVAR under locoregional anesthesia (LA) vs general anesthesia (GA). A random effects model was used to estimate the ORs by pooling the related data from individual studies. RESULTS: A total of eight studies were included in this analysis. The first meta-analysis of seven studies that reported the 30-day/in-hospital mortality with a total of 3116 patients (867 in the LA group and 2249 in the GA group) revealed that LA was associated with a lower 30-day/in-hospital mortality than GA (16.4% vs 25.4%; unadjusted OR, 0.47; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.32-0.68). The second meta-analysis of three of these seven studies (including 586 patients in the LA group and 1945 in the GA group) that reported the perioperative variables revealed comparable baseline characteristics but a lower 30-day/in-hospital mortality in the LA group (unadjusted OR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.42-0.71). The third meta-analysis of the adjusted ORs or hazard ratios that were reported from four studies (including 501 patients in the LA group and 1136 in the GA group) showed a similar trend (adjusted OR,0.37; 95% CI, 0.19-0.75). CONCLUSIONS: REVAR under LA is associated with a lower 30-day/in-hospital mortality than REVAR under GA. However, because the included studies may have had some observation bias, further randomized controlled trials are warranted to validate the present results.

Locoregional anesthesia is associated with lower 30-day mortality than general anesthesia in patients undergoing endovascular repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare 30-day postoperative mortality for patients undergoing endovascular repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) using locoregional vs general anesthesia. Unlike the open approach, endovascular repair of rAAA can be performed using either locoregional or general anesthesia. We hypothesize that mortality after endovascular repair of rAAA is lower when locoregional rather than general anesthesia is used. METHODS: Propensity score matching techniques were used to compare the 30-day postoperative outcomes of patients from the 2007 to 2015 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database who underwent endovascular repair of rAAA under locoregional vs general anesthesia. RESULTS: Of the 1382 endovascular rAAA repair procedures in our overall study population, 132 (9.5%) were performed using locoregional anesthesia. Our propensity score matching algorithm yielded a cohort of 130 general anesthesia patients who were well matched with their locoregional anesthesia counterparts for known patient and procedure characteristics. The 30-day postoperative mortality rates for patients in the matched cohort were 14.6% for patients in the locoregional anesthesia group compared with 29.2% for patients in the general anesthesia group (P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: Locoregional rather than general anesthesia is associated with a significantly lower 30-day mortality after endovascular repair of rAAA. The designs of future trials comparing endovascular and open rAAA repair should include stratification of endovascular procedures by anesthesia modality.

Decreased mortality with local versus general anesthesia in endovascular aneurysm repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm in the Vascular Quality Initiative database.

BACKGROUND: Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is an accepted approach for patients presenting with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) and suitable anatomy. The effect of anesthesia modality on mortality outcomes in rAAA has not been well described. Using the Vascular Quality Initiative database, this study compares local anesthesia (LA) vs general anesthesia (GA) in EVAR for rAAA. METHODS: The Vascular Quality Initiative database was queried for patients presenting with rAAA managed with open surgical repair, EVAR under LA (rEVAR-LA), and EVAR under GA (rEVAR-GA) between 2003 and 2017. Patients were observed until the earlier end point of either death or 1-year follow-up. Kaplan-Meier event rates are presented at 30 days and 1 year. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to model risk of death, with adjustment for demographic and clinical factors. Additional multivariate Cox hazards analyses were used to assess effect modifiers for 1-year mortality for the different repair methods. RESULTS: A total of 3330 patients (77.4% male) met the inclusion criteria (1594 [47.9%] open surgical repair, 226 [6.8%] rEVAR-LA, and 1510 [45.3%] rEVAR-GA). Patients treated with rEVAR-LA compared with rEVAR-GA had decreased intraoperative time, number of intraoperative blood transfusions, intraoperative crystalloid administration, intensive care unit length of stay, and postoperative pulmonary complications. Mortality rates with rEVAR-LA were lower compared with rEVAR-GA at 30 days (15.5% vs 23.3%; adjusted hazard ratio [AHR], 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.49-0.99; P = .04) and at 1 year (22.5% vs 32.3%; AHR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.53-0.96; P = .02). Patients undergoing EVAR who were <75 years old and those without preoperative hypotension had the greatest survival benefit from LA compared with GA (both factors: AHR, 0.14 [95% CI, 0.03-0.57]; single factor: AHR, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.36-0.91]). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that rEVAR-LA for rAAA may be a safe alternative to rEVAR-GA for certain patients, with lower morbidity and improved mortality. Further prospective study is warranted to confirm mortality benefit in rEVAR-LA for rAAA.

Local anaesthesia for endovascular repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm.

BACKGROUND: Case series and a post hoc subgroup analysis of a large randomized trial have suggested a potential benefit in treating ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAAs) using endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) with local anaesthesia (LA) rather than general anaesthesia (GA). The uptake and outcomes of LA in clinical practice remain unknown. METHODS: The UK National Vascular Registry was interrogated for patients presenting with rAAA managed with EVAR under different modes of anaesthesia between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2016. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included: the number of centres performing EVAR under LA; the proportion of patients receiving this technique; duration of hospital stay; and postoperative complications. RESULTS: Some 3101 patients with rAAA were treated in 72 hospitals during the study: 2306 underwent on open procedure and 795 had EVAR (LA, 319; GA, 435; regional anaesthesia, 41). Overall, 56 of 72 hospitals (78 per cent) offered LA for EVAR of rAAA. Baseline characteristics and morphology were similar across the three EVAR subgroups. Patients who had surgery under LA had a lower in-hospital mortality rate than patients who received GA (59 of 319 (18·5 per cent) versus 122 of 435 (28·0 per cent)), and this was unchanged after adjustment for factors known to influence survival (adjusted hazard ratio 0·62, 95 per cent c.i. 0·45 to 0·85; P = 0·003). Median hospital stay and postoperative morbidity from other complications were similar. CONCLUSION: The use of LA for EVAR of rAAA has been adopted widely in the UK. Mortality rates appear lower than in patients undergoing EVAR with GA.

Emergent Endovascular Treatment of Thoracoabdominal Aortic Rupture in Behcet's Disease.

BACKGROUND: Aortic rupture in Behcet's disease is associated with high mortality rates. Endovascular approach with parallel graft technique can be a valid solution in emergency setting for the treatment of thoraco-abdominal aorta involvement in Behcet's disease. METHODS: We describe the clinical case of a 41-year-old man, urgently hospitalized for a rupture of thoraco-abdominal aorta with occlusion of the celiac trunk and involvement of superior mesenteric artery. The patient also presented a massive right hemothorax and a massive left pulmonary thromboembolism. An aortic endoprosthesis was deployed from the third bottom of the thoracic aorta to the origin of the renal arteries. Parallel stent-graft technique was used to preserve the patency of the superior mesenteric artery. The procedure was performed with local anaesthesia due to the critical conditions of the patient. The patient was discharged in good clinical conditions. RESULTS: The angio-computed tomography performed 6 months after surgery showed good deployment of the endoprosthesis and patency of the superior mesenteric artery. CONCLUSION: In high risk for surgery patients, endovascular treatment with parallel stent graft of thoraco-abdominal aorta rupture is safe and feasible.

Western Vascular Society guidelines for transfer of patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm.

INTRODUCTION: When a patient with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) presents at a facility ill-equipped to provide care, transfer may provide the best chance for survival. Large distances and long travel times provide challenging barriers to prompt and appropriate care in the western United States. METHODS: The Western Vascular Society (WVS) adopted a set of guidelines in considering transfer of a patient with an rAAA using published literature, membership survey and input, and existing recommendations. This article reports the guidelines and describes the process and rationale behind their development. RESULTS: Fifteen guidelines for transfer and care of rAAAs were endorsed by the WVS. CONCLUSIONS: When local care cannot be provided, transfer guidelines may standardize care for rAAAs and may be applicable across may practice settings.

Integration of endovascular therapy of ruptured abdominal and iliac aneurysms in the treatment algorithm: a single-center experience in a medium-volume vascular center.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the influence of endovascular therapy of ruptured abdominal or iliac aneurysms on total mortality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed the mortality of 40 patients from 2005 to 2009, when only surgical treatment was available. These results were compared with the period 2010 to 2013, when endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) was assessed as the first option in selected patients. RESULTS: During 2005 to 2009, the mortality was 37.5%. From 2010 to 2013, 45 patients were treated with mortality 28.9%. Open repair was performed in 35 (77.8%) patients and EVAR in 10 (22.2%) patients. The 30-day and 1-year mortality rates of the EVAR group were 0% and 20%, respectively, and the total mortality rate was 30% during follow-up (median 11 months, range 1-42 months). The 30-day mortality in the surgical group remained unchanged, at 37.1%, and 1-year and total mortality rates were 45.7% and 51.4%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Following integration in the treatment algorithm, EVAR decreased total mortality in our center by 8.6%.

Early and delayed rupture after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in a 10-year multicenter registry.

OBJECTIVE: Rupture after abdominal endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) is a function of graft maintenance of the seal and fixation. We describe our 10-year experience with rupture after EVAR. METHODS: From 2000 to 2010, 1736 patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) from 17 medical centers underwent EVAR in a large, regional integrated health care system. Preoperative demographic and clinical data of interest were collected and stored in our registry. We retrospectively identified patients with postoperative rupture, characterized as "early" and "delayed" rupture (≤30 days and >30 days after the initial EVAR, respectively), and identified predictors associated with delayed rupture. RESULTS: The overall follow-up rate was 92%, and the median follow-up was 2.7 years (interquartile range, 1.2-4.4 years) in these 1736 EVAR patients. We identified 20 patients with ruptures; 70% were male, the mean age was 79 years, and mean AAA size at the initial EVAR was 6.3 cm. Six patients underwent initial EVAR for rupture (n = 2) or symptomatic presentation (n = 4). Of the 20 post-EVAR ruptures, 25% (five of 20) were early, all occurring within 2 days after the initial EVAR. Of these five patients, four had intraoperative adverse events leading directly to rupture, with one type I and one type III endoleak. Of the five early ruptures, four patients underwent endovascular repair and one received repair with open surgery, resulting in two perioperative deaths. Among the remaining 15 patients, the median time from initial EVAR to rupture was 31.1 months (interquartile range, 13.8-57.3 months). Most of these delayed ruptures (10 of 15) were preceded by AAA sac increases, including three patients with known endoleaks who underwent reintervention. At the time of delayed rupture, nine of 15 patients had new endoleaks. Among all 20 patients, six patients did not undergo repair (all delayed patients) and died, nine underwent repeated EVAR, and five had open repair. For patients who underwent repair for delayed rupture, mortality at 30 days and 1 year were 44.4% and 66.7%, respectively. Multivariable Cox regression analysis identified age 80 to 89 (hazard ratio, 3.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-9.4; P = .03), and symptomatic or ruptured initial indication for EVAR (hazard ratio, 7.4; 95% confidence interval, 2.2-24.8; P < .01) as significant predictors of delayed rupture. CONCLUSIONS: Rupture after EVAR is a rare but devastating event, and mortality after repair exceeds 60% at 1 year. Most delayed cases showed late AAA expansion, thereby implicating late loss of seal and increased endoleaks as the cause of rupture in these patients and mandating vigilant surveillance.

Ten-year results of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair from a large multicenter registry.

OBJECTIVE: To assess outcomes after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) in an integrated health care system. METHODS: Between 2000 and 2010, 1736 patients underwent EVAR at 17 centers. Demographic data, comorbidities, and outcomes of interest were collected. EVAR in patients presenting with ruptured or symptomatic aneurysms was categorized as urgent; otherwise, it was considered elective. Primary outcomes were mortality and aneurysm-related mortality (ARM). Secondary outcomes were change in aneurysm sac size, endoleak status, major adverse events, and reintervention. RESULTS: Overall, the median age was 76 years (interquartile range, 70-81 years), 86% were male, and 82% were Caucasian. Most cases (93.8%) were elective, but urgent use of EVAR increased from 4% in the first 5 years to 7.3% in the last 5 years of the study period. Mean aneurysm size was 5.8 cm. Patients were followed for an average of 3 years (range, 1-11 years); 8% were lost to follow-up. Intraoperatively, 4.5% of patients required adjunctive maneuvers for endoleak, fixation, or flow-limiting issues. The 30-day mortality rate was 1.2%, and the perioperative morbidity rate was 6.6%. Intraoperative type I and II endoleaks were uncommon (2.3% and 9.3%, respectively). Life-table analysis at 5 years demonstrated excellent overall survival (66%) and freedom from ARM (97%). Postoperative endoleak was seen in 30% of patients and was associated with an increase in sac size over time. Finally, the total reintervention rate was 15%, including 91 instances (5%) of revisional EVAR. The overall major adverse event rate was 7.9% and decreased significantly from 12.3% in the first 5 years to 5.6% in the second 5 years of the study period (P < .001). Overall ARM was worse in patients with postoperative endoleak (4.1% vs 1.8%; P < .01) or in those who underwent reintervention (7.6% vs 1.6%; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Results from a contemporary EVAR registry in an integrated health care system demonstrate favorable perioperative outcomes and excellent clinical efficacy. However, postoperative endoleak and the need for reintervention continue to be challenging problems for patients after EVAR.

Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm treated by endovascular aneurysm repair under local anaesthesia.

A 68 year old man with significant cardiorespiratory risks factors presented with a ruptured thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA). This was treated by emergency thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair (TEVAR) under general anaesthesia (GA). An incidental abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) was not treated. Eight months later, he presented with ruptured AAA. Due to the patient's compromised respiratory system, he underwent endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) under local anaesthesia (LA). He had a smoother post-operation recovery compared to the first repair under GA.

Intraoperative blood product resuscitation and mortality in ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm.

OBJECTIVES: The resuscitation of patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (RAAAs) has not been well studied, and the potential benefit of autotransfusion (AT) is unknown. The increased use of fresh-frozen plasma (FFP) has been associated with decreased mortality rates in trauma patients and may also improve RAAA survival. We explored the influence of intraoperative AT and FFP resuscitation on mortality rates in massively transfused RAAA patients. METHODS: A single-center review of RAAA patient records from April 1989 to October 2009 was undertaken. Clinical data and outcomes were studied. Operative and anesthesia records were queried for intraoperative transfusion totals. Massive transfusion was defined as ≥10 units of red blood cells (RBCs) inclusive of AT units. RESULTS: We identified 151 RAAA patients, of which 89 (60%) received a massive transfusion and comprised the study population. These 89 patients had an in-hospital mortality rate of 44%. Univariate predictors of mortality included increased age, preoperative hypotension, operative blood loss, and crystalloid, RBCs, and FFP volume. AT was used in 85 patients, with an increased ratio of AT:RBC units associated with survival. Mortality was 34% with AT:packed RBCs (PRBC) ≥1 (high AT) and 55% with AT:PRBC of <1 (low AT; P = .04). On multivariate analysis, age > 74 years (P = .03), lowest preoperative systolic blood pressure (SBP) <90 mm Hg (P = .06), blood loss >6 liters (P = .06), and low AT (P = .02) independently predicted mortality. The mean RBC:FFP ratio was similar in those that died (2.7) and in those that lived (2.9; P = .66). RBC:FFP ≤2 (high FFP) was present in 38 (43%) patients, with mortality of 49%. RBC:FFP >2 (low FFP) had 40% mortality (P = .39). RBC:FFP ratios decreased over time from 3.6 (years 1989 to 1999) to 2.2 (years 2000 to 2009; P < .001), but more liberal use of FFP was not associated with decreased mortality (47% vs 41%; P = .56). AT:PRBC ratios were stable over time (range, 1.4-1.2; P = .18). CONCLUSIONS: Greater use of AT but not of FFP was associated with survival in massively transfused RAAA patients. No mortality benefit was seen with increased FFP, but few patients had high FFP transfusion ratios. Further study to identify RAAA patients at risk for massive transfusion should be undertaken and a potentially greater role for AT in RAAA resuscitation investigated.

Is use of a Continuous Autotransfusion System beneficial in emergency abdominal aortic aneursym (AAA) surgery?

BACKGROUND: Allogeneic blood products have become a limited and expensive resource. The Continuous Autotransfusion System (CATS) has been promoted as a method for reducing the need for allogeneic blood transfusion. This study was undertaken to ascertain whether the use of CATS in emergency open AAA surgery has any benefits. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of all patients undergoing emergency open AAA surgery in our center during a 5-year period (between July 2004 and July 2009). Patients were identified from a prospectively maintained vascular database, and data were obtained from patient records. RESULTS: CATS was used in 69 emergency open AAA repairs. The median total blood loss was 3,500 mL (range: 751-13,796 mL) but the median volume of packed red blood cells produced by CATS was only 493 mL (~ 2 U). An average of 7 U (range: 0-19 U) of bank blood was still used despite the availability of CATS. The mean hemoglobin 24 hours postoperatively was 10.3 g/dL (6.4-14.1) with a hematocrit of 0.30. CONCLUSION: The use of CATS in emergency AAA surgery does not seem to reduce the use of allogeneic blood transfusion. This may be because of over transfusion, as reflected by relatively high postoperative hemoglobin levels.

[Current technologies and changing the medical paradigm in aortic ruptures (analysis of clinical cases)].

The paper describes two clinical cases of aortic rupture of traumatic and nontraumatic genesis, which was difficult to diagnose due to evident neurological symptoms. The analysis of these cases and the data available in the literature leads to the conclusion that aortic rupture is not a nosological entity with a known fatal outcome. Timely diagnosis based on widely practiced up-to-date ultrasound and radiological methods allows one to perform surgical or endovascular treatment in good time, by showing good long-term outcomes.

Outcomes before and after initiation of an acute aortic treatment center.

BACKGROUND: Acute aortic syndromes remain life-threatening. Time is of the essence, as mortality rises with increasing time after the acute episode. The aim of this report is to show changes in practice and outcomes after the establishment of an acute aortic treatment center (AATC) to expedite the care of acute aortic syndromes in a major metropolitan area with the belief that "door to intervention time under 90 minutes" reduces mortality and morbidity from acute aortic disease. METHODS: A database of patients admitted with acute aortic disease (Type A and B aortic dissections, acute thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysms, acute and ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms) for 1 year prior to initiation (2007) and 1 year after initiation of the pathway (AATC) in 2008 was developed. Comorbidities were scored according to Society of Vascular Surgery criteria. Anatomic and functional outcomes were determined and categorized by Society of Vascular Surgery reporting criteria. Multivariate analysis was performed for categorical outcomes and Cox proportional hazard analyses for time-dependent outcomes. RESULTS: Six hundred twenty-one patients reported with aortic disease to the cardiovascular services; 306 patients were considered to have acute disease. When compared with the year before the AATC was instituted, there was a 30% increase in the total number of admissions and a 25% increase in acute pathology after setting up the AATC (P = .02). There was a two-fold increase in thoracic aortic dissections admitted to the service. Initiation of the treatment pathway resulted in a highly significant 64% reduction in time to definitive therapy (526 ± 557 vs 187 ± 258 minutes, mean ± SD pre-AATC vs AATC; P = .0001). Comorbidity scores were equivalent between the two cohorts. Despite the increase in acuity, mortality (4% vs 6%) and morbidity (41% vs 45%) rates were unchanged, and there was a significant decrease in intensive care unit length of stay (5 vs 4 days, pre-AATC cohort vs the AATC cohort), but total hospital length of stay (11 vs 10 days) was unchanged. There was no correlation between deaths within 30 days and length of stay in the intensive care unit. CONCLUSION: Establishment of a multidisciplinary AATC pathway was associated with a 30% increase in volume, 64% reduction in time to definitive treatment, improved throughput with reduced intensive care unit time, and maintained clinical efficacy despite an increase in acute admissions. These results suggest the concept be further evaluated.

Early outcome of endovascular treatment of acute traumatic aortic injuries: the talent thoracic retrospective registry.

BACKGROUND: Acute traumatic injury of the thoracic aorta (TAI) is a life-threatening complication in patients who sustain deceleration or crush injuries. This study was conducted to examine the results in patients who underwent endovascular repair with the Talent (Medtronic/AVE, Santa Rosa, CA) thoracic stent graft for acute traumatic injury. METHODS: Out of 457 consecutive endograft patients, 41 (9%) were treated for traumatic aortic conditions. There were 36 males with a mean age of 36 +/- 14 years. Mean aortic diameter at the time of intervention was 34 mm +/- 9 (range, 20 to 70 mm). The mean length of covered aorta was 106 mm (range, 5 to 130 mm) with only one stent graft used in 98% (40) of all cases. Median follow-up period for hospital survivors was 13 months (1.0 to 69.0 months). RESULTS: Stent graft implantation was technically successful in all cases (100%). One patient died during hospitalization, yielding an overall in-hospital mortality rate of 2.4%. Procedural-related paraplegia was zero and a primary endoleak was observed in 1 patient. Postoperative complications occurred in 4 patients (3 respiratory failures, 1 multiorgan failure). No patient required conversion to open surgical repair. CONCLUSIONS: The treatment of acute traumatic injuries of the descending thoracic aorta with the Talent stent graft is a feasible and safe technique; it provides low morbidity and mortality rates in the early postoperative period, and early results are encouraging. However, long-term studies are worthwhile to evaluate the effectiveness and the durability of this procedure.