First trimester screening cut-offs for noninvasive prenatal testing as a contingent screen: Balancing detection and screen-positive rates for trisomy 21.

OBJECTIVE: To provide data on how screen-positive and detection rates of first trimester prenatal screening for fetal Down syndrome vary with changes in the risk cut-off and maternal age to inform contingency criteria for publicly funded noninvasive prenatal testing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: First trimester screening and diagnostic data were collected for all women attending for first trimester fetal aneuploidy screening in Western Australia between 2005 and 2009. Prenatal screening and diagnostic data were linked to pregnancy outcomes, including data from the Midwives' Notification System and the Western Australian Registry of Developmental Anomalies. The prevalence of Down syndrome and performance of screening by risk cut-off and/or for women >35 years were analysed. RESULTS: The current screening risk cut-off of 1:300 has screen-positive and detection rates of 3.5% and 82%. The screen-positive rate increases by 0.7-0.8% for each 100 point change in risk, up to 19.2% at 1:2500 (96% detection rate). Including all women >35 years as screen positive would increase the screen-positive rate and detection rates to 30.2% and 97.2%. CONCLUSION: Variation in screening risk cut-off and the use of maternal age to assess eligibility for noninvasive testing could significantly impact the demand for, and cost of, the test. A contingent first trimester screening approach for risk assessment is superior to the use of a combination of screening and maternal age alone. These data will inform decisions regarding the criteria used to determine eligibility for publicly funded noninvasive prenatal testing.

Health care needs of children with Down syndrome and impact of health system performance on children and their families.

OBJECTIVE: The functional, financial, and social impact on families of children with Down syndrome (DS) in the United States and the role of the US health care system in ameliorating these impacts have not been well characterized. We sought to describe the demographic characteristics and functional difficulties of these children and to determine whether children with DS, compared with children with "intellectual disability" (ID) generally, and compared with other "children and youth with special health care needs" (CYSHCN), are more or less likely to receive health care that meets quality standards related to care coordination and to have their health care service needs met. METHODS: This study analyzed data from the 2005-2006 National Survey of Children with Special Health Care Needs (n = 40,723). Children and youth aged 0 to 17 years with special health care need (CYSHCN) who experience DS (n = 395) and/or IDs (n = 4252) were compared with each other and other CYSHCN on a range of functioning, family impact, and health care quality variables using bivariate and multivariate methods. Data were weighted to represent all CYSHCN in the United States. RESULTS: Compared with CYSHCN without DS, children with DS were significantly less likely to receive comprehensive care within a medical home (29.7% vs 47.3%; p < .001). Parents of children with DS were also significantly more likely to cut back or stop work due to their child's health needs (23.5% vs 55.1%; p < .001). Although overall system performance was poorer for children with DS compared with those with ID and no DS after adjustment for family income, prevalence on most aspects of quality of care and family impacts evaluated were similar for these 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the families of children with DS, and ID generally, are burdened disproportionately when compared with other CYSHCN, reflecting the combination of impairments intrinsic to DS and ID and impacts of suboptimal medical care coordination and social support.

Direct health care costs of children and adolescents with Down syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the direct annual health care costs for children and adolescents with Down syndrome in Western Australia and to explore the variation in health care use including respite, according to age and disease profile. STUDY DESIGN: Population-based data were derived from a cross-sectional questionnaire that was distributed to all families who had a child with Down syndrome as old as 25 years of age in Western Australia. RESULTS: Seventy-three percent of families (363/500) responded to the survey. Mean annual cost was $4209 Australian dollars ($4287 US dollars) for direct health care including hospital, medical, pharmaceutical, respite and therapy, with a median cost of $1701. Overall, costs decreased with age. The decline in costs was a result of decreasing use of hospital, medical, and therapy costs with age. Conversely, respite increased with age and also with dependency. Health care costs were greater in all age groups with increasing dependency and for an earlier or current diagnosis of congenital heart disease. Annual health care costs did not vary with parental income, including cost of respite. CONCLUSIONS: Direct health care costs for children with Down syndrome decrease with age to approximate population costs, although costs of respite show an increasing trend.

Inequalities in provision of the Disability Living Allowance for Down syndrome.

OBJECTIVES: To assess factors associated with granting of the Disability Living Allowance (DLA) for Down syndrome. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING: Families with a child with Down syndrome enrolled in a community-based trial of vitamin supplementation. PARTICIPANTS: 156 children with trisomy 21 (59% male, 20% non-white) were enrolled before 7 months of age and 138 completed follow-up. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Before the child was 2 years old, we surveyed parents about applications for the DLA and socioeconomic factors, and assessed the child's development. RESULTS: Application for the DLA was not associated with ethnicity or speaking English. Significantly fewer ethnic minority parents (OR = 0.10; 95% CI 0.03 to 0.35; 69% vs 96%, risk difference 27%) and parents with English as a second language (OR = 0.15: 95% CI 0.04 to 0.62; 67% vs 93%, risk difference 26%) were granted the DLA. Amongst those granted the DLA, ethnic minority families were significantly less likely to be granted a higher monetary award (OR = 0.19; 95% CI 0.06 to 0.55). Severity of disability, reflected by quartile of Griffiths Developmental Quotient or the presence of severe cardiac disease requiring surgery, was not associated with application, granting or level of the DLA award. CONCLUSIONS: Although all children with Down syndrome meet some of the criteria for the DLA, only 80% were receiving this benefit. The decision to award the DLA and the monetary level of the award favoured white, English speaking parents and was not related to severity of disability. Routine monitoring of awards by ethnicity and language spoken is needed. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00378456.