Sarcoidosis of the central nervous system: Safety and efficacy of treatment, and experience of biological therapies.

OBJECTIVES: Neurological complications of sarcoidosis are uncommon and the natural history and optimal treatments under-researched. With the advent of biological therapies, it is important to define the clinical characteristics and immunopathology of the disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients referred to and treated within the Centre for Neurosarcoidosis over a 15 year period who had biopsy proven "highly probable" disease of the central nervous system were studied prospectively. RESULTS: Corticosteroids were used effectively in all patients, immunosuppression in 79 % and TNFα antagonists in 23 %. Treatment with steroids alone inevitably led to relapse, and low dose immunosuppression was ineffective in those with severe forms of the disease. Use of biological therapies substantially improved outcome. Patients with cranial neuropathy had an excellent outcome. Those with pachymeningitis had marked radiological abnormalities but less disablement. Those with leptomeningitis had an invasive, destructive disease which responded well to treatment but with residual neurological impairments. Treatment was required for many years, but the risk of relapse following treatment withdrawal was low. Infective complications arose in six. There were two deaths, neither directly related to the neurological disease, nor its treatment. CONCLUSIONS: This prospective study of the natural history and treatment response in neurosarcoidosis provides evidence that the use of high dose immunosuppression and early and prolonged use of biological therapies is associated with greatly improved outcomes and lower mortality. The data may be used to plan further studies and treatment trials, and provide class IV evidence for the effectiveness of biological agents in the treatment of Neurosarcoidosis.

Electrophysiologic testing for diagnostic evaluation and risk stratification in patients with suspected cardiac sarcoidosis with preserved left and right ventricular systolic function.

INTRODUCTION: While cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) carries a risk of ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) and sudden cardiac death (SCD), risk stratification of patients with CS and preserved left ventricular/right ventricular (LV/RV) systolic function remains challenging. We sought to evaluate the role of electrophysiologic testing and programmed electrical stimulation of the ventricle (EPS) in patients with suspected CS with preserved ventricular function. METHODS: One hundred twenty consecutive patients with biopsy-proven extracardiac sarcoidosis and preserved LV/RV systolic function underwent EPS. All patients had either probable CS defined by an abnormal cardiac positron emission tomography or cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, or possible CS with normal advanced imaging but abnormal echocardiogram (ECG), SAECG, Holter, or clinical factors. Patients were followed for 4.5 ± 2.6 years for SCD and VAs. RESULTS: Seven of 120 patients (6%) had inducible ventricular tachycardia (VT) with EPS and received an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). Three patients (43%) with positive EPS later had ICD therapies for VAs. Kaplan-Meier analysis stratified by EPS demonstrated a significant difference in freedom from VAs and SCD (P = 0.009), though this finding was driven entirely by patients within the cohort with probable CS (P = 0.018, n = 69). One patient with possible CS and negative EPS had unrecognized progression of the disease and unexplained death with evidence of CS at autopsy. CONCLUSIONS: EPS is useful in the risk stratification of patients with probable CS with preserved LV and RV function. A positive EPS was associated with VAs. While a negative EPS appeared to confer low risk, close follow-up is needed as EPS cannot predict fatal VAs related to new cardiac involvement or disease progression.

Electrophysiological characteristics of ventricular tachyarrhythmias in cardiac sarcoidosis versus arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: Recent evidence suggests that cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) and arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) can manifest very similarly. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether there are significant demographic and electrophysiological differences between patients with CS and ARVC. METHODS: We prospectively compared patients with proven CS or ARVC who underwent radiofrequency catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardias by using 3-dimensional electroanatomical mapping. Furthermore, we evaluated whether the diagnostic criteria for ARVC would have excluded ARVC in patients with CS. RESULTS: Eighteen patients (13 men; mean age 44.9 years) were included. All 18 patients had mild to moderately reduced right ventricular ejection fraction. Patients with cardiac sarcoidosis (n = 8) had a significantly lower mean left ventricular ejection fraction (35.6±19.3 vs 60.6±9.4; P = .002). Patients with CS had a significantly wider QRS (0.146 vs 0.110s; P = .004). Five of 8 (63%) patients with CS fulfilled the diagnostic ARVC criteria. Ventricular tachycardias (VTs) with a left bundle branch block pattern were documented in all but one patient (with CS). Programmed ventricular stimulation induced an average of 3.7 different monomorphic VTs in patients with CS vs 1.8 in patients with ARVC (P = .01). VT significantly more often originated in the apical region of the right ventricle in CS vs ARVC (P = .001), with no other predilection sites. Ablation success and other electrophysiological parameters were not different. CONCLUSIONS: The current diagnostic ARVC guidelines do not reliably exclude patients with CS. Clinical and electrophysiological parameters that were characteristic of CS in our patients include reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, a significantly wider QRS, right-sided apical VT, and more inducible forms of monomorphic VT.

Sudden death caused by cardiac sarcoidosis in childhood.

This report describes an adolescent who presented with ventricular tachycardia (VT) originating from the right ventricular apex, with no apparent underlying cause. Cardiac sarcoidosis was identified only at postmortem examination after sudden death. There must be a high index of suspicion for subtle forms of primary myocardial abnormalities in such cases. Investigation for VT should include specific investigations for cardiac sarcoidosis when no other pathology has been identified and there are persistent conduction abnormalities on resting ECG.