Early Toxicity of a Phase 2 Trial of Combined Salvage Radiation Therapy and Hormone Therapy in Oligometastatic Pelvic Node Relapses of Prostate Cancer (OLIGOPELVIS GETUG P07).

PURPOSE: Limited pelvic nodal relapse of prostatic cancer is a paramount challenge for locoregional salvage treatments. Salvage whole pelvis radiation therapy as considered in the BLINDED trial is an attractive option, but there are concerns about its toxicity. This article describes early toxicity with the technique. METHODS AND MATERIALS: BLINDED was a prospective multicenter phase 2 trial investigating high-dose salvage pelvic irradiation with an additional dose to the fluorocholine-based positron emission tomography-positive pelvic lymph nodes, combined with 6-month androgen blockade. The prescribed dose was 54 Gy in 1.8 Gy fractions with up to 66 Gy in 2.2 Gy fractions to the pathologic pelvic lymph nodes. Early toxicity was defined as toxicity until 1 year after radiation therapy. Patients quality of life was assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer questionnaires (QLQ-C30 and QLQ-PR25). RESULTS: Seventy-four patients were recruited in 15 French radiation oncology departments between August 2014 and July 2016. Seven were excluded before treatment because of violation of the inclusion criteria. The intention-to-treat analysis therefore included 67 patients. Half had received prior prostatic irradiation. Median age was 67.7 ± 6.5 years. Grade 2 acute urinary toxicity was observed in 9 of 67 patients (13.4%), and grade 2 1-year toxicity occurred in 4 of 67 patients (6%). Three patients (4.4%) had grade 3 urinary toxicity. Grade 2 acute digestive toxicity was observed in 10 of 67 patients (14.9%), and grade 2 1-year toxicity occurred in 4 of 67 patients (6%). Patients with prior prostate bed irradiation did not exhibit increased urinary or digestive toxicity. The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer questionnaire scores at 1 year did not worsen significantly. CONCLUSIONS: The acute and 1-year toxicity of the BLINDED protocol was satisfactory, even in patients with a history of prostatic irradiation.

Impact of bladder volume on acute genitourinary toxicity in intensity modulated radiotherapy for localized and locally advanced prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of changes in bladder volume during high-dose intensity-modulated-radiotherapy (IMRT) of prostate cancer on acute genitourinary (GU) toxicity and prospectively evaluate a simple biofeedback technique for reproducible bladder filling with the aim of reducing acute GU toxicity. METHODS: One hundred ninety-three patients were trained via a biofeedback mechanism to maintain a partially filled bladder with a reproducible volume of 200-300 cc at planning CT and subsequently at each fraction of radiotherapy. We prospectively analyzed whether and to what extent the patients' ability to maintain a certain bladder filling influenced the degree of acute GU toxicity and whether cut-off values could be differentiated. RESULTS: We demonstrated that the ability to reach a reproducible bladder volume above a threshold volume of 180 cc and maintain that volume via biofeedback throughout treatment predicts for a decrease in acute GU toxicity during curative high-dose IMRT of the prostate. Patients who were not able to reach a partial bladder filling to that cut-off value and were not able to maintain a partially filled bladder throughout treatment had a significantly higher risk of developing ≥grade 2 GU acute toxicity. CONCLUSION: Our results support the hypothesis that a biofeedback training for the patient is an easy-to-apply, useful, and cost-effective tool for reducing acute GU toxicity in high-dose IMRT of the prostate. Patients who are not able to reach and maintain a certain bladder volume during planning and treatment-two independent risk factors-might need special consideration.

Randomised Phase II Feasibility Trial of Image-guided External Beam Radiotherapy With or Without High Dose Rate Brachytherapy Boost in Men with Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer (CCTG PR15/ NCT01982786).

AIMS: We conducted a multicentre feasibility study to assess the ability to randomise patients between image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) and IGRT + high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy boost and to adhere to appropriate radiation quality assurance standards. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The primary end point was to determine the ability to randomise 60 patients over an 18 month period. Arm 1 (IGRT) patients received 78 Gy in 39 fractions or 60 Gy in 20 fractions (physician's preference), whereas arm 2 (IGRT + HDR) received 37.5 Gy in 15 fractions with HDR boost of 15 Gy. The secondary end points included >grade 3 acute genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicity, using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0 at 3 months, validation of a prospectively defined radiation oncology quality assurance to assess treatment compliance. All analyses were descriptive; no formal comparisons between treatment arms were carried out. RESULTS: Between April 2014 and September 2015, 57 National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN)-defined intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients were randomised between IGRT alone (arm 1; n = 29) and IGRT plus HDR brachytherapy boost (arm 2; n = 28). Overall, 93% received the treatment as randomised. There were four patients (one on IGRT arm 1 and three patients on the IGRT + HDR arm 2) who were treated differently from randomisation assignment. For the 29 patients receiving IGRT (arm 1), there were 14 cases reported with minor deviations and three with major deviations. For patients on IGRT + HDR (arm 2), there were 18 cases reported with minor deviations and two with major deviations. At 3 months in the IGRT group (arm 1), one patient reported grade 3 diarrhoea, whereas in the IGRT + HDR group (arm 2), two patients reported grade 3 haematuria. No other gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicities were reported. CONCLUSION: The pilot study showed the feasibility of randomisation between treatment with IGRT alone versus IGRT + HDR boost. Treatment compliance was good, including adherence to quality assurance standards.

Sequential boost in neoadjuvant irradiation for T3N0-1 rectal cancer: long-term results from a single-center experience.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the influence of radiation dose on tumor regression grade (TRG) and sphincter preservation rate in a series of cT3N0-1 rectal cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CT-RT) with or without a sequential radiation boost. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between May 2002 and September 2013, 116 cases were eligible for retrospective evaluation. Radiotherapy was delivered for a total dose of 45 Gy (no boost arm) or 50.4 Gy (boost arm). TRG was evaluated with the Dworak scale. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 62 months (range, 12-138 months). The 5-year overall survival and local control rates were 72% and 93%, respectively. Fifty-five patients (47%) were treated with a sequential radiation boost and 61 (53%) without a boost. Eighty patients (72%) presented T3N0 disease and 32 (28%) T3N1 disease. Concomitant capecitabine was administered in 92 cases (79%) and intravenous 5-fluorouracil in 24 cases (21%). Sphincter preservation was performed in 82% of patients in the boost arm and 66% in the no-boost arm. A higher TRG was related to a longer interval between neoadjuvant treatment and surgery (p<0.001). The probability of a TRG ≥2 was 2.5 times higher in the boost arm. A gain in local control, estimated at 4% during the first 3 years after CT-RT, favored the boost arm. CONCLUSIONS: The long-term results from our single-center experience confirm literature data on the role of a sequential boost in tumor response after neoadjuvant CT-RT in a series of cT3N0-1 rectal cancer patients.

Long-Term Efficacy and Toxicity of Low-Dose-Rate ¹²5I Prostate Brachytherapy as Monotherapy in Low-, Intermediate-, and High-Risk Prostate Cancer.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: To report long-term efficacy and toxicity for a single-institution cohort of patients treated with low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy permanent implant (PI) monotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From 1996 to 2007, 1989 patients with low-risk (61.3%), intermediate-risk (29.8%), high-intermediate-risk (4.5%), and high-risk prostate cancer (4.4%) were treated with PI and followed up prospectively in a registry. All patients were treated with (125)I monotherapy to 144 Gy. Late toxicity was coded retrospectively according to a modified Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events 4.0 scale. The rates of biochemical relapse-free survival (bRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), overall survival (OS), and prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM) were calculated. We identified factors associated with late grade ≥3 genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity, bRFS, DMFS, OS, PCSM, and incontinence. RESULTS: The median age of the patients was 67 years, and the median overall and prostate-specific antigen follow-up times were 6.8 years and 5.8 years, respectively. The overall 5-year rates for bRFS, DMFS, OS, and PCSM were 91.9%, 97.8%, 93.7%, and 0.71%, respectively. The 10-year rates were 81.5%, 91.5%, 76.1%, and 2.5%, respectively. The overall rates of late grade ≥3 GU and GI toxicity were 7.6% and 0.8%, respectively. On multivariable analysis, age and prostate length were significantly associated with increased risk of late grade ≥3 GU toxicity. The risk of incontinence was highly correlated with both pre-PI and post-PI transurethral resection of the prostate. CONCLUSIONS: Prostate brachytherapy as monotherapy is an effective treatment for low-risk and low-intermediate-risk prostate cancer and appears promising as a treatment for high-intermediate-risk and high-risk prostate cancer. Significant long-term toxicities are rare when brachytherapy is performed as monotherapy.

Outcomes of trimodality approach in the management of T2N0M0 bladder cancer.

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: The main objective of this study is to evaluate outcomes of bladder preservation treatment for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. METHODS AND STUDY DESIGN: 38 patients with histologically proven muscle-invasive bladder cancer treated at our department between January 2008 and December 2013 were analyzed retrospectively. Age, gender, pathology, stage, 3-year overall survival, 3-year disease-free survival, radiotherapy (RT) dose, genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicity scores and response evaluation of the patients were recorded. 3-year overall survival and 3-year disease-free survivals were calculated by Kaplan-Meier method along with the analysis of gender, pathology, stage and therapy response of the study group. RESULTS: 33 patients (86.8%) were managed with concomitant chemoradiotherapy whereas 5 patients (13.2%) received only radiation therapy due to renal insufficency and comorbid diseases. 6 (15.8%) out of 38 patients had partial response (PR) and remaining 32 (84.2%) patients experienced complete response (CR). The PR group underwent salvage cystectomy and CR group had been followed-up after radical radiotherapy. Mean age of the group was 70.9 (range 45-90) years. 26 of all patients were male (68.4%) and 12 were female (31.6%). Mean follow-up time after completion of radiotherapy was 24.7 months (range 12-40). Mean RT dose was 64 Gy (range 60-66). 3-year overall survival was 64% and 3-year disease free survival was 73%. CONCLUSIONS: Bladder preserving approach is an alternative definitive therapy solution to radical cystectomy in the treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer with less morbidity, preserved natural bladder, and high quality of life.

¹8F-choline positron emission tomography/computed tomography-driven high-dose salvage radiation therapy in patients with biochemical progression after radical prostatectomy: feasibility study in 60 patients.

PURPOSE: To retrospectively review data of a cohort of patients with biochemical progression after radical prostatectomy, treated according to a uniform institutional treatment policy, to evaluate toxicity and feasibility of high-dose salvage radiation therapy (80 Gy). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Data on 60 patients with biochemical progression after radical prostatectomy between January 2009 and September 2011 were reviewed. The median value of prostate-specific antigen before radiation therapy was 0.9 ng/mL. All patients at time of diagnosis of biochemical recurrence underwent dynamic (18)F-choline positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT), which revealed in all cases a local recurrence. High-dose salvage radiation therapy was delivered up to total dose of 80 Gy to 18F-choline PET/CT-positive area. Toxicity was recorded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 3.0, scale. RESULTS: Treatment was generally well tolerated: 54 patients (90%) completed salvage radiation therapy without any interruption. Gastrointestinal grade ≥2 acute toxicity was recorded in 6 patients (10%), whereas no patient experienced a grade ≥2 genitourinary toxicity. No grade 4 acute toxicity events were recorded. Only 1 patient (1.7%) experienced a grade 2 gastrointestinal late toxicity. With a mean follow-up of 31.2 months, 46 of 60 patients (76.6%) were free of recurrence. The 3-year biochemical progression-free survival rate was 72.5%. CONCLUSIONS: At early follow-up, (18)F-choline PET/CT-driven high-dose salvage radiation therapy seems to be feasible and well tolerated, with a low rate of toxicity.

Comparison of acute and subacute genitourinary and gastrointestinal adverse events of radiotherapy for prostate cancer using intensity-modulated radiation therapy, three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy, permanent implant brachytherapy and high-dose-rate brachytherapy.

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: To examine acute and subacute urinary and rectal toxicity in patients with localized prostate cancer monotherapeutically treated with the following four radiotherapeutic techniques: intensity-modulated radiation therapy, three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy, low-dose-rate permanent implant brachytherapy using I-125 seeds, and high-dose-rate brachytherapy. METHODS: One hundred and fifty-six patients with localized prostate cancer were distributed as follows: 57 underwent intensity-modulated radiation therapy, 35 underwent three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy, 37 underwent I-125 implant, and 27 underwent high-dose-rate brachytherapy. The prescribed doses were 70-74 Gy/35-37 fractions, 70 Gy/35 fractions, 145 Gy, and 45.5 Gy/7 fraction/4 days for intensity-modulated radiation therapy, three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy, I-125 implant, and high-dose-rate brachytherapy, respectively. Toxicities (≤6 months) were retrospectively evaluated using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.03. RESULTS: The frequency of grade 1 or 2 urinary toxicities using three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (33/35, 94%) was significantly higher than that with high-dose-rate brachytherapy (18/27, 67%) or intensity-modulated radiation therapy (37/57, 65%) (P <0.05). The frequency of grade 1 or 2 urinary toxicities using I-125 implant was 31/37, 84%. The frequency of grade 1 or 2 gastrointestinal toxicities using three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (17/35, 49%) was significantly higher than that using I-125 implant (4/37, 11%) or high-dose-rate brachytherapy (0/27, 0%) (P <0.05). Using intensity-modulated radiation therapy, the frequency of grade 1 or 2 gastrointestinal toxicities was 18/57 (32%), which was significantly higher than that using high-dose-rate brachytherapy (0/27, 0%) (P <0.05). Grade 3 or greater adverse events were not observed. CONCLUSIONS: Acute and subacute genitourinary toxicities were observed more frequently after three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy than after high-dose-rate brachytherapy or intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Acute and subacute gastrointestinal toxicities were seen more often after three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy than after brachytherapy (I-125 implant or high-dose-rate brachytherapy).

Commentary on "Toxicity after external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer: an analysis of late morbidity in men with diabetes mellitus." Kalakota K, Liauw SL, Department of Radiation Oncology, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, IL.: Urology 2013;81(6):1196-201. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.01.047. [Epub 2013 Mar 26].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the influence of diabetes mellitus (DM) on late genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity in patients treated with external beam radiotherapy (RT) for prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 626 men were treated with curative-intent RT for prostate cancer from 1988 to 2008. Using the National Comprehensive Cancer Network risk category, the patients were considered to have low-risk (30%), intermediate-risk (42%), or high-risk (28%) prostate cancer. The median radiation dose was 74 Gy; 45% received androgen deprivation therapy for a median of 4 months. Late GU and GI Radiation Therapy Oncology Group toxicity was recorded prospectively at each visit after external beam RT. The median follow-up period was 55 months. RESULTS: Of the 626 men, 102 (16%) had DM that was controlled by diet (8%), oral medications (52%), or insulin (39%). The patients with DM were more likely to receive intensity-modulated RT and androgen deprivation therapy and to have a shorter follow-up duration (P ≤.05 for all). Univariate analyses demonstrated that greater radiation dose, baseline urinary dysfunction, intensity-modulated RT, and DM were associated with grade 2 or greater GU toxicity, and transurethral resection of the prostate and DM were associated with grade 3 or greater GU toxicity. In addition, androgen deprivation therapy use, age ≥ 70 years, and anticoagulation were associated with grade 2 or greater GI toxicity, and age ≥ 70 years and anticoagulation were associated with grade 3 or greater GI toxicity. The multivariate analyses for late toxicity demonstrated a greater risk of grade 2 or greater (relative risk 1.36, P = .10) and grade 3 or greater GU toxicity (relative risk 2.74, P = .04) with DM. CONCLUSION: A greater incidence of late GU toxicity was seen in patients with DM treated for prostate cancer. This relationship might be useful when considering the treatment of patients with DM, especially those receiving dose-escalated RT or with a history of transurethral resection of the prostate.

Is there an increase in genitourinary toxicity in patients treated with transurethral resection of the prostate and radiotherapy? A systematic review.

PURPOSE: Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) is considered by some as a risk factor for genitourinary (GU) toxicity after radiotherapy (RT). However, there are conflicting results regarding the interaction between RT and TURP with respect to GU toxicity. The purpose of this report is to review the published data concerning TURP before or after RT and its effect on urinary complication. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A systematic literature review based on database searches in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Pubmed, Ovid, and Chochrane Library. The eligibility criteria of final review were (1) definitive RT for prostate cancer is reported; (2) comparison of GU toxicities between patients with and without TURP is reported; (3) minimum 5 patients after TURP are included. RESULTS: Twelve articles regarding overall GU toxicity, 15 articles regarding urinary incontinence, and 13 articles regarding urinary or bladder neck stricture met eligibility criteria, and they were included in the final review. A quantitative synthesis from the data of selected articles was impossible because of variable grading systems and variable definitions in their comparisons between patients with and without TURP. However, most published articles demonstrated the increased risk of GU toxicity with TURP in patients treated with RT. CONCLUSIONS: Our systematic review strongly suggests that TURP is one of the risk factors of GU toxicity after RT. This needs to be taken seriously when prostate cancer patients with TURP are considered for RT either external beam or brachytherapy.

Efficacy and toxicity of intensity-modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer in Chinese patients.

OBJECTIVE: To report the treatment efficacy and toxicity profile of intensitymodulated radiation therapy in Chinese patients with clinically localised prostate cancer. DESIGN: Historical cohort study. SETTING: Oncology unit in a university teaching hospital in Hong Kong. PATIENTS: Patients with clinically localised prostate cancer undergoing intensity-modulated radiation therapy in our institution between May 2001 and November 2009 were reviewed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The 5-year biochemical failure­free survival, 5-year overall survival, as well as acute/late gastro-intestinal toxicities and genito-urinary toxicities. RESULTS: A total of 182 patients were treated with prostate intensitymodulated radiation therapy with or without whole-pelvic radiotherapy. The median follow-up was 44 months. The median patient age was 72 years. Overall survival of the cohort was 92% after 5 years. The favourable, intermediate, and unfavourable risk category distributions of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network were 21 (12%), 42 (23%), and 119 (65%), respectively. The 5-year actuarial biochemical failure­free survival rates for patients in these categories were 95%, 82%, and 80%, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified early tumour stage, low pre-treatment prostate-specific antigen levels, and the use of adjuvant androgen deprivation as independent prognostic factors for better biochemical failure­free survival. Grade 2 and 3 late gastro-intestinal/genito-urinary toxicities occurred in 8%/3% and 4%/3% of the patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: Intensity-modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer is feasible and safe in the Chinese population. These data are consistent with the results of other series in Caucasian populations.

Toxicity after external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer: an analysis of late morbidity in men with diabetes mellitus.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the influence of diabetes mellitus (DM) on late genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity in patients treated with external beam radiotherapy (RT) for prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 626 men were treated with curative-intent RT for prostate cancer from 1988 to 2008. Using the National Comprehensive Cancer Network risk category, the patients were considered to have low-risk (30%), intermediate-risk (42%), or high-risk (28%) prostate cancer. The median radiation dose was 74 Gy; 45% received androgen deprivation therapy for a median of 4 months. Late GU and GI Radiation Therapy Oncology Group toxicity was recorded prospectively at each visit after external beam RT. The median follow-up period was 55 months. RESULTS: Of the 626 men, 102 (16%) had DM that was controlled by diet (8%), oral medications (52%), or insulin (39%). The patients with DM were more likely to receive intensity-modulated RT and androgen deprivation therapy and to have a shorter follow-up duration (P ≤.05 for all). Univariate analyses demonstrated that greater radiation dose, baseline urinary dysfunction, intensity-modulated RT, and DM were associated with grade 2 or greater GU toxicity, and transurethral resection of the prostate and DM were associated with grade 3 or greater GU toxicity. In addition, androgen deprivation therapy use, age ≥70 years, and anticoagulation were associated with grade 2 or greater GI toxicity, and age ≥70 years and anticoagulation were associated with grade 3 or greater GI toxicity. The multivariate analyses for late toxicity demonstrated a greater risk of grade 2 or greater (relative risk 1.36, P = .10) and grade 3 or greater GU toxicity (relative risk 2.74, P = .04) with DM. CONCLUSION: A greater incidence of late GU toxicity was seen in patients with DM treated for prostate cancer. This relationship might be useful when considering the treatment of patients with DM, especially those receiving dose-escalated RT or with a history of transurethral resection of the prostate.

Interstitial hyperthermia of the prostate in combination with brachytherapy : An evaluation of feasibility and early tolerance.

OBJECTIVE: A retrospective study to evaluate the feasibility and toxicity of interstitial hyperthermia (IHT) combined with high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy as the initial treatment for low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer, and as a salvage therapy in previously irradiated patients with local recurrence. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 18 December 2008 and 5 September 2012, 73  prostate cancer patients were treated with interstitial HDR brachytherapy of the prostate combined with IHT. In 54 patients this was the initial therapy for prostate cancer, while the other 19 were treated for local recurrence after previously undergoing external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). Toxicity for the organs of the genitourinary system and rectum was assessed according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v. 4.03 within 3 months after treatment. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 15 months (range 3-46). The combination of HDR brachytherapy and IHT was well tolerated. The toxicity profile was similar to that of HDR brachytherapy when not combined with hyperthermia. The most common minor complications were urinary frequency (grade 1: 37 %; grade 2: 22 %), nocturia (three times per night: 29 %; four- or more times per night: 20 %) and transient weakening of the urine stream (grade 1: 36 %; grade 2: 11 %). No early rectal complications were observed in the patient group and the severity of genitourinary toxicity was only grade 1-2. CONCLUSION: Early tolerance of IHT in combination with HDR brachytherapy is good. Further prospective clinical studies should focus on the effects of combining IHT with HDR brachytherapy and the influence of this adjuvant therapy on biochemical disease-free survival, local control and overall survival.

Long-term survival and toxicity in patients treated with high-dose intensity modulated radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: To report long-term survival and toxicity outcomes with the use of high-dose intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) to 86.4 Gy for patients with localized prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between August 1997 and December 2008, 1002 patients were treated to a dose of 86.4 Gy using a 5-7 field IMRT technique. Patients were stratified by prognostic risk group based on National Comprehensive Cancer Network risk classification criteria. A total of 587 patients (59%) were treated with neoadjuvant and concurrent androgen deprivation therapy. The median follow-up for the entire cohort was 5.5 years (range, 1-14 years). RESULTS: For low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups, 7-year biochemical relapse-free survival outcomes were 98.8%, 85.6%, and 67.9%, respectively (P<.001), and distant metastasis-free survival rates were 99.4%, 94.1%, and 82.0% (P<.001), respectively. On multivariate analysis, T stage (P<.001), Gleason score (P<.001), and >50% of initial biopsy positive core (P=.001) were predictive for distant mestastases. No prostate cancer-related deaths were observed in the low-risk group. The 7-year prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM) rates, using competing risk analysis for intermediate- and high-risk groups, were 3.3% and 8.1%, respectively (P=.008). On multivariate analysis, Gleason score (P=.004), percentage of biopsy core positivity (P=.003), and T-stage (P=.033) were predictive for PCSM. Actuarial 7-year grade 2 or higher late gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicities were 4.4% and 21.1%, respectively. Late grade 3 gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicity was experienced by 7 patients (0.7%) and 22 patients (2.2%), respectively. Of the 427 men with full potency at baseline, 317 men (74%) retained sexual function at time of last follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: This study represents the largest cohort of patients treated with high-dose radiation to 86.4 Gy, using IMRT for localized prostate cancer, with the longest follow-up to date. Our findings indicate that this treatment results in excellent clinical outcomes with acceptable toxicity.

Can high-dose-rate brachytherapy prevent the major genitourinary complication better than external beam radiation alone for patients with previous transurethral resection of prostate?

PURPOSE: To compare the grade 3 genitourinary toxicity and oncological outcome for localized prostate cancer between high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy and external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) alone in patients with previously undergone Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: From November 1998 to November 2008, 78 patients with a history of TURP underwent radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer. Of these, 59 were enrolled in this study. In this study, 34 patients underwent HDR brachytherapy and 25 patients underwent EBRT alone. RESULTS: Grade 3 genitourinary complication was observed in 8.8 % of HDR brachytherapy group and 44 % in EBRT alone group. Five-year urinary incontinence rate was 2.9 % in HDR brachytherapy and 24 % in EBRT alone group. The results showed that significant higher incidence of grade 3 genitourinary complication (p = 0.003) and urinary incontinence was the most significant (p = 0.023) in the EBRT alone group. Five-year biochemical survival rate was 82.4 % in HDR brachytherapy group and 72.0 % in EBRT alone group (p = 0.396). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with prostate cancer who have previously undergone TURP, we observed that HDR brachytherapy was able to control prostate cancer with fewer GU morbidities and oncological outcomes that were similar to those associated with traditional EBRT alone. Moreover, HDR brachytherapy led to a decrease in major GU toxicity and also preserved the sphincter function more than that in TURP patients who underwent EBRT alone.

Outcomes in men with large prostates (≥ 60 cm(3)) treated with definitive proton therapy for prostate cancer.

Large prostate size is associated with higher rates of genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicities after definitive treatment for prostate cancer, and because of this many men will undergo cytoreduction with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) before definitive therapy, which results in its own unique toxicities and worsens quality of life. This series investigates genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicity in men with large prostates (> 60 cm(3)) undergoing definitive proton therapy (PT) for prostate cancer. Material and methods. From 2006 to 2010, 186 men with prostates ≥ 60 cm(3) were treated with definitive PT (median dose, 78 CGE) for low- (47%), intermediate- (37%) and high-risk (16%) prostate cancer. Median prostate size was 76 cm(3) (range, 60-143 cm(3)) and pretreatment IPSS was > 15 in 27%. At baseline, 51% were managed for obstructive symptoms with transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) (9.7%) or medical management with α blockers (32%), 5 α-reductase inhibitors (15%), and/or saw palmetto (11%). Fourteen men received ADT for cytoreduction. Results. Median follow-up was two years. Grade 3 genitourinary toxicities occurred in 14 men, including temporary catheterization (n = 7), TURP (n = 6), and balloon dilation for urethral stricture (n = 1). Multivariate analysis demonstrated pretreatment medical management (p = 0.0065) and pretreatment TURP (p = 0.0002) were significantly associated with grade 3 genitourinary toxicity. One man experienced grade 3 gastrointestinal toxicity and 15 men had grade 2 gastrointestinal toxicities. On multivariate analysis, dose > 78 CGE was associated with increased grade 2 + gastrointestinal toxicity (p = 0.0142). Conclusion. Definitive management of men with large prostates without ADT was associated with low rates of genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicity.

Long-term results of an RTOG Phase II trial (00-19) of external-beam radiation therapy combined with permanent source brachytherapy for intermediate-risk clinically localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate.

PURPOSE: External-beam radiation therapy combined with low-doserate permanent brachytherapy are commonly used to treat men with localized prostate cancer. This Phase II trial was performed to document late gastrointestinal or genitourinary toxicity as well as biochemical control for this treatment in a multi-institutional cooperative group setting. This report defines the long-term results of this trial. METHODS AND MATERIALS: All eligible patients received external-beam radiation (45 Gy in 25 fractions) followed 2-6 weeks later by a permanent iodine 125 implant of 108 Gy. Late toxicity was defined by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer late radiation morbidity scoring scheme. Biochemical control was defined by the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO) Consensus definition and the ASTRO Phoenix definition. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-eight patients were enrolled from 20 institutions, and 131 were eligible. Median follow-up (living patients) was 8.2 years (range, 2.7-9.3 years). The 8-year estimate of late grade >3 genitourinary and/or gastrointestinal toxicity was 15%. The most common grade >3 toxicities were urinary frequency, dysuria, and proctitis. There were two grade 4 toxicities, both bladder necrosis, and no grade 5 toxicities. In addition, 42% of patients complained of grade 3 impotence (no erections) at 8 years. The 8-year estimate of biochemical failure was 18% and 21% by the Phoenix and ASTRO consensus definitions, respectively. CONCLUSION: Biochemical control for this treatment seems durable with 8 years of follow-up and is similar to high-dose external beam radiation alone or brachytherapy alone. Late toxicity in this multi-institutional trial is higher than reports from similar cohorts of patients treated with high-dose external-beam radiation alone or permanent low-doserate brachytherapy alone, perhaps suggesting further attention to strategies that limit doses to normal structures or to unimodal radiotherapy techniques.

Adaptive image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) eliminates the risk of biochemical failure caused by the bias of rectal distension in prostate cancer treatment planning: clinical evidence.

PURPOSE: Rectal distension has been shown to decrease the probability of biochemical control. Adaptive image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) corrects for target position and volume variations, reducing the risk of biochemical failure while yielding acceptable rates of gastrointestinal (GI)/genitourinary (GU) toxicities. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 1998 and 2006, 962 patients were treated with computed tomography (CT)-based offline adaptive IGRT. Patients were stratified into low (n = 400) vs. intermediate/high (n = 562) National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) risk groups. Target motion was assessed with daily CT during the first week. Electronic portal imaging device (EPID) was used to measure daily setup error. Patient-specific confidence-limited planning target volumes (cl-PTV) were then constructed, reducing the standard PTV and compensating for geometric variation of the target and setup errors. Rectal volume (RV), cross-sectional area (CSA), and rectal volume from the seminal vesicles to the inferior prostate (SVP) were assessed on the planning CT. The impact of these volumetric parameters on 5-year biochemical control (BC) and chronic Grades ≥2 and 3 GU and GI toxicity were examined. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 5.5 years. Median minimum dose covering cl-PTV was 75.6 Gy. Median values for RV, CSA, and SVP were 82.8 cm(3), 5.6 cm(2), and 53.3 cm(3), respectively. The 5-year BC was 89% for the entire group: 96% for low risk and 83% for intermediate/high risk (p < 0.001). No statistically significant differences in BC were seen with stratification by RV, CSA, and SVP in quartiles. Maximum chronic Grades ≥2 and 3 GI toxicities were 21.2% and 2.9%, respectively. Respective values for GU toxicities were 15.5% and 4.3%. No differences in GI or GU toxicities were noted when patients were stratified by RV. CONCLUSIONS: Incorporation of adaptive IGRT reduces the risk of geometric miss and results in excellent biochemical control that is independent of rectal volume/distension while maintaining very low rates of chronic GI toxicity.

Phase I trial of pelvic nodal dose escalation with hypofractionated IMRT for high-risk prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: Toxicity concerns have limited pelvic nodal prescriptions to doses that may be suboptimal for controlling microscopic disease. In a prospective trial, we tested whether image-guided intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) can safely deliver escalated nodal doses while treating the prostate with hypofractionated radiotherapy in 5½ weeks. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Pelvic nodal and prostatic image-guided IMRT was delivered to 53 National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) high-risk patients to a nodal dose of 56 Gy in 2-Gy fractions with concomitant treatment of the prostate to 70 Gy in 28 fractions of 2.5 Gy, and 50 of 53 patients received androgen deprivation for a median duration of 12 months. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 25.4 months (range, 4.2-57.2). No early Grade 3 Radiation Therapy Oncology Group or Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v.3.0 genitourinary (GU) or gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities were seen. The cumulative actuarial incidence of Grade 2 early GU toxicity (primarily alpha blocker initiation) was 38%. The rate was 32% for Grade 2 early GI toxicity. None of the dose-volume descriptors correlated with GU toxicity, and only the volume of bowel receiving ≥30 Gy correlated with early GI toxicity (p = 0.029). Maximum late Grades 1, 2, and 3 GU toxicities were seen in 30%, 25%, and 2% of patients, respectively. Maximum late Grades 1 and 2 GI toxicities were seen in 30% and 8% (rectal bleeding requiring cautery) of patients, respectively. The estimated 3-year biochemical control (nadir + 2) was 81.2 ± 6.6%. No patient manifested pelvic nodal failure, whereas 2 experienced paraaortic nodal failure outside the field. The six other clinical failures were distant only. CONCLUSIONS: Pelvic IMRT nodal dose escalation to 56 Gy was delivered concurrently with 70 Gy of hypofractionated prostate radiotherapy in a convenient, resource-efficient, and well-tolerated 28-fraction schedule. Pelvic nodal dose escalation may be an option in any future exploration of potential benefits of pelvic radiation therapy in high-risk prostate cancer patients.

Treatment results of PDR brachytherapy combined with external beam radiotherapy in 106 patients with intermediate- to high-risk prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate treatment outcome of pulsed dose-rate brachytherapy (PDR) combined with external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for the treatment of prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 2002 and 2007, 106 patients were treated by EBRT combined with PDR and followed prospectively. Two, 38, and 66 patients were classified as low-, intermediate-, and high-risk disease respectively according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network criteria. EBRT dose was 46 Gy in 2.0-Gy fractions. PDR dose was increased stepwise from 24.96 to 28.80 Gy. Biochemical disease free survival and overall survival were determined by the Kaplan-Meier method. Cumulative incidence of late gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicity were scored, according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. RESULTS: The 3- and 5-year biochemical nonevidence of disease (bNED) were 92.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 87.1-98.5) and 89.5% (95% CI, 85.2-93.8), respectively. Overall survival at 3 and 5 years was 99% (95% CI, 96-100) and 96% (95% CI, 90-100), respectively. The 3- and 5-year Grade 2 GI toxicity was 5.3% (95% CI, 0-10.6) and 12.0% (95% CI, 1.4-22.6), respectively. No Grade 3 or higher GI toxicity was observed. The 3- and 5-year Grade 2 or higher GU toxicity was 18.7% (95% CI, 10.3-27.1) and 26.9% (95% CI, 15.1-38.7), respectively. CONCLUSION: Results on tumor control and late toxicity of EBRT combined with PDR are good and comparable to results obtained with EBRT combined with high-dose-rate brachytherapy for the treatment of prostate cancer.