Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Curr Opin HIV AIDS ; 13(3): 187-195, 2018 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29432231

RESUMO

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Perinatally HIV-infected adolescents may be at increased risk of noninfectious comorbidities later in life. This review summarizes recent advances in the understanding of noncommunicable diseases (NCD) among HIV-infected adolescents in high-income and lower middle-income countries, and identifies key questions that remain unanswered. We review atherosclerotic vascular disease (AVD), chronic bone disease (CBD), chronic kidney disease (CKD), and chronic lung disease (CLD). RECENT FINDINGS: Persistent immune activation and inflammation underlie the pathogenesis of AVD, highlighting the importance of treatment adherence and maintenance of viral suppression, and the need to evaluate interventions to decrease risk. Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and trials of vitamin D supplementation have been the focus of recent studies of CBD with limited studies to date evaluating tenofovir alafenamide as an alternative to TDF for decreasing risk for bone and renal adverse effects among HIV-infected adolescents. Recent studies of CKD have focused primarily on estimating prevalence in different settings whereas studies of CLD are limited. SUMMARY: As perinatally HIV-infected children age into adolescence and adulthood with effective long-term ART, it is necessary to continue to evaluate their risks for noninfectious comorbidities and complications, understand mechanisms underlying their risks, and identify and evaluate interventions specifically in this population.


Assuntos
Saúde do Adolescente , Fármacos Anti-HIV/uso terapêutico , Infecções por HIV/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por HIV/economia , HIV-1/fisiologia , Doenças não Transmissíveis/tratamento farmacológico , Doenças não Transmissíveis/economia , Saúde do Adolescente/economia , Saúde do Adolescente/estatística & dados numéricos , Fármacos Anti-HIV/economia , Infecções por HIV/virologia , HIV-1/genética , Humanos , Renda/estatística & dados numéricos , Tenofovir/economia , Tenofovir/uso terapêutico
2.
Hepatol Int ; 10(6): 924-936, 2016 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27271357

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) is newly available for treatment of chronic hepatitis B patients in China. To date, no study has been conducted to examine the cost-effectiveness of this treatment. The aim of this study was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of TDF versus four oral nucleos(t)ide analogs [lamivudine (LAM), adefovir (ADV), telbivudine (LdT), and entecavir (ETV)] and from a pharmacoeconomic perspective to assess current drug pricing for TDF. METHODS: Based on Chinese healthcare perspectives, a Markov model was applied to simulate the lifetime (40-year time span) costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) for five different monotherapy strategies. Two kinds of rescue combination strategies (base-case: LAM + ADV then ETV + ADV; alternative: directly using ETV + ADV) were separately considered for treatment of patients refractory to monotherapy. Model parameters (including disease transition, cost, and utility) were obtained from previous Chinese population studies. Both branded and generic drugs were separately analyzed. Study model uncertainties were assessed by one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Two-way sensitivity analysis was used to explore uncertainties between efficacy and price of TDF. RESULTS: In the base-case analysis, the lowest lifetime cost and the best cost-effectiveness ratio were obtained by ETV, which was considered the reference treatment. LAM, ADV, and LdT treatments had significantly greater costs and lower efficacies. Compared to ETV, TDF was more effective but also more expensive. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of TDF versus ETV were much higher than the willing-to-pay threshold of $20,466 US dollars (USD) per QALY gained (3 × gross domestic product per capita of China, 2014). TDF would be the most cost-effective strategy if the annual cost did not exceed $2260 USD and $1600 USD for branded and generic drugs, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: For Chinese chronic hepatitis B patients, ETV is still the most cost-effective strategy over TDF and other nucleos(t)ide analogs, with a threshold of $20,466 USD/QALY gained.


Assuntos
Antivirais/administração & dosagem , Antivirais/economia , Hepatite B Crônica/economia , Tenofovir/administração & dosagem , Tenofovir/economia , Adenina/administração & dosagem , Adenina/análogos & derivados , Adenina/economia , Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , Guanina/administração & dosagem , Guanina/análogos & derivados , Guanina/economia , Hepatite B Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Lamivudina/administração & dosagem , Lamivudina/economia , Masculino , Cadeias de Markov , Organofosfonatos/administração & dosagem , Organofosfonatos/economia , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Telbivudina , Timidina/administração & dosagem , Timidina/análogos & derivados , Timidina/economia , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA