Prospective Phase II Open-Label Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare Mandibular Preservation in Upfront Surgery With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Surgery in Operable Oral Cavity Cancer.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to explore the potential role and safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in tumor shrinkage and resultant mandibular preservation in oral cancers compared with conventional surgical treatment. METHODS: This study was a single-center, randomized, phase II trial of treatment-naive histologically confirmed squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity with cT2-T4 and N0/N+, M0 (American Joint Committee on Cancer, seventh edition) stage, necessitating resection of the mandible for paramandibular disease in the absence of clinicoradiologic evidence of bone erosion. The patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to either upfront surgery (segmental resection) followed by adjuvant treatment (standard arm [SA]) or two cycles of NACT (docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil) at 3-week intervals (intervention arm [IA]), followed by surgery dictated by postchemotherapy disease extent. All patients in the IA received adjuvant chemoradiotherapy, and patients in the SA were treated as per final histopathology report. The primary end point was mandible preservation rate. The secondary end points were disease-free survival and treatment-related toxicity. RESULTS: Sixty-eight patients were enrolled over 3 years and randomly assigned to either SA (34 patients) or IA (34 patients). The median follow-up was 3.6 years (interquartile range, 0.95-7.05 years). Mandibular preservation was achieved in 16 of 34 patients (47% [95% CI, 31.49 to 63.24]) in the IA. The disease-free survival (P = .715, hazard ratio 0.911 [95% CI, 0.516 to 1.607]) and overall survival (P = .747, hazard ratio 0.899 [95% CI, 0.510 to 1.587]) were similar in both the arms. Complications were similar in both arms, but chemotherapy-induced toxicity was observed in the majority of patients (grade III: 14, 41.2%; grade IV: 11, 32.4%) in the IA. CONCLUSION: NACT plays a potential role in mandibular preservation in oral cancers with acceptable toxicities and no compromise in survival. However, this needs to be validated in a larger phase III randomized trial.

Organ Preservation in Patients with Rectal Cancer Treated with Total Neoadjuvant Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Retrospective studies suggest that watch-and-wait is a safe alternative to total mesorectal excision in selected patients with a clinical complete response after chemoradiotherapy. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the proportion of patients with rectal cancer who may benefit from watch-and-wait. DESIGN: This study is a retrospective analysis of data from prospectively maintained databases. SETTING: This study was conducted at a comprehensive cancer center. PATIENTS: Consecutive patients with stage II or III rectal adenocarcinoma who were treated with total neoadjuvant therapy using induction chemotherapy between 2012 and 2019 under the care of the same surgeon were included. INTERVENTION: Induction-type total neoadjuvant therapy consisted of 8 cycles of leucovorin-fluorouracil-oxaliplatin or 5 cycles of capecitabine-oxaliplatin before chemoradiotherapy. Patients with a clinical complete response were offered watch-and-wait, and patients with residual tumor were offered total mesorectal excision. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Tumor response was assessed with a digital rectal examination, endoscopy, and MRI. Patient characteristics and recurrence-free survival were compared between the watch-and-wait group and the total mesorectal excision group. RESULTS: A total of 88 patients were included in the analysis. One (1%) died during neoadjuvant therapy. Fifty-five patients (62.5%) had an incomplete clinical response and underwent surgery, 10 (18%) of the 55 developed distant metastasis, and 3 (5%) developed local recurrence. The remaining 32 patients (36.3%) had a clinical complete response and underwent watch-and-wait. On average, patients in the watch-and-wait group were older and had smaller, more distal tumors compared with patients in the surgery group. The median radiation dose, number of chemotherapy cycles, rate of adverse events, and length of follow-up did not differ substantively between the total mesorectal excision group and the watch-and-wait group. In the watch-and-wait group, 2 (6%) patients developed tumor regrowth, and one of them had distant metastasis. Recurrence-free survival was significantly higher in the watch-and-wait group. LIMITATIONS: Generalizability, sample size, and follow-up duration were limitations of this study. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately one-third of patients with stage II or III rectal cancer can benefit from a watch-and-wait approach with the aim of preserving the rectum if treated with induction-type total neoadjuvant therapy and followed by an experienced multidisciplinary team. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B688. CONSERVACIN DE RGANOS EN PACIENTES CON CNCER DE RECTO TRATADOS CON TERAPIA NEOADYUVANTE TOTAL: ANTECEDENTES:Estudios retrospectivos sugieren que observar y esperar es una alternativa segura a la escisión mesorrectal total en pacientes seleccionados con una respuesta clínica completa después de la quimiorradioterapia.OBJETIVO:Determinar la proporción de pacientes con cáncer de recto que pueden beneficiarse de observar y esperar.DISEÑO:Análisis retrospectivo de datos de bases de datos mantenidas de forma prospectiva.ESCENARIO:Centro Oncológico Integral.PACIENTES:Pacientes consecutivos con adenocarcinoma de recto en estadio II o III tratados con TNT utilizando quimioterapia de inducción entre 2012 y 2019 bajo el cuidado del mismo cirujano.INTERVENCIÓN:La terapia neoadyuvante total de tipo inducción consistió en ocho ciclos de leucovorín-fluorouracilo-oxaliplatino o cinco ciclos de capecitabina-oxaliplatino antes de la quimiorradioterapia. A los pacientes con una respuesta clínica completa se les ofreció observar y esperar, y a los pacientes con tumor residual se les ofreció la escisión mesorrectal total.PRINCIPALES RESULTADOS Y MEDIDAS:La respuesta del tumor se evaluó con un tacto rectal, endoscopia y resonancia magnética. Se compararon las características de los pacientes y la supervivencia libre de recurrencia entre el grupo de observación y espera y el grupo de escisión mesorrectal total.RESULTADOS:Se incluyó en el análisis a un total de 88 pacientes. Uno (1%) murió durante la terapia neoadyuvante. Cincuenta y cinco pacientes (62.5%) tuvieron una respuesta clínica incompleta y se sometieron a cirugía; 10 (18%) de los 55 desarrollaron metástasis a distancia y 3 (5%) desarrollaron recidiva local. Los 32 pacientes restantes (36.3%) tuvieron una cCR (respuesta clínica completa) y se sometieron a observar y esperar. En promedio, los pacientes del grupo de observación y espera eran mayores y tenían tumores más pequeños y distales en comparación con el grupo de cirugía. La dosis mediana de radiación, el número de ciclos de quimioterapia, la tasa de eventos adversos y la duración del seguimiento no difirieron sustancialmente entre el grupo de escisión mesorrectal total y el grupo de observación y espera. En el grupo de observación y espera, 2 (6%) pacientes desarrollaron recrecimiento del tumor y uno de ellos tuvo metástasis a distancia. La supervivencia libre de recurrencia fue significativamente mayor en el grupo de observación y espera.LIMITACIONES:Generalizabilidad, tamaño de la muestra, duración del seguimiento.CONCLUSIONES:Aproximadamente un tercio de los pacientes con cáncer de recto en estadio II o III pueden beneficiarse de un abordaje de observación y espera con el objetivo de preservar el recto si se tratan con terapia neoadyuvante total de tipo inducción y son seguidos por un equipo multidisciplinario experimentado. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B688.

Association of tumor downstaging after neoadjuvant chemotherapy with survival in patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a retrospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: Assessing the downstaging effects of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LANPC) and predicting response to treatment remain challenging. The present study aimed to evaluate the long-term prognosis of downstaging after NACT in patients with LANPC and to investigate the prognostic value of post-NACT tumor downstaging on treatment outcomes in the era of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). METHODS: This retrospective study included 226 patients with stage III (n = 188) and IVA (n = 38) NPC admitted to Haikou People's Hospital between 1 October 2009 and 1 October 2012. The patients were grouped as downstaging or no after NACT. Overall survival (OS), locoregional failure-free survival (LFFS), and distant failure-free survival (DFFS) were analyzed. RESULTS: Among 226 patients, 196 (86.7%) were in the downstaging group and 30 (13.3%) were in the non-downstaging group. The longest follow-up was 76 months, and the median was 45 months. The 3-year OS rates of the downstaging group and non-downstaging group were 91.0% (95% CI 0.89-0.93) and 69.5% (95% CI 0.66-0.72) (P = 0.005). The 5-year OS rates were 81.6% (95% CI 0.78-0.86) and 53.3% (95% CI 0.49-0.61) (P = 0.001). N downstaging (3-year OS, HR 0.491, 95% CI 0.221-0.881, P = 0.022; 5-year OS, HR = 0.597, 95% CI 0.378-0.878, P = 0.021) was independently associated with OS. CONCLUSION: In the treatment of LANPC, the patients with downstaging after NACT have a better prognosis than those without downstaging. This study suggests that NACT can improve the prognosis for patients with LANPC if there is downstaging.

Randomized phase II study comparing the efficacy and safety of SOX versus mFOLFOX6 as neoadjuvant chemotherapy without radiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer (KSCC1301).

BACKGROUND: Preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT), the current standard of care for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), is associated with many radiotherapy (RT)-related side effects. We aimed to evaluate whether S-1 and oxaliplatin (SOX) or folinic acid, 5-FU, and oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX6) can be as effective as neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) regimens for LARC without RT. METHODS: Patients with untreated resectable LARC were randomly assigned to receive SOX or mFOLFOX6. The NAC protocol period was 3 months. The primary endpoint was 3-year disease-free survival (DFS), and the secondary endpoints included pathological effects, surgical completion rate, 3-year survival, and safety. RESULTS: From September 2013 to October 2015, 56 and 54 patients were enrolled in the SOX and mFOLFOX6 arms, respectively. The 3-year DFS rates were 69.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 54.9-83.6) and 73.4% (95% CI 58.7-83.6) in the SOX and mFOLFOX6 arms, respectively; no significant differences were found between the arms (log-rank test; P = 0.5315, hazard ratio: 0.808, 95% CI 0.414-1.578). The 3-year survival rates were 92.3 and 91.8% in the SOX and mFOLFOX6 arms, respectively. The surgical completion rate was 98.1% overall, 100% in the SOX arm, and 96.0% in the mFOLFOX6 arm. The incidences of pathological response rates ≥grade 1b were 41.5 and 43.8% in the SOX and mFOLFOX6 arms, respectively. Both treatments were manageable and tolerable. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated the effectiveness and safety of SOX and mFOLFOX6, both of which may be new neoadjuvant treatment candidates in previously untreated LARC cases. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Date of enrolment of the first participant to the trial: 3rd Oct 2013; This study was registered in the UMIN clinical trials registry on 14th Aug, 2013. (Prospectively registered, UMIN-CTR number UMIN000011486). https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr/ctr.cgi?function=brows&recptno=R000013441&language=J.

Upfront or intermediate treatment of advanced ovarian cancer patients with cytoreduction plus HIPEC: Results of a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Newly diagnosed advanced-stage ovarian cancer patients are treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, primary or intermediate cytoreductive surgery, and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). The aim of this study is to evaluate the optimal timing of cytoreduction plus HIPEC for advanced ovarian cancer patients. METHODS: Advanced ovarian cancer patients treated with cytoreductive surgery plus HIPEC at three different hospitals between 2005 and 2019 were subgrouped regarding their time of management with cytoreduction plus HIPEC, upfront or intermediate. We retrospectively assessed the overall survival (OS), the progression-free survival (PFS), and the disease-free survival (DFS) of these groups. RESULTS: A total of 112 ovarian cancer patients were contained. Of whom, 47 patients were in the upfront group with 24 (51.1%) to be alive, while 65 patients were included in the intermediate group with 34 (52.3%) to be alive. OS (48 vs. 30 months) and DFS (42 vs. 20 months) indicated no significant difference. Although the same median PFS was observed in both groups (10 months), a higher mean PFS was observed in the upfront group (11.9 vs. 9 months, p = 0.023). CONCLUSION: The treatment of advanced ovarian cancer patients with upfront cytoreductive surgery plus HIPEC is feasible with the same survival results. Further, larger prospective studies need to verify our results.

Esophageal adenocarcinoma with any component of signet ring cells portends poor prognosis and response to neoadjuvant therapy.

BACKGROUND: Multiple investigations have shown inferior outcomes for esophageal cancer patients with signet ring cell (SRC) histology. Traditionally, SRC adenocarcinoma has been defined by ≥50% of the tumor composed of SRC. We hypothesized that patients with SRC even <50% would show resistance to standard multimodality therapy with poorer long-term outcomes. METHODS: Patients treated with trimodality therapy for adenocarcinoma from 2006 to 2018 were evaluated for SRC on pretreatment biopsy specimens. Available hematoxylin and eosin slides containing SRC tumors were re-reviewed by an esophageal pathologist to quantify the percent composition of SRC. RESULTS: SRC histology was identified on at least 1 pathologic specimen in 106 of 819 (13%) patients. Rates of pathologic complete response (pCR) among usual-type and SRC tumors were 25% (177/713) and 10% (11/106), respectively (P = .006). The pretreatment SRC components did not independently affect the rate of pCR (1%-10% SRC: 4% [2/46] pCR; 11%-49% SRC: 25% [7/28] pCR; 50%-100% SRC: 7% [2/30] pCR). Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated worse survival among patients with any degree of SRC present on pretreatment biopsy, as compared with usual-type esophageal adenocarcinoma (P < .0001). Cox multivariable analysis failed to identify a relationship between increasing SRC component and poorer survival. CONCLUSIONS: We present the only known evaluation of the percentage of SRC component in esophageal carcinoma. Our data support the hypothesis that esophageal adenocarcinoma with any component of SRC are more resistant to chemoradiation with poorer survival. Pathologic reporting of esophageal adenocarcinoma should include any component of SRC. Alternative therapies in patients with any SRC component may be indicated.

Quality of life in rectal cancer patients with or without oxaliplatin in the randomised CAO/ARO/AIO-04 phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: The CAO/ARO/AIO trial has shown that oxaliplatin added to preoperative chemoradiotherapy and postoperative chemotherapy significantly improved disease-free survival in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Here, we present a post-hoc analysis of quality of life (QoL) in disease-free patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 2006 and 2010, 1236 patients with LARC were randomly assigned either to preoperative chemoradiotherapy followed by total mesorectal excision and postoperative chemotherapy (N = 623) or combined with oxaliplatin (N = 613). QoL questionnaires (EORTC QLQ-C30, colorectal module CR38) were completed at baseline, after postoperative chemotherapy and during follow-up. Analysis was performed according intent-to-treat. RESULTS: Available questionnaires (baseline) were 82% (N = 512) in the control and 84% (N = 513) in the investigational group. Response rates were 49% (533 of 1086) at 1 year and 43% (403 of 928) at 3 years. Global health status (GHS) for disease-free patients was stable in both groups (range 0-100). At baseline: standard arm 62.0 (mean, SD 21.6; N = 491) versus oxaliplatin arm 63.2 (mean, SD 22; N = 503); at 3 years: 69.4 (SD 19.3; N = 187) versus 65.4 (SD 22.2; N = 202). After treatment and at 3 years, no significant differences (≥10 points) between groups were found in QoL subscales. Disease-free patients experiencing neurotoxic side-effects (grade 1-4) showed reduced GHS at 3 years versus patients without neurotoxicity (mean 59.2 versus 69.3; P < 0.001), while grade 3-4 rate was low. CONCLUSION: The addition of oxaliplatin was not associated with worse overall QoL. This information is of interest to patients in many ongoing rectal cancer trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: NCT00349076.

Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX followed by Chemoradiotherapy for Middle and Lower Rectal Cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Neoadjuvant concomitant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgical resection is the standard of care in the treatment of rectal cancer. We are investigating the value of adding combination chemotherapy oxaliplatin, irinotecan, leucovorin and fluorouracil (FOLFIRINOX) before neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. METHODS: Forty-one patients with middle and lower rectal cancer were included. FOLFORINOX were given every 2 weeks over 2 months (4 cycles) followed by concomitant chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Surgery was done 6-8 weeks after CRT and then adjuvant 4 months of FOLFOX or XELOX were given. The primary end point was sphincter preservation rate. RESULTS: All patients received the four cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy FOLFORINOX, 38 patients completed CRT and only 29 patients underwent surgery. 32 patients were available for assessment (29 patients who underwent surgery and three patients who refuse surgery because of no evidence of disease by endoscopy, imaging and biopsy). Sphincter preservation was achieved in twenty-one patients (51.2%). Pathological complete response rate was 24.1%. After a median follow up of 24 months. Median PFS was 20 months and 2-years PFS was 62.3%. The median overall survival of all patients was not reached, while 2-years OS was 76.5%. CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX followed by CRT for middle and lower rectal cancer is feasible, tolerable with satisfactory sphincter preservation rate. 
.

Prognostic impact of immune-microenvironment in colorectal liver metastases resected after triplets plus a biologic agent: A pooled analysis of five prospective trials.

BACKGROUND: Immune-contexture of tumour microenvironment (TME) influences prognosis of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients and can be altered by cytotoxic and targeted agents. Limited data are available regarding the immune-TME of CRC after treatment. METHODS: An extensive immunohistochemistry evaluation of immunological parameters on tumour cells and TME of colorectal liver metastases from 106 patients who underwent secondary resection, after receiving triplets FOLFOXIRI (5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin and irinotecan) or COI (capecitabine, oxaliplatin and irinotecan) plus bevacizumab (N = 59) or cetuximab (N = 47) in five first-line no-profit clinical trials was performed. RESULTS: No substantial differences were reported in immunological parameters according to administered targeted agent, RAS/BRAF mutational status and histopathological or Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours response. Stromal expression of Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) (p = 0.002), Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) (p = 0.003) and Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD1) (p = 0.002) were independent prognostic factors for longer relapse-free survival (RFS) at multivariate analysis with a positive trend for post-resection overall survival (OS). Patients whose metastases expressed stromal COX-2, HLA and PD1 (inflamed-score positive) reported longer RFS (25.5 versus 9.8 months; p < 0.001) and post-resection OS (64.3 versus 37.7 months; p = 0.003) as compared with others. In addition, patients with higher expression of CD4 and CD8 T-cells in tumour core and invasive margin (CD4/CD8-score) showed a better post-resection OS (not-reached versus 41.6 months; p = 0.032). A combined score of inflamed-score and CD4/CD8-score (combo-score) showed a clear prognostic role. CONCLUSIONS: The present study emphasises the role of immune-TME as independent predictor of survival in patients resected after triplets plus biologic. Inflamed-, CD4/C8- and combo-scores should be confirmed as prognostic factors in further studies.

Multicystic and diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma in children.

BACKGROUND: Malignant and multicystic peritoneal mesotheliomas are extremely rare tumors in children, developing from mesothelial cells. No specific guidelines are available at this age. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of all identified children (< 18-year-old) treated in France from 1987 to 2017 for a diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (DMPM) or a multicystic peritoneal mesothelioma (MCPM). RESULTS: Fourteen patients (5 males and nine females), aged 2.2 to 17.5 years, were included. The most frequent presenting symptoms were abdominal pain, ascitis, and alteration in the general condition. Eight patients had epithelioid mesothelioma, three had biphasic mesothelioma, and three had MCPM. Eight patients with DMPM diagnosis received cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Among them, six patients had neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy, one patient, post-operative chemotherapy, and one patient CRS and HIPEC only. Three patients received only systemic chemotherapy. All patients with MCPM had only surgery. After a median follow-up of seven years (2-15), six patients (6/11; one death) with DMPM and two patients (two/three) with MCPM had a local and distant recurrences. CONCLUSION: Peritoneal mesothelioma in children is a rare condition with difficult diagnosis and high risk of recurrence. Worldwide interdisciplinary collaboration and networking are mandatory to help diagnosis and provide harmonious treatment guidelines.

Long-term survival analysis of addition of carboplatin to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-negative breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Addition of carboplatin (CBDCA) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) has improved pathological complete response (pCR) rates in previous studies. We present long-term survival outcomes (disease-free survival [DFS], pre-planned secondary endpoint; overall survival [OS], post hoc exploratory endpoint) of our randomized study of the addition of CBDCA to NAC for HER2-negative breast cancer. METHODS: Patients with stage II/III, HER2-negative breast cancer (N = 179) were randomly assigned to receive CP-CEF (four 3-week cycles of CBDCA [area under the curve, 5 mg/mL/min, day 1] and weekly paclitaxel [wPTX, 80 mg/m2, day 1, 8, 15] followed by four 3-week cycles of cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and 5-fluorouracil [CEF, 500/100/500 mg/m2]) or P-CEF (four cycles of wPTX followed by four cycles of CEF) as NAC. DFS and OS were analyzed at each population of pCR status and assigned treatment arm. RESULTS: Of 179 patients, 154 were available for long-term follow-up. At a median follow-up of 6.6 years (range, 0.7-8.0 years), patients who achieved pCR [n = 42, 23.5% (CP-CEF: n = 28, P-CEF: n = 16)] had longer DFS and OS than non-pCR patients [DFS; HR 0.15 (0.04-0.61), P = 0.008, OS; log-rank P = 0.003]. Addition of carboplatin to NAC significantly improved DFS and OS in the subset of patients with TNBC [DFS: HR, 0.22 (0.06-0.82), P = 0.015; OS: HR, 0.12 (0.01-0.96), P = 0.046], but not in the subset of patients with hormone receptor-positive disease or among all patients. CONCLUSIONS: Addition of carboplatin to neoadjuvant chemotherapy significantly improved DFS and OS in patients with TNBC but not in those with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer.

Prognosis of limited-stage small cell lung cancer with comprehensive treatment including radical resection.

BACKGROUND: The NCCN (National Comprehensive Cancer Network) Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN guidelines) recommend radical resection for T1-2N0M0 patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC). However, only about 5% of patients with small cell cancer (SCLC) were initially diagnosed as T1-2N0M0. The purpose of our study was to analyze and compare the effects of the comprehensive treatment including radical surgery and concurrent chemoradiotherapy on the prognosis of patients with LS-SCLC. METHODS: We comprehensively reviewed the medical data of patients with SCLC diagnosed by pathology in our hospital from January 2011 to April 2018. The Ethics Committee of West China Hospital of Sichuan University approved the study. Finally, 50 patients with good follow-up and complete medical data were selected as the surgical group (S group). According to the clinical characteristics of the patients in the S group, 102 LS-SCLC patients who received concurrent chemoradiotherapy in the same period were included in the CCRT group (concurrent chemoradiotherapy group) as the control group. Then according to the orders of the adjuvant treatments, the patients in the S group were divided into the SA group (radical surgery + adjuvant chemotherapy + adjuvant radiotherapy group, 30 cases in total) and the NS group (neoadjuvant chemotherapy + radical surgery + adjuvant chemotherapy ± adjuvant radiotherapy group, 20 cases in total) for subgroup analysis. The SPSS 23.0 software was used for statistical analysis, and the t test was used for group comparison; Kaplan-Meier was used for survival analysis. P < 0.05 demonstrates a statistically significant difference. RESULTS: The median progress-free survival (PFS) in the S group (73 months) was significantly better than that in the CCRT group (10.5 months, P < 0.0001), and the median overall survival (OS) in the S group (79 months) was also significantly better than that in the CCRT group (23 months, P < 0.0001). Subgroup analysis showed that there was no significant difference between the NS group and the SA group. CONCLUSIONS: For LS-SCLC patients, the comprehensive treatment including radical surgery (radical surgery + adjuvant chemotherapy ± adjuvant radiotherapy/neoadjuvant chemotherapy + radical surgery + adjuvant chemotherapy ± adjuvant radiotherapy)may be superior to concurrent chemoradiotherapy.

The clinical value and usage of inflammatory and nutritional markers in survival prediction for gastric cancer patients with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and D2 lymphadenectomy.

BACKGROUND: The clinical values of inflammatory and nutritional markers remained unclear for gastric cancer with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). METHODS: The inflammatory, nutritional markers and their changes were analyzed for locally advanced gastric cancer with NACT. The predictive value was evaluated by the Cox proportional hazards regressions under three hypothesized scenarios. The nomograms including independent prognostic factors were plotted for survival prediction. RESULTS: A total of 225 patients were included in the study. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), systemic immune-inflammation index, and hemoglobin (Hgb) were significantly reduced, and the body mass index was significantly increased after NACT (all P < 0.05). The pre-NACT NLR [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.176, P = 0.059] showed a trend to correlate with the overall survival (OS) when only pre-NACT markers available; The post-NACT Hgb (HR = 0.982, P = 0.015) was the independent prognostic factor when only post-NACT markers available; The post-NACT Hgb (HR = 0.984, P = 0.025) and the change value of LMR (HR = 1.183, P = 0.036) were the independent prognostic factors when both pre- and post-NACT markers available. The nomogram had a similar Harrell's C-statistic compared to ypTNM stage (0.719 vs. 0.706). CONCLUSION: For locally advanced gastric cancer, the NACT could significantly decrease some inflammatory markers. The pre-NACT NLR, the post-NACT Hgb and the change value of LMR had some values in survival prediction combined with age, sex, tumor location and the clinical stages under different clinical scenarios. The elevated initial NLR, the preoperative anemia and the greater change value of LMR implied a poor prognosis.

Neoadjuvant therapy versus upfront surgery for borderline-resectable pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant therapy is recommended for patients with borderline-resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC). In this study, we compare survival outcomes of neoadjuvant therapy with upfront surgery. METHODS: From January 2011 to June 2016, 1415 patients underwent treatments for pancreatic cancer in Samsung Medical Center. Among them, 112 (7.9%) patients were categorized as BRPC by the NCCN 2016 guideline. They were classified by type of initial treatments into neoadjuvant group (NA, N.=26) and upfront surgery group (US, N.=86). RESULTS: The median survival duration of all patients was 18.3 months. Patients in the NA group had more T4 disease than those in the US group (38.5% in NA versus 15.1% in the US group; P=0.010). Arterial involvement was more frequent in the NA group (42.3% versus 15.1%; P=0.003). In the NA group, ten (38.5%) patients underwent surgery, and seven of them had complete R0 resection. In the US group, 83 (96.5%) patients received radical surgery, and 42 (48.8%) had R0 resection. In survival analysis according to intent to treat, the overall two-year survival rate was 51.1% in the US group and 36.7% in the NA group (P=0.001). However, among patients who underwent surgery (N.=96), the two-year overall survival rate was not significantly different between the two groups (P=0.089). According to involved vessels, the survival rate was not different between patients with arterial or both arterial and venous involvement and in patients with only venous involvement (P=0.649). CONCLUSIONS: It is necessary to demonstrate the efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy and to standardize the regimens through large-scale, multicenter, randomized controlled studies.

Neoadjuvant Modified FOLFOX6 With or Without Radiation Versus Fluorouracil Plus Radiation for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: Final Results of the Chinese FOWARC Trial.

PURPOSE: In the multicenter, open-label, phase III FOWARC trial, modified infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX6) plus radiotherapy resulted in a higher pathologic complete response rate than fluorouracil plus radiotherapy in Chinese patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Here, we report the final results. METHODS: Adults ages 18 to 75 years with stage II/III rectal cancer were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to five cycles of infusional fluorouracil (leucovorin 400 mg/m2, fluorouracil 400 mg/m2, and fluorouracil 2.4 g/m2 over 48 hours) plus radiotherapy (46.0 to 50.4 Gy delivered in 23 to 25 fractions during cycles 2 to 4) followed by surgery and seven cycles of infusional fluorouracil, the same treatment plus intravenous oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 on day 1 of each cycle (mFOLFOX6), or four to six cycles of mFOLFOX6 followed by surgery and six to eight cycles of mFOLFOX6. The primary end point was 3-year disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS: In total, 495 patients were randomly assigned to treatment. After a median follow-up of 45.2 months, DFS events were reported in 46, 39, and 46 patients in the fluorouracil plus radiotherapy, mFOLFOX6 plus radiotherapy, and mFOLFOX6 arms. In each arm, the probability of 3-year DFS was 72.9%, 77.2%, and 73.5% (P = .709 by the log-rank test), the 3-year probability of local recurrence after R0/1 resection was 8.0%, 7.0%, and 8.3% (P = .873 by the log-rank test), and the 3-year overall survival rate was 91.3%, 89.1%, and 90.7% (P = .971 by log-rank test), respectively. CONCLUSION: mFOLFOX6, with or without radiation, did not significantly improve 3-year DFS versus fluorouracil with radiation in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. No significant difference in outcomes was found between mFOLFOX6 without radiotherapy and fluorouracil with radiotherapy, which requires additional investigation of the role of radiotherapy in these regimens.

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy With mFOLFOXIRI Without Routine Use of Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Although neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy (CRT) achieves low local recurrence rates in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), it raises a lot of concerns about long-term anal and sexual functions. We explored the efficacy of preoperative chemotherapy with mFOLFOXIRI (folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan) in patients with LARC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with LARC evaluated by pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were enrolled in this trial. All received 4 to 6 cycles of mFOLFOXIRI. MRI was performed to assess clinical response after chemotherapy. Patients with mesorectal fascia-positive or ycT4a/b after re-evaluation would receive radiation before surgery, whereas responders would have immediate total mesorectal excision (TME). Adjuvant chemotherapy with mFOLFOX6 (folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin) was recommended. The primary endpoint was the proportion of tumor downstaging to ypT0-2N0M0. The secondary endpoints were pathologic complete response rate (pCR), 3-year disease-free survival rate, and safety. RESULTS: Overall, 106 patients were enrolled and received neoadjuvant mFOLFOXIRI chemotherapy. A total of 103 participants underwent TME surgery. Among 103 patients who completed at least 4 cycles of preoperative chemotherapy, 2 received short-term radiation before TME, and 12 underwent long-term CRT after MRI evaluation. The pCR rate was 20.4%, and the tumor downstaging rate was 42.7%. Among patients without preoperative long-term radiotherapy, the pCR rate and tumor downstaging rate were 17.4% and 41.3%, respectively. Among the per-protocol population, the tumor downstaging rate was 48.1%, and the pCR rate was 20.3%. The chemotherapy-related toxicity was well-tolerated. CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with mFOLFOXIRI and selective radiation does not seem to compromise outcomes in LARC. It could be a reasonable alternative to CRT in previously untreated patients with LARC.

The Influence of the Perioperative Nutritional Status on the Survival Outcomes for Esophageal Cancer Patients with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Studies have shown a variety of nutritional indices to be prognostic predictors for esophageal cancer patients. However, which nutritional index should be used and when it should be measured during the perioperative period remain unclear. This study attempted to clarify the details surrounding predictive nutritional evaluation by assessing the longitudinal data of serologic indices in perioperative esophageal cancer patients. METHODS: The study included 141 esophageal cancer patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy after radical esophagectomy at Tohoku University Hospital from April 2008 to December 2017. The nutritional status was retrospectively assessed during the perioperative period, and the prognostic factors related to survival were analyzed. RESULTS: Use of the controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score showed that malnutrition occurred only from 14 days after surgery in most cases. Use of the prognostic nutritional index (PNI) showed that the ratio of malnutrition increased gradually from presurgery to 14 days after surgery. The timing of malnutrition that affected survival was 14 days after surgery with the CONUT score and presurgery and 4 months after surgery with the PNI. A multivariable analysis of independent prognostic factors predicting survival identified malnutrition 14 days after surgery with the CONUT score and a low PNI before surgery, invasion depth of the primary lesion, and node metastasis. CONCLUSIONS: Malnutrition occurring during the perioperative state of esophageal cancer was shown to be a survival prognostic factor. Development of an optimal nutritional intervention is recommended for esophageal cancer patients to prevent malnutrition both before and after surgery.

Phase II Trial of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy, Chemoradiotherapy, and Laparoscopic Surgery with Selective Lateral Node Dissection for Poor-Risk Low Rectal Cancer.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of induction modified 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX6) plus bevacizumab followed by S- 1-based chemoradiotherapy in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-defined poor-risk locally advanced low rectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a prospective phase II trial at a single comprehensive cancer center. The primary endpoint was the pathological complete response (pCR) rate. Eligible patients had clinical stage II-III low rectal adenocarcinoma with any of the following MRI-defined poor-risk features: circumferential resection margin (CRM) ≤ 1 mm, cT4, positive lateral nodes, mesorectal N2 disease, and/or requiring abdominoperineal resection. Patients received six cycles of mFOLFOX6 with 5 mg/kg bevacizumab followed by oral S-1 (80 mg/m2/day on days 1-14 and 22-35) plus radiotherapy (50.4 Gy). Surgery was conducted through a laparoscopic approach. Lateral node dissection was selectively added when the patient had enlarged lateral nodes. RESULTS: A total of 43 patients were enrolled. Grade 3-4 adverse events occurred in nine patients during induction chemotherapy and in five patients during chemoradiotherapy. One patient declined surgery with a clinical complete response. Forty-two patients underwent surgery, and 16 had pCR [37.2%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 24.4-52.1%]. All underwent R0 resection without conversion, including combined resection of adjacent structures (n = 14) and lateral node dissection (n = 30). Clavien-Dindo grade 3-4 complications occurred in six patients (14.3%). With median follow-up of 52 months, six developed recurrences (lung n = 5, local n = 1; 3-year relapse-free survival 86.0%). CONCLUSIONS: This study achieved a high pCR rate with favorable toxicity and postoperative complications in poor-risk locally advanced low rectal cancer. Multicenter study is warranted to evaluate this regimen.

Effects of Omega-3 Supplementation on Ki-67 and VEGF Expression Levels and Clinical Outcomes of Locally Advanced Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant CAF Chemotherapy: A Randomized Controlled Trial Report

Background: Omega-3 is a polyunsaturated fatty acid with an ability to regulate cell proliferation and apoptosis through interaction with inflammatory mediators. The potential additional beneficial effects of Omega-3 on chemotherapy patients with breast cancer is not yet completely revealed. Methods: A double-blind randomized control trial (RCT) involving a total of 48 locally advanced breast cancer patients was conducted. Ki-67 and VEGF expressions, as well as overall survival of patients receiving neoadjuvant cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin-5'fluorouracyl (CAF) chemotherapy plus Omega-3 (intervention group) or placebo (control group), were compared. Kaplan-Meier curve and Cox-regression tests were used to assess conditional disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) between the two groups. Results: Decreased Ki-67 expression was observed in the intervention group compared to control (42.4±4.8 versus 39.2±5.3; T-test p=0.032). Decreased Ki-67 expression was observed in intervention compared to control group (42.4±4.8 versus 39.2±5.3; T-test p=0.032). Decreased VEGF expression was also seen in the intervention group compared to control (32.7±5.2 versus 29.5±5.4; T-test p=0.041). VEGF expression positively correlated with Ki-67 expression (Spearman's test p<0.001, R2=0.541). Overall survival in the intervention group was significantly longer in comparison to the control group (mean survival: 30.9 ± 3.71 versus 25.9 ± 3.6 weeks, Mantel-Cox test p=0.048; HR=0.411, 95%CI: 0.201-0.840). Disease-free survival was significantly longer in the intervention group compared to the control group (mean survival: 28.5 ± 3.3 versus 23.7 ± 3.6, respectively; Mantel-Cox test p=0.044, HR= 0.439, 95%CI: 0.222-0.869). Conclusion: Omega-3 fatty acid supplementation improved overall survival and progression-free survival of locally advanced breast cancer treated with CAF neoadjuvant chemotherapy and mastectomy.

Treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma with chemotherapy preceding versus after surgical resection.

OBJECTIVES: There are 2 main treatment paradigms recognized by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network for resectable malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM): induction chemotherapy followed by resection (IC/R), and up-front resection with postoperative chemotherapy (R/PC). These paradigms are being compared in an accruing randomized phase II trial. In the absence of such completed trials, in this study we evaluated overall survival (OS) and postoperative outcomes of IC/R and R/PC. METHODS: The National Cancer Database was queried for newly diagnosed epithelioid/biphasic MPM. Metastatic, node-positive, and/or cT4 disease was excluded, along with nondefinitive surgery and lack of chemotherapy. Multivariable logistic regression ascertained factors independently associated with induction chemotherapy delivery. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to evaluate OS between cohorts; multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to assess factors associated with OS. Survival was also evaluated between propensity-matched populations. Last, postoperative outcomes were assessed between groups. RESULTS: Overall, 361 patients (182 IC/R, 179 R/PC) were analyzed. Temporal trends revealed that IC/R is decreasing over time. Survival of the IC/R cohort was similar to that of R/PC patients (20.9 vs 21.7 months; P = .500); this persisted after propensity matching (20.8 vs 22.0 months; P = .270). However, patients who underwent IC/R experienced longer postoperative hospitalization (median 7 days vs 6 days; P = .001) and higher 30-day mortality (3.3% vs 0%; P = .020). CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the only comparative investigation of the 2 major management paradigms of operable MPM. IC/R regimens are decreasing over time in the United States. Although associated with survival similar to R/PC, IC/R might be associated with worse postoperative outcomes. Careful induction chemotherapy patient selection is thus highly recommended.