Renal replacement therapy in Brunei Darussalam: comparing standards with international renal registries.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Brunei Darussalam is a small South East Asian country with a high prevalence and incidence of end stage kidney disease (ESRD). This study aims to compare key performance indicators recorded in the Brunei Dialysis and Transplant Registry and department records against international practice. Registries from the USA (USRDS), UK (UK Renal Registry), Australasia (ANZDATA), Europe (ERA-EDTA Registry) and Malaysia (MDTR) were used for comparisons. METHODS AND RESULTS: Haemodialysis (83%) and renal transplantation (6%) were the most and least favoured modality of renal replacement therapy in Brunei. Diabetes mellitus as a cause of ESRD (57%) was high in Brunei but on par with other South East Asian countries. Dialysis death rates (11%) and living-related transplant survival rates (5 year graft and patient survival 91% and 96% respectively) were favourable compared with other registries. Anaemia and mineral bone disease management were similar to Malaysia but slightly inferior to the others, but generally in keeping with KDOQI and KDIGO targets. Haemodialysis adequacy (48% achieving urea reduction ratio of >65%) was relatively poorer due to poor dialysis flow rates and low fistula usage (71%). Peritoneal dialysis peritonitis (24.5 patient-month/episode) and adequacy (78% achieving kt/v of 1.7) were in keeping with ISPD targets and international registries' results. CONCLUSION: Brunei has achieved reasonable and commendable standards in many areas pertaining to the renal services. This report has identified several key areas for developments but this is to be expected for a service making its first foray into international benchmarked practice.

[Regional citrate anticoagulation: towards a first-choice treatment]. / Anticoagulazione regionale con citrato: verso un trattamento di prima scelta.

Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is the most widely used technique for the treatment of severe acute kidney injury in the critically ill. The need for prolonged anticoagulation is the most important drawback of CRRT and clinically important bleeding significantly increases the risk of death. Therefore, alternative anticoagulation methods should be more widely adopted. Among the potential alternatives to systemic heparin anticoagulation, regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) is the most promising. By reducing ionized calcium inside the extracorporeal circuit, citrate is able to block the coagulation cascade at different levels. Compared with unfractionated heparin, several studies reported better filter survival times and a marked reduction of transfusion rates with RCA. Despite the positive reports about the efficacy and safety of RCA, the use of this alternative method of anticoagulation appears to be relatively limited. Desirable future improvements in RCA should be focused on simplifying protocols, minimizing the need for calcium and magnesium supplementation, increasing the flexibility of buffer balance, and introducing customized dialysis systems able to deliver automated RCA. In particular, safe protocols with automated delivery of citrate and calcium can allow easy parameter settings that can be adapted to a wide range of clinical situations, facilitating the wider use of RCA in the coming years.

Translating knowledge on best practice into improving quality of RRT care: a systematic review of implementation strategies.

Recent studies showed wide variation in the extent to which guidelines and other types of best practice have been implemented as part of routine health care. This is also true for the delivery of renal replacement therapy (RRT) for ESRD patients. Increasing uptake of best practice within such complex care systems requires an understanding of implementation strategies and specific quality improvement (QI) techniques. Therefore, we systematically reviewed over 5000 titles published since 1990 and included papers describing planned attempts to accelerate uptake of best RRT practice into daily care. This resulted in a list of 93 QI initiatives, categorized in order to expedite shared learning. The majority of the initiatives were executed within the domains of vascular access, nutrition, and anemia management. Strategies oriented at patients were most common and many initiatives pre-defined an improvement target before starting implementation. Of the 93 initiatives, 22 were sufficiently robust methodologically to be analyzed in more detail. Our results tend to support previous findings that multifaceted strategies are more effective than single strategies. Improving our understanding of how to successfully implement best practice can inform system-level change and is the only way to close the gap between knowledge on what works and the actual care delivered to ESRD patients. Research into implementation, using specific QI techniques, should therefore be given priority in future.

A patient pathway to renal replacement therapy: implementation in the progressive renal insufficiency population.

Care paths and patient pathways are collaborative interdisciplinary tools developed to provide quality care. One goal in progressive renal insufficiency (PRI) care is to provide patients and family members with relevant and timely information to help them cope with medical therapy and lifestyle changes required to slow the progression of renal insufficiency. At Halton Healthcare Services, clinical and patient pathways have been widely used with success. Recognizing the potential benefits of a patient pathway for the PRI population, our interdisciplinary team developed a pathway that outlines the journey to renal replacement therapy. The pathway provides the patient with some insight into the future, as their disease process continues to have impact on their life. Reviewed by a patient within our PRI program during the development process, we have tailored this pathway to meet the needs of this unique population. We predict this patient pathway will have positive impact on the patient's understanding of the role of the PRI clinic and the partnership between the team members, the patient, and the family.