Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 10 de 10
Filtrar
1.
Dermatitis ; 31(6): 367-372, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33074937

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Testing cosmetics and their ingredients is essential to avoid missing relevant allergens and to monitor fluctuating incidence of hypersensitivity. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to review the usefulness of patch testing with a customized antimicrobials, vehicles, and cosmetics (AVC) series over 15 years at a single Canadian site. METHODS: Between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2019, patients suspected of having cosmetics allergy were patch tested with a 40-allergen AVC series in addition to the North American Contact Dermatitis Group standard screening series. We reviewed the patch test results of 2868 patients. RESULTS: We consecutively patch tested with the baseline series 6103 patients, of which 2868 (47%) were also tested with the AVC series. Of 53 different allergens that were tested at some point, 26 remained in the series throughout the 15-year span. The most common positive allergens were thimerosal (4.52%), polyvidone-iodine (2.25%), propolis (2.06%), sodium metabisulfite (1.94%), dodecyl gallate (1.53%), carmine (1.10%), lauryl glucoside (1.01%), sandalwood oil (0.7%), and tert-butylhydroquinone (0.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Although the expansion of the North American Contact Dermatitis Group standard screening series has decreased the yield from the AVC series from 21.1% to 13.9%, it still remains a useful adjunct for patients suspected of having cosmetics or disinfectants allergy.


Assuntos
Anti-Infecciosos/efeitos adversos , Cosméticos/efeitos adversos , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/etiologia , Testes do Emplastro/métodos , Veículos Farmacêuticos/efeitos adversos , Canadá , Carmim/efeitos adversos , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/diagnóstico , Ácido Gálico/efeitos adversos , Ácido Gálico/análogos & derivados , Glucosídeos/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Hidroquinonas/efeitos adversos , Óleos de Plantas/efeitos adversos , Povidona-Iodo/efeitos adversos , Própole/efeitos adversos , Sesquiterpenos/efeitos adversos , Sulfitos/efeitos adversos , Timerosal/efeitos adversos
3.
Aten Primaria ; 51(1): 40-46, 2019 01.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30262223

RESUMO

Vaccines are an essential tool for the prevention of infectious diseases. However, false ideas and rumours with no scientific foundation about their possible negative effects may dissuade people from being vaccinated, with the consequent risks for the health of the population. The objective of this article is to evaluate the origin and the arguments of some of the most frequent mistaken ideas and rumours about the possible adverse effects of vaccines. Some clearly established adverse effects are presented, as well as false beliefs about various vaccines and potential harm to health. Vaccines, like any drug, can cause adverse effects, but the possible adverse effects of vaccination programs are clearly lower than their individual (vaccinated) and collective benefits (those vaccinated and those who cannot be vaccinated for medical reasons). The possible adverse effects attributable to vaccines should be detected by powerful and well-structured pharmacovigilance systems.


Assuntos
Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Imunização/psicologia , Vacinas/efeitos adversos , Imunidade Adaptativa , Asma/etiologia , Transtorno do Espectro Autista/etiologia , Doenças Autoimunes/etiologia , Vacina contra Difteria, Tétano e Coqueluche/efeitos adversos , Formaldeído/efeitos adversos , Gastroenterite/prevenção & controle , Gastroenterite/virologia , Síndrome de Guillain-Barré/etiologia , Humanos , Hipersensibilidade/etiologia , Imunização/efeitos adversos , Recém-Nascido , Vacinas contra Influenza/efeitos adversos , Vacina contra Sarampo-Caxumba-Rubéola/efeitos adversos , Narcolepsia/etiologia , Neoplasias/etiologia , Farmacovigilância , Vacina Antipólio de Vírus Inativado/efeitos adversos , Conservantes Farmacêuticos/efeitos adversos , Infecções por Rotavirus/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra Rotavirus/efeitos adversos , Timerosal/efeitos adversos , Zinco/efeitos adversos
4.
J Toxicol Environ Health A ; 73(24): 1665-77, 2010.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21058170

RESUMO

Universal hepatitis B vaccination was recommended for U.S. newborns in 1991; however, safety findings are mixed. The association between hepatitis B vaccination of male neonates and parental report of autism diagnosis was determined. This cross-sectional study used weighted probability samples obtained from National Health Interview Survey 1997-2002 data sets. Vaccination status was determined from the vaccination record. Logistic regression was used to estimate the odds for autism diagnosis associated with neonatal hepatitis B vaccination among boys age 3-17 years, born before 1999, adjusted for race, maternal education, and two-parent household. Boys vaccinated as neonates had threefold greater odds for autism diagnosis compared to boys never vaccinated or vaccinated after the first month of life. Non-Hispanic white boys were 64% less likely to have autism diagnosis relative to nonwhite boys. Findings suggest that U.S. male neonates vaccinated with the hepatitis B vaccine prior to 1999 (from vaccination record) had a threefold higher risk for parental report of autism diagnosis compared to boys not vaccinated as neonates during that same time period. Nonwhite boys bore a greater risk.


Assuntos
Transtorno Autístico/etiologia , Vacinas contra Hepatite B/efeitos adversos , Recém-Nascido , Transtorno Autístico/epidemiologia , Transtorno Autístico/etnologia , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Vacinas contra Hepatite B/análise , Hispânico ou Latino , Humanos , Esquemas de Imunização , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Modelos Biológicos , Programas Nacionais de Saúde , Fatores de Risco , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Timerosal/efeitos adversos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , População Branca
7.
Can J Neurol Sci ; 33(4): 341-6, 2006 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17168158

RESUMO

Because of a temporal correlation between the first notable signs and symptoms of autism and the routine childhood vaccination schedule, many parents have become increasingly concerned regarding the possible etiologic role vaccines may play in the development of autism. In particular, some have suggested an association between the Measles-Mumps-Rubella vaccine and autism. Our literature review found very few studies supporting this theory, with the overwhelming majority showing no causal association between the Measles-Mumps-Rubella vaccine and autism. The vaccine preservative thimerosal has alternatively been hypothesized to have a possible causal role in autism. Again, no convincing evidence was found to support this claim, nor for the use of chelation therapy in autism. With decreasing uptake of immunizations in children and the inevitable occurrence of measles outbreaks, it is important that clinicians be aware of the literature concerning vaccinations and autism so that they may have informed discussions with parents and caregivers.


Assuntos
Transtorno Autístico/etiologia , Vacinação/efeitos adversos , Vacinas/efeitos adversos , Criança , Humanos , Conservantes Farmacêuticos/efeitos adversos , Timerosal/efeitos adversos
9.
Contact Dermatitis ; 43(4): 216-22, 2000 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11011921

RESUMO

The present work reports the results of a multicentre study of toothpaste allergic contact cheilitis (TACC) conducted by GIRDCA (Gruppo Italiano Ricerca Dermatiti da Contatto e Ambientali). The study examined 54 patients with eczematous lesions on the lips, the possible cause of which was suspected to be the use of toothpastes. Patch tests were conducted with a standard series, a specially-targeted series (toothpaste cheilitis series, TCS), and with suspected toothpaste(s). A stop-restart test (SRT) was carried out with these, together with a use test to identify possible alternative products. The TCS produced 17 positive reactions in 13 patients, the most frequent being to spearmint oil. Of the 54 patients, 5 displayed positive reactions only to the TCS. The patch tests with toothpaste produced positive reactions in 11/32 patients, the SRT a positive response in 10/12 cases. The diagnosis of TACC was confirmed in 15/54 patients. Alternative products were identified for 5 patients. In conclusion, the allergens most frequently responsible for TACC were the flavourings, and the additional series proved to be useful in many cases (together with patch tests with toothpastes and the SRT) for correct diagnosis and to initiate effective prevention.


Assuntos
Queilite/induzido quimicamente , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/etiologia , Cremes Dentais/efeitos adversos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Alérgenos/efeitos adversos , Cáusticos/efeitos adversos , Queilite/imunologia , Eczema/induzido quimicamente , Feminino , Aromatizantes/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Irritantes/efeitos adversos , Lamiaceae/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Níquel/efeitos adversos , Testes do Emplastro/métodos , Perfumes/efeitos adversos , Óleos de Plantas/efeitos adversos , Dicromato de Potássio/efeitos adversos , Conservantes Farmacêuticos/efeitos adversos , Timerosal/efeitos adversos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA