Comparative Risk of Major Congenital Malformations With Antiseizure Medication Combinations vs Valproate Monotherapy in Pregnancy.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Valproate should be avoided in pregnancy, but it is the most effective drug for generalized epilepsies. Alternative treatment may require combinations of other drugs. Our objectives were to describe first trimester use of antiseizure medication (ASM) combinations that are relevant alternatives to valproate and determine whether specific combinations were associated with a lower risk of major congenital malformations (MCM) compared with valproate monotherapy. METHODS: We conducted a population-based cohort study using linked national registers from Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden and administrative health care data from the United States and New South Wales, Australia. We described first trimester use of ASM combinations among pregnant people with epilepsy from 2000 to 2020. We compared the risk of MCM after first trimester exposure to ASM combinations vs valproate monotherapy and low-dose valproate plus lamotrigine or levetiracetam vs high-dose valproate (≥1,000 mg/d). We used log-binomial regression with propensity score weights to calculate adjusted risk ratios (aRRs) and 95% CIs for each dataset. Results were pooled using fixed-effects meta-analysis. RESULTS: Among 50,905 pregnancies in people with epilepsy identified from 7.8 million total pregnancies, 788 used lamotrigine and levetiracetam, 291 used lamotrigine and topiramate, 208 used levetiracetam and topiramate, 80 used lamotrigine and zonisamide, and 91 used levetiracetam and zonisamide. After excluding pregnancies with use of other ASMs, known teratogens, or a child diagnosed with MCM of infectious or genetic cause, we compared 587 exposed to lamotrigine-levetiracetam duotherapy and 186 exposed to lamotrigine-topiramate duotherapy with 1959 exposed to valproate monotherapy. Pooled aRRs were 0.41 (95% CI 0.24-0.69) and 1.26 (0.71-2.23), respectively. Duotherapy combinations containing low-dose valproate were infrequent, and comparisons with high-dose valproate monotherapy were inconclusive but suggested a lower risk for combination therapy. Other combinations were too rare for comparative safety analyses. DISCUSSION: Lamotrigine-levetiracetam duotherapy in first trimester was associated with a 60% lower risk of MCM than valproate monotherapy, while lamotrigine-topiramate was not associated with a reduced risk. Duotherapy with lamotrigine and levetiracetam may be favored to treat epilepsy in people with childbearing potential compared with valproate regarding MCM, but whether this combination is as effective as valproate remains to be determined. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class II evidence that in people with epilepsy treated in the first trimester of pregnancy, the risk of major congenital malformations is lower with lamotrigine-levetiracetam duotherapy than with valproate alone, but similar with lamotrigine-topiramate.

Common teratogenic medication exposures-a population-based study of pregnancies in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Risk mitigation for most teratogenic medications relies on risk communication via drug label, and prenatal exposures remain common. Information on the types of and risk factors for prenatal exposures to medications with teratogenic risk can guide strategies to reduce exposure. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to identify medications with known or potential teratogenic risk commonly used during pregnancy among privately insured persons. STUDY DESIGN: We used the Merative™ MarketScan® Commercial Database to identify pregnancies with live or nonlive (ectopic pregnancies, spontaneous and elective abortions, stillbirths) outcomes among persons aged 12 to 55 years from 2011 to 2018. Start/end dates of medication exposure and pregnancy outcomes were identified via an adapted algorithm based on validation studies. We required continuous health plan enrollment from 90 days before conception until 30 days after the pregnancy end date. Medications with known or potential teratogenic risk were selected from TERIS (Teratogen Information System) and drug monographs based on the level of risk and quality of evidence (138 with known and 60 with potential risk). We defined prenatal exposure on the basis of ≥1 outpatient pharmacy claim or medical encounter for medication administration during target pregnancy periods considering medication risk profiles (eg, risk only in the first trimester or at a certain dose threshold). Sex hormones and hormone analogs, and abortion and postpartum/abortion hemorrhage treatments were not considered as teratogenic medications because of challenges in separating pregnancy-related indications, nor were opioids (because of complex risk-benefit considerations) or antiobesity medications if their only teratogenic mechanism was weight loss. RESULTS: Among all pregnancies, the 10 medications with known teratogenic risk and the highest prenatal exposures were sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim (1988 per 100,000 pregnancy-years), high-dose fluconazole (1248), topiramate (351), lisinopril (144), warfarin (57), losartan (56), carbamazepine (50), valproate (49), vedolizumab (28 since 2015), and valsartan (25). Prevalence of exposure to sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim decreased from 2346 to 1453 per 100,000 pregnancy-years from 2011 to 2018, but prevalence of exposure to vedolizumab increased 6-fold since its approval in 2015. Prenatal exposures in the first trimester were higher among nonlive pregnancies than among live-birth pregnancies, with the largest difference observed for warfarin (nonlive 370 vs live birth 78), followed by valproate (258 vs 86) and topiramate (1728 vs 674). Prenatal exposures to medications with potential teratogenic risk were most prevalent for low-dose fluconazole (6495), metoprolol (1325), and atenolol (448). The largest first-trimester exposure differences between nonlive and live-birth pregnancies were observed for lithium (242 vs 89), gabapentin (1639 vs 653), and duloxetine (1914 vs 860). Steady increases in hydralazine and gabapentin exposures were observed during the study years, whereas atenolol exposure decreased (561 to 280). CONCLUSION: Several medications with teratogenic risk for which there are potentially safer alternatives continue to be used during pregnancy. The fluctuating rates of prenatal exposure observed for select teratogenic medications suggest that regular reevaluation of risk mitigation strategies is needed. Future research focusing on understanding the clinical context of medication use is necessary to develop effective strategies for reducing exposures to medications with teratogenic risk during pregnancy.

Does sleep relate to next-day cannabis use during treatment? Findings from an adolescent and young adult motivational enhancement and cognitive behavioral therapy plus topiramate intervention.

BACKGROUND: Interventions for youth cannabis use have limited efficacy. Sleep is likely to affect treatment response, as sleep difficulties are cross-sectionally associated with use and common during treatment. This analysis examined how sleep duration and subjective trouble sleeping related to next-day cannabis use among youth during cannabis treatment. METHOD: Participants (N=64) received a psychosocial intervention plus topiramate versus placebo while completing a 6-week ecological momentary assessment study. Time-varying effect modeling (TVEM) examined within- and between-person associations between sleep and cannabis use and how the strength of within-person associations varied over the course of treatment. RESULTS: TVEM resvealed that, between-participants, youth with longer average sleep duration used cannabis less often controlling for baseline cannabis use, topiramate, and weekend status. Daily within-person fluctuations in sleep duration and trouble were not associated with use. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest regularly shorter sleep may impede treatment outcomes. Adolescents who regularly have insufficient sleep durations likely need additional intervention to improve sleep difficulties in tandem with cannabis use reduction.

Antiseizure medications as migraine preventatives: a call for action for a teratogenic and neurodevelopmental risk removal.

INTRODUCTION: A recent study has demonstrated an increased risk of neurodevelopmental disorders, including autism spectrum disorder, in individuals exposed to either valproate or topiramate monotherapy. Regulatory bodies have initiated a review to reassess the safety of topiramate exposure during pregnancy. These novel findings raise concerns regarding the recommendation of antiseizure medications in women of childbearing potential. This manuscript highlights current research defining concerns specific to the use of valproate and topiramate in women of childbearing potential. AREAS COVERED: This manuscript summarizes recent findings regarding the safety of valproate and topiramate when compared to alternative therapies for the preventative treatment of migraine in women of childbearing potential. The studies included in this review were selected following a comprehensive literature review of multiple relevant databases. All studies that were published within the past 15 years were considered for inclusion. EXPERT OPINION: The use of valproate and topiramate in women of childbearing potential should be highly discouraged. Our recommendations include a review of current prescribing guidelines, further public education regarding the neurodevelopmental and congenital risks associated with the use of valproate and topiramate, and an appeal for further research defining the safety of alternative medications for migraine prevention when intrauterine exposure is possible.

2022 Taiwan Guidelines for Preventive Treatment of Migraine.

The Treatment Guideline Subcommittee of the Taiwan Headache Society evaluated the medications currently used for migraine prevention in Taiwan. The subcommittee assessed the results of recently published trials, meta-analyses, and guidelines. After expert panel discussions, the subcommittee reached a consensus on the preventive treatment of migraine in Taiwan, which includes recommendation levels, the strength of evidence, and essential prescription information (i.e., dosage and adverse effects) . The recent introduction of CGRP monoclonal antibodies has had a substantial effect on migraine treatment. Thus, the subcommittee updated the previous version of the treatment guideline published in 2017. Preventive medications for migraines can be divided into the following categories: ß-blockers, anticonvulsants, calcium channel blockers, antidepressants, onabotulinumtoxinA, anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies, and complementary and alternative medicine. For episodic migraine prevention, propranolol, flunarizine, and topiramate are recommended as the first-line medications. Second-line medications for episodic migraine prevention include valproic acid, amitriptyline, and anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies. Other treatment options could be used as third-line treatments. For chronic migraine prevention, topiramate, flunarizine, onabotulinumtoxinA, and anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies are recommended as first-line therapies. Preventive medications for episodic migraine can also be used as second-line treatments for chronic migraine. For menstrual migraines, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and triptans can be used for short-term prophylaxis. Indications for starting preventive treatment include a headache frequency of ≥4 days per month, profound disabilities, failure of or contraindication to acute therapies, a complicated migraine with debilitating (e.g., hemiplegic) auras, and migrainous brain infarction. The general principle for oral preventives is to "start low and go slow" while monitoring for adverse events and comorbid conditions. Physicians could consider gradually tapering the medications in patients with sustained improvement over 3 to 6 months in episodic migraine and 6 to 12 months in chronic migraine. Education about not overusing acute medications is also essential for all patients with migraine. Key words: migraine, preventive treatment, evidence-based medicine, guidelines, CGRP monoclonal antibodies, onabotulinumtoxinA, neuromodulation.

Topiramate potential neurotoxicity and mitigating role of ginger oil in mice brain.

Topiramate has multiple pharmacological mechanisms that are efficient in treating epilepsy and migraine. Ginger has been established to have gingerols and shogaols that cause migraine relief. Moreover, Topiramate has many off-label uses. Thus, it was necessary to explore the possible neurotoxicity of Topiramate and the role of ginger oil in attenuating the Topiramate neurotoxicity. Male albino mice were orally gavaged with Topiramate, ginger oil (400 mg/kg), and Topiramate plus ginger oil with the same pattern for 28 days. Oxidative stress markers, acetylcholinesterase (AchE), gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) were examined. Histopathological examination, immunohistochemical glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), and Bax expression analysis were detected. The GABAAR subunits, Gabra1, Gabra3, and Gabra5 expression, were assessed by RT-qPCR. The investigation showed that Topiramate raised oxidative stress markers levels, neurotransmitters, TNF-α, and diminished glutathione (GSH). In addition, Topiramate exhibited various neuropathological alterations, strong Bax, and GFAP immune-reactivity in the cerebral cortex. At the same time, the results indicated that ginger oil had no neurotoxicity. The effect of Topiramate plus ginger oil alleviated the changes induced by Topiramate in the tested parameters. Both Topiramate and ginger oil upregulated the mRNA expression of gabra1 and gabra3, while their interaction markedly downregulated them. Therefore, it could be concluded that the Topiramate overdose could cause neurotoxicity, but the interaction with ginger oil may reduce Topiramate-induced neurotoxicity and should be taken in parallel.

The interplay of epilepsy with impaired mitophagy and autophagy linked dementia (MAD): A review of therapeutic approaches.

The duration and, age of dementia have been linked to a higher risk of seizures. The exact mechanism that drives epileptogenesis in impaired mitophagy and autophagy linked dementia (MAD) is fully defined after reviewing the Scopus, Publon, and Pubmed databases. The epileptogenesis in patients with Alzheimer's disease dementia (ADD) and Parkinson's disease dementia (PDD) is due to involvement of amyloid plaques (Aß), phosphorylated tau (pTau), Parkin, NF-kB and NLRP3 inflammasome. Microglia, the prime protective and inflammatory cells in the brain exert crosstalk between mitophagy and inflammation. Several researchers believed that the inflammatory brain cells microglia could be a therapeutic target for the treatment of a MAD associated epilepsy. There are conventional antiepileptic drugs such as gabapentin, lamotrigine, phenytoin sodium, carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, felbamate, lamotrigine, valproate sodium, and topiramate are prescribed by a psychiatrist to suppress seizure frequency. Also, the conventional drugs generate serious adverse effects and synergises dementia characteristics. The adverse effect of carbamazepine is neurotoxic and also, damages haemopoietic system and respiratory tract. The phenytoin treatment causes cerebellar defect and anemia. Dementia and epilepsy have a complicated relationship, thus targeting mitophagy for cure of epileptic dementia makes sense. Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is one of the rising strategies by many patients of the world, not only to suppress seizure frequency but also to mitigate dementia characteristics of patients. Therefore our present review focus on the interplay between epilepsy and MAD and their treatment with CAM approaches.

Digoxin at sub-cardiotonic dose modulates the anticonvulsive potential of valproate, levetiracetam and topiramate in experimental primary generalized seizures.

The prevalence of epilepsy in the world population together with a high percentage of patients resistant to existing antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) stimulates the constant search for new approaches to the treatment of the disease. Previously a significant anticonvulsant potential of cardiac glycoside digoxin has been verified by enhancing a weak activity of AEDs in low doses under screening models of seizures induced by pentylenetetrazole and maximal electroshock. The aim of the present study is to investigate the influence of digoxin at a sub-cardiotonic dose on the anticonvulsant activity of valproate, levetiracetam, and topiramate in models of primary generalized seizures with different neurochemical mechanisms. A total of 264 random-bred male albino mice have been used. AEDs were administered 30 min before seizure induction once intragastrically at conditionally effective (ED50) and sub-effective (½ ED50) doses: sodium valproate and topiramate - at doses of 300 and 150 mg/kg; levetiracetam - at doses of 100 and 50 mg/kg. Digoxin was administered once subcutaneously at a dose of 0.8 mg/kg body weight (1/10 LD50) 10-15 min before seizure induction. Picrotoxin (aqueous solution 2.5 mg/kg, subcutaneously), thiosemicarbazide (aqueous solution 25 mg/kg, intraperitoneally), strychnine (aqueous solution 1.2 mg/kg, subcutaneously), camphor (oil solution 1000 mg/kg, intraperitoneally) have been used as convulsive agents for seizure induction. It was found that under the conditions of primary generalized seizures induced by picrotoxin, thiosemicarbazide, strychnine, and camphor, digoxin not only shows its own strong anticonvulsant activity but also significantly enhances the anticonvulsant potential of classical AEDs sodium valproate, levetiracetam, and topiramate. The obtained results substantiate the expediency of further in-depth study of digoxin as an anticonvulsant drug, in particular, the in-depth study of neurochemical mechanisms of its action.

Association of topiramate prescribed for any indication with reduced alcohol consumption in electronic health record data.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Topiramate is a medication that is widely prescribed to treat a variety of conditions, including alcohol use disorder (AUD). We used electronic health record (EHR) data to measure topiramate's effects on drinking in individuals differentiated by a history of AUD. DESIGN: Parallel-groups comparison of patients prescribed topiramate and a propensity score-matched comparison group. SETTING: A large US integrated health-care system. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test-Consumption (AUDIT-C) scores prior to and after a minimum of 180 days of topiramate prescription for any indication and a propensity score-matched group. The sample included 5918 patients with an electronic health record diagnosis of alcohol use disorder at any time (AUD-hx-pos) (1738 topiramate-exposed and 4180 controls) and 23 614 patients with no EHR diagnosis of AUD (AUD-hx-neg) (6324 topiramate-exposed and 17 290 controls). MEASUREMENTS: Regression analyses compared difference-in-difference (DiD) estimates, separately by AUD history. DiD estimates represent exposure-group (i.e. topiramate versus control) differences on the pre-post difference in AUDIT-C score. Effects of baseline AUDIT-C score and daily topiramate dosage were also tested. FINDINGS: AUD-hx-neg patients who received topiramate had a greater reduction in AUDIT-C score (-0.11) than matched controls (-0.04). This yielded a DiD score of -0.07 [95% confidence interval (CI) = -0.11,-0.03; P = 0.002], with the greatest effect among AUD-hx-neg patients with a baseline AUDIT-C score of 4+ (DiD = -0.35, 95% CI = -0.49, -0.21; P < 0.0001) and those prescribed > 150 mg/day of the medication (DiD = -0.15, 95%CI = -0.23, -0.07; P < 0.001). DISCUSSION: Among individuals with no history of alcohol use disorder, topiramate appears to be associated with reduced drinking. This small effect is most evident among patients with higher baseline drinking levels and at a higher average daily topiramate dosage.

The Promising Effect of Topiramate on Random-Pattern Skin Flap Survival in Rats.

BACKGROUND: Partial necrosis of skin flaps following plastic and reconstructive surgeries is one of the major problems in these medical interventions. This study was conducted to evaluate the beneficial effects of topiramate an anti-epileptic agent on ischemic random skin flaps. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-four Wistar rats were provided and randomly divided into four experimental groups (control group and low-, intermediate- and high-dose treatment groups). A rat random-pattern skin flap model was performed in all groups, and animals in the low-, intermediate- and high-dose experimental groups were administered topiramate intraperitoneally at doses of 25, 50 and 100 mg/kg, respectively, 1 h before raising the flap and once daily for 7 consecutive days after the initial surgical procedure. Control rats received vehicle according to the same schedule. On postoperative day 7 the flap necrotic area was measured, and tissue samples were stained with hematoxylin and eosin for histological analysis. Furthermore, the oxidative stress in flap tissue was assessed by measuring the activity of superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione (GSH) level and the content of malondialdehyde (MDA). RESULTS: Treating animals with 50 and 100 mg/kg topiramate significantly decreased the necrotic flap areas as compared to the control group. Histological studies demonstrated that in intermediate and high dose topiramate groups the inflammatory cell numbers were attenuated and microvessel development were markedly increased. Furthermore, the MDA contents were significantly reduced and GSH levels were significantly increased in these groups as compared to the control group. However, the SOD activity was increased significantly only in high-dose group as compared to the control group. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicated that topiramate in doses of 50 and 100 mg/kg increases random skin flap survival. NO LEVEL ASSIGNED: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each submission to which Evidence-Based Medicine rankings are applicable. This excludes Review Articles, Book Reviews, and manuscripts that concern Basic Science, Animal Studies, Cadaver Studies, and Experimental Studies. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

The Impact of Vitamin D3 Supplementation to Topiramate Therapy on Pediatric Migraine Prophylaxis.

Background:There is still a need for more studies to evaluate the role of vitamin D3 in pediatric migraine prophylaxis. Objectives: We aimed to evaluate the effects and safety of vitamin D3 supplementation to topiramate on pediatric migraine. Methods: A double-blinded prospective clinical trial was conducted on 5- to 14-year-old children with migraine. They were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio into 2 groups, one with vitamin D3 supplementation (the supplementation group) and the other without vitamin D supplementation (the placebo group). The supplementation group received topiramate plus one 5000-IU dose of vitamin D3 daily for 4 months. The placebo group received topiramate with a placebo capsule without any effective substances. The primary outcomes were a monthly frequency of headache attacks, a good response to intervention, and reduction in migraine severity, duration, and disability before and after treatment. Fifty-six children completed the trial. Vitamin D3 supplementation to topiramate was more effective than the placebo group in the reduction of monthly frequency (6231.31 vs 9792.24 times, P = .01) and disability score for migraines (17 566.43 vs 25 187.65, P = .04). A good response was observed in 76.13% of patients in the vitamin D3 supplementation group and 53.5% of patients in the placebo group, and vitamin D3 supplementation was significantly more effective than placebo (P = .01). Side effects were observed in 13.3% and 20% of the intervention group and placebo groups, respectively, P = .5. Conclusion: Vitamin D3 supplementation in pediatric migraine prophylaxis could be a well-tolerated, safe, and effective strategy.

Preparation and evaluation of bilayer-core osmotic pump tablets contained topiramate.

Topiramate (TPM) was an antiepileptic agent commonly used in clinical. Studies showed that an oral preparation of TPM with extended-release manner could bring some benefits for epileptics. In this paper, controlled release push-pull osmotic pump (PPOP) tablets of sparingly water-soluble TPM were successfully prepared. This bi-layer tablet core mainly consisted of sodium chloride as osmotic promoting agent and polyethylene oxide as suspending and pushing agents. The influences of osmotic agents, pushing agents and the compositions of coating membrane on TPM release profiles were evaluated. An optimal formulation of TPM-PPOP was obtained through single-factor experiments. In vitro release tests showed that the optimum formulation could release TPM at an approximate zero-order rate up to 8 h. Pharmacokinetic behaviors of TPM-PPOP tablets were evaluated and compared with the immediate release capsules after an oral single dose in beagle dogs. Pharmacokinetics results demonstrated that the TPM-PPOP tablet was able to provide a prolonged release of TPM with longer tmax and mean residence time. Lower fluctuations of drug plasma levels could also be achieved with TPM-PPOP tablets. These results suggested that sparely water-soluble drugs as TPM can be designed to PPOP for efficacy and safety use.

Case Reports on the Use of Aloe Vera, Naltrexone, and Topiramate for the Treatment of Scars.

The purpose of this case report is to discuss the use of Aloe Vera/Naltrexone/Topiramate 0.5/1/2.5% in Pracasil-Plus cream in two patients; one patient with post dysplasia removal surgery, and one patient post cholecystectomy to reduce appearance of suture scar tissue. Images of scar progression for both of these patients are provided. Both patients have seen desirable effects from the scar cream, including a decrease in discoloration and a more suitable texture of the scar area.

Combined pharmacotherapy and evidence-based psychosocial Cannabis treatment for youth and selection of cannabis-using friends.

BACKGROUND: Theoretical models of behavior change argue that youth should decrease their time with cannabis-using friends and increase their time with non-using friends during treatment. Informed by behavior-change models of recovery and socialization and selection peer-influence models, the current study examined whether combining evidence-based psychosocial treatment with adjunctive pharmacotherapy helps youth decrease their affiliations with cannabis-using friends and increase their affiliations with non-using friends during cannabis misuse treatment. METHODS: Youth ages 15-24 years (51 % male), participated in a double-blind randomized clinical trial that tested the effects of motivational enhancement and cognitive behavioral therapy (MET-CBT) plus topiramate (N = 39) or placebo (N = 26) on cannabis craving and use. Ecological momentary assessment data, collected via smartphones throughout the six-week intervention, assessed youths' time with cannabis-using and non-using friends, cannabis use, and craving in daily life. Multiple group multilevel structural equation modeling tested study hypotheses. RESULTS: Across the topiramate (48 % completion rate) and placebo (77 % completion rate) conditions, greater time spent with cannabis-using friends promoted greater next day cannabis use and craving (socialization effect). In turn, cannabis craving, but not use, promoted continued selection of cannabis-using friends. This indirect effect was only supported in the placebo condition due to the selection piece of this cycle not being significant for youth who received topiramate. Neither cannabis craving nor use were associated with time with non-using friends the next day. CONCLUSIONS: MET-CBT and adjunctive topiramate pharmacotherapy interrupted youth selection processes. This finding suggests that changing peer affiliations could be one mechanism by which treatments can work.

Use of Topiramate in the Spectrum of Addictive and Eating Disorders: A Systematic Review Comparing Treatment Schemes, Efficacy, and Safety Features.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Topiramate has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of epilepsy since the 1990s, and it has also been used off-label in the treatment of many types of addictive disorders. To date, no systematic review has embraced the entire field of addiction, both substance use and behavioral addictions, including eating disorders, to compare topiramate-based protocols and the related level of evidence in each addictive disorder. Our objective is to fill this gap. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted using the MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Cochrane databases without a date or language limit. All trials and meta-analyses assessing the efficacy of topiramate in alcohol use disorder; cocaine use disorder; methamphetamine, nicotine, cannabis, opiate, and benzodiazepine use disorders; binge eating disorder; bulimia; and pathological gambling were analyzed. The quality of the studies was rated using the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias tool for randomized trials (ROB-2), the Risk of Bias In Nonrandomized Studies (ROBINS-I), or the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist, depending on the study design. Safety features were assessed based on a wider non-systematic review. RESULTS: Sixty-two articles were reviewed. Treatment protocols were relatively homogenous across addictive disorders, with slow dose titration schemes and a maximum dose range of 200-400 mg per day. The most supportive evidence for topiramate efficacy was found in alcohol use disorder for drinking reduction parameters only. To a lesser extent, topiramate could be a promising therapeutic option for binge eating disorder and cocaine use disorder. Evidence was weak for other addictive disorders. No major tolerability issues were found, provided that basic safety rules were followed. Adverse drug reactions could lead to early treatment discontinuation. DISCUSSION: Though off-label, addiction specialists should consider topiramate as a second-line option for drinking reduction in alcohol use disorder, as well as for binge eating disorder or cocaine use disorder.

Topiramate, acupuncture, and BoNT-A for chronic migraine: a network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Botulinum neurotoxin A (BoNT-A) was the primary choice for preventive treatment of chronic migraine. Topiramate and acupuncture showed promising effect for chronic migraine, but their effectiveness relative to BoNT-A was rarely studied. We aimed to perform a network meta-analysis to compare the effectiveness and acceptability between topiramate, acupuncture, and BoNT-A. METHODS: We searched OVID Medline, Embase, the Cochrane register of controlled trials (CENTRAL), the Chinese Clinical Trial Register, and clinicaltrials.gov for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared topiramate, acupuncture, and BoNT-A with any of them or placebo in the preventive treatment of chronic migraine. A network meta-analysis was performed by using a frequentist approach and a random-effects model. The primary outcomes were reduction in monthly headache days and monthly migraine days at week 12. Acceptability was defined as the number of dropouts owing to adverse events. RESULTS: We included 15 RCTs (n = 2545). Eleven RCTs were at low risk of bias. The network meta-analyses (n = 2061) showed that acupuncture (2061 participants; standardized mean difference [SMD] -1.61, 95% CI: -2.35 to -0.87) and topiramate (582 participants; SMD -0.4, 95% CI: -0.75 to -0.04) ranked the most effective in the reduction of monthly headache days and migraine days, respectively; but they were not significantly superior over BoNT-A. Topiramate caused the most treatment-related adverse events and the highest rate of dropouts owing to adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Topiramate and acupuncture were not superior over BoNT-A; BoNT-A was still the primary preventive treatment of chronic migraine. Large-scale RCTs with direct comparison of these three treatments are warranted to verified the findings.

Efficacy, Safety, and Acceptability of Pharmacologic Treatments for Pediatric Migraine Prophylaxis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.

Importance: Migraine is one of the most common neurologic disorders in children and adolescents. However, a quantitative comparison of multiple preventive pharmacologic treatments in the pediatric population is lacking. Objective: To examine whether prophylactic pharmacologic treatments are more effective than placebo and whether there are differences between drugs regarding efficacy, safety, and acceptability. Data Sources: Systematic review and network meta-analysis of studies in MEDLINE, Cochrane, Embase, and PsycINFO published through July 2, 2018. Study Selection: Randomized clinical trials of prophylactic pharmacologic treatments in children and adolescents diagnosed as having episodic migraine were included. Abstract, title, and full-text screening were conducted independently by 4 reviewers. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Data extraction was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis network meta-analysis guidelines. Quality was assessed with the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Effect sizes, calculated as standardized mean differences for primary outcomes and risk ratios for discontinuation rates, were assessed in a random-effects model. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcomes were efficacy (ie, migraine frequency, number of migraine days, number of headache days, headache frequency, or headache index), safety (ie, treatment discontinuation owing to adverse events), and acceptability (ie, treatment discontinuation for any reason). Results: Twenty-three studies (2217 patients) were eligible for inclusion. Prophylactic pharmacologic treatments included antiepileptics, antidepressants, calcium channel blockers, antihypertensive agents, and food supplements. In the short term (<5 months), propranolol (standard mean difference, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.03-1.17) and topiramate (standard mean difference, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.03-1.15) were significantly more effective than placebo. However, the 95% prediction intervals for these medications contained the null effect. No significant long-term effects for migraine prophylaxis relative to placebo were found for any intervention. Conclusions and Relevance: Prophylactic pharmacologic treatments have little evidence supporting efficacy in pediatric migraine. Future research could (1) identify factors associated with individual responses to pharmacologic prophylaxis, (2) analyze fluctuations of migraine attack frequency over time and determine the most clinically relevant length of probable prophylactic treatment, and (3) identify nonpharmacologic targets for migraine prophylaxis.

Anti-epileptic drug and folic acid usage during pregnancy, seizure and malformation outcomes: Changes over two decades in the Kerala Registry of Epilepsy and Pregnancy.

BACKGROUND: This study was carried out to determine changes over time in use of folic acid, anti-epileptic drugs (AED), seizures during pregnancy and malformation rate over two decades in women with epilepsy enrolled in the Kerala registry of Epilepsy and Pregnancy (KREP). METHODS: All completed pregnancies with known outcome between 1998 and 2017 (n = 1962) were analyzed for the use of folic acid and AEDs in the first trimester, seizure count for the entire pregnancy and the presence of major congenital malformation (MCM). The results were presented for three epochs (1998-2004, 2005-2011 and 2012-2017). RESULTS: There was significant increase (p = .001) in the use of folic acid 5 mg/day or more in pre-pregnancy month (43.9 to 81 %) and first trimester (52.7 to 86.6 %). Occurrence of seizures during pregnancy had declined significantly (57.2 to 32.9 %, p = 0.001) over time. Those who were off AEDs during pregnancy declined from 17.4 to 8.5 % (p = .001). Newer AEDs - lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine and topiramate) were increasingly preferred in the last seven years instead of older AEDs (phenobarbitone, phenytoin and clonazepam). There was no significant change in the use of carbamazepine or valproate. MCM rates did not show any significant change (7.5 to 7.3 %). CONCLUSION: Seizure control and high dose folic acid usage during pregnancy had improved over two decades. Despite the changes in the AED usage over time the MCM rates had remained unchanged probably due to continued use of valproate, increased use of topiramate and clobazam that are associated with higher MCM rates and lack of reduction in polytherapy.