The 25th anniversary of the Eurotransplant Acceptable Mismatch program for highly sensitized patients.

In 2014, the Eurotransplant Acceptable Mismatch (AM) program celebrated its 25th anniversary. The AM program was initiated to enhance transplantation of highly sensitized patients awaiting a renal transplant within the Eurotransplant region. Unlike the regular renal transplant allocation, in which the histocompatibility parameters consist of the degree of compatibility with the patient's human leucocyte antigen (HLA) type and the absence of unacceptable antigens, the AM program is based on compatibility of the possible donor with the combination of the patient's HLA type and the acceptable antigens. These acceptable antigens are defined as HLA antigens to which the patient has never made antibodies. This strategy aims at the prediction of a negative cross match. Since the start of the program almost 2000 patients participated and more than 1000 patients were transplanted with excellent transplant outcome, comparable to that of non-immunized transplant recipients within Eurotransplant. Progressive insights have led to fine-tuning of the AM program through the years, as well as to novel initiatives, including a recent consortium study to determine the feasibility of a Europe-wide AM program. The current review will tell the story of the AM program in a historical perspective, but will also provide an open-minded look into the future of transplanting highly sensitized patients.

When do tissues and cells become products? Regulatory oversight of emerging biological therapies.

Although therapeutics derived from biological sources have been subjected to regulatory oversight for some time, the products used in transplantation procedures have historically been exempt from this oversight. These products have been viewed as being part of medical practice rather than as the result of mainstream pharmaceutical manufacture. Furthermore, their unique source makes them difficult to assess in traditional regulatory systems based on the tenets of pharmaceutical quality control. With the increasing use of transplantation therapies to both replace dysfunctional organs and to influence genetic and metabolic processes, public health concerns on these therapies have increased. In addition, it is recognized that therapeutic claims for some of these interventions need to be properly assessed. These considerations have led the established regulatory agencies of the developed world to develop new regulatory paradigms for the products of transplantation practice. While a number of concerns have driven these developments, the minimization of infectious disease risk remains the paramount driver for introducing these regulatory systems. More than the regulation of medicines and medical devices manufactured in traditional pharmaceutical modes, the regulation of cell and tissue products is intimately linked to areas of public health policy and funding. This places regulators in a challenging position as they attempt to reconcile their roles as independent assessors with the needs of the overall public health framework. This is particularly difficult when considering measures which may affect access to life saving therapies. Regulators have recognized the need to assess these therapies through systems which incorporate consideration of risk-benefit ratios and include mechanisms for transparent and accountable release of products when full compliance to traditional concepts of manufacturing practice is not possible.