Clinical insights into traumatic injury of the inferior alveolar and lingual nerves: a comprehensive approach from diagnosis to therapeutic interventions.

OBJECTIVES: This scoping review explores the risk and management of traumatic injuries to the inferior alveolar and lingual nerves during mandibular dental procedures. Emphasizing the significance of diagnostic tools, the review amalgamates existing knowledge to offer a comprehensive overview. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature search across PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library informed the analysis. RESULTS: Traumatic injuries often lead to hypo-/anesthesia and neuropathic pain, impacting individuals psychologically and socially. Diagnosis involves thorough anamnesis, clinical-neurological evaluations, and radiographic imaging. Severity varies, allowing for conservative or surgical interventions. Immediate action is recommended for reversible causes, while surgical therapies like decompression, readaptation, or reconstruction yield favorable outcomes. Conservative management, utilizing topical anesthesia, capsaicin, and systemic medications (tricyclic antidepressants, antipsychotics, and serotonin-norepinephrine-reuptake-inhibitors), proves effective for neuropathic pain. CONCLUSIONS: Traumatic nerve injuries, though common in dental surgery, often go unrecorded. Despite lacking a definitive diagnostic gold standard, a meticulous examination of the injury and subsequent impairments is crucial. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Tailoring treatment to each case's characteristics is essential, recognizing the absence of a universal solution. This approach aims to optimize outcomes, restore functionality, and improve the quality of life for affected individuals.

Neuromodulation of the lingual nerve: a novel technique.

Acute injury of the trigeminal nerve or its branches can result in posttraumatic trigeminal neuropathy (PTTN). Affected patients suffer from chronic debilitating symptoms long after they have recovered from the inciting trauma. Symptoms vary but usually consist of paresthesia, allodynia, dysesthesia, hyperalgesia, or a combination of these symptoms. PTTN of the trigeminal nerve can result from a variety of traumas, including iatrogenic injury from various dental and maxillofacial procedures. Treatments include medications, pulsed radiofrequency modulation, and microsurgical repair. Although trigeminal nerve stimulation has been reported for trigeminal neuropathy, V3 implantation is often avoided because of an elevated migration risk secondary to mandibular motion, and lingual nerve implantation has not been documented. Here, the authors report on a patient who suffered from refractory PTTN despite multiple alternative treatments. He elected to undergo novel placement of a lingual nerve stimulator for neuromodulation therapy. To the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the first documented case of lingual nerve stimulator implantation for lingual neuropathy, a technique for potentially reducing the risk of electrode migration.

Medicolegal Considerations Involving Iatrogenic Lingual Nerve Damage.

The aim of this review is to improve risk management strategies through analysis of the anatomic, semeiotic, and medicolegal aspects that characterize iatrogenic lingual nerve damage (LND) and its legal consequences in the case of legal proceedings for a claim for compensation. In dental practice, LND can be caused by local or general anesthesia or by mechanical, chemical, or thermal mechanisms. A certain postoperative identification of LND etiopathogenesis is often very challenging because it can be difficult to show at what time the damage occurred and which mechanism actually caused it. Clinical tests assessing lingual nerve sensory capabilities have a low sensitivity and moderate specificity, whereas instrumental tests have the advantage of not being affected by data interpretation subjectivity by both the operator and the patient. The quantification of permanent LND is not uniformly established, and there are no specific standard worldwide indications. From a medicolegal point of view, LND is a complication that may or may not be caused by surgical error. The 2 different concepts of "expectability" and avoidability or preventability allow one to discriminate between professional liability and fate and therefore to determine the surgeon's imputability in LND. Despite clinical competence and practice in performing the medical or surgical procedure, the clinician risks a lawsuit for negligence if he or she does not warn the patient about all relevant risks regardless of their frequency. Informed consent plays an essential role in minimizing litigation; the patient must be informed-with both his or her level of culture and ability to understand being taken into consideration-of the diagnosis, prognosis, and therapeutic perspectives and their consequences, in addition to all other viable alternative therapies, as well as the risks of nontreatment.

Local vs general anaesthesia in the development of neurosensory disturbances after mandibular third molars extraction: A retrospective study of 534 cases

BACKGROUND: The choice of the anaesthetic modality is one of the primary steps during planning of third molar surgery. The aim of the present study was to compare the risk of developing neurological injures of the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) and lingual nerve (LN) in patients treated for wisdom teeth removal under general anaesthesia (GA) with a group treated under local anaesthesia (LA). MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is an observational retrospective, unicentric study; between September 2013 and September 2014, 534 patients underwent third molar surgery, 194 (36,3%) under GA and 340 (63,7%) under LA by the same oral surgeon. Difference in the incidence of IAN and LN injures between groups have been statistically analyzed with Fisher exact test and estimated odd ratio for development of such complications has been calculated. RESULTS: In GA patients the incidence of IAN and LN injures was 4.6% and 2.1%, respectively while in the LA group it was and 0.3% and 0%, respectively. A significant difference in IAN and LN involvement between groups was observed (IAN lesion: Fisher exact test, p < 0.001; LN lesions: Fisher exact test, p < 0.05). The estimated odd ratio for development of IAN injures after GA was 16.49 (95% CI: 2.07-131.19) and was not calculable for LN injures because no cases were observed in the LA group. CONCLUSIONS: Since GA is a perioperative variable that seems to significantly increase the risk of developing IAN and LN lesions, when treating patients that request GA, they must be adequately informed that an higher incidence of post-surgical sensory disturbances is expected

Trials needed to identify best management of iatrogenic inferior alveolar and lingual nerve injuries.

DATA SOURCES: The Cochrane Oral Health Group's Trials Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Medline and Embase databases were searched with no language or date restrictions. STUDY SELECTION: Three reviewers independently selected studies. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) involving interventions to treat patients with neurosensory defect of the inferior alveolar or lingual nerve or both as a sequela of iatrogenic injury were considered. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Standard Cochrane methodological procedures were followed. RESULTS: Two studies considered at high risk of bias, reporting data from 26 analysed patients were included. Both studies investigated the effectiveness of low-level laser treatment compared to placebo laser therapy on inferior alveolar sensory deficit as a result of iatrogenic injury. Two studies assessed as at high risk of bias, reporting data from 26 analysed participants were included in this review. The age range of participants was from 17 to 55 years. Both trials investigated the effectiveness of low-level laser treatment compared to placebo laser therapy on inferior alveolar sensory deficit as a result of iatrogenic injury.Patient-reported altered sensation was partially reported in one study and fully reported in another. Following treatment with laser therapy, there was some evidence of an improvement in the subjective assessment of neurosensory deficit in the lip and chin areas compared to placebo, though the estimates were imprecise: a difference in mean change in neurosensory deficit of the chin of 8.40 cm (95% confidence interval (CI) 3.67 to 13.13) and a difference in mean change in neurosensory deficit of the lip of 21.79 cm (95% CI 5.29 to 38.29). The overall quality of the evidence for this outcome was very low. No studies reported on the effects of the intervention on the remaining primary outcomes of pain, difficulty eating, speaking or taste. No studies reported on quality of life or adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: There is clearly a need for randomised controlled clinical trials to investigate the effectiveness of surgical, medical and psychological interventions for iatrogenic inferior alveolar and lingual nerve injuries. Primary outcomes of this research should include: patient-focused morbidity measures including altered sensation and pain, pain, quantitative sensory testing and the effects of delayed treatment.

Interventions for iatrogenic inferior alveolar and lingual nerve injury.

BACKGROUND: Iatrogenic injury of the inferior alveolar or lingual nerve or both is a known complication of oral and maxillofacial surgery procedures. Injury to these two branches of the mandibular division of the trigeminal nerve may result in altered sensation associated with the ipsilateral lower lip or tongue or both and may include anaesthesia, paraesthesia, dysaesthesia, hyperalgesia, allodynia, hypoaesthesia and hyperaesthesia. Injury to the lingual nerve may also affect taste perception on the affected side of the tongue. The vast majority (approximately 90%) of these injuries are temporary in nature and resolve within eight weeks. However, if the injury persists beyond six months it is deemed to be permanent. Surgical, medical and psychological techniques have been used as a treatment for such injuries, though at present there is no consensus on the preferred intervention, or the timing of the intervention. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of different interventions and timings of interventions to treat iatrogenic injury of the inferior alveolar or lingual nerves. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the following electronic databases: the Cochrane Oral Health Group's Trial Register (to 9 October 2013), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2013, Issue 9), MEDLINE via OVID (1946 to 9 October 2013) and EMBASE via OVID (1980 to 9 October 2013). No language restrictions were placed on the language or date of publication when searching the electronic databases. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) involving interventions to treat patients with neurosensory defect of the inferior alveolar or lingual nerve or both as a sequela of iatrogenic injury. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used the standard methodological procedures expected by The Cochrane Collaboration. We performed data extraction and assessment of the risk of bias independently and in duplicate. We contacted authors to clarify the inclusion criteria of the studies. MAIN RESULTS: Two studies assessed as at high risk of bias, reporting data from 26 analysed participants were included in this review. The age range of participants was from 17 to 55 years. Both trials investigated the effectiveness of low-level laser treatment compared to placebo laser therapy on inferior alveolar sensory deficit as a result of iatrogenic injury.Patient-reported altered sensation was partially reported in one study and fully reported in another. Following treatment with laser therapy, there was some evidence of an improvement in the subjective assessment of neurosensory deficit in the lip and chin areas compared to placebo, though the estimates were imprecise: a difference in mean change in neurosensory deficit of the chin of 8.40 cm (95% confidence interval (CI) 3.67 to 13.13) and a difference in mean change in neurosensory deficit of the lip of 21.79 cm (95% CI 5.29 to 38.29). The overall quality of the evidence for this outcome was very low; the outcome data were fully reported in one small study of 13 patients, with differential drop-out in the control group, and patients suffered only partial loss of sensation. No studies reported on the effects of the intervention on the remaining primary outcomes of pain, difficulty eating or speaking or taste. No studies reported on quality of life or adverse events.The overall quality of the evidence was very low as a result of limitations in the conduct and reporting of the studies, indirectness of the evidence and the imprecision of the results. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is clearly a need for randomised controlled clinical trials to investigate the effectiveness of surgical, medical and psychological interventions for iatrogenic inferior alveolar and lingual nerve injuries. Primary outcomes of this research should include: patient-focused morbidity measures including altered sensation and pain, pain, quantitative sensory testing and the effects of delayed treatment.

Managing iatrogenic trigeminal nerve injury: a case series and review of the literature.

This study describes the management of 216 patients with post-traumatic iatrogenic lingual nerve injuries (LNIs; n=93) and inferior alveolar nerve injuries (IANI; n=123). At initial consultation, 6% IANI and 2% LNI patients had undergone significant resolution requiring no further reviews. Reassurance and counselling was adequate management for 51% IANI and 55% LNI patients. Systemic or topical medication was offered as pain relief to 5% of patients. Additional cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) was offered to 8% of patients. Topical 5% lidocaine patches reduced pain and allodynia in 7% of IANI patients, most often used without any other form of management. A small percentage of IANI patients (4%) received a combination of therapies involving CBT, surgery, medication and 5% lidocaine patches. Exploratory surgery improved symptoms and reduced neuropathic area in 18 LNI and 15 IANI patients resulting in improved quality of life. In conclusion, the authors suggest a more diverse and perhaps holistic strategy for management of patients with iatrogenic trigeminal nerve injuries and recommend pragmatic assessment criteria for measurement of treatment success in these patients.

Long-term outcome of trigeminal nerve injuries related to dental treatment.

PURPOSE: There is little information available on the long-term effects on patients of permanent involvement of the inferior alveolar or lingual nerve because of dental treatment. This study has attempted to document this information from patients who were reviewed between 3 and 9 years after injury. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients with an ICD-9 diagnosis of 951.2 (injury to the trigeminal nerve) because of dental treatment, seen in the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clinic at the University of California, San Francisco between January 1, 2001 and December 31, 2006, were contacted in an attempt to complete a telephone survey of long-term effects. RESULTS: Of the 727 patients who were eligible for the study, 145 patients (95 female and 50 male) completed the telephone surveys. Many patients had sought both conventional and alternative treatments after consultation at University of California, San Francisco. A small number of patients had undergone subsequent surgery elsewhere. Many patients reported significant life changes, including adverse effects on employment (13%), relationship changes (14%), depression (37%), problems speaking (38%), and problems eating (43%). In general, however, patients reported improvement over time, often using a number of different coping mechanisms. Males had a greater decrease in symptoms than females, and those older than 40 years reported more pain in the long term than those under 40. Lingual nerve symptoms improved more than inferior alveolar nerve symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Although most patients continue to have long-term problems that affect the overall quality of life, for most patients there has been improvement in symptoms over time.

Phonetic damage related to unilateral functional inhibition of the lingual nerve.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to analyze the effects of unilateral functional inhibition of the lingual nerve in phonetic function by perceptual and acoustic analyses of speech, which was recorded before and after neurosensory modification of the lingual nerve, and a comparison of results of these evaluations with a subject's self-perception. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The sample consisted of 10 volunteers who had the lingual nerve of the right side anesthetized. The analyzed recordings consisted of terms directly dependent on the tongue for production. In the perceptual analysis, pitch and loudness behaviors were observed, in addition to coarticulation and intelligibility. The acoustic analysis of 5 vowels and sibilant /s/ was realized. A questionnaire about the discomfort level in speech production was applied. RESULTS: Perceptual/auditive and acoustic parameters showed no significant differences. Although 3 informants declared some kind of discomfort related to speech production, they presented no acoustic or perceptual modification in sound quality. CONCLUSIONS: Although inhibition of sensory function of the lingual nerve generated considerable annoyance, there was no specific damage to phonetic function in the group under study, because no differences were observed in the quality of the speech of subjects after applying anesthesia to the lingual nerve.

Profiling of patients presenting with posttraumatic neuropathy of the trigeminal nerve.

AIMS: To describe the cause, clinical signs, and symptoms of patients presenting to a tertiary care center with iatrogenic lesions to the mandibular branches of the trigeminal nerve. METHODS: Pain history, pain scores using the visual analog scale, and mechanosensory testing results were recorded from 93 patients with iatrogenic lingual nerve injuries (LNI) and 90 patients with iatrogenic inferior alveolar nerve injuries (IANI). Results were analyzed using the SPSS statistical software. Chi-square tests were applied for nonparametric testing of frequencies, where P ⋜ .05 indicated statistical significance. Appropriate correlations were also carried out between certain data sets. RESULTS: Significantly more females were referred than males (P < .05). Overall, third molar surgery (TMS) caused 73% of LNI, followed by local anesthesia (LA) (17%). More diverse procedures caused IANI, including TMS (60%), LA (19%), implants (18%), and endodontics (8%). Approximately 70% of patients presented with neuropathic pain coincident with anesthesia and÷or paresthesia. Neuropathy was demonstrable in all patients with varying degrees of loss of mechanosensory function, paresthesia, dysesthesia, allodynia, and hyperalgesia. Functionally, IANI and LNI patients mostly had problems with speech and eating, where speech was affected amongst significantly more patients with LNI (P < .001). Sleep, brushing teeth, and drinking were significantly more problematic for IANI patients (P < .05, P < .001, and P < .0001, respectively). CONCLUSION: Neuropathic pain, as well as anesthesia, frequently occurs following iatrogenic trigeminal nerve injury similar to other posttraumatic sensory nerve injuries. This must be acknowledged by clinicians as a relatively common problem and informed consent appropriately formulated for patients at risk of trigeminal nerve injuries in relation to dentistry requires revision.

Trigeminal nerve injuries in relation to the local anaesthesia in mandibular injections.

OBJECTIVE: This study reports the signs and symptoms that are the features of trigeminal nerve injuries caused by local anaesthesia (LA). METHODS: Thirty-three patients with nerve injury following LA were assessed. All data were analysed using the SPSS statistical programme and Microsoft Excel. RESULTS: Lingual nerve injury (LNI; n = 16) and inferior alveolar nerve injury (IANI; n = 17) patients were studied. LNI were more likely to be permanent. Neuropathy was demonstrable in all patients with varying degrees of paraesthesia, dysaesthesia (in the form of burning pain) allodynia and hyperalgesia. All injuries were unilateral. A significantly greater proportion of LNI patients (75%) had received multiple injections, in comparison to IANI patients (41%) (p <0.05). Fifty percent of patients with LNI reported pain on injection. The presenting signs and symptoms of both LNI and IANI included pain. These symptoms of neuropathy were constant in 88% of the IANI group and in 44% of LNI patients. Functional difficulties were different between the LNI and IANI groups, a key difference being the presence of severely altered taste perception in nine patients with LA-induced LNI. CONCLUSIONS: Chronic pain is often a symptom after local anaesthetic-induced nerve injury. Patients in the study population with lingual nerve injury were significantly more likely to have received multiple injections compared to those with IANI.

[Transoral removal of submandibular hilar calculi: 36 cases]. / Exérèse endobuccale des lithiases submandibulaires postérieures: 36 cas.

INTRODUCTION: Proximal submandibular calculi are usually removed by transcervical submandibular sialadenectomy. The aim of this study was to show that intraoral removal of hilar submandibular calculi gives the same results with fewer complications than submandibulectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The surgical indication is assessed by palpability of the stone and confirmed by simple CT scan. The surgical procedure is performed under local or general anaesthesia. At the end of the procedure, the duct is controlled with a sialendoscope to remove remaining concretions. We prospectively followed 36 patients with a mean follow-up of six months (one to 36 months). RESULTS: The transoral removal of calculi was performed in 34 patients without any definitive neurological complication. The procedure failed in two patients with nonpalpable calculi. Two patients had a recurrence of symptoms due to small intraglandular calculi, which were evacuated later. DISCUSSION: The transoral removal of submandibular hilar calculi is a safe and reproducible procedure with less morbidity than submandibulectomy. It should be recommended for posterior palpable submandibular calculi.

Permanent sensory nerve impairment following third molar surgery: a prospective study.

OBJECTIVE: This prospective study reports the proportion of permanent sensory impairment of the inferior alveolar and lingual nerves and the factors influencing such prevalence after the removal of mandibular third molars under local anesthesia. STUDY DESIGN: There were 1,087 patients with 1,087 mandibular third molars removed under local anesthesia from 1998 to 2003. Standardized data collection included the patient's name, age, gender, radiographic position of extracted tooth, grade of surgeon, proximity of the inferior alveolar nerve, and the prevalence of lingual and/or inferior alveolar nerve paresthesia. RESULTS: Inferior alveolar nerve injury was 4.1% 1 week after surgery and decreased to 0.7% after 2 years of follow-up, and alteration in tongue sensation occurred in 6.5% of patients 1 week after surgery and decreased to 1.0% after 2 years of follow-up. CONCLUSION: The experience of the operator was found to be a significant factor in determining both permanent lingual nerve (P=.022) and permanent inferior alveolar nerve paresthesia (P=.026).

Local anesthetics: dentistry's most important drugs, clinical update 2006.

Local anesthetics are the safest most effective drugs in medicine for the control and management of pain. They also represent the most important drugs in dentistry. Today, dentistry has a spectrum of local anesthetics that permit pain control to be tailored to the specific needs of the patient: short-, intermediate-, and long-acting drugs. Bupivacaine has become a standard part of the armamentarium for postsurgical pain control while articaine has become the second-most used local anesthetic in the United States since its introduction in 2000. Despite an increase in anecdotal reports of paresthesia since articaine's introduction there is yet, no supporting scientific evidence.

Lingual nerve injury subsequent to wisdom teeth removal--a 5-year retrospective audit from a high street dental practice.

Lingual nerve damage subsequent to lower wisdom tooth removal affects a small number of patients, sometimes producing permanent sensory loss or impairment. A number of surgical techniques have been described which are associated with low incidences of this distressing post-operative complication. When a technique is adopted by an individual clinician then a personal audit may be prudent to establish how effective it is in relation to established nerve injury rates. This audit looks at a technique involving the minimal interference of lingual soft tissues during lower wisdom tooth removal in a high street practice situation for patients having mild to moderate impacted wisdom teeth removed under local anaesthetic. It was concluded that the technique employed was associated with a low incidence of lingual nerve trauma, comparable with that reported elsewhere.

Links between anaesthetic modality and nerve damage during lower third molar surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationships between eruption status, gender, social class, grade of operator, anaesthetic modality and nerve damage during third molar surgery. DESIGN: Two centre prospective longitudinal study. SETTING: The department of oral and maxillofacial surgery, University Hospital Birmingham NHS Trust and oral surgery outpatient clinics at Birmingham Dental Hospital. SUBJECTS: A total of 391 patients had surgical removal of lower third molars. Sensory disturbance was recorded at one week post operatively. Patients with altered sensation were followed up at one month, three months and six months following surgery. RESULTS: 614 lower third molars in 391 patients were removed. Forty-six procedures (7.5%) were associated with altered sensation at one week with three procedures (0.49%) showing persistent symptoms at six months. Of these 46 nerve injuries, 26 (4.23%) involved the lingual nerve and 20 (3.25%) the inferior dental nerve (IDN). All three persistent sensations were IDN related. A logistic regression model found that the use ofa lingual retractor chi2 = 11.559, p = 0.003 was more significant than eruption status chi2 = 12.935, p = 0.007. There was no significant relationship between anaesthetic modality, age, social class, sex and seniority of operator. CONCLUSIONS: There was no link between the choices of local or general anaesthesia and nerve damage during lower third molar removal when difficulty of surgery was taken into account.

Nerve morbidity following wisdom tooth removal under local and general anaesthesia.

Two hundred and one patients had unilateral removal of the lower third molars under local anaesthesia and a further 234 patients had either bilateral or unilateral removal under general anaesthesia. A total of 634 lower third molars were extracted by four experienced surgeons (two consultants and two senior grade staff). All patients were reviewed independently 1-week postoperatively and any sensory disturbance and its location was recorded. Patients with sensory disturbance were subsequently reviewed at 1 month and again at 6 months if recovery was not complete. This study demonstrated little difference in the adverse event rate per tooth extracted between procedures under local and general anaesthesia. However, within the general anaesthetic group, the few unilateral procedures showed evidence of higher risk, but the number was too small for valid satisfactory analysis. The risk of nerve morbidity was also greater where the duration of the procedure was longer than 15 minutes in unilateral cases.

Factors influencing nerve damage during lower third molar surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate relationships between pathology, eruption status, age, anaesthetic modality and nerve damage during lower third molar surgery. DESIGN: Single centre prospective study. SETTING: Oral surgery out-patient clinics. SUBJECTS: 367 patients unselected for age, gender or social class, scheduled for lower third molar removal. At 1 week, any evidence of iatrogenic nerve damage was recorded. Patients with altered lingual and/or labial sensation were followed up for 6 months. RESULTS: 718 lower third molars were removed from 250 males and 117 females. 96 removals (13.4%) were associated with altered lingual, labial or buccal sensation. There were no significant associations between nerve damage and eruption status, age and pre-operative pathology. There was a highly significant difference in the incidence of nerve damage between LA removal (3%) and GA removal (18%) (chi-squared = 17.18; f = 2; P < 0.01) but no significant associations between surgical difficulty and nerve damage within each of the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Lingual and inferior alveolar nerve damage was five times more frequent when lower third molars were removed under general anaesthesia rather than local anaesthesia. This could not be explained in terms of surgical difficulty, pre-operative pathology, age or anatomical position.

Lingual nerve paresthesia following third molar surgery: a retrospective clinical study.

Lingual nerve anesthesia, paresthesia, and dysesthesia are possible side effects of third molar extraction. These unwanted complications are frequently disturbing to both the patient and practitioner. The incidence of lingual nerve damage following third molar surgery is more frequent than once thought. Six hundred questionnaires were sent to randomly selected Fellows of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons in 50 states to determine the parameters surrounding this phenomenon. Of the 452 respondents, 76.05% reported having had patients with lingual anesthesia, dysesthesia, or paresthesia. Of all the reported cases, 18.64% of the cases failed to resolve. Of the reported cases, only three underwent surgical intervention. Because many cases of lingual nerve dysfunction do not resolve, it is important to inform patients that microsurgical nerve repair techniques are available as a modality of treatment following diagnosis. It has also been recommended that if the paresthesia does not resolve within 10 to 12 weeks, then management options including microsurgical nerve reconstruction within a short period of time should be discussed as a plan with the patient.