The effectiveness of intradermal sterile water injection for low back pain in the emergency department: A prospective, randomized controlled study.

AIM: Low back pain (LBP) is a common musculoskeletal complaint among emergency department (ED) admissions. In this study, it was aimed to compare the effectiveness of systemic treatment with intradermal sterile water injection (ISWI) treatment protocol combined with systemic therapy in patients with LBP of unclear chronicity. METHODS: A prospective randomized, unblinded, controlled clinical study was conducted on patients admitted to the ED for LBP of unclear chronicity. One hundred twelve patients were randomly assigned to two groups; Group ISWI (n = 56) administered ISWI in the LBP region of patients along with systemic intravenous dexketoprofen therapy, while the other group (n = 56) received only systemic intravenous dexketoprofen therapy. The treatment methods' effectiveness was compared by measuring the pain intensity with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at admission, 10th minutes, 20th minutes, 30th minutes, and 24 h later. Also, opioid and analgesic consumptions in 24 h after treatment and patient satisfactions were compared. RESULTS: In the treatment of LBP, ISWI treatment was found to be more effective in relieving pain than systemic therapy alone (p < 0.001). Also, it was observed that opioid consumption in the ED and analgesic consumption within 24 h after treatments were decreased in the ISWI group (p < 0.001). The patient satisfaction in the ED was statistically increased (p < 0.001). DISCUSSION: In this unblinded study, ISWI with systemic therapy improved pain outcomes more than systemic therapy alone. Further research is needed to determine whether this was due entirely to placebo effect.

Efficacy and safety of motherwort injection add-on therapy to carboprost tromethamine for prevention of post-partum blood loss: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Motherwort (YiMuCao), a traditional Chinese herb, has been shown beneficial effects for women's diseases. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of motherwort injection add-on therapy to carboprost tromethamine for prevention of post-partum blood loss. A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, VIP and Wanfang from their inception to December 2017. Randomized controlled trials that determined the add-on effects of motherwort injection to carboprost for prevention of post-partum blood loss were eligible. Pooled risk ratio (RR) and mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to summarize the effect sizes. Eight trials including 1276 pregnant women fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Prophylactic use of motherwort injection add-on therapy significantly reduced the post-partum 2 h (MD -127.5 mL; 95% CI -149.13 to -105.88) and 24 h (MD -146.85 mL; 95% CI -179.77 to -113.94) blood loss and incidence of post-partum hemorrhage (RR 0.28; 95% CI 0.17-0.45) than carboprost. Moreover, adjunctive treatment with motherwort injection significantly decreased the length of the third stage of labor (MD -3.41 min; 95% CI -4.33 to -2.49) and duration of lochia (MD -7.13 days; 95% CI -8.49 to -5.76). There was no statistical significant difference in the incidence of adverse events (RR 0.76; 95% CI 0.50-1.16). Prophylactic use of motherwort injection add-on therapy to carboprost tromethamine could reduce post-partum blood loss. However, more well-designed trials are necessary to confirm the findings of this study due to the methodological flaws of the included trials.

Large doses of uterotonic drugs caused type II second degree sinoatrial block during cesarean section.

In China, it is a routine procedure to inject 250 µg of hemabate (sterile solution, an oxytocic, contains the tromethamine salt of the (I5S)-15 methyl analogue of naturally occurring prostaglandin F2α in a solution suitable for intramuscular injection) into the myometrium of patients experiencing uterine inertia after delivery, with an additional dose given in the event that the efficacy is not obvious. Although hemabate is prohibited from being used in patients with active liver disease, there are no restrictions regarding the application of hemabate in positive hepatitis B surface antigen (HbsAg)-positive subjects with normal liver function. Here we report adverse effects of hemabate in 1 HbsAg-positive subject with normal liver function. This subject experienced increased blood pressure, chest tightness, and type II second degree sinoatrial block 25 minutes after an additional injection of hemabate. Thus, special attention should be paid when applying hemabate in HbsAgpositive subjects with normal liver function.

[Dexketoprofene, selective cox-1 inhibitor nsaids, without gastrointestinal injury in rats]. / Dexketoprofeno. Aine preferencial inhibidor COX-1, sin lesión gastrointestinal, en ratas.

Dexketoprofene (De) NSAID was studied as a selective COX-1 inhibitor in comparison with Ketorolac (Ke), a mainly COX-1 inhibitor. De and Ke were administered to different groups of animals in a dose-dependent manner, i.e., 3-15 and 25 mgs/kg. The gastrointestinal mucosa damage was macroscopically and microscopically quantified at 24 hs, as well as leukocyte infiltration (LI) and neosinophilia. Similarly, Indomethacin (Indo) damage (COX-1-COX-2), with 25 mgs/kg. Dose was compared. On the other hand, De and Ke at inhibitory selective COX-1 dose (3 mg/kg) plus Celecoxib, selective COX-2 inhibitor, yielding no gastrointestinal damage, with decreased LI and without neutrophilia, the same as Ke (n.s.). Similarly De at higher dose (2.5 mgs/kg), produced minimal gastrointestinal lesions, showing a preferential COX-1 inhibitor behavior. Ke and Indo produced important gastrointestinal necrotic and erosive lesions with remarkable LI and neutrophilia (p < 0.001). On the other hand, COX-1 De dose plus Celecoxib produced evident gastrointestinal lesions, increased LI and neutrophilia, the same as Indo, pointing out that the gastrointestinal damage is due to COX-1 and COX-2 inhibition.

A double-blind evaluation of ketorolac tromethamine versus acetaminophen in pediatric tonsillectomy: analgesia and bleeding.

The study was designed to compare intravenous ketorolac to rectal acetaminophen for analgesia and bleeding in pediatric patients undergoing tonsillectomy. We studied 50 patients, aged 2-15 yr undergoing tonsillectomy with or without adenoidectomy. In a randomized, prospective double-blind fashion, patients were assigned to receive either ketorolac (1 mg/kg) or rectal acetaminophen (35 mg/kg). Bleeding was evaluated by measuring intraoperative blood loss and noting extra measures required to obtain hemostasis. Bleeding times were also measured before and during surgery. Pain was evaluated using a standard objective pain score for the first 3 h. Persistent pain was treated with morphine, acetaminophen, and codeine and recorded for 24 h. Blood for determination of acetaminophen levels was drawn at 20 and 40 min after the administration of study drugs. Pain scores were not significantly different between the ketorolac and acetaminophen groups. The majority of patients in both groups required additional opioid in the postoperative period. Acetaminophen levels were all less than the therapeutic range. Intraoperative bleeding times were normal in all patients, but blood loss was significantly higher in the ketorolac group (2.67 mL/kg) compared to the acetaminophen group (1.44 mL/kg), P = 0.025. Significantly more measures to achieve hemostasis were required in the ketorolac group (P = 0.012). We conclude that ketorolac is no more effective than high-dose rectal acetaminophen for analgesia in the patient undergoing tonsillectomy. Hemostasis during tonsillectomy was significantly more difficult to achieve in patients receiving ketorolac.

Single-blind comparative analgesic and safety study of single doses of intramuscularly administered ketorolac tromethamine and pethidine hydrochloride in patients with pain following orthopaedic surgery.

Ketorolac tromethamine, a potent non-narcotic prostaglandin synthetase inhibiting analgesic was compared with pethidine for relief of moderate to severe postoperative pain. Forty-eight patients received Ketorolac 0.5 mg/kg and 52 received pethidine 1.25 mg/kg. The degree of pain prior to the administration of the drug and pain relief that followed were quantified using a vertical visual analogue scale (VAS) and monitored at hourly intervals. The safety profile was also studied by recording all adverse events noted. The mean pain (VAS) score at medication for Ketorolac was 7.04 and for pethidine 7.09. The pain relief obtained in the first four hours following administration of the drugs was similar for pethidine and Ketorolac. Although Ketorolac showed a longer sustained pain relief, time to peak analgesia after administration of this drug was slower than that after pethidine. It took 30 to 50 min for pethidine compared to 75 to 150 min for Ketorolac to achieve peak analgesia. The latter is therefore inappropriate if rapid pain relief is required. The incidence of side effects was significantly greater with pethidine (40.4%) as compared to Ketorolac (10.4%). The similar analgesic efficacy to pethidine makes Ketorolac an appropriate drug for the relief of postoperative pain especially in day surgery settings where observation following administration of the drug as in the case of pethidine can be dispensed with and patients sent home earlier because of the minimal side effects associated with its use. Caution must be exercised with the use of large doses of Ketorolac especially if the drug is used for more than 5 days to avoid serious complications like renal failure and gastrointestinal bleeding.

Enhancement of pain control with ketorolac tromethamine in patients with sickle cell vaso-occlusive crisis.

Twenty one patients with sickle cell disease admitted to the hospital with the pain of vaso-occlusive crisis (VOC) were treated by continuous IV infusion of ketorolac or normal saline for up to 5 days. All patients received supplemental IM injections of meperidine, 100 mg, as necessary, but not more frequently than every 3 hr. Over the 5 days the ketorolac treated patients (KT) required 33% less meperidine than did the placebo treated patients (PL), P = 0.04, and had significantly better pain relief as assessed by categorical, visual analog, and pain relief scales. By the end of 5 days infusions had been discontinued in six KT and one PL. The time to discontinuation of the infusion was significantly shorter in KT, (P = 0.009). The median duration of hospital stay from the start of treatment was 3.3 days for KT and 7.2 days for PL, P = 0.027. Adverse events were mainly related to the digestive system. This study showed that continuous infusion of ketorolac significantly reduced total meperidine requirement and that the analgesia produced by this combination was superior to that produced by meperidine alone. Further evaluation of this drug in the management of sickle cell VOC is warranted.

Comparison of intravenous ketorolac tromethamine and morphine sulfate in the treatment of postoperative pain.

This study compared the efficacy and safety of ketorolac tromethamine and morphine sulfate in alleviating moderate or severe pain immediately after major surgery. One hundred twenty-two patients were randomly assigned to receive single intravenous injections of ketorolac 10 mg, ketorolac 30 mg, morphine 2 mg, or morphine 4 mg; patients could receive a second dose 15 minutes thereafter, upon request, and most received both available doses. Analgesic efficacy was measured by interviewing patients and assessing pain intensity and pain relief for 6 hours after the first medication administration. The two drugs showed a similar onset of action, peaking 1 hour after administration. When placed in order of descending efficacy, the mean scores for most efficacy measures fell into the following sequence: ketorolac 30 mg, ketorolac 10 mg, morphine 4 mg, and morphine 2 mg. There were no statistically significant differences among the two ketorolac doses and the high dose of morphine, but all three of these treatments were significantly superior to the low morphine dose. One patient who took morphine 4 mg withdrew because of drowsiness; other common adverse events reported included nausea, vomiting, somnolence, and dyspepsia. There were no statistically significant differences in the frequency of adverse events among the treatment groups. Intravenous ketorolac is effective for the treatment of postoperative pain.