[A Case of UFT/LV-Induced Acute Liver Failure after Surgery for Sigmoid Colon Cancer].

Oral uracil and tegafur plus Leucovorin(UFT/LV)therapy is one of the standard adjuvant chemotherapies for colorectal cancer, and is widely used without any serious adverse events. Herein, we describe a case of UFT/LV-induced acute liver failure in a 75-year-old woman who underwent laparoscopic sigmoidectomy for sigmoid colon cancer. She was diagnosed with advanced colon cancer and lymph node metastasis by postoperative histopathological analysis, and adjuvant chemotherapy was initiated. After 30 days of commencing the therapy, the patient visited our hospital with complaints of severe diarrhea and difficulty in food intake. The apparent cause of these symptoms was unclear on computed tomography(CT), and mild liver damage was revealed in blood test results. The hepatic disorder gradually progressed after the hospitalization, and the condition was diagnosed as acute hepatic insufficiency. Additionally, obvious atrophy of the liver parenchyma and significant ascites were confirmed on CT. Two months later, the platelet count decreased markedly, but fortunately, no bleeding occurred. There has been no recurrence since 2 years after the surgery without any additional adjuvant therapy.

Randomized phase II study of tegafur-uracil/leucovorin versus tegafur-uracil/leucovorin plus oxaliplatin after curative resection of high-risk stage II/III colorectal cancer (SOAC-1101 trial).

PURPOSE: This randomized phase II trial compared tegafur-uracil/leucovorin (UFT/LV) plus oxaliplatin (TEGAFOX) to UFT/LV as adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with high-risk stage II/III colorectal cancer. METHODS: From 2010 to April 2015, 159 patients who underwent curative resection were randomly assigned to receive TEGAFOX (85 mg/m2 oxaliplatin on days 1 and 15, 300 mg/m2/day UFT and 75 mg/day LV on days 1-28, every 35 days for five cycles) or UFT/LV. The primary study endpoint was disease-free survival. RESULTS: The 3-year disease-free survival rate was 84.2% in the TEGAFOX arm, versus 62.1% for UFT/LV. The stratified hazard ratio for disease-free survival for TEGAFOX compared to UFT/LV was 0.338 (P < 0.01). The incidence of any-grade adverse events was significantly higher in the TEGAFOX arm (96.1%) than in the UFT/LV arm (76.6%; P < 0.01). The rates of any-grade neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase elevation, and peripheral sensory neuropathy were higher in the TEGAFOX group, whereas the incidence of grade ≥ 3 adverse events did not differ between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: TEGAFOX is an additional adjuvant chemotherapy option for high-risk stage II/III colorectal cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN ID: 000007696, date of registration: April 10, 2012.

Administration Method of Adjuvant Tegafur-Uracil and Leucovorin Calcium in Patients with Resected Colorectal Cancer: A Phase III Study.

LESSONS LEARNED: The 3-year disease-free survival rate of the twice-daily regimen was not inferior to that of the conventional three-times-daily regimen, and the twice-daily regimen did not lead to an increase in adverse events. The effectiveness of the twice-daily regimen highlights an increased number of treatment options for patients. This will facilitate personalized medicine, particularly for elderly or frail patients who may experience more severe side effects from the combination therapy. BACKGROUND: Tegafur-uracil (UFT)/leucovorin calcium (LV) is an adjuvant chemotherapy treatment for colorectal cancer. We conducted a multicenter randomized trial to assess the noninferiority of a twice-daily compared with a three-times-daily UFT/LV regimen for stage II/III colorectal cancer in an adjuvant setting. METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to group A (three doses of UFT [300 mg/m2 per day]/LV [75 mg per day]) or B (two doses of UFT [300 mg/m2 per day]/LV [50 mg per day]). The primary endpoint was 3-year disease-free survival. RESULTS: In total, 386 patients were enrolled between July 28, 2011, and September 27, 2013. The 3-year disease-free survival rates of group A (n = 194) and B (n = 192) were 79.4% and 81.4% (95% confidence interval, 72.6-84.4-74.5-85.9), respectively. The most common grade 3/4 adverse events in group A and B were diarrhea (3.9% vs. 7.3%), neutropenia (2.9% vs. 1.6%), increase in aspartate aminotransferase (4.0% vs. 3.9%), increase in alanine aminotransferase (6.2% vs. 6.8%), nausea (1.7% vs. 3.4%), and fatigue (1.1% vs. 2.3%). CONCLUSION: Group B outcomes were not inferior to group A outcomes, and adverse events did not increase.

Efficacy and Safety of Miglitol- or Repaglinide-Based Combination Therapy with Alogliptin for Drug-Naïve Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: An Open-Label, Single-Center, Parallel, Randomized Controlled Pilot Study.

BACKGROUND: Combination therapy with an alpha-glucosidase inhibitor or glinide plus a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor is thought to be effective for glycemic control because of its effects on postprandial hyperglycemia. However, no studies have directly compared these two combination therapies in relation to efficacy and safety. METHODS: Eighteen patients with type 2 diabetes were studied. All had diabetes not adequately controlled with diet and exercise therapy, an HbA1c level of ≥7.5%, and were not receiving any medication for diabetes. The patients were randomized to either miglitol- or repaglinide-based combination therapy with alogliptin. Patients received miglitol or repaglinide monotherapy for 3 months (the miglitol and repaglinide groups, respectively), after which alogliptin was added to each group as combination therapy for 3 months. A meal tolerance test (MTT) was performed before the start of treatment and at the end of monotherapy and combination therapy. RESULTS: During the study period, decreases in HbA1c and glycated albumin were significantly greater in the repaglinide group than in the miglitol group; however, there was no significant difference between treatment groups at the end of the study. At the end of monotherapy, insulin secretion relative to glucose elevation (ISG0-30: area under the curve of insulin from 0 to 30 min during MTT [AUC0-30 of IRI]/AUC0-30 of plasma glucose) was significantly higher only in the repaglinide group; ISG0-30 did not significantly increase in either group after the addition of alogliptin. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of alogliptin to repaglinide monotherapy did not cause glucose-independent inappropriate insulin secretion and did not appear to increase the incidence of hypoglycemia.

Regorafenib Is Associated With Increased Skeletal Muscle Loss Compared to TAS-102 in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network and the European Society of Medical Oncology recommend regorafenib or trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) for third-line therapy of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We evaluated the impact of regorafenib and TAS-102 treatment on skeletal muscle dynamics and sarcopenia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective analysis was based on unselected, consecutive mCRC patients treated with regorafenib and/or TAS-102 during third or later line of therapy at our tertiary-care cancer center in Salzburg, Austria. The skeletal muscle index (SMI, cm2/m2) and sarcopenia were evaluated from cross-sectional computed tomographic images at the level of the third lumbar vertebra. RESULTS: Between January 2013 and April 2018, a total of 45 patients had received regorafenib and/or TAS-102. At initial mCRC diagnosis and at initiation of third-line therapy, 24% and 54% of patients presented with sarcopenia. A statistically significant skeletal muscle loss was observed during regorafenib treatment (median SMI change: -2.75 cm2/m2 [-6.3%]; P < .0001), which was not the case during TAS-102 therapy (-1.5 cm2/m2 [-3.5%]; P = .575). Furthermore, subclassification of patients into 3 groups-normal muscle mass, stable sarcopenia, and new-onset sarcopenia-at initiation of third-line therapy permitted discrimination of overall survival, with 1-year overall survival rates of 61%, 29%, and 16%, respectively (P = .04). CONCLUSION: The frequency of sarcopenia increases during the course of mCRC and negatively affects survival. In contrast to TAS-102, regorafenib is associated with increased skeletal muscle loss during mCRC treatment and should therefore be used with caution in mCRC patients with preexisting sarcopenia or a history of recent weight loss.

Twelve weeks of ombitasvir/paritaprevir/r and dasabuvir without ribavirin is effective and safe in the treatment of patients with HCV genotype 1b infection and compensated cirrhosis: results from a real-world cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the effectiveness and safety of ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir and dasabuvir (OBV/PTV/r+DSV) for 12 weeks without ribavirin in adults with chronic HCV genotype 1b infection and compensated cirrhosis. METHODS: Observational study of a prospective cohort of adult patients with HCV genotype 1b infection and compensated cirrhosis who received 12 weeks of OBV/PTV/r and DSV without ribavirin. Effectiveness was assessed by recording the percentage of patients achieving sustained virological response at week 12 post-treatment (SVR12). Safety outcomes were based on the incidence of adverse events. RESULTS: Seventy-eight patients were included. The SVR12 rate was 96.1% (95%CI 89.2-99.2). Adverse events were recorded in 78.0% of patients. Of these, 97.7% were grade 1/2. One patient discontinued treatment prematurely owing to adverse events. Eighty-six interactions were detected in 43 patients (55.1%). Overall, 81.4% of interactions required close monitoring, alteration of drug dosage, or timing of administration. In 7.0% of cases, the interactions arose from contraindications that required the suspension of the concomitant drug. In 11.6% of cases, medicinal plants or foods were withdrawn. CONCLUSIONS: The simplified regimen of OBV/PTV/r+DSV administered for 12 weeks is effective and safe in patients with chronic HCV genotype 1b infection and compensated cirrhosis. No adverse reactions related to drug-drug interactions were recorded.

Planned Safety Analysis of the ACTS-CC 02 Trial: A Randomized Phase III Trial of S-1 With Oxaliplatin Versus Tegafur and Uracil With Leucovorin as Adjuvant Chemotherapy for High-Risk Stage III Colon Cancer.

BACKGROUND: This trial was designed to verify the superiority of 6 months of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with SOX (S-1 with oxaliplatin) with UFT (tegafur and uracil) with LV (leucovorin) in terms of disease-free survival in patients with high-risk stage III colon cancer. We report the results of a planned safety analysis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent curative resection for high-risk stage III colon cancer (any T, N2, or positive nodes around the origin of the feeding arteries) were randomly assigned to receive either UFT/LV (300-600 mg/d UFT with 75 mg/d LV on days 1-28, every 35 days, for 5 cycles) or SOX (100 mg/m2 of oxaliplatin on day 1 with 80-120 mg/d S-1 on days 1-14, every 21 days, for 8 cycles). Treatment status and safety were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 966 patients were enrolled, and 932 patients were included in safety analyses. The planned 6-month protocol treatment was received by 76.9% of the patients in the UFT/LV group and 65.8% of those in the SOX group. The overall incidence of any Grade adverse events (AEs) were 91.3% in the UFT/LV group and 98.7% in the SOX group, and those of Grade ≥ 3 AEs were 16.1% and 36.1%, respectively. As for Grade ≥ 3 AEs, leukopenia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and sensory neuropathy were more common in the SOX group. The incidence of Grade ≥ 3 sensory peripheral neuropathy was 4.6% in the SOX group. CONCLUSION: The completion rate of adjuvant SOX and its incidence of AEs were acceptable in patients with colon cancer.

Randomized Controlled Trial of Adjuvant Chemotherapy with Fluoropyrimidines Versus Surgery-alone for Gastric Cancer.

AIM: This prospective randomized study compared the survival of patients with stage IB-IIIA gastric cancer treated with surgery alone or surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with pathological stage IB-IIIA disease were randomly assigned to the following groups: surgery alone (n=116), or surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil, doxifluridine, or uracil-tegafur for 12 months (n=113). RESULTS: The overall survival rate was 86.1% in the adjuvant group and 78.5% in the surgery-alone group. The overall survival rate did not significantly differ between the adjuvant-chemotherapy and surgery-only groups (p=0.163). In the subgroup analyses, patients with stage II disease and those receiving uracil-tegafur treatment in the adjuvant group showed significantly better prognosis than those in the surgery-alone group (p=0.036 and 0.005, respectively). CONCLUSION: This study did not find a significant survival benefit to be associated with adjuvant chemotherapy with fluoropyrimidines in patients with stage IB-IIIA gastric cancer. However, it may be effective for patients with stage II disease. Additionally, uracil-tegafur is a promising agent for adjuvant chemotherapy of gastric cancer if S-1 is not available because of its toxicity.

A phase II study of preoperative chemoradiation with tegafur-uracil plus leucovorin for locally advanced rectal cancer with pharmacogenetic analysis.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a high dose of oral tegafur-uracil (400 mg/m2) plus leucovorin with preoperative chemoradiation of locally advanced rectal cancer and to explore the impact of polymorphisms of cytochrome P 2A6 (CYP2A6), uridine monophosphate synthetase (UMPS), and ATP-binding cassette B1 (ABCB1) on clinical outcome. METHODS: Patients with cT3 or cT4 rectal cancer were enrolled and were given tegafur-uracil 400 mg/m2/day and leucovorin 90 mg/m2/day for 7 days a week during preoperative chemoradiation (50.4 Gy/28 fractions) in this phase II trial. Primary endpoint was pathologic complete response rate, and the secondary endpoint was to explore the association between clinical outcomes and genetic polymorphisms CYP2A6 (*4, *7, *9 and *10), UMPS G638C, and three ABCB1 genotypes (C1236T, C3435T, and G2677T). RESULTS: Ninety-one patients were given study treatment, and 90 underwent surgery. Pathologic complete response was noted in 10 patients (11.1%). There was no grade 4 or 5 toxicity; 20 (22.0%) experienced grade 3 toxicities, including diarrhea (10, 11.0%), abdominal pain (2, 2.2%), and anemia (2, 2.2%). Relapse-free survival and overall survival at 5 years were 88.6% and 94.2%, respectively. Patients with the UMPS 638 CC genotype experienced significantly more frequent grade 2 or 3 diarrhea (p for trend = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative chemoradiation with tegafur-uracil 400 mg/m2/day with leucovorin was feasible, but did not meet the expected pathologic complete response rate. The UMPS 638 CC genotype might be a candidate biomarker predicting toxicity in patients receiving tegafur-uracil/leucovorin-based preoperative chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN11812525 , registered on 25 July 2016. Retrospectively registered.

TAS-102 an Emerging Oral Fluoropyrimidine.

Colon cancer is a common type of cancer with high mortality. The standard therapy for colon cancer is 5-FU-based regimen, although the current response rate to 5-FU is only 10-15%. Various approaches have been used to improve the efficacy of 5-FU including inhibition of its degradation enzyme dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) such as S1, UTF, use of 5-FU pro-drug capecitabine to exploit thymidine phosphorylase (TP) and supplementation of reduced folate acid to increase cytotoxicity. TAS-102 is a newly-developed anti-folate drug containing the 5-FU analogue trifluridine (TFD) and tipiracil hydrochloride (TPI). TPI is an inhibitor of TFD degradation enzyme thymidine phosphorylase and thus increases the bioavailability of TFD. In the present review, we summarize recent progress with regard to TAS-102, including pre-clinical tests and clinical trials. We further propose several approaches to further improve the efficacy of TAS-102 including combination with targeted therapy and immune therapy.

[A case of severe enteritis induced by adjuvant chemotherapy for colon cancer].

A 77-year-old man underwent surgery for sigmoid colon cancer. He was diagnosed with Stage IIIa colon cancer; there- fore, we initiated oral administration of adjuvant chemotherapy comprising uracil/tegafur(UFT)plus Leucovorin(LV). However, chemotherapy was stopped after 21 days because of fatigue and diarrhea. He recovered after 3 weeks, and we administered the same regimen with a dose reduction. However, he again experienced fatigue and diarrhea after 20 days; therefore, chemotherapy was discontinued. Subsequently, he was hospitalized 8 times for conditions such as diarrhea, hypoalbuminemia, and fever. Computed tomography revealed thickening of the transverse colonic wall and colonoscopy revealed colitis, which we believe was induced by UFT plus LV. Twelve months after the last chemotherapy session, he was diagnosed with Clostridium difficile colitis. Therefore, we initiated the oral administration of vancomycin, which resulted in rapid recovery from colitis. However, he developed liver metastasis and died 29 months after the initiation of chemotherapy. We believe that this severe case of intractable colitis was caused by UFT plus LV. Therefore, we report this case with a review of the literature on enteritis induced by fluorouracil-based anticancer agents in Japan.

Safety analysis of two different regimens of uracil-tegafur plus leucovorin as adjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk stage II and III colon cancer in a phase III trial comparing 6 with 18 months of treatment: JFMC33-0502 trial.

PURPOSE: The JFMC33-0502 trial is a phase III clinical study designed to determine the most appropriate duration of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with uracil-tegafur (UFT) plus leucovorin in patients with stage IIB or III colon cancer. We report the interim results of preplanned safety analyses. METHODS: Patients with stage IIB or III colon cancer who had undergone curative resection were randomly assigned to receive UFT (300 mg/m(2)) plus leucovorin (75 mg/day) for 6 months (control group, 4 weeks of treatment followed by a 1-week rest, five courses) or for 18 months (study group, 5 days of treatment followed by a 2-day rest, 15 courses). Treatment status and safety were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 1,071 patients were enrolled, and 1,063 were included in safety analyses. Treatment completion rate at 6 months was 74.0 % in the control group and 76.7 % in the study group. Treatment completion rate in the study group at 18 months was 56.0 %. The overall incidence of adverse events (AEs) was 75.3 % in the control group and 77.6 % in the study group. The incidences of grade 3 or higher AEs were low in both groups. During the first 6 months, the incidences of the subjective AEs were significantly lower in the study group. CONCLUSIONS: Oral UFT plus leucovorin given by either dosage schedule is a very safe regimen for adjuvant chemotherapy. In particular, 5 days of treatment followed by a 2-day rest was a useful treatment option from the viewpoint of toxicity even when given for longer than 6 months.

Celecoxib plus chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: a phase II TCOG study.

BACKGROUND: To report the results of a phase II trial combining celecoxib and preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for locally advanced rectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with clinical stage II or III rectal cancer were treated with radiotherapy of 44 Gy in 22 fractions. Concurrent chemotherapy consisted of oral tegafur-uracil and folinate on days 1-30 and 38-65. Celecoxib (400 mg/day) given from days 1 to 65. Surgery was done on day 70. The expression of cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2) in tumor tissues was evaluated microscopically as a prognostic factor. RESULTS: From 2008 to 2011, 53 patients completed CRT+ celecoxib therapy and 47 received radical surgery. Grade 3 diarrhea developed in 5 (9%). Grade 4 anemia was seen in 2 (4%). Pathological complete response (pCR) was seen in 6 (13%). T or N downstaging found in 38 (81%). Sphincter preservation was achieved in 77% of low-positioned tumors. Patients with tumors expressing high-level COX-2 after CRT + celecoxib treatment had inferior pelvic control (P = 0.01), disease-free survival (P = 0.04), and overall survival (P = 0.03) than those with low-level expression. CONCLUSIONS: Celecoxib can be safely combined with preoperative CRT for rectal cancer. More intensified adjuvant therapy may be considered for tumors expressing high-level COX-2 after CRT and surgery.

Efficacy of tegafur-uracil (UFT) administration in castration-resistant prostate cancer patients with a history of both alternative antiandrogen therapy and estramustine phosphate sodium hydrate therapy.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of tegafur-uracil (UFT) administration as a fourth-line therapy in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) who had already received combined androgen blockade (CAB) therapy (first-line), alternative antiandrogen therapy (second-line), and estramustine phosphate sodium hydrate (EMP) therapy (third-line), in order to determine who would benefit from UFT therapy. METHODS: UFT was administered at a daily dose of 300 mg/m(2) to 26 patients, and the response to UFT 4 weeks after its induction and its toxicity were evaluated. RESULTS: A reduction in the serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value was observed in 12 patients (46.2 %), while two cases (7.7 %) achieved more than 50 % reduction in PSA. Two patients (7.7 %) required discontinuation of UFT administration because of side effects (grade 2 exanthema in one patient and grade 2 nausea in one patient). A PSA response to UFT was observed, especially in patients older than 75 years and/or whose Gleason score was 8 or less. CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that UFT administration as a fourth-line therapy was tolerable and effective to some degree in patients with CRPC who had already received CAB therapy, alternative antiandrogen therapy, and EMP therapy. It can be used, even in patients aged more than 75 years old, without any loss of efficacy or effect on their activities of daily life, and can be regarded as a treatment option for patients with advanced prostate cancer.

Safety of UFT/LV and S-1 as adjuvant therapy for stage III colon cancer in phase III trial: ACTS-CC trial.

BACKGROUND: The Adjuvant Chemotherapy Trial of TS-1 for Colon Cancer (ACTS-CC) is a phase III trial designed to validate the non-inferiority of S-1 to UFT/leucovorin (LV) as postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III colon cancer. We report the results of a planned safety analysis. METHODS: Patients aged 20-80 years with curatively resected stage III colon cancer were randomly assigned to receive UFT/LV (UFT, 300 mg m(-2) per day as tegafur; LV, 75 mg per day on days 1-28, every 35 days, 5 courses) or S-1 (80, 100, or 120 mg per day on days 1-28, every 42 days, 4 courses). Treatment status and safety were evaluated. RESULTS: Of 1535 enrolled patients, a total of 1504 (756 allocated to S-1 and 748 to UFT/LV) were analysed. The completion rate of protocol treatment was 77% in the S-1 group and 73% in the UFT/LV group. The overall incidence of adverse events (AEs) were 80% in S-1 and 74% in UFT/LV. Stomatitis, anorexia, hyperpigmentation, and haematological toxicities were common in S-1, whereas increased alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase were common in UFT/LV. The incidences of grade 3 AEs were 16% and 14%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Although AE profiles differed between the groups, feasibility of the protocol treatment was good. Both S-1 and UFT/LV could be safely used as adjuvant chemotherapy.

[Preliminary study of Peptide vaccine with UFT/LV as adjuvant setting for stage III colorectal cancer].

cDNA microarray technology has been used to identify HLA-A24-restricted epitope peptides as potential targets for cancer vaccination in metastatic colorectal cancer patients. We conducted a clinical trial of two novel cancer-specific peptides( RNF43, TOMM34) with UFT/LV for the treatment of recurrent colorectal cancer. Among 23 patients, 21 patients had completed the protocol. All patients were well tolerated with no severe toxicities. The median survival time was 24.4 months. Furthermore, we investigated the relationship between CTL response to both antigens and overall survival. The best long-term survival was observed in the group with CTL responses against both antigens, followed by the group showing CTL responses against only RNF43 or TOMM34. The patients with no response had the lowest survival. Based on the results, we started a randomized trial of the current protocol, as adjuvant immunochemotherapy in following curative resection of Stage III colorectal cancer patients.

An evidence-based review of a Lentinula edodes mushroom extract as complementary therapy in the surgical oncology patient.

The purpose of this review is to present the currently published evidence regarding the use, efficacy, potential mechanisms of action, and results of published clinical trials regarding the use of a Lentinula edodes mushroom-derived extract (active hexose correlated compound) as complementary therapy in patients with cancer. The authors explore the current preclinical and clinical evidence as it relates to this topic and its potential use in the surgical oncology patient. There has been a growing interest in stimulation of the immune system in trauma, cancer, and surgical patients in general. Little, however, has been written about some-of the supplements in widely used in Japan and China, but relatively unheard of in the United States.

Phase II study of preoperative radiation plus concurrent daily tegafur-uracil (UFT) with leucovorin for locally advanced rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Considerable variation in intravenous 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) metabolism can occur due to the wide range of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) enzyme activity, which can affect both tolerability and efficacy. The oral fluoropyrimidine tegafur-uracil (UFT) is an effective, well-tolerated and convenient alternative to intravenous 5-FU. We undertook this study in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of UFT with leucovorin (LV) and preoperative radiotherapy and to evaluate the utility and limitations of multicenter staging using pre- and post-chemoradiotherapy ultrasound. We also performed a validated pretherapy assessment of DPD activity and assessed its potential influence on the tolerability of UFT treatment. METHODS: This phase II study assessed preoperative UFT with LV and radiotherapy in 85 patients with locally advanced T3 rectal cancer. Patients with potentially resectable tumors received UFT (300 mg/m/2/day), LV (75 mg/day), and pelvic radiotherapy (1.8 Gy/day, 45 Gy total) 5 days/week for 5 weeks then surgery 4-6 weeks later. The primary endpoints included tumor downstaging and the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate. RESULTS: Most adverse events were mild to moderate in nature. Preoperative grade 3/4 adverse events included diarrhea (n = 18, 21%) and nausea/vomiting (n = 5, 6%). Two patients heterozygous for dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase gene (DPYD) experienced early grade 4 neutropenia (variant IVS14+1G > A) and diarrhea (variant 2846A > T). Pretreatment ultrasound TNM staging was compared with postchemoradiotherapy pathology TN staging and a significant shift towards earlier TNM stages was observed (p < 0.001). The overall downstaging rate was 42% for primary tumors and 44% for lymph nodes. The pCR rate was 8%. The sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound for staging was poor. Anal sphincter function was preserved in 55 patients (65%). Overall and recurrence-free survival at 3 years was 86.1% and 66.7%, respectively. Adjuvant chemotherapy was administered to 36 node-positive patients (mean duration 118 days). CONCLUSION: Preoperative chemoradiotherapy using UFT with LV plus radiotherapy was well tolerated and effective and represents a convenient alternative to 5-FU-based chemoradiotherapy for the treatment of resectable rectal cancer. Pretreatment detection of DPD deficiency should be performed to avoid severe adverse events.

[European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 and functional assessment of cancer therapy- general for measurement of quality of life in colorectal cancer patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy- a comparison].

Quality of life (QOL) was measured prospectively using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 (QLQ-C30) and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) in 94 colorectal cancer patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy with oral uracil/tegafur plus leucovorin. Two QOL questionnaires were then compared with reference to corresponding scales. The post-treatment assessments changed significantly from the baseline values and favored post-treatment for all scales except social well-being of the FACT-G. All scales except social well-being in patients with Grade 0-1 toxicities were better than those with Grade 2-3 toxicities. Social well-being in patients with Grade 2-3 toxicities were worse than those with Grade 0-1. When corresponding scales between the two QOL questionnaires were compared, a high correlation for physical domain or emotional domain was found, whereas no correlation was noticed for social domain. In conclusion, the social domain of the two QOL questionnaires may evaluate different aspects of QOL.

[Compliance of oral UFT plus leucovorin adjuvant chemotherapy in patients who underwent curative resection for colorectal cancer].

NSABP C-06 study showed that an oralUFT /Leucovorin(LV)regimen proved to be equivalent to an infusional 5-fluorouracil/LV regimen in an adjuvant setting for colorectalcancer. Thus, the oralregimen has been approved as the treatment of choice in Japan, but compliance of the regimen for Japanese patients has scarcely been reported. We assessed the compliance of oralUFT /LV adjuvant chemotherapy(5 cycles, 25weeks)in 99 consecutive colorectal cancer patients undergoing curative resection. Eighty-two percent(81 of 99)received all scheduled doses of UFT plus LV for five cycles. The mean relative dose intensity was 0. 87. Mean treatment courses given were 4. 5. The treatment was discontinued because of toxicity in 18 of the 99 patients. Nine of 18 received UFT only after the toxicities resolved. The remaining nine patients had no chemotherapy. The toxicity was generally mild. Six patients each had grade 3 diarrhea or anorexia, despite inclusion of overlapping cases. Fifteen of the 99 patients(15%)developed grade 3 toxicities. These results suggest that the compliance of oral UFT/LV treatment was equivalent to that of oral UFT adjuvant treatment for various cancers(80-90%).