Meaningful use of COMSAE Phase 1 in preparation for COMLEX-USA Level 1.

CONTEXT: The Comprehensive Osteopathic Medical Licensing Examination of the United States (COMLEX-USA) is a three level national standardized licensure examination for the practice of osteopathic medicine. The Comprehensive Medical Self Assessment Examination (COMSAE) is a three phase self assessment tool designed to gauge the base knowledge and ability of candidates preparing for COMLEX-USA. OBJECTIVES: To investigate how COMSAE Phase 1 (Phase 1) was used by candidates and how completing Phase 1 impacted their performance on the COMLEX-USA Level 1 (Level 1) examination. METHODS: Using data from the 2018-2019 administration of Level 1 and Phase 1 examinations, we counted the frequency of the unique Phase 1 forms taken by the candidates and calculated the correlation between the candidates' first attempt Phase 1 scores and the number of Phase 1 forms taken. We then calculated the correlation between the Level 1 scores and the Phase 1 scores. Next, we applied a multilevel regression model to examine the candidates' score improvement on the multiple Phase 1 forms taken. Finally, we investigated the effect of practicing through Phase 1 on the candidates' Level 1 performance using logistic regression models. RESULTS: The majority of candidates took one (2,414; 33.9%) to two (2,196; 30.8%) timed Phase 1 forms prior to the Level 1 examination. There was a significant negative correlation (r=-0.48, t(6,505)=-44.05, p<0.001) between the candidates' first attempt Phase 1 scores and the number of Phase 1 forms taken. There was a strong and positive correlation (r=0.66 to 0.74, p<0.001) between Phase 1 and Level 1 scores. With other variables controlled, on average, candidates' Phase 1 scores increased 23.2 points on one attempt from the previous attempt. Having the most recent Phase 1 score controlled, a greater number of Phase 1 forms taken was associated with an improvement on the Level 1 performance. CONCLUSIONS: The significant correlation between Phase 1 and Level 1 performance provided validity evidence for Phase 1. Moreover, our results suggested that candidates, especially those with lower performance on their initial Phase 1 attempt, might improve their Level 1 performance by taking multiple Phase 1 forms to monitor their academic improvement and gauge their readiness for Level 1.

The Scottish national LifeCurve™ survey: costs of functional decline, opportunities to achieve early intervention to support well-being in later life, and meaningfulness of the LifeCurve™.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the Scottish AHP LifeCurve™ survey was to gather a snapshot of where people are on their LifeCurve™ when receiving allied health professions (AHP) services and to understand the cost consequence of intervening 'late' in the ageing trajectory. The objectives were to promote discussion around preventing functional decline, support innovation in service delivery, and facilitate broader engagement with individuals, communities, and wider environments for improving health and well-being in later life. In addition, subsequent learning could help address the increasing resource gap between the demand and capacity across health and social care. STUDY DESIGN: The survey was paper-based in the form of a printed booklet, which contained the 15 activities of daily living (ADL) and instrumental ADL (IADL) which comprise the LifeCurve™ with additional lifestyle questions and information about the member of staff and service the participant was seen in, including their Community Health Index (CHI) number. The survey questions and booklet layout were tested over a five-month period with AHPs and people receiving AHP services. Liaison with national health literacy colleagues and lead speech and language therapists ensured that the survey material was accessible to a wide range of people. In addition, the survey could be made available in alternative formats, on request. METHODS: Agreement to undertake the national survey was obtained in November 2016 by all AHP directors and associate directors who appointed communication support leads in their area who would support implementation at all stages at a local level. All materials relating to the survey were published on a dedicated area of a community of practice to support awareness and training during the preimplementation phase. AHPs working in adult services were asked to complete a survey with a minimum of two people they would 'typically' see in their service during a two-week period in May 2017, with the exclusion of people who were too unwell to participate, children and young people under 16 years, and adults with incapacity and without a guardianship arrangement in place. Approval was gained from the Public Benefit Privacy Panel to link the survey data to participants' health service usage using their CHI number. Completed forms were returned to the University of Strathclyde for entry into an encrypted electronic database using a double data entry process and were allocated a unique identifier. The unique identifier and CHI numbers were sent to Information Services Division (ISD), and then, the CHI numbers were deleted from the encrypted database. ISD sent the linked health data to the Scottish Government Analytical Services Division, which thus produced a full encrypted and anonymised database. RESULTS: The data explain what stages on the LifeCurve™ AHPs are intervening, and the matched data provide associated healthcare costs at each stage. Due to poor or missing data in the AHP/Service section, only 60% (n = 8261) of the total completed surveys were able to be matched with health service usage records. These data show that whilst AHPs are seeing people at each of the 15 ADL/IADL stages on the LifeCurve™, interventions fell into three groups where 25% of people where seen at the 'precurve' stage, 13% of people at 'mid-curve' (stage number five), and 39% of people at 'late-curve' (stages 10 to 13). The healthcare cost usage of these participants increased the further along the LifeCurve™ a person moves, with an average annual cost of £2700 at 'precurve' rising to £12,330 at 'late-curve' in 2016-2017. The results indicate that different services and professions are represented at each of these three points. So, for example, as might be expected, outpatient (especially musculoskeletal) services were seen more often at the 'precurve' stage, and in-patient and community rehabilitation, services were seen more often at the 'late-curve' stages; diagnostic radiographers and orthoptists saw people at the 'early-curve' stages, dieticians and podiatrists saw people at the 'mid-curve' stage, whilst physiotherapists, speech and language therapists, and occupational therapists saw people at the 'late-curve' stages. Data analysis showed this pattern is different for people receiving mental health services and, so, their data were removed and will be analysed and reported separately. CONCLUSIONS: It is clear from the results that healthcare costs increased as participants moved down LifeCurve™ stages, that is, as their levels of functional decline increase. It is also clear that AHPs are intervening late in a person's functional decline with associated limitations on changing their ageing trajectory. The cost consequence of this is significant - moving someone from 'late- to mid-curve' could save £3200 per person per annum. However, those AHPs typically associated with reabling approaches and rehabilitation, which have greatest potential to change ageing trajectories, were not represented at the 'mid-curve' stage (e.g., physiotherapists, occupational therapists). Therefore, we must find places to have conversations with people to inform them that functional decline is malleable and not inevitable purely by virtue of chronological age and provide education and support to prevent or reverse functional decline and collaborate around strategic planning and commissioning to offer different options that support an optimum LifeCurve™.

Documenting Stage 1 and 2 Meaningful Use criteria: A comparison of clinical pharmacists with other healthcare providers.

PURPOSE: Documentation of Stage 1 and Stage 2 Meaningful Use (MU) criteria for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus between clinical pharmacists and other healthcare providers was compared. METHODS: Patients seen at 8 clinics in a federally qualified health center who had type 2 diabetes mellitus and were seen by clinical pharmacists or other healthcare providers were randomly selected for inclusion in this retrospective study. Approximately half of the encounters were evaluated for Stage 1 MU compliance (encounters from October through December 2014), and half were evaluated for Stage 2 MU compliance (encounters from January through March 2015). Categorical and descriptive variables were analyzed by calculating frequencies and percentages. Chi-square tests were used to compare groups with an a priori level of significance set at 0.05. RESULTS: A total of 790 patients were seen by 46 providers, 8 (18%) of whom were clinical pharmacists. The study also included 24 medical doctors, 8 family nurse practitioners, 1 physician assistant, and 5 doctors of osteopathic medicine. Other healthcare providers more consistently documented 5 Stage 1 MU criteria than did clinical pharmacists. Clinical pharmacists more consistently documented 2 core objectives than did other healthcare providers. Otherwise, no significant differences in documentation were detected. CONCLUSION: Other healthcare providers more consistently documented 5 Stage 1 MU criteria than did clinical pharmacists. Clinical pharmacists more consistently documented 2 core objectives than did other healthcare providers.

A sucata como avesso complementar da contemporaneidade / Scrap as the complementary reverse of contemporaneity / El material de desperdício como el reverso complementario de la contemporaneidad

Este artigo objetiva discutir os significados da sucata na contemporaneidade, apresentando o relato de uma experiência com sucata em oficina de criação espontânea, realizada em uma universidade, como parte de uma investigação sobre os sentidos atribuídos à sucata. Propõe-se, então, a sucata - cujo significado etimológico é objeto sem valor - e as relações que ela mantém, tanto no plano econômico quanto no plano das relações sociais, como objeto e, também, como método de investigação científica. Observamos que a sucata deixa de ser apenas um objeto sem valor para se tornar um meio, um caminho que abre possibilidades de leituras de mundo, de interferências no mundo, de desdobramentos, de vias de escape. Conclui-se, assim, que em toda sua complexidade, a sucata da história (história pessoal e social), pode proporcionar, por meio de sua característica maior - a falta de significado -, a possibilidade de ressignificação, tornando-se um modo, um método, às avessas, em negativo, do contemporâneo.

The main objective of this article is to discuss the meanings associated to refuse/scrap nowadays, presenting a report about an experience conducted in a university campus, exploring scrap workshop spontaneous creation, as part of an investigation into the meanings assigned to it. We focus on the concept of refuse/scrap - whose meaning is associated with worthless material- and the relationships it maintains, both on the economic level and in terms of social relations, and also as object and scientific research method. We can observe that scrap metal ceases to be just worthless object, to become a means and a path, which enables world readings, interference and escape routes in world developments. We conclude, therefore, that in all its complexity, scrap history (personal and social history), despite being considered worthless as its greatest feature, can provide - considering its lack of meaning - the possibility of reframing, becoming a method in reverse, as a negative, of the contemporary.

Este artículo objetiva discutir los significados de la chatarra en la contemporaneidad, presentando el relato de una experiencia con la chatarra en un taller de creación espontánea, realizada en una Universidad, como parte de una investigación sobre los sentidos atribuidos a la chatarra. De ahí, se propone la chatarra - cuyo significado etimológico es objeto sin valor - y las relaciones que ella mantiene, tanto en el plano económico como en los planos de relaciones sociales, como objeto y también como un método de investigación científica. Observamos que la chatarra deja de ser apenas un objeto sin valor para convertirse en un medio, un camino que abre posibilidades de lecturas de mundo, de interferencias en el mundo, de desdoblamientos, de despliegue. Se concluye, por lo tanto, que en toda su complejidad, la chatarra, chatarra de la historia (historia personal y social), puede proporcionar por medio de su mayor característica - la falta de significado - la posibilidad de resignificación, convirtiéndose en un método, al revés, en negativa, de lo contemporáneo.

[The role of Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise (IHE) in telemedicine]. / Die Rolle von Integrating the Healtcare Enterprise (IHE) in der Telemedizin.

BACKGROUND: Telemedicine systems are today already used in a variety of areas to improve patient care. The lack of standardization in those solutions creates a lack of interoperability of the systems. Internationally accepted standards can help to solve the lack of system interoperability. With Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise (IHE), a worldwide initiative of users and vendors is working on the use of defined standards for specific use cases by describing those use cases in so called IHE Profiles. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this work is to determine how telemedicine applications can be implemented using IHE profiles. METHODS: Based on a literature review, exemplary telemedicine applications are described and technical abilities of IHE Profiles are evaluated. These IHE Profiles are examined for their usability and are then evaluated in exemplary telemedicine application architectures. RESULTS: There are IHE Profiles which can be identified as being useful for intersectoral patient records (e.g. PEHR at Heidelberg), as well as for point to point communication where no patient record is involved. In the area of patient records, the IHE Profile "Cross-Enterprise Document Sharing (XDS)" is often used. The point to point communication can be supported using the IHE "Cross-Enterprise Document Media Interchange (XDM)". IHE-based telemedicine applications offer caregivers the possibility to be informed about their patients using data from intersectoral patient records, but also there are possible savings by reusing the standardized interfaces in other scenarios.

Systems Architecture for a Nationwide Healthcare System.

From a national level to give Internet technology support, the Nationwide Integrated Healthcare System in Uruguay requires a model of Information Systems Architecture. This system has multiple healthcare providers (public and private), and a strong component of supplementary services. Thus, the data processing system should have an architecture that considers this fact, while integrating the central services provided by the Ministry of Public Health. The national electronic health record, as well as other related data processing systems, should be based on this architecture. The architecture model described here conceptualizes a federated framework of electronic health record systems, according to the IHE affinity model, HL7 standards, local standards on interoperability and security, as well as technical advice provided by AGESIC. It is the outcome of the research done by AGESIC and Systems Integration Laboratory (LINS) on the development and use of the e-Government Platform since 2008, as well as the research done by the team Salud.uy since 2013.

Towards lifetime electronic health record implementation.

Integrated care concepts can help to diminish demographic challenges. Hereof, the use of eHealth, esp. overarching electronic health records, is recognized as an efficient approach. The article aims at rigorously defining the concept of lifetime electronic health records (LEHRs) and the identification of core factors that need to be fulfilled in order to implement such. A literature review was conducted. Existing definitions were identified and relevant factors were categorized. The derived assessment categories are demonstrated by a case study on Germany. Seven dimensions to differentiate types of electronic health records were found. The analysis revealed, that culture, regulation, informational self-determination, incentives, compliance, ICT infrastructure and standards are important preconditions to successfully implement LEHRs. The article paves the way for LEHR implementation and therewith for integrated care. Besides the expected benefits of LEHRs, there are a number of ethical, legal and social concerns, which need to be balanced.

A socio-technical analytical framework on the EHR-organizational innovation interplay: Insights from a public hospital in Greece.

The healthcare sector globally is confronted with increasing internal and external pressures that urge for a radical reform of health systems' status quo. The role of technological innovations such as Electronic Health Records (EHR) is recognized as instrumental in this transition process as it is expected to accelerate organizational innovations. This is why the widespread uptake of EHR systems is a top priority in the global healthcare agenda. The successful co-deployment though of EHR systems and organizational innovations within the context of secondary healthcare institutions is a complex and multifaceted issue. Existing research in the field has made little progress thus emphasizing the need for further research contribution that will incorporate a holistic perspective. This paper presents insights about the EHR-organizational innovation interplay from a public hospital in Greece into a socio-technical analytical framework providing a multilevel set of action points for the eHealth roadmap with worldwide relevance.

EHR System MojTermin: Implementation and Initial Data Analysis.

Healthcare informatics has gained importance over the last several years. E-health systems on a national level have already been implemented in most European countries. Data generated by these systems are used to improve healthcare policies as well as health services. In this paper we present the system MojTermin (MyAppointment), as it evolves from a healthcare appointment engine to a complete national e-health system. We also present preliminary results from data gathered during the implementation of this system. In our analysis, we show how the system aided in the discovery of several specific socio-cultural phenomena, which led to governance changes in order to optimize resourses and raise the quality of the entire national healthcare system.

[Integration of primary and secondary data in the Study of Health in Pomerania and description of clinical outcomes using stroke as an example]. / Die Integration von Primär- und Sekundärdaten in der Study of Health in Pomerania und die Beschreibung von klinischen Endpunkten am Beispiel Schlaganfall.

OBJECTIVE: This study describes (i) the procedure of obtaining patients' consent for secondary data usage, (ii) the complexity of integrating data from multiple sources, and (iii) the correspondence among patients' self-reports, physician reports, routine data, hospital discharge diagnosis, and cause-of-death coding regarding stroke. METHODS: Data from the first follow-up (N=3 186) of the population-based Study of Health in Pomerania (SHIP) were used. These data were combined with secondary data from the Greifswald University Hospital, the association of statutory health insurance physicians Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania, physician reports, and death certificates. RESULTS: Consent for using health-related information from all data sources in question was obtained from more than 90% of the SHIP participants. Follow-up data from at least one source were available for 2 747 (86%) participants. For 92 participants information about the occurrence of stroke was found in at least one data source. In 59 cases the event appeared in only one data source, in 24 cases the event was found in 2 sources, and for 9 participants 3 data sources reported on the event. CONCLUSION: Participants of a population-based cohort are highly willing to give consent for using their health-related information from secondary data sources. Yet, data integration is challenging due to considerable differences in data type, structure and coverage.

Meaningful use: a national framework for integrated telemedicine.

INTRODUCTION: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services has incentivized electronic health records (EHRs) implementation through meaningful use (MU) to improve healthcare quality and efficacy. Telemedicine is a key tool that has shown its ability to facilitate MU through technological innovation with cost savings and has shown promise in the area of integrated behavioral healthcare. The purpose of this article is to propose a model of MU to frame the incentivized implementation of an integrated telemedicine (ITM)-specific model to effect system-level change. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the background, principles, and a justification for the ITM Model including cost issues, the development and structure of MU in the context of EHRs, the benefits of integrated behavioral healthcare and telemedicine, and the case for their combined implementation in the form of ITM. RESULTS: The model proposed, the ITM Incentive Program, parallels the current MU program and is composed of three stages. Stage 1 focuses on incentivizing current and new Medicaid providers to adapt, implement, and upgrade technology needed to conduct virtual meetings with patients and other healthcare professionals. Stage 2 is a tiered incentive system with process-focused and track metrics related to increasing the number of consultations with patients. In Stage 3, providers are encouraged to continue use of ITM by meeting thresholds for several objectives focused on clinical outcomes. Recommendations for implementing this model within a payment waiver system are discussed. CONCLUSIONS: The ITM Model offers a needed union of integrated care and telemedicine through the combination of technology, business, and clinical processes. The success of MU as a tiered incentive program for EHRs, as well as the precedent of using waiver opportunities for incentive funding repayments, sets forth a strategic framework to successful implementation of ITM to address cost issues and improve quality and access to care in the healthcare system.

[Linking claims data and beneficiary survey information to report on the quality of health care: potential, pitfalls, and perspectives]. / Routinedaten der gesetzlichen Krankenversicherung und Versichertenbefragungen in der Qualitätsberichterstattung - Potenzial, Probleme und Perspektiven.

Reports on the quality of care aim at health and patient-reported outcomes in routine clinical care. To achieve meaningful information the study designs must be robust against bias through highly selected patient populations or health care providers but also allow for adequate control of confounding. The article describes the potential and pitfalls of administrative claims data and surveys of beneficiaries. The large potential of using both sources is illustrated in the primary inpatient treatment for prostate cancer. However, linking claims data and patient survey data still leaves some problems to be addressed in the final section. Linking claims data and beneficiary survey information on patient reported outcomes overcomes sectoral barriers and allows for an integrated evaluation of pathways of care in the short-, mid- and long-term. It is economical and well suited for a variety, but not all health care problems. Future efforts might be directed towards more collaboration among sickness funds.

Stage 1 of the meaningful use incentive program for electronic health records: a study of readiness for change in ambulatory practice settings in one integrated delivery system.

BACKGROUND: Meaningful Use (MU) provides financial incentives for electronic health record (EHR) implementation. EHR implementation holds promise for improving healthcare delivery, but also requires substantial changes for providers and staff. Establishing readiness for these changes may be important for realizing potential EHR benefits. Our study assesses whether provider/staff perceptions about the appropriateness of MU and their departments' ability to support MU-related changes are associated with their reported readiness for MU-related changes. METHODS: We surveyed providers and staff representing 47 ambulatory practices within an integrated delivery system. We assessed whether respondent's role and practice-setting type (primary versus specialty care) were associated with reported readiness for MU (i.e., willingness to change practice behavior and ability to document actions for MU) and hypothesized predictors of readiness (i.e., perceived appropriateness of MU and department support for MU). We then assessed associations between reported readiness and the hypothesized predictors of readiness. RESULTS: In total, 400 providers/staff responded (response rate approximately 25%). Individuals working in specialty settings were more likely to report that MU will divert attention from other patient-care priorities (12.6% vs. 4.4%, p = 0.019), as compared to those in primary-care settings. As compared to advanced-practice providers and nursing staff, physicians were less likely to have strong confidence in their department's ability to solve MU implementation problems (28.4% vs. 47.1% vs. 42.6%, p = 0.023) and to report strong willingness to change their work practices for MU (57.9% vs. 83.3% vs. 82.0%, p < 0.001). Finally, provider/staff perceptions about whether MU aligns with departmental goals (OR = 3.99, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.13 to 7.48); MU will divert attention from other patient-care priorities (OR = 2.26, 95% CI = 1.26 to 4.06); their department will support MU-related change efforts (OR = 3.99, 95% CI = 2.13 to 7.48); and their department will be able to solve MU implementation problems (OR = 2.26, 95% CI = 1.26 to 4.06) were associated with their willingness to change practice behavior for MU. CONCLUSIONS: Organizational leaders should gauge provider/staff perceptions about appropriateness and management support of MU-related change, as these perceptions might be related to subsequent implementation.

Characteristics of patient portals developed in the context of health information exchanges: early policy effects of incentives in the meaningful use program in the United States.

BACKGROUND: In 2014, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services in the United States launched the second stage of its Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Program, providing financial incentives to providers to meaningfully use their electronic health records to engage patients online. Patient portals are electronic means to engage patients by enabling secure access to personal medical records, communication with providers, various self-management tools, and administrative functionalities. Outcomes of patient portals have mainly been reported in large integrated health systems. This may now change as the EHR Incentive Program enables and supports the use of patient portals in other types of health systems. In this paper, we focus on Health Information Exchanges (HIE): entities that facilitate data exchange within networks of independent providers. OBJECTIVE: In response to the EHR Incentive Program, some Health Information Exchanges in the United States are developing patient portals and offering them to their network of providers. Such patient portals hold high value for patients, especially in fragmented health system contexts, due to the portals' ability to integrate health information from an array of providers and give patients one access point to this information. Our aim was to report on the early effects of the EHR incentives on patient portal development by HIEs. Specifically, we describe the characteristics of these portals, identify factors affecting adoption by providers during the 2013-2014 time frame, and consider what may be the primary drivers of providers' adoption of patient portals in the future. METHODS: We identified four HIEs that were developing patient portals as of spring 2014. We collected relevant documents and conducted interviews with six HIE leaders as well as two providers that were implementing the portals in their practices. We performed content analysis on these data to extract information pertinent to our study objectives. RESULTS: Our findings suggest that there are two primary types of patient portals available to providers in HIEs: (1) portals linked to EHRs of individual providers or health systems and (2) HIE-sponsored portals that link information from multiple providers' EHRs. The decision of providers in the HIEs to adopt either one of these portals appears to be a trade-off between functionality, connectivity, and cost. Our findings also suggest that while the EHR Incentive Program is influencing these decisions, it may not be enough to drive adoption. Rather, patient demand for access to patient portals will be necessary to achieve widespread portal adoption and realization of potential benefits. CONCLUSIONS: Optimizing patient value should be the main principle underlying policies intending to increase online patient engagement in the third stage of the EHR Incentive Program. We propose a number of features for the EHR Incentive Program that will enhance patient value and thereby support the growth and sustainability of patient portals provided by Health Information Exchanges.

Enabling Person-Centric Care using linked data technologies.

Patient-Centric Care requires comprehensive visibility into the strengths and vulnerabilities of individuals and populations. The systems involved in Patient-Centric Care are numerous and heterogeneous, span medical, behavioral and social domains and must be coordinated across government and NGO stakeholders in Health Care, Social Care and more. We present a system, based on Linked Data technologies, taking first steps in making this cross-domain information accessible and fit-for-use, using minimal structure and open vocabularies. We evaluate our system through user studies.

Augmented meaningful use criteria to identify patients eligible for lung cancer screening.

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer screening (LCS) with low-dose-radiation (low-dose computed tomography [LDCT]) saves lives. Despite recent US Preventive Services Task Force (USPTF) draft endorsement of LCS, a minority of eligible patients get screened. Meaningful use is a set of standards for electronic health records (EHR) established by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and includes reporting of smoking status. We sought to improve rates of LCS among patients treated at our institution by identifying eligible patients using augmented smoking-related meaningful use criteria. METHODS: We launched an LCS program at our institution, a National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) cancer center, in January 2013. We developed a "tobacco screen," administered by clinic staff to all adult outpatients every 6 months and entered into the EHR. This contained smoking-related meaningful use criteria as well as a pack-year calculation and quit date if applicable. Weekly electronic reports of patients who met eligibility criteria for LCS were generated, and EHR review excluded patients who had had chest computed tomography (CT) within 12 months or who were undergoing cancer treatment. We then contacted eligible patients to review eligibility for LCS and communicated with the primary treating physician regarding the plan for LCS. RESULTS: During the first 3 months of the program, 4 patients were enrolled, 2 by physician referral and 2 by self-referral. We then began to use the tobacco screen reports and identified 418 patients potentially eligible for LCS. Over the next 7 months, we enrolled a total of 110 patients. Fifty-eight (53%) were identified from the tobacco screen, 32 (29%) were self-referred, and 20 (18%) were physician referrals. Three stage I lung cancers were detected and treated. The tobacco screen was easily implemented by clinic staff and took a median time of 2 minutes to enter for current and former smokers. Lack of response to attempts at telephone contact and objection to paying out-of-pocket costs were the most common reasons for failing to screen eligible patients. CONCLUSIONS: Use of augmented meaningful use criteria containing detailed tobacco exposure history is feasible and allows for identification of patients eligible for LCS in a medical center. Barriers to LCS include lack of insurance coverage and lack of systematic referral of patients at high risk.

Assessing the legacy of a legislative Workgroup for bidirectional integration of services.

Across the USA, health care systems are recognizing the value of integrating behavioral health services and primary care. The Texas Legislature took a unique approach to integration, passing legislation creating a Workgroup to explore key issues, identify best practices, and recommend policy and practice changes. This article situates the Workgroup in a rapidly evolving policy environment, describing the passage of integrated health care legislation in Texas, the Integration of Health and Behavioral Health Services Workgroup that was created by the legislation, and the policy recommendations that emerged from the Workgroup. The article analyzes how the Workgroup process intersected with a changing policy environment in Texas and nationally, opening the door for essential collaboration and partnership. The Workgroup ultimately laid the groundwork for integration's key role in a comprehensive Medicaid transformation waiver designed to expand access, improve population health and satisfaction with treatment, while better managing costs.

Impacts of EHR Certification and Meaningful Use Implementation on an Integrated Delivery Network.

Three years ago Intermountain Healthcare made the decision to participate in the Medicare and Medicaid Electronic Heath Record (EHR) Incentive Program which required that hospitals and providers use a certified EHR in a meaningful way. At that time, the barriers to enhance our home grown system, and change clinician workflows were numerous and large. This paper describes the time and effort required to enhance our legacy systems in order to pass certification, including filling 47 gaps in (EHR) functionality. We also describe the processes and resources that resulted in successful changes to many clinical workflows required by clinicians to meet meaningful use requirements. In 2011 we set meaningful use targets of 75% of employed physicians and 75% of our hospitals to meet Stage 1 of meaningful use by 2013. By the end of 2013, 87% of 696 employed eligible professionals and 100% of 22 Intermountain hospitals had successfully attested for Stage 1. This paper describes documented and perceived costs to Intermountain including time, effort, resources, postponement of other projects, as well as documented and perceived benefits of attainment of meaningful use.

Measuring the performance of electronic health records: a case study in residential aged care in Australia.

Measuring the performance of electronic health records (EHR) is an important, yet un-resolved challenge. Various measurements have addressed different aspects of EHR success, yet a holistic, comprehensive measurement tool needs to be developed to capture the potential EHR success variables completely. A self-administered questionnaire survey instrument was developed based on the theoretical framework of the DeLone and McLean Information Systems Success Model. It measures nigh variables of EHR success: system quality, information quality, service quality, training, self efficacy, intention to use, use, user satisfaction and net benefits. The instrument was used to measure the performance of aged care EHR systems in three aged care organizations. The results suggest that the instrument was reliable.