The effect of mind-body exercise on cervical spine mobility of people with neck discomfort: A systemic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Long-term and high-intensity work can lead to considerable discomfort in people's cervical spines. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to explore the effect of mind-body exercise intervention on the cervical spine mobility of people with neck discomfort through meta-analysis. METHODS: This study's researchers were searched a total of five research databases for data retrieval: China National Knowledge Infrastructure (from 1979), Web of Science (from 1950), PubMed (from 1965), Cochrane (from 1991), and EBSCO (from 1949) (Date of retrieval: March 10, 2021). Two authors independently searched literature records, scanned titles, abstracts, and full texts, collected data, and assessed materials for risk of bias. Stata14.0 software was used for the data analysis (Registration number: INPLASY202140126). RESULTS: Four articles were finally included with a total of 208 participants, and their age range was 18-65 years old. (1) Mind-body exercise intervention had a significant improving effect on Cervical extension, effect size of [SMD = 0.51 (95% CI 0.13 to 0.88), p <0.01; I2 = 45.2%], there was moderate heterogeneity; Mind-body exercise intervention had a significant improving effect on Cervical flexion, effect size of [SMD = 0.61 (95% CI 0.32 to 0.90), p <0.01; I2 = 5.7%], no heterogeneity; (2) Mind-body exercise intervention was no effect on the other four cervical range of motions; (3) The difference in participant's neck discomfort was the source of heterogeneity, and all results had the potential risk of publication bias. CONCLUSION: This study showed that mind-body exercise had a positive effect on the extension and flexion of people with neck discomfort. However, further research and more reliable evidence were needed to prove that mind-body exercise could be used for the treatment of neck discomfort.

Impact of Cervical Spine Rehabilitation on Temporomandibular Joint Functioning in Patients with Idiopathic Neck Pain.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of a 3-week rehabilitation programme focusing only on the cervical region, pain intensity, range of motion in the cervical spine, head posture, and temporomandibular joint (TMJ) functioning in subjects with idiopathic neck pain who did not report TMJ pain. DESIGN: A parallel group trial with follow-up. METHODS: The study included 60 participants divided into 2 groups: experimental: n = 25, 27-57 years old, experiencing idiopathic neck pain and who underwent a 3-week rehabilitation programme, and the control, n = 35, 27-47 years, who were cervical pain-free. At baseline and after 3 weeks of treatment in the experimental group and with a 3-week time interval in the control group, pain intensity, head posture in the sagittal plane, range of motion in the cervical spine, and TMJ functioning were evaluated. RESULTS: After 3 weeks of rehabilitation, there was a significant decrease in pain intensity, improved range of motion of the cervical spine and head posture, and improved clinical condition of TMJ in participants with idiopathic neck pain who did not report TMJ pain. CONCLUSION: The study suggested that idiopathic neck pain is associated with limited range of motion in the cervical spine, incorrect head posture, and TMJ dysfunction. Our data suggests that therapy focusing only on the cervical region may improve the clinical condition of the TMJ in subjects with idiopathic neck pain who do not report TMJ pain. These observations could be helpful in physiotherapeutic treatment of neck and craniofacial area dysfunctions. This trial is registered with ISRCTN Registry ISRCTN14511735.

Manual Therapy as a Management of Cervical Radiculopathy: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Cervical radiculopathy is defined as a disorder involving dysfunction of the cervical nerve roots characterised by pain radiating and/or loss of motor and sensory function towards the root affected. There is no consensus on a good definition of the term. In addition, the evidence regarding the effectiveness of manual therapy in radiculopathy is contradictory. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of manual therapy in improving pain, functional capacity, and range of motion in treating cervical radiculopathy with and without confirmation of altered nerve conduction. METHODS: Systematic review of randomised clinical trials on cervical radiculopathy and manual therapy, in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, PEDro, and Cochrane Library Plus databases. The PRISMA checklist was followed. Methodological quality was evaluated using the PEDro scale and RoB 2.0. tool. RESULTS: 17 clinical trials published in the past 10 years were selected. Manual therapy was effective in the treatment of symptoms related to cervical radiculopathy in all studies, regardless of the type of technique and dose applied. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review did not establish which manual therapy techniques are the most effective for cervical radiculopathy with electrophysiological confirmation of altered nerve conduction. Without this confirmation, the application of manual therapy, regardless of the protocol applied and the manual therapy technique selected, appears to be effective in reducing chronic cervical pain and decreasing the index of cervical disability in cervical radiculopathy in the short term. However, it would be necessary to agree on a definition and diagnostic criteria of radiculopathy, as well as the definition and standardisation of manual techniques, to analyse the effectiveness of manual therapy in cervical radiculopathy in depth.

The effect of mind-body exercise on the cervical spine mobility of people with neck discomfort: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: With the development of the economy and society, the pace of in-person work has gradually accelerated, resulting in longer and more intense work hours. Long-term and high-intensity work can lead to considerable discomfort in people's cervical spines. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to explore the effect of mind-body exercise intervention on the cervical spine mobility of people with neck discomfort through meta-analysis. METHODS: This study's researchers will search a total of 5 research databases for data retrieval: China National Knowledge Infrastructure (from 1979), Web of Science (from 1950), PubMed (from 1965), Cochrane (from 1991), and EBSCO (from 1949) (Date of retrieval: March 10, 2021). Two authors will independently search literature records, scan titles, abstracts, and full texts, collect data, and assess materials for risk of bias. Stata14.0 software will be used for the data analysis. RESULTS: The current study is a systematic review and meta-analysis program with no results. Data analysis will be completed after the program has been completed. DISCUSSION: There is potential evidence that exercise can have a positive effect on the cervical spine mobility of people with cervical spine discomfort. In addition, direct evidence of the benefits of mind-body exercise intervention may be more important. INPLASY REGISTRATION NUMBER: INPLASY202140126.

Clinical Efficacy and Safety of "Three-Dimensional Balanced Manipulation" in the Treatment of Cervical Spondylotic Radiculopathy by Finite Element Analysis.

Cervical spondylotic radiculopathy (CSR) is the most commonly encountered cervical spine disorder. Cervical manipulation has been demonstrated as an effective therapy for patients. However, the mechanisms of manipulations have not been elucidated. A total of 120 cervical spondylotic radiculopathy patients were divided into the "three-dimensional balanced manipulation" treatment group (TBM group) and control group randomly. The control group was treated with traditional massage; the TBM treatment group was treated with "three-dimensional balanced manipulation" based on traditional massage. The symptoms and clinical efficacy of the patients were compared before and after treatment for one month. A three-dimensional finite element model was established. The mechanical parameters were imported to simulate TBM, and finite element analysis was performed. The results showed that the total effective rate was significantly higher in the TBM group compared with the control group. The biomechanical analysis showed the vertebral body stress was mainly distributed in the C3/4 spinous processes; the deformation mainly concentrated in the anterior processes of the C3 vertebral body. The intervertebral disc stress in the C3~C7 segment was mainly distributed in the anterior part of the C3/4 intervertebral disc, and the deformation extends to the posterior part of the C3/4 nucleus pulposus. In summary, these data are suggesting that TBM was effective in CSR treatment. The results of the finite element model and biomechanical analysis provide an important foundation for effectively avoiding iatrogenic injuries and improving the effect of TBM in the treatment of CSR patients.

Effects of the Manual Therapy Approach of Segments C0-1 and C2-3 in the Flexion-Rotation Test in Patients with Chronic Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background: Flexion-rotation test predominantly measures rotation in C1-2 segment. Restriction in flexion-rotation may be due to direct limitation in C1-2, but also to a premature tightening of the alar ligament as a result of lack of movement in C0-1 or C2-3. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of a 20-min single cervical exercise session, with or without manual therapy of C0-1 and C2-3 segment in flexion-rotation test, in patients with chronic neck pain and positive flexion-rotation test. Methods: Randomized controlled clinical trial in 48 subjects (24 manual therapy+exercise/24 exercise). Range of motion and pain during flexion-rotation test, neck pain intensity and active cervical range of motion were measured before and after the intervention. Results: Significant differences were found in favour of the manual therapy group in the flexion-rotation test: right (p < 0.001) and left rotation (p < 0.001); pain during the flexion-rotation test: right (p < 0.001) and left rotation (p < 0.001); neck pain intensity: (p < 0.001); cervical flexion (p < 0.038), extension (p < 0.010), right side-bending (p < 0.035), left side-bending (p < 0.002), right rotation (p < 0.001), and left rotation (p < 0.006). Conclusions: Addition of one C0-C1 and C2-C3 manual therapy session to cervical exercise can immediately improve flexion-rotation test and cervical range of motion and reduce pain intensity.

A Pilot Longitudinal Study of 3-Dimensional Head and Neck Kinematics During Functional Tasks in Individuals With Chronic Idiopathic Neck Pain Either Wait-Listed for or Receiving Chiropractic Spinal Manipulative Therapy With Exercise.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine if there is a relationship between pain and movement kinematics during functional tasks, evaluated over time, in individuals with chronic idiopathic neck pain. METHODS: Ten participants with chronic idiopathic neck pain performed 2 functional tasks (overhead reach to the right and putting on a seatbelt) while evaluated using 8 Oqus 300+ cameras. Kinematic variables included joint angles and range of motion (ROM) (°), head segment relative to neck segment (head-neck [HN]); and head/neck segment relative to upper thoracic segment (head/neck-trunk), velocity (m/s), and time (% of movement phase). Pain was quantified using a 100-mm visual analog scale. Linear mixed effects regression models were used to analyze associations between pain and kinematic variables adjusting for treatment group. RESULTS: For overhead reach, higher pain was associated with less HN peak rotation at baseline (ß = -0.33; 95% CI -0.52 to -0.14, P = .003) and less HN total rotation ROM at 6 months (ß = -0.19; 95% CI -0.38 to -0.003, P = .048). For the seatbelt task, higher pain was associated with less HN peak rotation (ß = -0.52; 95% CI -0.74 to -0.30 to -0.74, P < .001) and less HN total rotation ROM at baseline (ß = -0.32; 95% CI -0.53 to -0.10, P = .006). No other movement variables demonstrated meaningful relationships with pain for the reach or seatbelt tasks. CONCLUSION: Higher pain is associated with less HN peak and total rotation during functional reaching tasks requiring head rotation. Recognizing altered functional kinematics in individuals with chronic neck pain may assist patient management.

Relationship Between Intensity of Neck Pain and Disability and Shoulder Pain and Disability in Individuals With Subacromial Impingement Symptoms: A Cross-Sectional Study.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to verify a possible relationship between shoulder disability and shoulder pain intensity and the variables related to cervical-spine dysfunction, and determine which of these can differentiate moderate to severe shoulder pain (>4 on a numerical rating scale [NRS]) from mild shoulder pain (≤4 on the NRS) in individuals with subacromial impingement symptoms. METHODS: One hundred and forty volunteers with shoulder pain were evaluated. Demographic information and variables related to the shoulder and neck were collected. Self-reported pain and disability of the shoulder and cervical spine were measured using the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) and Neck Disability Index (NDI) questionnaires, respectively. An NRS was used to measure pain in the shoulder and cervical spine. A purposeful modeling strategy was used to determine the best model to predict shoulder disability and shoulder pain (dependent variables). Multiple logistic regression analysis followed by receiver operating curve analysis was used to determine which variables better differentiated moderate to severe shoulder pain from mild shoulder pain. RESULTS: Variables such as Neck Disability Index (NDI) score (ß = 1.09, P = .00) and age (ß = -0.19, P = .03) were associated with the total SPADI score. Neck pain was significantly associated with shoulder pain (ß = 0.40, P = .00). The combination of variables predicting moderate to severe shoulder pain was total SPADI score (odds ratio [OR] = 1.15, P = .003), neck pain (OR = 3.20, P = .04), and age (OR = 1.01, P = .05). CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate the important connection between shoulder- and neck-related symptoms in individuals with subacromial impingement symptoms.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Investigation of Cervical-Spine Meniscoid Composition: A Validation Study.

OBJECTIVE: The composition of cervical-spine meniscoids may have clinical significance in neck-pain conditions, but the accuracy of assessment of meniscoid composition in vivo using magnetic resonance imaging has not been established. The aim of this study was to compare cervical-spine meniscoid composition by magnetic resonance imaging with histologic composition. METHODS: Four embalmed cadaveric cervical spines (mean [standard deviation] age, 79.5 [3.7] years; 1 female, 3 male) underwent magnetic resonance imaging, allowing radiologic classification of lateral atlantoaxial- and zygapophyseal-joint (C2-3 to C6-7) meniscoids as either mostly fatty, mixed tissue, or mostly connective tissue. Subsequently, each joint was dissected and disarticulated to allow excision of meniscoids for histologic processing. Each meniscoid was sectioned sagittally, stained with hematoxylin and eosin, examined using light microscopy, and classified as adipose, fibroadipose, or fibrous in composition. Data were analyzed using the kappa statistic with linear weighting. RESULTS: From dissection, 62 meniscoids were identified, excised, and processed; 46 of these 62 were visualized with magnetic resonance imaging. For single-rater identifying structures, agreement between assessment of meniscoid composition by magnetic resonance imaging and by microscopy was fair (κ = 0.24; 95% confidence interval, 0.02-0.46; P = .02). CONCLUSION: Findings suggest that the accuracy of this method of magnetic resonance imaging assessment of cervical-spine meniscoid composition may be limited. This should be considered when planning or interpreting research investigating meniscoid composition using magnetic resonance imaging.

Intrarater and Interrater Reliability of the Flexion Rotation Test and Cervical Range of Motion in People With Migraine.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the reliability, standard error of measurement (SEM), and smallest detectable change (SDC) of the flexion rotation test (FRT) and cervical range of motion (CROM) assessed with the CROM device in individuals with and without migraine. METHODS: Twenty-five women with migraine (mean age, 35 years; standard deviation, 10 years) and 25 comparable headache-free women (mean age, 32 years; standard deviation, 11 years) participated in this study. C1/C2 mobility was assessed with the FRT, whereas global cervical range of motion was calculated using a CROM device. To assess the interrater reliability, tests were conducted on the same day at 20-minute intervals, by 2 independent assessors, and they were repeated after a 1-week interval by the same assessor to evaluate the intrarater reliability. The mean value of 3 repetitions was used to calculate the intraclass correlation coefficient ICC(2,k), SEM, and SDC. RESULTS: The intrarater reliability was excellent (ICC > 0.83), and interrater reliability ranged from substantial to excellent (ICC > 0.77) for the FRT. The SEM ranged from 2.44° to 2.85°, and the SDC from 6.78° to 7.9°. Intrarater and interrater reliability for cervical range of motion was substantial to excellent (ICC > 0.65), with the SEM ranging from 2.03° to 5.46° and the SDC from 5.6° to 15.14°. CONCLUSION: The results demonstrate that FRT and global cervical range of motion with a CROM device show high reliability in individuals with migraine. In addition, the SEM and SDC were relatively small. Both assessments can be used for clinical evaluation of the cervical spine in individuals with migraine.

Effects of static stretching as compared to autogenic inhibition and reciprocal inhibition muscle energy techniques in the management of mechanical neck pain: a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of static stretching with autogenic inhibition and reciprocal inhibition muscle energy techniques on pain, disability and range of motion in patients with mechanical neck pain. METHODS: A parallel design randomised controlled trial was conducted at Fauji Foundation Hospital and Railway-General Hospital, Rawalpindi, Pakistan, from April to November, 2017, and comprised of patients aged 18-70 years with neck pain of moderate intensity scoring 4-8 on numeric pain rating scale with limited or painful range of motion. The patients were randomly allocated via lottery method into static stretching group, autogenic inhibition muscle energy technique group and reciprocal inhibition muscle energy technique group. All the subjects received five consecutive treatments sessions. Outcome measurements included numeric pain rating scale score, neck disability index score and goniometry for cervical range of motion. Data was collected at baseline and after first and fifth sessions, and was analysed using SPSS 21. RESULTS: Of the 78 subjects, there were 26(33.3%) in each of the three groups. Of them 7 were lost to follow-up and the study was completed by 71(91%) subjects. The overall mean age was 41.55±11.89 years (p>0.05). There was no significant difference between the groups at baseline (p>0.05). However, at first and second follow-up, there was a significant difference (p<0.05) between the groups in terms of immediate and short-term relief, except for immediate effects related to range of motion (p=0.056). CONCLUSIONS: Significant difference existed among static stretching, autogenic inhibition and reciprocal inhibition groups in terms of pain, disability and range of motion in patients with mechanical neck pain.

Effectiveness of manual therapy to the cervical spine with and without manual therapy to the upper thoracic spine in the management of non-specific neck pain; a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the effectiveness of manual therapy to the cervical spine with and without manual therapy to the upper thoracic spine in the management of non-specific neck pain. METHODS: The randomized controlled trial was conducted at 3 different hospitals in Peshawar, Pakistan, from October 2016 to January 2017, and comprised patients suffering from non-specific neck pain aged 25-60 years. The control group received cervical manual therapy alone while the experimental group received cervical along with thoracic manual therapy for 2 weeks. Data was analysed using SPSS 20. RESULTS: Of the 37 subjects, 20(54%) were cases and 17(46%) were controls.The overall mean age was 35.9±9.6 years. There was no significant difference between the groups at baseline in terms of the levels of pain (p=0.125) and disability (p=0.392). The experimental group showed greater reduction in pain (p=0.02) and disability (p=0.03) compared to the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Cervical along with thoracic manual therapy reduced neck pain and associated neck disability more effectively than cervical manual therapy alone.

Effect of muscle energy techniques and facet joint mobilization on spinal curvature in patients with mechanical neck pain: A pilot study.

Neck is one of the most common site of musculoskeletal symptom manifestations. An impaired spinal curvature is a common finding in patients with mechanical neck pain. A pre-post quasi experimental pilot study was conducted at Fauji Foundation Hospital from January- March 2017,in which 12 patients with mechanical neck pain and straightening of the cervical spine were included and treated for 7 consecutive sessions consisting of muscle energy techniques (MET) in combination with facet joint mobilization. The objective of this study was to determine the effects of MET and facet joint mobilization on spinal curvature and functional outcomes in patients with neck pain. Outcome measurement tools that were included comprised of pain severity, neck disability index (NDI), cervical lordosis which was measured via x-ray based posterior tangential method, goniometry for cervical range of motion (ROM) and modified sphygmomanometer dynamometry (MSD) for isometric muscle strength. A significant difference was observed in pre and post treatment scores for all outcomes (p<0.05); demonstrating an effective combination therapy in terms of improved spinal curvature, pain, disability, ROM and isometric muscle strength.

Isometric osteopathic manipulation influences on cervical ranges of motion and correlation with osteopathic palpatory diagnosis: A randomized trial.

INTRODUCTION: Isometric manipulation is a current practice in osteopathy and treatment benefits have been reported in the literature. Such benefits could be assessed using experimental non-invasive cervical mobility measurements. The main objective was to quantitatively measure the effects of isometric manipulation on principal and compensatory cervical motions. METHODS: 101 healthy volunteers were included in this study. 51 healthy volunteers selected randomly underwent the experimental protocol before and after isometric treatment and were compared to 50 healthy volunteers who underwent a placebo treatment. Osteopathic diagnosis was performed on each healthy volunteer before and after the treatment. The experimental protocol included measurements by a motion capture system focusing on principal range of motion and compensatory motions. RESULTS: In both the isometric and the placebo sample, respectively including 51 (age: 29.2 ± 8.1, BMI: 22.2 ± 3.5) and 50 healthy volunteers (age: 27.4 ± 6.8, BMI: 22.9 ± 2.8), a pre-treatment diagnosis revealed a light cervical dysfunction in all subjects, mainly in levels C3 and C4. Altered ranges of motion thresholds (C3/C4 alterations) were identified: 113.2° for flexion, 130.0° for rotation and 90.2° for lateral flexion. After manipulations, the volunteers who underwent the isometric treatment presented a slight increase in amplitude for lateral flexion (p < 0.04), which was not found in the volunteers who underwent the placebo treatment. Compensatory motions showed differences pre and post isometric treatment without reaching significant values. CONCLUSION: Principal ranges of motion were found significantly higher after osteopathic treatment when compared to the placebo treatment. Osteopathic palpatory diagnosis showed significant correlation with range of motions before treatment.

Biological, Mechanical or Physical? Conservative Treatment of Cervical Radiculopathy.

BACKGROUND: There is equivocal evidence in support of the effectiveness of each of the three co-existing approaches to conservative treatment of cervical radiculopathy (CR): biological (regenerative), mechanical (decompression) and physical (analgesic and anti-inflammatory). The aim of the study was to compare the effectiveness of the three treatment approaches in CR. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 90 patients were assigned to six treatment groups. Biological treatment: 4 ultra-sound-guided periradicular injections of ACS or PRP (1 per week); Mechanical treatment: manual therapy (MT) or traction therapy (TT) - 8 ses-sions (two per week); Physical treatment: laser therapy (LT) or collagen magnetophoresis (CM) - 8 sessions (two per week). As-sessment: before therapy (W0), after completion of the treatment (W1), two months after completion (W2). Assessment tools: NRS (0-10), NDI (0-50), cross section root area in mm2 in ultrasound examination (CRA) and hand sensorimotor function test (DPT). RESULTS: The largest reduction in mean NRS, NDI and CRA values at W2 was observed with the biological treatments (NRS: ACS 71.7%, PRP 70.6%, NDI: ACS 61.5%, PRP 56.6%, CRA: ACS 23.6 %, PRP 25%). Improvement of hand sensorimotor functions was observed at both W1 and W2 only in the PRP group. The PRP group demonstrated a stronger analgesic effect than the ACS group at W1 (58.82% compared to 43.39%), but ACS therapy had the same effectiveness during the follow-up period. Other methods reduced pain and disability at W1, but further reduction of mean NRS values during the follow-up period was only evident in the CM group (32.25%), very mild in the MM (19.35%) and LT groups (18.75%), and the TT group actually demonstrated a regression (-5.58%). In 3 cases, TT exacerbated the symptoms, which resulted in termination of the therapy. CONCLUSIONS: 1. Biological treatments were more effective than mechanical and physical therapies in reducing pain, im-proving the disability index and proprioception of the hand both immediately on completion of therapy and after a follow-up period, which may suggest their regenerative properties. 2. Physical and mechanical therapies produced improvement in the above-mentioned indicators on completion of the therapy, but subsequently exerted a very slight effect during the follow-up period without evident regenerative effects; moreover, a regression of the results was actually recorded for traction therapy. 3. Caution should be paid when using traction therapy in the acute period of root oedema, due to possible signs of intolerance of the procedure and exacerbation of the discomfort.

Alterations of functional connectivity between thalamus and cortex before and after decompression in cervical spondylotic myelopathy patients: a resting-state functional MRI study.

OBJECTIVE: Cervical spondylotic myelopathy is regarded as a chronic, special incomplete spinal cord injury, so the sensory components transmitted to thalamus decreased after distal spinal cord injury, which lead the disturbance of thalamus-cortex circuits, which might explain the alterations of clinical function of cervical spondylotic myelopathy patients. However, for lack of effective methods to evaluate the disturbance circuits and how the relative mechanism adapt to the recovery of cervical spondylotic myelopathy patients after decompression. Therefore, this study aim to explore how the possible mechanism of thalamus-cortex circuits reorganization adapt to the recovery of clinical function. METHODS: Regard thalamus as the interest area, we evaluate the brain functional connectivity within 43 pre-operative cervical spondylotic myelopathy patients, 21 post-operative (after 3 months) cervical spondylotic myelopathy patients and 43 healthy controls. Functional connectivity difference between pre-/post-operative cervical spondylotic myelopathy group and healthy controls group were obtained by two independent samples t-test, and difference between pre-operative cervical spondylotic myelopathy and post-operative cervical spondylotic myelopathy group were obtained by paired t-test. Clinical function was measured via Neck Disability Index and Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores. Furthermore, Pearson correlation were used to analyse the correlation between functional connectivity values and clinical scores. RESULTS: Compared with healthy controls group, pre-operative cervical spondylotic myelopathy group showed increased functional connectivity between left thalamus and bilateral lingual gyrus/cuneus/right cerebellum posterior lobe (Voxel P-value <0.01, Cluster P-value <0.05, GRF corrected); post-operative cervical spondylotic myelopathy group manifested decreased functional connectivity between right thalamus and bilateral paracentral lobe/precentral gyrus but significantly increased between right thalamus and pons/superior temporal gyrus. In comparison with pre-operative cervical spondylotic myelopathy group, post-operative cervical spondylotic myelopathy group showed increased functional connectivity between bilateral thalamus and posterior cingulate lobe, angular gyrus, medial prefrontal, but significantly decreased functional connectivity between bilateral thalamus and paracentral lobe/precentral gyrus. The functional connectivity between left thalamus and bilateral lingual gyrus/cuneus/right cerebellum posterior lobe in pre-operative cervical spondylotic myelopathy group have a significantly positive correlation with sensory Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores (r = 0.568, P < 0.001). The functional connectivity between thalamus and paracentral lobe/precentral gyrus in post-operative cervical spondylotic myelopathy group have a significantly positive correlation with upper limb movement Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores (r = 0.448, P = 0.042). CONCLUSION: Pre- or post-operative cervical spondylotic myelopathy patients showed functional connectivity alteration between thalamus and cortex, which suggest adaptive changes may favor the preservation of cortical sensorimotor networks before and after cervical cord decompression, and supply the improvement of clinical function.

Effects of oscillatory mobilization as compared to sustained stretch mobilization in the management of cervical radiculopathy: A randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Cervical radiculopathy is a relatively common musculoskeletal disorder resulting in a significant social and occupational impact. Manual therapy is thought to provide relief in cervical radiculopathy; however, evidence is lacking regarding the comparison of different manual therapy concepts. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of Maitland's oscillatory mobilization as compared to Kaltenborn's sustained stretch mobilization in the management of cervical radiculopathy. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial was conducted at Fauji Foundation Hospital comprising of 46 patients randomized into oscillatory and sustained stretch mobilization groups. Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), Neck Disability Index (NDI) and cervical range of motion (ROM) were used as outcome variables. RESULTS: No significant differences were observed at base line between the two groups (P> 0.05) except for ROM in extension and left side bending (P< 0.05). In terms of pre and post treatment comparison, P value of less than 0.05 was observed for both groups, indicating both treatments to be effective in isolation. However, post treatment comparison between both groups showed oscillatory mobilization to be superior to sustained stretch mobilization (P< 0.05) in the management of cervical radiculopathy except for the outcomes of pain and side bending. CONCLUSION: Both oscillatory and sustained stretch mobilization techniques are found to be effective in the management of cervical radiculopathy in terms of pain, range and disability. However, oscillatory mobilization is found to be superior in terms of functional ability and range of motion.

Effect of Mulligan spinal mobilization with arm movement along with neurodynamics and manual traction in cervical radiculopathy patients: A randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of Mulligan Spinal Mobilisation with Arm Movement along with neurodynamics and manual traction on pain, disablity and cervical range of motion in cervical radiculopathy patients. METHODS: The randomised controlled trial (RCT) was conducted from August to December 2017 at the Railway General Hospital, Rawalpindi, Pakistan, and comprised cervical radiculopathy patients of either gender aged 20-60 years. They were randomised into two groups, with the experimental Group A getting treated with Spinal Mobilisation with Arm Movement along with neurodynamics and manual traction, while the control group B only getting treated with neurodynamics and manual traction. The pain, disability and cervical range of motion were assessed before and after treatment of 3 weeks using Numeric Pain Rating Scale, Neck Disability Index and Goniometry. Data was analyzed using SPSS 21. RESULTS: Of the 31 patients, 19(61.3%) were females and 12(38.7%) were males. The overall mean age was 41.65±9.714 years. There were 15(48.4%) patients in Group A, and 16(51.6%) in Group B. Group A showed significantly better results in terms of pain, disability and cervical range of motion (p<0.05 each). CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated with Spinal Mobilisation with Arm Movement along with neurodynamics and manual traction had better outcome compared to those who only got neurodynamics and manual traction.

Cost-Effectiveness of Jingshu Granules Compared to Placebo for the Treatment of Patients with Cervical Radiculopathy in China: A Decision-Tree Model Based on Randomized Controlled Trial.

Objective: Traditional Chinese Medicines (TCMs), as well as physiotherapy and chemical drugs, are recommended for the treatment of cervical spondylosis by Chinese guidelines for cervical spondylosis diagnosis and treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether TCM Jingshu Granules are cost-effective in patients with cervical radiculopathy in China. Methods: A multicenter, double-blinded, randomized placebo-controlled trial was performed. A total of 480 patients were recruited from 14 tertiary hospitals in China and were randomly divided into an experimental group (Jingshu Granules) or control group (placebo) at a 3:1 ratio. All patients received 4 weeks of treatment. Clinical outcomes and cost data were collected during the trial, including the neck disability index (NDI), visual analog scale (VAS) of pain, VAS of numbness, 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) score, willingness to pay (WTP) for VAS of pain, direct medical costs, and transport costs. From a social perspective, a decision-tree model and cost-effectiveness analysis were conducted. Results: The treatment group has a significant advantage in reducing NDI (9.41 ± 10.51 vs. 4.83 ± 8.43, p < 0.05), VAS of pain (22.72 ± 15.08 vs. 12.86 ± 13.45, p < 0.05), and VAS of numbness (16.96 ± 17.53 vs. 11.64 ± 16.54, p < 0.05), respectively, while there was no significant difference in the improvement of quality of life (QoL; SF-36 score, p > 0.05). The expected mean cost of the experimental group was 1144.34 yuan, and the effective rates were 57.9% for NDI and 72.9% for VAS of pain. The expected mean cost of the control group was 767.41 yuan, and the effective rates were 33.3% for NDI and 51.6% for VAS of pain. For the primary indicators (VAS of pain and NDI), the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was 17.69 and 15.32, respectively. The WTP per efficacy for pain resolution of patients was 19.10 yuan. Setting the WTP as threshold, Jingshu Granules were found to be a cost-effectiveness strategy, and sensitivity analysis showed that the effective rates and inspection fees of both groups had a greater impact on the results of both groups. Conclusions: Jingshu Granules were shown to be effective for treating patients with cervical radiculopathy. This treatment was found to be cost-effective when considering VAS of pain and NDI as clinical outcome indicators compared to no treatment (placebo). A clinical study with longer duration or real world study is needed to determine the impact on QoL of patients in the future.

Efficiency of pulsed electromagnetic fields on pain, disability, anxiety, depression, and quality of life in patients with cervical disc herniation: a randomized controlled study

Background/aim: In this study, it was aimed to investigate the effects ofpulsed electromagnetic field(PEMF) therapy on pain, disability, psychological state, and quality of life in cervical disc herniation. Materials and methods: Patients were randomly divided into two groups, including Group 1, which received a therapy consisting of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), hot pack (HP), and PEMF, and Group 2, which received a magnetic field (sham magnetic field) without current flow in addition to TENS and HP therapy. Pain was assessed by a visual analog scale (VAS, 0­10 cm). The other outcome measures were function (Neck Pain and Disability Scale), anxiety-depressive mood (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), and quality of life (Nottingham Health Profile). All evaluations were performed at baseline, in the 3rd week, and in the 12th week after treatment. Results: A significant improvement was found in the neck pain, disability, depression, anxiety, and quality of life scores of both groups after treatment when compared to those before treatment. However, in the comparison between changes within groups, significant improvements were determined only in the VAS and Nottingham Health Profile sleep subparameter in the 12th week after treatment compared to those before treatment. Conclusion: PEMF therapy in cervical disc herniation can be used safely in routine treatment in addition to conventional physical therapy modalities.