Catheter ablation for non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. A review.

Atrial fibrillation (AF), the most common cardiac arrhythmia is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The higher mortality is due to the risk of heart failure and cardioembolic events. This in-depth review focuses on the strategies and efficacy of catheter ablation for non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. The main medical databases were searched for contemporary studies on catheter ablation for non-paroxysmal AF. Catheter ablation is currently proven to be the most effective treatment for AF and consists of pulmonary vein isolation as the cornerstone plus additional ablations. In terms of SR maintenance, it is less effective in non-paroxysmal AF than in paroxysmal patients. but the clinical benefit in non-paroxysmal patients is substantially higher. Since pulmonary vein isolation is ineffective, a variety of techniques have been developed, e.g. linear ablations, ablation of complex atrial fractionated electrograms, etc. Another paradox consists in the technique of catheter ablation. Despite promising results in early observation studies, further randomized studies have not confirmed the initial enthusiasm. Recently, a new approach, pulsed-field ablation, appears promising. This is an in-depth summary of current technologies and techniques for the ablation of non-paroxysmal AF. We discuss the benefits, risks and implications in the treatment of patients with non-paroxysmal AF.

Reliable focal and rotational activations in CARTOFINDER mapping using the OctaRay catheter.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of the current study was to elucidated the reliable atrial fibrillation (AF) drivers identified by CARTOFINDER using OctaRay catheter. METHODS AND RESULTS: The reliability of focal and rotational activations identified by CARTOFINDER using OctaRay catheter was assessed by the sequential recordings in each site of both atrium before and after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in 10 persistent AF patients. The outcome measures were the reproducibility rate during the sequential recordings and the stability rate between pre- and post-PVI as reliable focal and rotational activations. The study results were compared with those under use of PentaRay catheter (N = 18). Total 68928 points of 360 sites in OctaRay group and 24 177 points of 311 sites in PentaRay were assessed. More focal activation sites were identified in OctaRay group than PentaRay group (7.9% vs. 5.7%, p < .001), although the reproducibility rate and the stability rate were significantly lower in OctaRay group (45.3% vs. 58.9%, p < .001; 11.2% vs. 28.4%, p < .001). Meanwhile, the prevalence of reproducible focal activation sites among overall points was comparable (3.6% vs. 3.3%, p = .08). Regarding rotational activation, more rotational activation sites were identified in OctaRay group (5.1% vs. 0.2%, p < .001), and the reproducibility rate and the stability rate were significantly higher in OctaRay group (45.2% and 12.5% vs. 0.0%, p < .001). Both reliable focal and rotational activation sites were characterized by significantly shorter AF-cycle length (CL) and higher repetition of focal and rotational activations during the recordings compared with the sites of non or unreliable focal and rotational activations. CONCLUSION: In CARTOFINDER, OctaRay catheter could identify reliable focal activation with high resolution and reliable rotational activation compared with PentaRay catheter. The repetitive focal and rotational activations with short AF-CL could be the potential target during ablation.

Baseline left atrial low-voltage area predicts recurrence after pulmonary vein isolation: WAVE-MAP AF results.

AIMS: Electro-anatomical mapping may be critical to identify atrial fibrillation (AF) subjects who require substrate modification beyond pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). The objective was to determine correlations between pre-ablation mapping characteristics and 12-month outcomes after a single PVI-only catheter ablation of AF. METHODS AND RESULTS: This study enrolled paroxysmal AF (PAF), early persistent AF (PsAF; 7 days-3 months), and non-early PsAF (>3-12 months) subjects undergoing de novo PVI-only radiofrequency catheter ablation. Sinus rhythm (SR) and AF voltage maps were created with the Advisor HD Grid™ Mapping Catheter, Sensor Enabled™ for each subject, and the presence of low-voltage area (LVA) (low-voltage cutoffs: 0.1-1.5 mV) was investigated. Follow-up visits were at 3, 6, and 12 months, with a 24-h Holter monitor at 12 months. A Cox proportional hazards model identified associations between mapping data and 12-month recurrence after a single PVI procedure. The study enrolled 300 subjects (113 PAF, 86 early PsAF, and 101 non-early PsAF) at 18 centres. At 12 months, 75.5% of subjects were free from AF/atrial flutter (AFL)/atrial tachycardia (AT) recurrence. Univariate analysis found that arrhythmia recurrence did not correlate with AF diagnosis, but LVA was significantly correlated. Low-voltage area (<0.5 mV) >28% of the left atrium in SR [hazard ratio (HR): 4.82, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.08-11.18; P = 0.0003] and >72% in AF (HR: 5.66, 95% CI: 2.34-13.69; P = 0.0001) was associated with a higher risk of AF/AFL/AT recurrence at 12 months. CONCLUSION: Larger extension of LVA was associated with an increased risk of arrhythmia recurrence. These subjects may benefit from substrate modification beyond PVI.

Impact of Interatrial Epicardial Connections on the Dominant Frequency of Atrial Fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: An epicardial connection (EC) between the right-sided pulmonary venous (RtPV) carina and right atrium (RA) may preclude PV isolation, but its electrophysiological role during atrial fibrillation (AF) remains unknown.Methods and Results: This prospective observational study included 98 consecutive patients undergoing catheter ablation for AF, subdivided into the EC group (n=17) and non-EC group (n=80) based on observation of RA posterior wall breakthrough during RtPV pacing. Mean left atrial (LA) dominant frequency (mean DFLA) was defined as the averaged DFs at the right and left PVs and LA appendage. The regional DF was higher in the EC group vs. the non-EC group except at the left PV antrum. The DF at the RA appendage (RAA) and mean DFLAwere equivocal (6.5±0.7 vs. 6.6±0.7 Hz) in the EC group, but the mean DFLAwas significantly higher than that at the RAA (5.8±0.6 vs. 6.1±0.5 Hz, P=0.001) in the non-EC group, suggesting an LA-to-RA DF gradient. A significant correlation of DF between the RtPV antrum and RAA was observed in the EC group (P<0.001, r=0.84) but not in the non-EC group. CONCLUSIONS: An electrophysiological link via interatrial ECs might attenuate the hierarchical nature of activation frequencies of AF, leading to advanced electrical remodeling of the atria.

A single-beat algorithm to discriminate farfield from nearfield bipolar voltage electrograms from the pulmonary veins.

BACKGROUND: Superimposition of farfield (FF) and nearfield (NF) bipolar voltage electrograms (BVE) complicates the confirmation of pulmonary vein (PV) isolation after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Our aim was to develop an automatic algorithm based on a single-beat analysis to discriminate PV NF from atrial FF BVE from a circular mapping catheter during the cryoballoon PV isolation. METHODS: During freezing cycles in cryoablation PVI, local NF and distant FF signals were recorded, identified and labelled. BVEs were classified using four different machine learning algorithms based on four frequency domain (high-frequency power (PHF), low-frequency power (PLF), relative high power band, PHF ratio of neighbouring electrodes) and two time domain features (amplitude (Vmax), slew rate). The algorithm-based classification was compared to the true identification gained during the PVI and to a classification by cardiac electrophysiologists. RESULTS: We included 335 BVEs from 57 consecutive patients. Using a single feature, PHF with a cut-off at 150 Hz showed the best overall accuracy for classification (79.4%). By combining PHF with Vmax, overall accuracy was improved to 82.7% with a specificity of 89% and a sensitivity of 77%. The overall accuracy was highest for the right inferior PV (96.6%) and lowest for the left superior PV (76.9%). The algorithm showed comparable accuracy to the classification by the EP specialists. CONCLUSIONS: An automated farfield-nearfield discrimination based on two simple features from a single-beat BVE is feasible with a high specificity and comparable accuracy to the assessment by experienced cardiac electrophysiologists.

Small solitary atrial fractionated electrogram zone as a novel ablation target for persistent atrial fibrillation.

INTRODUCTION: Various adjunctive approaches to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) have been attempted for persistent atrial fibrillation (perAF) and longstanding persistent AF (ls-perAF). We aimed to identify the novel zones responsible for perpetuation of AF. METHODS: To identify novel zones acting as a source of perAF and ls-perAF after PVI/re-PVI, we performed fractionation mapping in 258 consecutive patients with perAF (n = 207) and ls-perAF (n = 51) in whom PVI/re-PVI failed to restore sinus rhythm. RESULTS: In 15 patients with perAF (5.8%: 15/258), fractionation mapping identified a small solitary zone (<1 cm2 ) with high-frequency and irregular waves, showing fractionated electrograms (EGM). We defined this zone as the small solitary atrial fractionated EGM (SAFE) zone. The small SAFE zone was surrounded characteristically by a homogeneous area showing relatively organized activation with nonrapid and nonfractionated waves. Only one small SAFE zone was detected in each patient. This characteristic electrical phenomenon was observed stably during the procedure until ablation. AF duration, (defined as the duration between initial detection of AF and the current ablation) was longer in patients with the small SAFE zone than in those without (median, [25 and 75 percentiles]; 5.0 [3.5, 7.0] vs. 1.1 [1.0, 4.0] years, p = .0008). Longer AF cycle length was observed in patients with the small SAFE zone than in those without. The ablation of the small SAFE zone terminated AF in all 15 patients without any need for other ablations. AF/atrial tachycardia-free rate at follow-up was 93% (14/15) at 6 months, 87% (13/15) at 1 year, and 60% (9/15) at 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: Using fractionation mapping, this study identified a small SAFE zone surrounded characteristically by a homogeneous, relatively organized, low-excitability EGM lesion. The ablation of the small SAFE zone terminated AF in all patients, demonstrating it as a substrate for perpetuated AF. Our findings provide novel ablation targets in perAF patients with prolonged AF duration. Further studies to confirm the present results are warranted.

Multi-centre, prospective randomized comparison of three different substrate ablation strategies for persistent atrial fibrillation.

AIMS: The optimal strategy for persistent atrial fibrillation (PerAF) is poorly defined. We conducted a multicentre, randomized, prospective trial to compare the outcomes of different ablation strategies for PerAF. METHODS AND RESULTS: We enrolled 450 patients and randomly assigned them in a 1:1:1 ratio to undergo pulmonary vein isolation and subsequently undergo the following three different ablation strategies: anatomical guided ablation (ANAT group, n = 150), electrogram guided ablation (EGM group, n = 150), and extensive electro-anatomical guided ablation (EXT group, n = 150). The primary endpoint was freedom from atrial fibrillation (AF) lasting longer than 30 s at 12 months after a single ablation procedure. After 12 months of follow-up, 72% (108) of patients in the EXT group were free from AF recurrence, as compared with the 64% (96) in the EGM group (P = 0.116), and 54% (81) in the ANAT group (P = 0.002). The EXT group showed less AF/atrial tachycardia recurrence than the EGM group (60% vs. 50%, P = 0.064) and the ANAT group (60% vs. 37.3%, P < 0.001). The EXT group showed the highest rate of AF termination (66.7%), followed by 56.7% in the EGM group, and 20.7% in the ANAT group. The AF termination signified less AF recurrence at 12 months compared to patients without AF termination (30.1% vs. 42.7%, P = 0.008). Safety endpoints did not differ significantly between the three groups (P = 0.924). CONCLUSIONS: Electro-anatomical guided ablation achieved the most favourable outcomes among the three ablation strategies. The AF termination is a reliable ablation endpoint.

Improving outcomes of AF ablation by integrated personalized lifestyle interventions: rationale and design of the prevention to improve outcomes of PVI (POP) trial.

Progression of atrial fibrillation (AF) and outcomes of ablation therapy are strongly affected by modifiable risk factors. Although previous studies show beneficial effects of modifying single risk factors, there is lack of evidence from randomized controlled trials on the effects of integrated AF lifestyle programmes. The POP trial is designed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of a dedicated nurse-led AF lifestyle outpatient clinic in patients with symptomatic AF. This study is a prospective, 1:1 randomized, single centre, investigator-initiated clinical trial in 150 patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF referred for a first pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Prior to the ablation, patients in the intervention group receive a personalized risk factor treatment programme in a specialized, protocolized, nurse-led outpatient clinic. Patient education and durable lifestyle management is promoted with an e-health platform. Patients in the control group receive standard care by cardiologists before ablation. The primary endpoint is the number of hospitalizations for re-ablation and cardioversion, with a follow-up of 12 months after ablation. Secondary endpoints include mortality, number of acute ischemic events, stroke or hospitalizations for heart failure, quality of life, number of ablations cancelled because of symptom reduction, and ablation success rate at 12 months. Determinants of patient and staff experience are explored and a cost-effectiveness analysis is included. The POP trial will help ascertain the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of an integrated technology-supported lifestyle therapy in patients with symptomatic AF. The trial is funded by the Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development [10070012010001]. Home sleep apnoea testing devices were provided by Itamar Medical, Ltd.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT05148338. AF atrial fibrillation, OSA obstructive sleep apnoea, PFA pulsed field ablation, PVI pulmonary vein isolation.

Anterior mitral line in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation and anterior scar: A multicenter matched comparison-The MiLine study.

BACKGROUND: The benefit of an anterior mitral line (AML) in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) and anterior atrial scar undergoing ablation has never been investigated. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of AML in addition to standard treatment compared to standard treatment alone (no AML) in this subset of patients. METHODS: Patients with persistent AF and anterior low-voltage zone (LVZ) treated with AML in 3 centers were retrospectively enrolled. The patients were matched in 1:1 fashion with patients having persistent AF and anterior LVZ who underwent conventional ablation in the same centers. Matching parameters were age, LVZ burden, and repeated ablation. Primary endpoint was AF/atrial tachycardia (AT) recurrence. RESULTS: One hundred eight-six patients (age 66 ± 9 years; 34% women) were selected and divided into 2 matched groups. Bidirectional conduction block was achieved in 95% of AML. After median follow-up of 2 years, AF/AT recurrence occurred in 29% of the patients in the AML group vs 48% in the no AML group (log-rank P = .024). On Cox regression multivariate analysis, left atrial volume (hazard ratio [HR] 1.03; P = .006) and AML (HR 0.46; P = .003) were significantly associated with the primary endpoint. On univariate logistic regression, lower body mass index, older age, extensive anterior LVZ, and position of the left atrial activation breakthrough away from the AML were associated with first-pass AML block. CONCLUSION: In this retrospective matched analysis of patients with persistent AF and anterior scar, AML in addition to standard treatment was associated with improved AF/AT-free survival compared to standard treatment alone.

Characterization and identification of atrial fibrillation drivers in patients with nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation using simultaneous amplitude frequency electrogram transform.

INSTRUCTION: We hypothesized that real-time simultaneous amplitude frequency electrogram transform (SAFE-T) during sinus rhythm (SR) is able to identify and characterize the drivers of atrial fibrillation (AF) in nonparoxysmal (NP) AF. METHODS: Twenty-one NPAF patients (85.71% males, mean age 52 years old) underwent substrate mapping during SR (SAFE-T and voltage) and during AF (complex fractionated atrial electrograms [CFAE] and similarity index [SI]). After pulmonary veins isolation, extensive substrate ablation was performed with the endpoint of procedural termination or elimination of all SI sites (>63% similarities). Sites with procedural termination and non-termination sites were tagged for postablation SR analysis using SAFE-T. RESULTS: In 74 CFAE sites identified (average of 3 ± 2 sites per person), 28 (37.84%) were identified as termination sites demonstrating a high SI compared with the non-termination sites (80.11 ± 9.57% vs. 45.96 ± 13.38%, p < .001) during AF. During SR, these termination sites have high SAFE-T values and harbor a highly resonant, localized, repetitive high frequency components superimposed in the low frequency components compared with non-termination sites (5.70 ± 3.04 vs. 1.49 ± 1.66 Hz·mV, p < .001). In the multivariate analysis, the termination sites have higher SAFE-T and SI value (p < .001). CONCLUSION: AF procedural termination sites harbored signal characteristics of repetitive, high frequency component of individualized electrogram during SR, which can be masked by the low frequency fractionated electrogram and are difficult to see from the bipolar electrogram. Thus, SAFE-T mapping is feasible in identifying and characterizing sites of AF drivers.

Voltage mapping and pulmonary vein isolation in master athletes with atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Master athletes encompass a wide range of exercise enthusiasts. At the extreme, there is an increased risk of atrial fibrillation (AF). Therapies aimed at rate or rhythm control are often limited given unfavorable side effects. Although studies suggest an increase in left atrial (LA) fibrosis in this population, minimal electrophysiologic data exist regarding the LA voltage mapping and the efficacy of AF ablation with pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). METHODS: In a retrospective single-center study, we reviewed AF ablations (pulmonary vein isolation and assessment/ablation of non-pulmonary vein triggers) performed in extreme master athletes with AF. We define "extreme" as those who have repeatedly competed in long distance endurance events for a > 10-year period. Bipolar voltage mappings obtained through PENTARAY Catheter (Biosense Webster) were reviewed using CARTO. LA scarring was defined as an area of less than 0.1 mV. All patients were monitored as outpatients for AF recurrence. RESULTS: Between January 2018 and February 2022, 16 patients (11 marathon runners, four long distance cyclers, and one marathon swimmer) underwent AF ablations. All patients in the cohort were male with an average CHA2DS2-VASc score of 1.2 ± 0.8 and left atrial volume of 34.4 cc/m2  ± 9.9. A total of eight patients (50%) had persistent AF. One patient (6.3%) had LA scar on bipolar voltage mapping, whom also had a non-pulmonary vein trigger of AF. Bidirectional blocks of the four pulmonary veins were achieved by radiofrequency (RF) ablation in all patients. Freedom from documented recurrence of AF up to 24 months was 93.8%. One patient (6.3%) had recurrence of AF at 14 months and underwent successful cardioversion. CONCLUSION: In our series of extreme master athletes with AF, the incidence of LA scarring on bipolar voltage mapping was low and the recurrence of AF following PVI by RF ablation was minimal.

DR-FLASH Score Is Useful for Identifying Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Who Require Extensive Catheter Ablation Procedures.

Background Modification of arrhythmogenic substrates with extensive ablation comprising linear and/or complex fractional atrial electrogram ablation in addition to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI-plus) can theoretically reduce the recurrence of atrial fibrillation. The DR-FLASH score (score based on diabetes mellitus, renal dysfunction, persistent form of atrial fibrillation, left atrialdiameter >45 mm, age >65 years, female sex, and hypertension) is reportedly useful for identifying patients with arrhythmogenic substrates. We hypothesized that, in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation, the DR-FLASH score can be used to classify patients into those who require PVI-plus and those for whom a PVI-only strategy is sufficient. Methods and Results This study is a post hoc subanalysis of the a multicenter, randomized controlled, noninferiority trial investigating efficacy and safety of pulmonary vein isolation alone for recurrence prevention compared with extensive ablation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (EARNEST-PVI trial). This analysis focuses on the relationship between DR-FLASH score and the efficacy of different ablation strategies. We divided the population into 2 groups based on a DR-FLASH score of 3 points. A total of 469 patients were analyzed. Among those with a DR-FLASH score >3 (N=279), the event rate of atrial arrhythmia recurrence was significantly lower in the PVI-plus arm than in the PVI-only arm (hazard ratio [HR], 0.45 [95% CI, 0.28-0.72]; P<0.001). In contrast, among patients with a DR-FLASH score ≤3 (N=217), no differences were observed in the event rate of atrial arrhythmia recurrence between the PVI-only arm and the PVI-plus arm (HR, 1.08 [95% CI, 0.61-1.89]; P=0.795). There was significant interaction between patients with a DR-FLASH score >3 and DR-FLASH score ≤3 (P value for interaction=0.020). Conclusions The DR-FLASH score is a useful tool for deciding the catheter ablation strategy for patients with persistent atrial fibrillation. Registration URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03514693.

Fixed complex electrograms during sinus rhythm and local pacing: potential ablation targets for persistent atrial fibrillation.

In atrial fibrillation (AF) patients, complex electrograms during sinus rhythm (C-EGMs) could be pathological or not. We aimed to demonstrate whether local pacing was helpful to discern pathological C-EGMs. 126 persistent AF patients and 27 patients with left-side accessory pathway (LAP) underwent left atrial mapping during sinus rhythm. If C-EGMs were detected, local pacing was performed. If the electrograms turned normal, we defined them as non-fixed C-EGMs, otherwise as fixed C-EGMs. No difference was detected in the incidence and proportion of non-fixed C-EGMs between AF patients and LAP patients (101/126 vs. 19/27, P = 0.26; 9.1 ± 6.0% vs. 7.7 ± 5.7%, P = 0.28). However, the incidence and proportion of fixed C-EGMs were higher in persistent AF patients (87/126 vs. 1/27, P < 0.01; 4.3 ± 3.4% vs. 0.1 ± 0.5%, P < 0.01). Compared with non-fixed C-EGMs, fixed C-EGMs had lower amplitudes, longer electrogram durations and longer Stimuli-P wave internals. All AF patients received circumferential pulmonary vein isolation. Among AF patients with fixed C-EGMs, 45 patients received fixed C-EGMs ablation and 42 patients underwent linear ablation. Compared with linear ablation, fixed C-EGMs ablation reduced recurrence (HR: 0.43; 95% CI 0.21-0.81; P = 0.011). Among patients without fixed C-EGMs ablation, the proportion of fixed C-EGMs was an independent predictor of ablation outcomes (HR for per percent: 1.13, 95% CI 1.01-1.28, P = 0.038). C-EGMs could be classified into fixed and non-fixed C-EGMs through local pacing. Fixed rather than non-fixed C-EGMs might indicate abnormal atrial substrates and fixed C-EGMs ablation improve outcomes of persistent AF ablation.

Low-voltage area substrate modification for atrial fibrillation ablation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials.

AIMS: The value of additional ablation beyond pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is unclear, especially for persistent AF. The optimal target for substrate modification to improve outcomes is uncertain. We investigate the utility of low-voltage area (LVA) substrate modification in patients undergoing catheter ablation for AF. METHODS AND RESULTS: This meta-analysis was reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Medline, Scopus and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were systematically searched to identify relevant studies. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Only randomized studies were included. AF patients who underwent catheter ablation with voltage-guided substrate modification targeting LVA (LVA group) vs. conventional ablation approaches not targeting LVA (non-LVA group) were compared. Four studies comprising 539 patients were included (36% female). Freedom from arrhythmia (FFA) in patients with persistent AF was greater in the LVA group [risk ratio (RR) 1.30; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03-1.64]. There was no difference in FFA in patients with paroxysmal AF between groups (RR 1.30; 95% CI 0.89-1.91). There was no difference in total procedural time (mean difference -17.54 min; 95% CI -64.37 to 29.28 min) or total ablation time (mean difference -36.17 min; 95% CI -93.69 to 21.35 min) in all included patients regardless of AF type between groups. There was no difference in periprocedural complications between groups in all included patients regardless of AF type (RR 0.93; 95% CI 0.22-3.82). CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis demonstrates improved FFA in persistent AF patients who underwent voltage-guided substrate modification targeting LVA.

Impact of Adenosine on Wavefront Propagation in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: Insights From Global Noncontact Charge Density Mapping of the Left Atrium.

Background Adenosine shortens action potential duration and refractoriness and provokes atrial fibrillation. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of adenosine on mechanisms of wavefront propagation during atrial fibrillation. Methods and Results The study included 22 patients undergoing catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation. Left atrial mapping was performed using the AcQMap charge density system before and after administration of intravenous adenosine at 1 or more of 3 time points during the procedure (before pulmonary vein isolation, after pulmonary vein isolation, and after nonpulmonary vein isolation ablation). Wave-front propagation patterns were evaluated allowing identification and quantification of localized rotational activation (LRA), localized irregular activation, and focal firing. Additional signal processing was performed to identify phase singularities and calculate global atrial fibrillation cycle length and dominant frequency. A total of 35 paired maps were analyzed. Adenosine shortened mean atrial fibrillation cycle length from 181.7±14.3 to 165.1±16.3, (mean difference 16.6 ms; 95% CI, 11.3-21.9, P<0.0005) and increased dominant frequency from 6.0±0.7 Hz to 6.6±0.8 Hz (95% CI, 0.4-0.9, P<0.0005). This was associated with a 50% increase in the number of LRA occurrences (16.1±7.6-24.2±8.1; mean difference 8.1, 95% CI, 4.1-12, P<0.0005) as well as a 20% increase in the number of phase singularities detected (30.1±7.8-36.6±9.3; mean difference 6.5; 95% CI, 2.6-10.0, P=0.002). The percentage of left atrial surface area with LRA increased with adenosine and 42 of 70 zones (60%) with highest density of LRA coincided with high density LRA zones at baseline with only 28% stable across multiple maps. Conclusions Adenosine accelerates atrial fibrillation and promotes rotational activation patterns with no impact on focal activation. There is little evidence that rotational activation seen with adenosine represents promising targets for ablation aimed at sites of stable arrhythmogenic sources in the left atrium.

Reproducibility and stability of atrial fibrillation drivers identified by an automated algorithm: CARTOFINDER.

BACKGROUND: The characteristics of atrial fibrillation (AF) drivers identified by CARTOFINDER have not been thoroughly evaluated. Therefore, the current study was sought to validate the reliability of AF drivers. METHODS: The reliability of focal and rotational activation identified by CARTOFINDER during AF was assessed by the sequential recordings in each site before and after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in 27 persistent AF patients. The primary outcome measures were the reproducibility rate during the sequential recordings and the stability rate between pre- and post-PVI. RESULTS: Among 32,135 points in 509 sites, focal activation was identified in 1775 points (5.5%) with a repetition of 11 (6-26) times during the recording. Rotational activation was identified in 132 points (0.4%) with a repetition number of 21 (14-21) times. AF drivers had significantly higher voltage and shorter AF cycle length than non-AF driver sites. The reproducibility rate of focal activation during the sequential recordings was 57.8% and increased with the repetition number. The reproducibility rate of rotational activation was 37.4%. The prevalence and the reproducibility rate of focal activation in post-PVI were significantly lower than pre-PVI (5.3% versus 6.0%, P = 0.02; 53.4% versus 63.6%, P < 0.001). The stability rate of focal activation between pre- and post-PVI was only 28.3% but increased with the repetition number. There was no stable rotational activation between pre- and post-PVI. CONCLUSIONS: The reproducibility of AF drivers, especially focal activation, identified by CARTOFINDER is relatively favorable, but the stability between pre- and post-PVI was poor. These results depended on the repetition number during the recording.

Mapping Atrial Fibrillation After Surgical Therapy to Guide Endocardial Ablation.

BACKGROUND: Surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) can be effective, yet has mixed results. It is unclear which endocardial lesions delivered as part of hybrid therapy' will best augment surgical lesion sets in individual patients. We addressed this question by systematically mapping AF endocardially after surgical ablation and relating findings to early recurrence, then performing tailored endocardial ablation as part of hybrid therapy. METHODS: We studied 81 consecutive patients undergoing epicardial surgical ablation (stage 1 hybrid), of whom 64 proceeded to endocardial catheter mapping and ablation (stage 2). Stage 2 comprised high-density mapping of pulmonary vein (PV) or posterior wall (PW) reconnections, low-voltage zones (LVZs), and potential localized AF drivers. We related findings to postsurgical recurrence of AF. RESULTS: Mapping at stage 2 revealed PW isolation reconnection in 59.4%, PV isolation reconnection in 28.1%, and LVZ in 42.2% of patients. Postsurgical recurrence of AF occurred in 36 patients (56.3%), particularly those with long-standing persistent AF (P=0.017), but had no relationship to reconnection of PVs (P=0.53) or PW isolation (P=0.75) when compared with those without postsurgical recurrence of AF. LVZs were more common in patients with postsurgical recurrence of AF (P=0.002), long-standing persistent AF (P=0.002), advanced age (P=0.03), and elevated CHA2DS2-VASc (P=0.046). AF mapping revealed 4.4±2.7 localized focal/rotational sites near and also remote from PV or PW reconnection. After ablation at patient-specific targets, arrhythmia freedom at 1 year was 81.0% including and 73.0% excluding previously ineffective antiarrhythmic medications. CONCLUSIONS: After surgical ablation, AF may recur by several modes particularly related to localized mechanisms near low voltage zones, recovery of posterior wall or pulmonary vein isolation, or other sustaining mechanisms. LVZs are more common in patients at high clinical risk for recurrence. Patient-specific targeting of these mechanisms yields excellent long-term outcomes from hybrid ablation.