Comparable efficacy with varying dosages of glucarpidase in pediatric oncology patients.

BACKGROUND: Glucarpidase rapidly reduces methotrexate plasma concentrations in patients experiencing methotrexate-induced renal dysfunction. Debate exists regarding the role of glucarpidase in therapy given its high cost. The use of reduced-dose glucarpidase has been reported, and may allow more institutions to supply this drug to their patients. This report explores the relationship between glucarpidase dosage and patient outcomes in pediatric oncology patients. METHODS: The authors evaluated data from 26 patients who received glucarpidase after high-dose methotrexate. Decrease in plasma methotrexate concentrations and time to renal recovery were evaluated for an association with glucarpidase dosage, which ranged from 13 to 90 units/kg. RESULTS: No significant relationship was found between glucarpidase dosage (units/kg) and percent decrease in methotrexate plasma concentrations measured by TDx (P > 0.1) or HPLC (P > 0.5). Patients who received glucarpidase dosages <50 units/kg had a median percent reduction in methotrexate plasma concentration of 99.4% (range, 98-100) measured by HPLC compared to a median percent reduction of 99.4% (range, 77.2-100) in patients who received ≥50 units/kg. Time to SCr recovery was not related to glucarpidase dosage (P > 0.8). CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of glucarpidase in the treatment of HDMTX-induced kidney injury was not dosage-dependent in this retrospective analysis of pediatric oncology patients.

Efficacy of glucarpidase (carboxypeptidase g2) in patients with acute kidney injury after high-dose methotrexate therapy.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Because the incidence rate of renal impairment is 2-10% for patients treated with high-dose methotrexate and renal impairment develops in 0-12.4% of patients treated for osteosarcoma, we sought to evaluate the efficacy of glucarpidase, a recently approved drug that rapidly hydrolyzes methotrexate to inactive metabolites, which allows for nonrenal clearance in patients with delayed renal methotrexate elimination. DESIGN: Pooled analysis of efficacy data from four multicenter single-arm compassionate-use clinical trials using protocols from 1993 to 2007. PATIENTS: Of 476 patients with renal toxicity and delayed methotrexate elimination who were treated with intravenous glucarpidase for rescue after high-dose methotrexate, 169 patients had at least one preglucarpidase (baseline) plasma methotrexate concentration greater than 1 µmol/L and one postglucarpidase methotrexate concentration measurement by high-performance liquid chromatography and were included in the efficacy analysis; renal recovery was assessed in 436 patients who had at least one recorded preglucarpidase and postglucarpidase serum creatinine concentration measurement. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Efficacy was defined as rapid and sustained clinically important reduction (RSCIR) in plasma methotrexate concentration, with a concentration of 1 µmol/L or lower at all postglucarpidase determinations. Median age of efficacy-evaluable patients was 20 years (range 5 weeks-84 years). Osteosarcoma (36%), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (27%), and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (20%) were the most frequent underlying diagnoses. Median preglucarpidase serum methotrexate was 11.7 µmol/L. At the first (median 15 minutes) through the last (median 40 hours) postglucarpidase measurement, plasma methotrexate concentrations demonstrated consistent 99% median reduction. RSCIR was achieved by 83 (59%) of 140 patients. A total of 64% of patients with renal impairment greater than or equal to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade 2 recovered to grade 0 or 1 at a median of 12.5 days after glucarpidase administration. CONCLUSION: Glucarpidase caused a clinically important 99% or greater sustained reduction of serum methotrexate levels and provided noninvasive rescue from methotrexate toxicity in renally impaired patients.

Glucarpidase, leucovorin, and thymidine for high-dose methotrexate-induced renal dysfunction: clinical and pharmacologic factors affecting outcome.

PURPOSE: To assess the role of the recombinant bacterial enzyme, glucarpidase (carboxypeptidase-G(2)), leucovorin, and thymidine in the management and outcome of patients with high-dose methotrexate (HDMTX) -induced nephrotoxicity. METHODS: Patients with HDMTX-induced nephrotoxicity received one to three doses of intravenous (IV) glucarpidase and leucovorin rescue. The initial cohort (n = 35) also received thymidine by continuous IV infusion. Subsequently, thymidine was restricted to patients with prolonged exposure (> 96 hours) to methotrexate (MTX) or with substantial MTX toxicity at study entry. Plasma MTX, leucovorin, and 5-methyltetrahydrofolate (5-mTHF) concentrations were measured pre- and postglucarpidase. Toxicities were monitored, and logistic regression analysis was used to assess the relationship of baseline characteristics to the development of severe toxicity and death. RESULTS: Glucarpidase was administered at a median of 96 hours (receiving thymidine, n = 44) and 66 hours (not receiving thymidine, n = 56) after the start of the MTX infusion. Plasma MTX concentrations decreased within 15 minutes of glucarpidase by 98.7%. Plasma 5-mTHF concentrations also decreased more than 98% after administration of glucarpidase. Of 12 deaths, six were directly attributed to irreversible MTX toxicity. Presence of grade 4 toxicity before administration of glucarpidase, inadequate initial increase in leucovorin dosing, and administration of glucarpidase more than 96 hours after the start of the MTX infusion were associated with development of grade 4 and 5 toxicity. CONCLUSION: Early intervention with the combination of leucovorin and glucarpidase is highly effective in patients who develop HDMTX-induced renal dysfunction. Severe toxicity and mortality occurred in patients in whom glucarpidase rescue was delayed and occurred despite thymidine administration.

Enhancement of antibody-directed enzyme prodrug therapy in colorectal xenografts by an antivascular agent.

The irregular nature of solid tumor vasculature produces a heterogeneous distribution of antibody-targeted therapies within the tumor mass, which frequently results in reduced therapeutic efficacy. We have, therefore, combined two complementary therapies: Antibody-directed Enzyme Prodrug Therapy (ADEPT), which targets tumor cells, and an agent that selectively destroys tumor vasculature. A single i.p. dose (27.5 mg/kg) of the drug 5,6-dimethylxanthenone-4-acetic acid (DMXAA), given to nude mice bearing the LS174T colorectal xenograft, destroyed all but a peripheral rim of tumor cells, without enhancing survival. The ADEPT system, in which a pretargeted enzyme activates a prodrug, consisted of the F(ab')2 fragment of anti-carcinoembryonic antigen antibody A5B7 conjugated to the bacterial enzyme carboxypeptidase G2 and the prodrug 4-[(2-chloroethyl)(2-mesyloxyethyl)amino]benzoyl-L-glutamic acid, which was given i.p. in three doses of 500 mg/kg at 72, 84, and 96 h post-conjugate administration (25 units of carboxypeptidase G2). The antibody-enzyme conjugate could be selectively retained at approximately twice the control levels by administration of the antivascular agent at the time of optimal conjugate localization within the tumor (20 h post-conjugate administration), as demonstrated by gamma counting, phosphor plate image analysis, and active enzyme measurement. This resulted in significantly enhanced tumor growth inhibition in groups of six mice, compared to conventional ADEPT therapy, with no concomitant increase in systemic toxicity. In a separate experiment, aimed at trapping the prodrug within the tumor, a 16-fold increase over control values was produced (means, 44.8 versus 2.8 microg/g tumor) when DMXAA was given 4 h prior to 4-[(2-chloroethyl)(2-mesyloxyethyl)amino]benzoyl-L-glutamic acid. The therapeutic window was small, with no significant enhancement of prodrug retention when DMXAA was given at either earlier or later time points. This correlated with the time of vascular shut-down induced by the antivascular agent. We are currently investigating whether it is more advantageous to trap increased levels of conjugate or prodrug within the tumor for maximal enhancement of conventional ADEPT. These studies demonstrate that combined use of antibody-directed and antivascular therapies can significantly benefit the therapeutic outcome of either strategy alone.