Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Randomized clinical trial: the clinical effects of herb-partitioned moxibustion in patients with diarrhoea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome.
Ma, Yu-Xia; Liu, Xiao; Liu, Cun-Zhi; Wang, Lin-Peng; Guo, Gang; Du, Dong-Qing; Wang, Zhi-Lei; Ma, Hong; Qi, Ping; Li, Zhao-Feng; Guo, Yan-Ping; Yi, Hua-Qiang; Gao, Shu-Zhong.
Affiliation
  • Ma YX; Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shandong, Jinan 250014, China.
  • Liu X; Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shandong, Jinan 250014, China.
  • Liu CZ; Beijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine Affiliated to Capital Medicine University, Beijing 10010, China.
  • Wang LP; Beijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine Affiliated to Capital Medicine University, Beijing 10010, China.
  • Guo G; Qilu Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Shandong, Jinan 250012, China.
  • Du DQ; Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shandong, Jinan 250014, China.
  • Wang ZL; Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shandong, Jinan 250014, China.
  • Ma H; Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shandong, Jinan 250014, China.
  • Qi P; Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shandong, Jinan 250014, China.
  • Li ZF; Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shandong, Jinan 250014, China.
  • Guo YP; Qianfoshan Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Shandong, Jinan 250014, China.
  • Yi HQ; Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shandong, Jinan 250014, China.
  • Gao SZ; Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shandong, Jinan 250014, China ; Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, University Science Park, Chang-Qing District, Jinan 250355, China.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24454500
Objective. To explore the efficacy of Herb-partitioned moxibustion in treating IBS-D patients. Method. 210 IBS-D patients were randomly assigned on a 3 : 3 : 2 basis to group HM, group FM, or group PB for 4-week treatment. The change of GSRS total score at weeks 4 and 8, the changes of GSRS specific scores, and adverse events were evaluated. Results. Patients in group HM and group FM had lower GSRS total score at week 4 (1.98 ± 0.303, 2.93 ± 0.302 versus 3.73 ± 0.449) and at week 8 (2.75 ± 0.306, 3.56 ± 0.329 versus 4.39 ± 2.48) as compared with patients' score in group PB. However, there was no significant difference of GSRS total score between group HM and group FM. The effect of HM was significantly greater than that of orally taking PB in ameliorating the symptoms of rugitus (0.38 versus 0.59, P < 0.05), abdominal pain (0.28 versus 0.57, P < 0.01), abdominal distension (0.4 versus 0.7, P < 0.01), and increased passage of stools (0.06 versus 0.25, P < 0.01) at the end of treatment period. In the follow-up period, patients' therapeutic effect in group HM remained greater than that in group FM (in abdominal pain, abdominal distension, and increased passage of stools) and that in group PB (in loose stools). Conclusions. HM appears to be a promising, efficacious, and well-tolerated treatment for patients with IBS-D.

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Clinical_trials Language: En Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med Year: 2013 Type: Article Affiliation country: China

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Clinical_trials Language: En Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med Year: 2013 Type: Article Affiliation country: China