Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Critical insights for a sustainability framework to address integrated community water services: Technical metrics and approaches.
Xue, Xiaobo; Schoen, Mary E; Ma, Xin Cissy; Hawkins, Troy R; Ashbolt, Nicholas J; Cashdollar, Jennifer; Garland, Jay.
Affiliation
  • Xue X; Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Engineering (ORISE), National Risk Management Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 26 West Martin Luther King Drive, Cincinnati, OH 45268, USA. Electronic address: Xue.Xiaobo@epa.gov.
  • Schoen ME; Soller Environmental, 312 NE 82nd St., Seattle, WA 98115, USA. Electronic address: mschoen@sollerenvironmental.com.
  • Ma XC; National Risk Management Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 26 West Martin Luther King Drive, Cincinnati, OH 45268, USA. Electronic address: Ma.Cissy@epa.gov.
  • Hawkins TR; National Risk Management Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 26 West Martin Luther King Drive, Cincinnati, OH 45268, USA. Electronic address: thawkins@enviance.com.
  • Ashbolt NJ; National Exposure Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 26 West Martin Luther King Drive, Cincinnati, OH 45268, USA. Electronic address: ashbolt@ualberta.ca.
  • Cashdollar J; National Exposure Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 26 West Martin Luther King Drive, Cincinnati, OH 45268, USA. Electronic address: Cashdollar.Jennifer@epa.gov.
  • Garland J; National Exposure Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 26 West Martin Luther King Drive, Cincinnati, OH 45268, USA. Electronic address: Garland.Jay@epa.gov.
Water Res ; 77: 155-169, 2015 Jun 15.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25864006
ABSTRACT
Planning for sustainable community water systems requires a comprehensive understanding and assessment of the integrated source-drinking-wastewater systems over their life-cycles. Although traditional life cycle assessment and similar tools (e.g. footprints and emergy) have been applied to elements of these water services (i.e. water resources, drinking water, stormwater or wastewater treatment alone), we argue for the importance of developing and combining the system-based tools and metrics in order to holistically evaluate the complete water service system based on the concept of integrated resource management. We analyzed the strengths and weaknesses of key system-based tools and metrics, and discuss future directions to identify more sustainable municipal water services. Such efforts may include the need for novel metrics that address system adaptability to future changes and infrastructure robustness. Caution is also necessary when coupling fundamentally different tools so to avoid misunderstanding and consequently misleading decision-making.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Water Resources / Waste Disposal, Fluid / Conservation of Natural Resources Type of study: Prognostic_studies Language: En Journal: Water Res Year: 2015 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Water Resources / Waste Disposal, Fluid / Conservation of Natural Resources Type of study: Prognostic_studies Language: En Journal: Water Res Year: 2015 Type: Article