Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Is cytotoxicity a determinant of the different in vitro and in vivo effects of bioactives?
Di Nunzio, Mattia; Valli, Veronica; Tomás-Cobos, Lidia; Tomás-Chisbert, Teresa; Murgui-Bosch, Lucía; Danesi, Francesca; Bordoni, Alessandra.
Affiliation
  • Di Nunzio M; Interdepartmental Centre for Industrial Agri-Food Research, University of Bologna, Piazza Goidanich 60, 47521, Cesena, Italy.
  • Valli V; Department of Agri-Food Sciences and Technologies, University of Bologna, Piazza Goidanich 60, 47521, Cesena, Italy.
  • Tomás-Cobos L; Department of Bioassays, Ainia Centro Tecnológico, Parque Tecnológico de Valencia, c. Benjamin Franklin 5-11, E46980, Paterna, Valencia, Spain.
  • Tomás-Chisbert T; Department of Bioassays, Ainia Centro Tecnológico, Parque Tecnológico de Valencia, c. Benjamin Franklin 5-11, E46980, Paterna, Valencia, Spain.
  • Murgui-Bosch L; Department of Bioassays, Ainia Centro Tecnológico, Parque Tecnológico de Valencia, c. Benjamin Franklin 5-11, E46980, Paterna, Valencia, Spain.
  • Danesi F; Department of Agri-Food Sciences and Technologies, University of Bologna, Piazza Goidanich 60, 47521, Cesena, Italy.
  • Bordoni A; Interdepartmental Centre for Industrial Agri-Food Research, University of Bologna, Piazza Goidanich 60, 47521, Cesena, Italy. alessandra.bordoni@unibo.it.
BMC Complement Altern Med ; 17(1): 453, 2017 Sep 07.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28882181
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Foodstuffs of both plant and animal origin contain a wide range of bioactive compounds. Although human intervention studies are mandatory to assess the health effects of bioactives, the in vitro approach is often used to select the most promising molecules to be studied in vivo. To avoid misleading results, concentration and chemical form, exposure time, and potential cytotoxicity of the tested bioactives should be carefully set prior to any other experiments.

METHODS:

In this study the possible cytotoxicity of different bioactives (docosahexaenoic acid, propionate, cyanidin-3-O-glucoside, protocatechuic acid), was investigated in HepG2 cells using different methods. Bioactives were supplemented to cells at different concentrations within the physiological range in human blood, alone or in combination, considering two different exposure times.

RESULTS:

Reported data clearly evidence that in vitro cytotoxicity is tightly related to the exposure time, and it varies among bioactives, which could exert a cytotoxic effect even at a concentration within the in vivo physiological blood concentration range. Furthermore, co-supplementation of different bioactives can increase the cytotoxic effect.

CONCLUSIONS:

Our results underline the importance of in vitro cytotoxicity screening that should be considered mandatory before performing studies aimed to evaluate the effect of bioactives on other cellular parameters. Although this study is far from the demonstration of a toxic effect of the tested bioactives when administered to humans, it represents a starting point for future research aimed at verifying the existence of a potential hazard due to the wide use of high doses of multiple bioactives.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Biological Factors / Cell Survival / Biomedical Research / Models, Biological Type of study: Prognostic_studies Language: En Journal: BMC Complement Altern Med Year: 2017 Type: Article Affiliation country: Italy

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Biological Factors / Cell Survival / Biomedical Research / Models, Biological Type of study: Prognostic_studies Language: En Journal: BMC Complement Altern Med Year: 2017 Type: Article Affiliation country: Italy