Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A comparison of cyclosporine A and Nva2-cyclosporine (cyclosporine G) in a rat renal allograft model.
Transplantation ; 44(1): 9-12, 1987 Jul.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-3299927
ABSTRACT
We compared CsG and CsA in the DA-to-Lewis rat renal allograft model. At equivalent oral doses, plasma radioimmunoassay (RIA) CsG levels were higher than CsA (P less than 0.02). Neither drug prevented rejection at doses of 5 mg/kg/day. CsG-treated rats had a higher rejection rate at doses of 7.5 mg/kg/day (P less than 0.05). Both drugs were equally effective in preventing rejection at doses of 10 mg/kg/day. Neither drug was nephrotoxic at the doses used in this study. CsG is a potent immunosuppressant, and thus a potential clinical successor to CsA. Since CsG and CsA provide equivalent immunosuppression at therapeutic doses, CsG's clinical significance will ultimately depend on its nephrotoxicity in man.
Subject(s)
Search on Google
Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Kidney Transplantation / Cyclosporine / Cyclosporins / Graft Rejection Language: En Journal: Transplantation Year: 1987 Type: Article
Search on Google
Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Kidney Transplantation / Cyclosporine / Cyclosporins / Graft Rejection Language: En Journal: Transplantation Year: 1987 Type: Article