Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Eat what you want and when you want. Effect of a free choice menu on the energy and protein intake of geriatric medical patients.
Dynesen, Anja Weirsøe; Snitkjær, Pia; Andreasen, Line Stripp; Elgaard, Line; Aaslyng, Margit Dall.
Affiliation
  • Dynesen AW; Centre for Nutrition and Rehabilitation, University College Absalon, Denmark. Electronic address: andy@pha.dk.
  • Snitkjær P; Centre for Nutrition and Rehabilitation, University College Absalon, Denmark.
  • Andreasen LS; Centre for Nutrition and Rehabilitation, University College Absalon, Denmark.
  • Elgaard L; Centre for Nutrition and Rehabilitation, University College Absalon, Denmark.
  • Aaslyng MD; Centre for Nutrition and Rehabilitation, University College Absalon, Denmark.
Clin Nutr ESPEN ; 46: 288-296, 2021 12.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34857210
BACKGROUND: Geriatric medical patients are often at nutritional risk when admitted to hospital. More flexible meal service concepts may prove successful in improving nutritional intake. AIM: To evaluate whether the Free Choice Menu (FCM), a new room service resembling meal service concept, improves energy and protein intake in a population of geriatric medical patients compared with the traditional concept of serving meals from a trolley with a fixed menu (trolley). METHODS: Data were collected consecutive in a geriatric ward at Slagelse Hospital (Denmark) before (autumn 2018; n = 98) and after (autumn 2020; n = 52) implementing the Free Choice Menu. Weighed dietary intake was recorded for three full days for each patient. RESULTS: Energy and protein intake did not differ significantly when comparing the two meal service concepts (trolley: 6124 kJ; 52.6 g and FCM: 5923 kJ; 47.1 g) over three days. The FCM concept showed however a significantly higher energy and protein intake for the dinner (relative to the other meals), whereas a higher percentage of protein and energy intake was covered by oral nutritional supplements in the trolley concept. The majority of the participants met the recommendations for energy intake, while only a minority met the recommendations for protein intake. Plate waste was significantly lower (p = 0.0005) at the lunch meal for the FCM concept (15.6%) compared with the trolley concept (26.1%). CONCLUSION: When implementing a FCM, energy and protein intake was maintained and patients received more energy and protein from the dinner and less from oral nutritional supplements. However, the introduction of a free choice of meals concept did not in itself ensure nutritional intake in geriatric medical patients.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Food Service, Hospital Language: En Journal: Clin Nutr ESPEN Year: 2021 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Food Service, Hospital Language: En Journal: Clin Nutr ESPEN Year: 2021 Type: Article