Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cost-effectiveness of ceftazidime/avibactam plus metronidazole versus meropenem as first-line empiric therapy for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections: A study based on the in-vitro surveillance data in China.
Shi, Xiaoping; Fu, Jie; Li, Xiaoyu; Lv, Qianzhou; Wan, Xu; Xu, Qing.
Affiliation
  • Shi X; Department of Pharmacy, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. Electronic address: shi.xiaoping@zs-hospital.sh.cn.
  • Fu J; Department of Pharmacy, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. Electronic address: fujieeva@163.com.
  • Li X; Department of Pharmacy, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. Electronic address: li.xiaoyu@zs-hospital.sh.cn.
  • Lv Q; Department of Pharmacy, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. Electronic address: lv.qianzhou@zs-hospital.sh.cn.
  • Wan X; Department of Pharmacy, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. Electronic address: wanxu2015@126.com.
  • Xu Q; Department of Pharmacy, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. Electronic address: xu.qing@zs-hospital.sh.cn.
J Infect Public Health ; 16(3): 361-367, 2023 Mar.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36689854
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

With the increase in drug resistance rates of pathogens isolated from complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAIs), ceftazidime/avibactam (CAZ-AVI) is increasingly used clinically. However, given the high drug cost and the fact that not yet covered by the health insurance payment, this study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of CAZ-AVI plus metronidazole versus meropenem as a first-line empiric treatment for cIAIs from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system.

METHODS:

A decision analytic model with a one-year time horizon was constructed to assess the cost-effectiveness based on the entire disease course. Model inputs were mainly obtained from clinical studies, published literature, and publicly available databases. Primary outcomes were cost, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), life years (Lys), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). One-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were also performed.

RESULTS:

In the base cases, compared to meropenem, CAZ-AVI plus metronidazole had a shorter mean hospital length of stay (-0.77 days per patient) and longer life expectancy (+0.05 LYs and +0.06 QALYs). CAZ-AVI plus metronidazole had an ICER of $25517/QALY, which is well below the threshold of $31509 per QALY in China. The one-way sensitivity analysis showed that the change of the treatment duration of CAZ-AVI plus metronidazole was the parameter that most influenced the results of the ICER. In probabilistic sensitivity analysis, CAZ-AVI plus metronidazole was the optimal strategy in 75% of simulations at $31510/QALY threshold.

CONCLUSIONS:

CAZ-AVI plus metronidazole could be considered as a cost-effective option for the empiric treatment of patients with cIAIs in China, and this benefit will be more evident when the price of CAZ-AVI decreases by 23.8%.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Therapeutic Methods and Therapies TCIM: Plantas_medicinales Main subject: Ceftazidime / Intraabdominal Infections Type of study: Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Language: En Journal: J Infect Public Health Year: 2023 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Therapeutic Methods and Therapies TCIM: Plantas_medicinales Main subject: Ceftazidime / Intraabdominal Infections Type of study: Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Language: En Journal: J Infect Public Health Year: 2023 Type: Article