Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Safety and Efficacy of Traditional Heart Failure Therapies in Patients With Cardiac Amyloidosis and Heart Failure.
Yan, Crystal Lihong; Gallo, Ryan A; Vasquez Martinez, Moises; Rivera Rodriguez, Beatriz; Trujillo, Luis; Thakkar Rivera, Nina; Hoffman, James E.
Affiliation
  • Yan CL; Divison of Internal Medicine, University of Miami Health System, Miami, Florida. Electronic address: crystaly@med.miami.edu.
  • Gallo RA; University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.
  • Vasquez Martinez M; Divison of Internal Medicine, University of Miami Health System, Miami, Florida.
  • Rivera Rodriguez B; Divison of Internal Medicine, University of Miami Health System, Miami, Florida.
  • Trujillo L; Divison of Internal Medicine, University of Miami Health System, Miami, Florida.
  • Thakkar Rivera N; Department of Heart Failure and Transplantation, Heart, Vascular & Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, Florida.
  • Hoffman JE; Division of Hematology, Sylvester Comprehensive Care Center, Miami, Florida.
Am J Cardiol ; 204: 360-365, 2023 10 01.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37573615
ABSTRACT
Randomized controlled trials have demonstrated mortality benefits for several medication classes in patients with heart failure (HF), especially with reduced ejection fraction (EF). However, the benefit of these traditional HF therapies in patients with HF from cardiac amyloidosis is unclear. our study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of traditional HF therapies in patients with cardiac amyloidosis and HF with reduced EF or HF with mid-range EF (HFmrEF). We conducted a single-center retrospective study. Patients were included if they were diagnosed with cardiac amyloidosis and HF with reduced EF or HF with mid-range EF between January 2012 and 2022. The primary outcomes of interest were medication use patterns (for ß blockers [BB], angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors [ACEI], angiotensin receptor blockers [ARBs], angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors [ARNI], and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists [MRAs]); potential medication side effects (symptomatic bradycardia, fatigue, hypotension, lightheadedness, and syncope); hospitalization; and death. The associations of BB, ACEI/ARB/ARNI, and MRA use with clinical outcomes were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression. A total of 82 patients met study criteria. At time of cardiac amyloidosis diagnosis, 63.4% were on a BB, 51.2% were on an ACEI/ARB/ARNI, and 43.9% were on an MRA. At last follow-up, 51.2% were on a BB, 35.4% were on an ACEI/ARB/ARNI, and 43.9% were on an MRA. There were no statistically significant differences in rates of potential medication side effects in patients on the medication class compared with those who were not. There was no association with hospitalization or mortality for baseline or follow-up BB, ACEI/ARB/ARNI, or MRA use. In conclusion, BBs, ACEI/ARB/ARNIs, and MRAs may be safely used in this population. However, their use does not appear to improve mortality or hospitalization.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Ventricular Dysfunction, Left / Heart Failure Type of study: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Language: En Journal: Am J Cardiol Year: 2023 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Ventricular Dysfunction, Left / Heart Failure Type of study: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Language: En Journal: Am J Cardiol Year: 2023 Type: Article