Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Exploring primary care physician feedback following an integrative oncology consultation.
Hauzer, Michael; Grimberg, Ran; Samuels, Noah; Keshet, Yael; Mordechai, Alperin; Dagash, Jamal; Ben-Arye, Eran.
Affiliation
  • Hauzer M; Department of Family Medicine, Haifa & Western Galilee District, Clalit Health Services Community Division, HaShahaf 6, Bat-Galim, Haifa, Israel. michaelhau@clalit.org.il.
  • Grimberg R; Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel. michaelhau@clalit.org.il.
  • Samuels N; Department of Family Medicine, Haifa & Western Galilee District, Clalit Health Services Community Division, HaShahaf 6, Bat-Galim, Haifa, Israel.
  • Keshet Y; Center for Integrative Complementary Medicine, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
  • Mordechai A; Department of Sociology, Western Galilee Academic College, Galilee, Israel.
  • Dagash J; Department of Family Medicine, Haifa & Western Galilee District, Clalit Health Services Community Division, HaShahaf 6, Bat-Galim, Haifa, Israel.
  • Ben-Arye E; Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
Support Care Cancer ; 31(10): 606, 2023 Oct 03.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37787815
OBJECTIVE: To explore responses from primary care physicians (PCPs) from an integrative physician (IP) consultation and recommended integrative oncology (IO) treatment program. METHODS: Chemotherapy-treated patients were referred by their oncology healthcare professional to an IP, a physician dually trained in complementary medicine and supportive cancer care. The consultation summary and patient-centered IO treatment program was then sent to the patient's PCP, with PCP-to-IP responses analyzed qualitatively using ATLAS.Ti software for systematic coding and content analysis. Trial Registration Number NCT01860365 published May 22, 2013. RESULTS: Of the 597 IP consultations conducted, 470 (78.7%) summaries were sent to patients' PCPs, with only 69 (14.7%) PCP-to-IP responses returned. PCPs were more likely to respond if the patient was Hebrew-speaking (78.3% vs. 65.1%, P = 0.032). Systematic coding identified four predominant themes among PCP narratives: addressing the patient's medical condition and leading QoL-related concerns; patient-centered reflections; available resources providing support and promoting resilience; and PCP attitudes to the IO treatment program. CONCLUSION: PCP-IP communication can provide valuable insight into the patient's bio-psycho-social care, addressing the patient's health-belief model, emotional concerns, caregiver-related factors, preferences, and barriers to adherence to IO care. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Healthcare services should consider promoting IP-PCP communication in order to facilitate better patient outcomes from an IO treatment program.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Physicians, Primary Care / Integrative Oncology Type of study: Prognostic_studies Language: En Journal: Support Care Cancer Year: 2023 Type: Article Affiliation country: Israel

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Physicians, Primary Care / Integrative Oncology Type of study: Prognostic_studies Language: En Journal: Support Care Cancer Year: 2023 Type: Article Affiliation country: Israel