Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial Among People Recovering from Mental Illness: A Tailored Mindfulness-Based Intervention versus Relaxation Training.
Cheng, Yi Ting Daphne; Young, Kim Wan Daniel; Carlbring, Per; Ng, Yat Nam; Hung, Suet Lin Shirley.
Affiliation
  • Cheng YTD; Department of Social Work, Hong Kong Baptist University, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong.
  • Young KWD; Department of Social Work, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong.
  • Carlbring P; Department of Psychology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Ng YN; Department of Social Work, Hong Kong Baptist University, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong.
  • Hung SLS; Department of Social Work, Hong Kong Baptist University, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong.
J Evid Based Soc Work (2019) ; : 1-31, 2023 Nov 20.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37982391
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

This study assessed the potential effectiveness, acceptability and feasibility of a tailored mindfulness-based intervention (MBI, REMIND 2.0) for personal recovery among people with mental illness during the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS:

In this pilot mixed methods randomized controlled trial, participants were assigned to either the MBI (n = 14) or the relaxation training (RT) (n = 14). Quantitative measures were used to assess primary outcomes, including personal recovery, mindfulness, self-compassion, resilience, and secondary outcomes, including depression, stress, anxiety, positive and negative moods, quality of life and general health at baseline (T0), post-intervention (T1) and one-month follow-up (T2). Quantitative interviews were conducted to explore the experiences and perceptions toward the MBI.

RESULTS:

Results indicated significant group and time interactions for all outcomes except anxiety and stress. MBI participants showed significant improvements in all outcomes at T1, which were maintained at T2, except for positive mood. RT participants showed a significant decline in resilience but significant improvements in all secondary outcomes at T1, but all outcomes significantly declined at T2, except for anxiety and stress. MBI participants were receptive toward the programme in all aspects of personal recovery.

CONCLUSIONS:

The tailored MBI is a potentially effective, feasible and acceptable approach to facilitate personal recovery among people with mental illness. Differences between MBI and RT are discussed.
Key words

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Therapeutic Methods and Therapies TCIM: Terapias_mente_y_cuerpo / Meditacion Language: En Journal: J Evid Based Soc Work (2019) Year: 2023 Type: Article Affiliation country: Hong Kong

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Therapeutic Methods and Therapies TCIM: Terapias_mente_y_cuerpo / Meditacion Language: En Journal: J Evid Based Soc Work (2019) Year: 2023 Type: Article Affiliation country: Hong Kong