Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Flexible CO2 Laser in Therapeutic Bronchoscopy: Initial Experiences in a Tertiary Center.
Ortiz-Jaimes, Gabriel; Mullon, John; Nelson, Darlene; Reisenauer, Janani; Midthun, David; Edell, Eric; Anderson, Dagny; Vargas-Brochero, Maria; Petrossian, Robert; Kern, Ryan.
Affiliation
  • Ortiz-Jaimes G; Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine.
  • Mullon J; Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine.
  • Nelson D; Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine.
  • Reisenauer J; Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine.
  • Midthun D; Division of Thoracic Surgery.
  • Edell E; Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine.
  • Anderson D; Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine.
  • Vargas-Brochero M; Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine.
  • Petrossian R; Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
  • Kern R; Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine.
J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol ; 31(2): 205-214, 2024 Apr 01.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38151967
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

CO2 Laser (CO2L) technology deployable through flexible endoscopes now allows for their use throughout the airway, although published data are limited.

METHODS:

Retrospective analysis of CO2L bronchoscopic procedures, excluding glottic and subglottic interventions. Procedural success was defined as >50% visual reduction in airway obstruction in the area treated or resolution of the procedural indication.

RESULTS:

Seventy-two procedures were performed on 36 patients. Nonmalignant indications comprised 66% stent-associated granulation tissue (28%), granulomatosis with polyangiitis lesions (23%), and lung transplant-related granulation tissue (16%) were the most common. Bronchoscopic access was flexible only in 81% and primarily rigid (combined with flexible) in 18%. The site of intervention was the trachea at 19%, the mainstem at 56%, and lobar/segmental airways at 45%. Procedural success was 89%. CO2L was used exclusively in 19%; in 81%, additional techniques were required, most commonly balloon dilation (59%), cryo-debulking (23%), and rigid dilation (16%). Malignant indications had a nonsignificant trend toward requiring adjuvant techniques ( P =0.05). Seventy-six percent of the patients required more than 1 procedure. CO2L exclusive cases had no statistically different needs for subsequent therapeutic bronchoscopies ( P =0.10) or time to reintervention (109 vs. 41 days, P =0.07), and reintervention-free survival was similar ( P =0.10) and difficult to predict. The complication rate attributable to CO2L was 2.7%.

CONCLUSION:

CO2L is a safe and useful tool when precise cutting and vaporization are desired. Its use in multi-modality approaches has high levels of success in adequately selected lesions, adding an ablative potential to dilation techniques. Vasculitis-associated scars/webs and granulation tissue (including stent-associated) appear to be ideal targets.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Airway Obstruction / Lasers, Gas Language: En Journal: J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol Year: 2024 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Airway Obstruction / Lasers, Gas Language: En Journal: J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol Year: 2024 Type: Article