Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Analysis of Clinical Characteristics and Prognostic Factors Related to EMs Correlation in Ovarian Cancer Patients.
Altern Ther Health Med ; 30(8): 104-107, 2024 Aug.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38290463
ABSTRACT

Objective:

To investigate the clinical characteristics and prognostic factors in patients with endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer.

Methods:

In this study, we retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 135 ovarian cancer patients admitted to our hospital from January 2016 to January 2018. Based on the presence of concomitant endometriosis (EMs), the patients were divided into two groups the Endometriosis-Associated Ovarian Cancer (EAOC) group (n=64) and the non-EAOC (NEAOC) group (n=71). We compared the clinical characteristics of the two groups. Additionally, in the EAOC group, we followed up with patients for 5 years, categorized them into the survival group (n=40) and the deceased group (n=24) based on their prognosis, and conducted univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses to identify influencing factors.

Results:

In comparison to the NEAOC group, patients in the EAOC group exhibited higher rates of menopause occurrence, pathological stages I-II, vaginal bleeding, and history of cesarean section, with statistical significance (P < .05). They also had a lower incidence of dysmenorrhea, lymph node metastasis, and abdominal distension, as well as an earlier age of onset, all of which were statistically significant (P < .05). There were no statistically significant differences (P > .05) between the two groups in terms of parity, gravidity, tumor diameter, abdominal pain incidence, and body mass index. Based on prognosis, the patients were categorized into a survival group (n=40) and a deceased group (n=24). Comparison between the two groups showed statistically significant differences (P < .05) in terms of postoperative residue, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, and lymph node metastasis. In contrast, there were no statistically significant differences (P > .05) in terms of tumor laterality, histological type, tumor stage, differentiation degree, and vaginal bleeding. The variables with P < .05 were assigned as independent variables, with the prognosis of death as the dependent variable. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that epithelial-mesenchymal transition and lymph node metastasis were independent risk factors for mortality in EAOC patients (P < .05).

Conclusion:

Clinical characteristics of EAOC patients show significant differences, with epithelial-mesenchymal transition and lymph node metastasis being identified as independent adverse prognostic factors associated with poor outcomes in EAOC patients. However, this study has limitations such as a relatively small sample size, and further research is therefore necessary.
Subject(s)
Search on Google
Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Ovarian Neoplasms / Endometriosis Type of study: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Language: En Journal: Altern Ther Health Med Year: 2024 Type: Article
Search on Google
Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Ovarian Neoplasms / Endometriosis Type of study: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Language: En Journal: Altern Ther Health Med Year: 2024 Type: Article