Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Estimates of use of preferred contraceptive method in the United States: a population-based study.
Gomez, Anu Manchikanti; Bennett, Ariana H; Arcara, Jennet; Stern, Lisa; Bardwell, Jamie; Cadena, Denicia; Chaudhri, Aisha; Davis, Laura; Dehlendorf, Christine; Frederiksen, Brittni; Labiran, Catherine; McDonald-Mosley, Raegan; Rice, Whitney S; Stein, Tara B; Valladares, Ena Suseth; Kavanaugh, Megan L; Marshall, Cassondra.
Affiliation
  • Gomez AM; Sexual Health and Reproductive Equity Program, School of Social Welfare, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.
  • Bennett AH; Sexual Health and Reproductive Equity Program, School of Social Welfare, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.
  • Arcara J; Sexual Health and Reproductive Equity Program, School of Social Welfare, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.
  • Stern L; Coalition to Expand Contraceptive Access, Washington, DC, USA.
  • Bardwell J; Converge, Ridgeland, MS, USA.
  • Cadena D; Independent Consultant, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
  • Chaudhri A; Illinois Caucus for Adolescent Health, Chicago, IL, USA.
  • Davis L; Advocates for Youth, Washington, DC, USA.
  • Dehlendorf C; Person-Centered Reproductive Health Program, Departments of Family & Community Medicine, Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, and Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
  • Frederiksen B; KFF, San Francisco, CA, USA.
  • Labiran C; Independent Consultant, Brooklyn, NY, USA.
  • McDonald-Mosley R; Power to Decide, Washington, DC, USA.
  • Rice WS; Center for Reproductive Health Research in the Southeast, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
  • Stein TB; New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, New York, NY, USA.
  • Valladares ES; California Latinas for Reproductive Justice, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  • Kavanaugh ML; Guttmacher Institute, New York, NY, USA.
  • Marshall C; Sexual Health and Reproductive Equity Program, School of Social Welfare, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Lancet Reg Health Am ; 30: 100662, 2024 Feb.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38304390
ABSTRACT

Background:

In the U.S. and globally, dominant metrics of contraceptive access focus on the use of certain contraceptive methods and do not address self-defined need for contraception; therefore, these metrics fail to attend to person-centeredness, a key component of healthcare quality. This study addresses this gap by presenting new data from the U.S. on preferred contraceptive method use, a person-centered contraceptive access indicator. Additionally, we examine the association between key aspects of person-centered healthcare access and preferred contraceptive method use.

Methods:

We fielded a nationally representative survey in the U.S. in English and Spanish in 2022, surveying non-sterile 15-44-year-olds assigned female sex at birth. Among current and prospective contraceptive users (unweighted n = 2119), we describe preferred method use, reasons for non-use, and differences in preferred method use by sociodemographic characteristics. We conduct logistic regression analyses examining the association between four aspects of person-centered healthcare access and preferred contraceptive method use.

Findings:

A quarter (25.2%) of current and prospective users reported there was another method they would like to use, with oral contraception and vasectomy most selected. Reasons for non-use of preferred contraception included side effects (28.8%), sex-related reasons (25.1%), logistics/knowledge barriers (18.6%), safety concerns (18.3%), and cost (17.6%). In adjusted logistic regression analyses, respondents who felt they had enough information to choose appropriate contraception (Adjusted Odds Ratio [AOR] 3.31; 95% CI 2.10, 5.21), were very (AOR 9.24; 95% CI 4.29, 19.91) or somewhat confident (AOR 3.78; 95% CI 1.76, 8.12) they could obtain desired contraception, had received person-centered contraceptive counseling (AOR 1.72; 95% CI 1.33, 2.23), and had not experienced discrimination in family planning settings (AOR 1.58; 95% CI 1.13, 2.20) had increased odds of preferred contraceptive method use.

Interpretation:

An estimated 8.1 million individuals in the U.S. are not using a preferred contraceptive method. Interventions should focus on holistic, person-centered contraceptive access, given the implications of information, self-efficacy, and discriminatory care for preferred method use.

Funding:

Arnold Ventures.
Key words

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Lancet Reg Health Am Year: 2024 Type: Article Affiliation country: United States

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Lancet Reg Health Am Year: 2024 Type: Article Affiliation country: United States