Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Glycemic response to newly initiated diabetes therapies.
Karter, Andrew J; Moffet, Howard H; Liu, Jennifer; Parker, Melissa M; Ahmed, Ameena T; Go, Alan S; Selby, Joe V.
Afiliación
  • Karter AJ; Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente, 2000 Broadway, Oakland, CA 94612, USA. andy.j.karter@kp.org
Am J Manag Care ; 13(11): 598-606, 2007 Nov.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17988185
OBJECTIVE: The glycemic response to antihyperglycemic therapies for type 2 diabetes has been thoroughly evaluated in randomized controlled trials, but inadequately studied in real-world settings. STUDY DESIGN: We studied glycemic response among 15 126 type 2 diabetic patients who initiated any single new antihyperglycemic agent (metformin, sulfonylureas, thiazolidinediones, or insulin added to medical nutrition therapy or to existing diabetes therapies) during 1999-2000 within Kaiser Permanente of Northern California, an integrated healthcare delivery system. METHODS: Pre-post (3-12 months after initiation) change in glycosylated hemoglobin (A1C) was analyzed using ANCOVA (analysis of covariance) models adjusted for baseline A1C, concurrent (ongoing) antihyperglycemic therapy, demographics, health behaviors, medication adherence, clinical factors, and processes of care. RESULTS: Mean A1C was 9.01% (95% confidence interval [CI] 8.98%-9.04%) before therapy initiation and 7.87% (95% CI 7.85%-7.90%) 3 to 12 months after initiation (mean A1C reduction 1.14 percentage points; 95% CI 1.11-1.17). Overall, 30.2% (95% CI 29.2%-31.1%) of patients achieved glycemic target (A1C < 7%). Although baseline disease severity and concurrent therapies differed greatly across therapeutic classes, after adjustment for these baseline clinical characteristics, no significant differences were noted in glucose-lowering effect across therapeutic classes. Treatment effects did not differ by age, race, diabetes duration, obesity, or level of renal function. CONCLUSIONS: Metformin, sulfonylures, thiazolidinediones, and insulin were equally effective in improving glucose control. Nonetheless, most patients failed to achieve the glycemic target. Findings suggest that, to keep up with progressive worsening of glycemic control, patients and providers must commit to earlier, more aggressive therapy intensification, triggered promptly after A1C exceeds the recommended glycemic target.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Glucemia / Resultado del Tratamiento / Índice Glucémico / Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 / Hipoglucemiantes Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Am J Manag Care Año: 2007 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Glucemia / Resultado del Tratamiento / Índice Glucémico / Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 / Hipoglucemiantes Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Am J Manag Care Año: 2007 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos