Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The impact of allogenic red cell transfusion and coated bypass circuit on the inflammatory response during cardiopulmonary bypass: a randomized study.
Senay, Sahin; Toraman, Fevzi; Gunaydin, Serdar; Kilercik, Meltem; Karabulut, Hasan; Alhan, Cem.
Afiliación
  • Senay S; Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Acibadem Kadikoy Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey. sahinsenay@gmail.com
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg ; 8(1): 93-9, 2009 Jan.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18801802
OBJECTIVES: This study is designed to determine and compare the effects of transfusion and coated circuits on the inflammatory response during cardiopulmonary bypass. METHODS: Forty patients were randomized into two groups according to the type of extracorporeal circuit used and later prospectively enrolled into two subgroups according to the need for red cell transfusion during CPB (leading to 4 groups--10 patients per group; group 1: with no transfusion and standard oxygenator, group 2: with transfusion and standard oxygenator, group 3: with no transfusion and coated oxygenator, group 4: with transfusion and coated oxygenator). Serum lactate, interleukin 6, human tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha), D-dimer and CRP levels were measured at three time points (T1: start of CPB, T2: before removal of aortic cross-clamp, T3: 45 min after the completion of proximal anastomoses). Protein adsorption of oxygenator fibers was measured. Outcome parameters were recorded. RESULTS: Interleukin 6, TNF-alpha, D-dimer and lactate levels increased at T2 and T3 in all groups (P<0.05 within groups). The increase in interleukin 6 was significant at T2 in group 2 when compared to group 1 (8.0+/-3.9 vs. 4.4+/-1.8, P=0.03). The increase in TNF-alpha was higher at T2 in group 1 when compared to group 3 (16.0+/-4.2 vs. 11.7+/-2.8, P=0.05) and in group 2 when compared to group 3 at T2 and T3 (15.3+/-4.6 vs. 11.7+/-2.8, P=0.06; 17.6+/-5.0 vs. 13.7+/-3.9, P=0.06). Protein adsorption was higher in group 1 and group 2 (group 1 vs. group 3, 2.2+/-0.8 vs. 1.4+/-0.3, P=0.01; group 2 vs. group 3, 2.4+/-0.7 vs. 1.4+/-0.3, P=0.02; group 2 vs. group 4, 2.4+/-0.7 vs. 1.8+/-0.3, P=0.04), it was also higher at group 4 when compared to group 3 (1.8+/-0.3 vs. 1.4+/-0.3, P=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Allogenic red cell transfusion enhances inflammatory response during CPB; coated circuit systems have a limiting effect on this inflammatory reaction.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Métodos Terapéuticos y Terapias MTCI: Terapias_biologicas / Hemoterapia Asunto principal: Materiales Biocompatibles / Puente Cardiopulmonar / Puente de Arteria Coronaria / Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica / Transfusión de Eritrocitos / Síndrome de Respuesta Inflamatoria Sistémica Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies Idioma: En Revista: Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg Año: 2009 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Turquía

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Métodos Terapéuticos y Terapias MTCI: Terapias_biologicas / Hemoterapia Asunto principal: Materiales Biocompatibles / Puente Cardiopulmonar / Puente de Arteria Coronaria / Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica / Transfusión de Eritrocitos / Síndrome de Respuesta Inflamatoria Sistémica Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies Idioma: En Revista: Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg Año: 2009 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Turquía